Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect.
(73/3615)
To achieve perceptual alignment between a flashed target and a moving one, subjects typically require the flashed target to be aligned with a position that the moving target will only reach some time after the flash (the flash-lag effect). We examined how the magnitude of this misalignment changes near an abrupt change in velocity. The magnitude of the misalignment turns out to depend on the target's velocity after, rather than before, the flash. Thus, the misalignment cannot be caused by motion extrapolation. Neither can it be the inevitable consequence of a difference between the time it takes to process flashed and moving stimuli, because the magnitude of the misalignment is influenced by the extent to which subjects can anticipate the flash. We propose that it is the consequence of having to 'sample' the moving target's position in response to the flash. (+info)
Are there separate first-order and second-order mechanisms for orientation discrimination?
(74/3615)
In a series of experiments we compared orientation discrimination performance for Gabor stimuli in which the stimulus profile was either matched to the receptive field profile of single V1 simple cells ('simple'), or in which the carrier and envelope orientations were different ('tigertails'). In the first Experiment, using small, high spatial frequency, peripheral stimuli to minimise the number of detectors involved, we found that simple stimuli were more detectable than tigertails of the same contrast energy, and that orientation discrimination thresholds for simple stimuli were lower than for tigertails of equal detectability. In later experiments with larger stimuli we measured thresholds for detecting tilts of the envelope with the carrier fixed in orientation. Envelope thresholds were similar for different carrier orientations, but carrier orientation had a strong biasing effect upon perceived envelope orientation. When the orientation difference between envelope and carrier was small, the carrier orientation was attracted to that of the envelope; when the difference was large (>10 degrees ) repulsion was found. The biases were reduced by half-wave rectifying the stimuli, putatively making the envelope visible to a first-order filter (Experiment 2). Discrimination thresholds for envelope orientation were higher than those for carrier orientation, and this difference was greater for briefly-presented parafoveal stimuli than for long duration foveal stimuli (Experiments 3 and 4). We conclude from these results that there are separate mechanisms for envelope and carrier orientation discriminations for large stimuli, but that first- and second-order mechanisms are not independent in the discrimination of orientation. (+info)
Simple mechanisms organise orientation of escape swimming in embryos and hatchling tadpoles of Xenopus laevis.
(75/3615)
Many amphibian tadpoles hatch and swim before their inner ears and sense of spatial orientation differentiate. We describe upward and downward swimming responses in hatchling Xenopus laevis tadpoles from stages 32 to 37/38 in which the body rotates about its longitudinal axis. Tadpoles are heavier than water and, if touched while lying on the substratum, they reliably swim upwards, often in a tight spiral. This response has been observed using stroboscopic photography and high-speed video recordings. The sense of the spiral is not fixed for individual tadpoles. In 'more horizontal swimming' (i.e. in directions within +/-30 degrees of the horizontal), the tadpoles usually swim belly-down, but this position is not a prerequisite for subsequent upward spiral swimming. Newly hatched tadpoles spend 99 % of their time hanging tail-down from mucus secreted by a cement gland on the head. When suspended in mid-water by a mucus strand, tadpoles from stage 31 to 37/38 tend to swim spirally down when touched on the head and up when touched on the tail. The three-dimensional swimming paths of stage 33/34 tadpoles were plotted using simultaneous video images recorded from the side and from above. Tadpoles spiralled for 70 % of the swimming time, and the probability of spiralling increased to 1 as swim path angles became more vertical. Tadpoles were neutrally buoyant in Percoll/water mixtures at 1.05 g cm(-)(3), in which anaesthetised tadpoles floated belly-down and head-up at 30 degrees. In water, their centre of mass was ventral to the muscles in the yolk mass. A simple mathematical model suggests that the orientation of tadpoles during swimming is governed by the action of two torques, one of which raises the head (i.e. increases the pitch) and the other rotates (rolls) the body. Consequently, tadpoles (i) swim belly-down when the body is approximately horizontal because the body is ballasted by dense yolk, and (ii) swim spirally at more vertical orientations when the ballasting no longer stabilises orientation. Measurements in tethered tadpoles show that dorsal body flexion, which could produce a dorsal pitch torque, is present during swimming and increases with tailbeat frequency. We discuss how much of the tadpole's behaviour can be explained by our mathematical model and suggest that, at this stage of development, oriented swimming responses may depend on simple touch reflexes, the organisation of the muscles and physical features of the body, rather than on vestibular reflexes. (+info)
A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect.
(76/3615)
Mechanisms of visual extinction were investigated in four patients with right hemisphere damage using a partial report paradigm. Different shapes (star or triangle) were displayed in one, two or four possible locations so that double simultaneous stimuli occurred either across the two hemifields or within the same hemifield. Patients attended either to the location (right, left or both), number (one, two or four) or shape (no, one or two stars among the shapes presented) of stimuli in three separate experiments using the same displays and exposure duration. Reporting the location (Experiment 1) produced marked contralesional extinction, although reaction time was delayed compared with unilateral right trials, indicating unconscious processing. Reaction time was also delayed on correct bilateral and unilateral left trials. In contrast, enumerating stimuli (Experiment 2) caused no significant contralesional extinction on bilateral displays and reaction time was similar on bilateral and unilateral right trials, suggesting that information from both fields was grouped in a single numerable percept in this task. However, patients often detected only one of two stimuli within the left field. Whereas similarity of shapes improved localization and did not affect enumeration, identifying stars among shapes (Experiment 3) revealed a severe inability to detect two similar targets between hemifields as well as within each of the hemifields. Distracting triangles were generally less detrimental to the perception of a concurrent target on either side, but slowed the reaction time regardless of whether they were in the same or the opposite field. Relative difficulty in ignoring distractors correlated with neglect severity on a cancellation task, and was most prominent in one patient with a large amount of frontal damage. These findings suggest that (i) allocation of attention to identical stimuli can be modulated by task demand; (ii) enumerating a small set of items across fields may not require attending to individual stimuli but relies on preattentive subitizing ability, as found in normal subjects; (iii) location information may be critical for attentional mechanisms subserved by the parietal cortex and pathological competition for awareness in extinction; (iv) extinction entails a bilateral deficit in attending to two concurrent similar targets when their features must be identified; and (v) the relevance of the stimuli can modulate the distribution of attention, possibly through frontal top-down control. These findings are consistent with recent neurophysiological evidence of parietal and frontal attentional influences on ventral visual pathways. (+info)
Modeling LGN responses during free-viewing: a possible role of microscopic eye movements in the refinement of cortical orientation selectivity.
(77/3615)
Neural activity appears to be essential for the normal development of the orientation-selective responses of cortical cells. It has been proposed that the correlated activity of LGN cells is a crucial component for shaping the receptive fields of cortical simple cells into adjacent, oriented subregions alternately receiving ON- and OFF-center excitatory geniculate inputs. After eye opening, the spatiotemporal structure of neural activity in the early stages of the visual pathway depends not only on the characteristics of the environment, but also on the way the environment is scanned. In this study, we use computational modeling to investigate how eye movements might affect the refinement of orientation tuning in the presence of a Hebbian scheme of synaptic plasticity. Visual input consisting of natural scenes scanned by varying types of eye movements was used to activate a spatiotemporal model of LGN cells. In the presence of different types of movement, significantly different patterns of activity were found in the LGN. Specific patterns of correlation required for the development of segregated cortical receptive field subregions were observed in the case of micromovements, but were not seen in the case of saccades or static presentation of natural visual input. These results suggest an important role for the eye movements occurring during fixation in the refinement of orientation selectivity. (+info)
Neck muscle vibration makes walking humans accelerate in the direction of gaze.
(78/3615)
We studied the effect of the continuous vibration of symmetrical dorsal neck muscles in seven normal subjects during (a) quiet standing, (b) stepping in place movements and (c) walking on the treadmill. The experiments were performed in a darkened room and the subjects were given the instruction not to resist the applied perturbation. In one condition the velocity of the treadmill was controlled by feedback from the subject's current position. Head, trunk and leg motion were recorded at 100 Hz. In normal standing, neck vibration elicited a prominent forward body sway. During stepping in place, neck vibration produced an involuntary forward stepping at about 0.3 m s-1 without modifying the stepping frequency. If the head was turned horizontally 45 and 90 deg to the right or to the left, neck muscle vibration caused stepping approximately in the direction of the head naso-occipital axis. For lateral eye deviations, the direction of stepping was roughly aligned with gaze direction. In treadmill locomotion, neck vibration produced an involuntary step-like increase of walking speed (by 0.1-0.6 m s-1), independent of the initial walking speed. During backward locomotion, the walking speed tended to decrease during neck vibration. Thus, continuous neck vibration evokes changes in the postural reference during quiet standing and in the walking speed during locomotion. The results suggest that the proprioceptive input from the neck is integrated in the control of human posture and locomotion and is processed in the context of a viewer-centred reference frame. (+info)
Orientation formed by a spot's trajectory: a two-dimensional population approach in primary visual cortex.
(79/3615)
There exist a large number of visual illusions indicating that perception differs from pure representation of physical input. For example, a spot of light can be characterized by its position, but it does not contribute any information about orientation. However, when moved fast enough, a continuous streak along its trajectory is perceived that helps to determine the orientation of the movement path. The question arises whether the processing of the trajectory and its orientation are simultaneously represented in the primary visual cortex. Here I show that decoding neural population activity within a two-dimensional parameter space represents both (1) physical input given by the actual position of the moving spot and (2) orientation. This latter parameter has no physical counterpart in the stimulus but must be actively formed by spatiotemporal integration of the spot's trajectory. (+info)
A new visual illusion of relative motion.
(80/3615)
We present a remarkably simple illusion that manifests whenever a certain class of flat static patterns are moved across our peripheral visual field. A relative motion is perceived in a direction perpendicular to the true motion. Translatory, looming, and rotational movements of the head or the pattern can all elicit it. Each pattern is constructed of simple elements that define, through luminance, an orientation polarity. This polarity could be encoded by spatiotemporally tuned, orientation sensitive units in area V1. We offer an explanation for the illusion based on how such units from V1 may be combined to feed the processes that subsequently interpret motion. (+info)