Illusory contour strength does not depend on the dynamics or relative phase of the inducers.
(57/677)
We use a new objective measure of illusory contour strength, threshold reduction for aspect ratio discrimination, to examine the effect of dynamics and relative phase on the Kanizsa illusion. We found no dependence of illusory contour strength on the relative phase of flickering inducers (in phase, antiphase, or in quadrature phase) either for the standard Kanizsa square, or for modifications that facilitated or interfered with amodal completion. Comparison with a vernier acuity task indicates that the distance between the inducers, rather than the nature of the task, accounts for the insensitivity to relative phase. (+info)
Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system.
(58/677)
We distinguish two representations of visual space: a cognitive representation drives perception, and a sensorimotor representation controls visually guided behavior. Spatial values in the two representations are separated with the Roelofs effect: a target within an off-center frame appears biased in a location opposite the direction of the frame. The effect appears for a verbal measure (cognitive) but not for a jab at the target (sensorimotor). A 2-s response delay induces a Roelofs effect in the motor measure, showing the limit of motor memory. Motor error is not correlated with reaction time. Subjects could strike one of two identical targets, a process involving choice, without intrusion of a Roelofs effect, showing that the sensorimotor system can use its own coordinates even when a cognitive choice initiates the motor processing. (+info)
Independent aftereffects of attention and motion.
(59/677)
In the motion aftereffect (MAE), a stationary pattern appears to move in the opposite direction to previously viewed motion. Here we report an MAE that is observed for a putatively high level of visual analysis-attentive tracking. These high-level MAEs, visible on dynamic (but not static) tests, suggest that attentive tracking does not simply enhance low-level motion signals but, rather, acts at a subsequent stage. MAEs from tracking (1) can overrule competing MAEs from adaptation to low-level motion, (2) can be established opposite to low-level MAEs seen on static tests at the same location, and (3), most striking, are specific to the overall direction of object motion, even at nonadapted locations. These distinctive properties suggest MAEs from attentive tracking can serve as valuable probes for understanding the mechanisms of high-level vision and attention. (+info)
Phantom surface captures stereopsis.
(60/677)
A phantom surface is a stereoscopic illusory area that can be seen in depth although there is no conventional stereoscopic cues [Liu, L., Stevenson, S.B., & Schor, C.M. (1994). Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence. Nature, 367, 66-69; Gillam, B. & Nakayama, K. (1999). Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone. Vision Research, 39, 109-112]. The phenomenon has been explained as an example of half-occlusion processing in which the visual system uses information about cyclopean occlusion structure of the visual world. We created stereo capture stereograms in which phantom surfaces changed the perceived depth of conventionally defined binocular textures. Because conventional stereoscopic matching is strongly affected by half-occlusion processing, we suggest that half-occlusion processing is an integral part of the early stereoscopic processing and solving of the correspondence problem. (+info)
Effects of disparity-perspective cue conflict on depth contrast.
(61/677)
The role of disparity-perspective cue conflict in depth contrast was examined. A central square and a surrounding frame were observed in a stereoscope. Five conditions were compared: (1) only disparity was introduced into either the centre or surround stimulus, (2) only perspective was introduced into the centre or surround, (3) concordant perspective and disparity were introduced into the centre or surround, (4) disparity was introduced into one stimulus and perspective into the other, and (5) only the centre stimulus was presented with horizontal shear disparity and perspective manipulated independently. The results show that individual differences in depth contrast were related to individual differences in the weighting of disparity and perspective in the single-stimulus conditions. We conclude that conflict between disparity and perspective contributes to depth contrast. However, significant depth contrast occurred when there was no disparity-perspective cue conflict, indicating that this cue conflict is not the sole mechanism producing depth contrast. (+info)
Orientation processing mechanisms revealed by the plaid tilt illusion.
(62/677)
The tilt after-effect (TAE) and tilt illusion (TI) have revealed a great deal about the nature of orientation coding of 1-dimensional (1D) lines and gratings. Comparatively little research however has addressed the mechanisms responsible for encoding the orientation of 2-dimensional (2D) plaid stimuli. A multi-stage model of edge detection has recently been proposed [Georgeson, M. A. (1998) Image & Vision Computing, 16(6-7), 389-405] to account for the perceived structure of a plaid stimulus that incorporates extraction of the zero-crossings (ZCs) of the plaid. Data is presented showing that the ZCs of a plaid inducing stimulus can interact with vertical grating test stimulus to induce a standard tilt illusion. However, by considering the second-order structure of a plaid rather than ZCs, it was shown that the perceived orientation of the vertical test grating results from the combination of orientation illusions due to the first- and second-order components of an inducing plaid. The data suggest that the mechanisms encoding the orientation of second-order contours are similar to, and interact directly with, those that encode first-order contours. (+info)
The persistence of position.
(63/677)
I describe a signal coined position persistence that stores information about the last seen position of an object. Position persistence is not the same as visible persistence, although some of its properties are similar. The duration of position persistence is such that objects visible briefly always generate a position signal for at least 180 ms. The signal is not affected by the intensity of the object, nor of the background. Position persistence decreases with increasing speed, but does not depend on retinal eccentricity. Finally, the persisting signal is not tightly bound to the object that causes it. The signal contains no information on the colour of the object, whereas shape information may become represented after approximately 100 ms. The existence of this signal is interpreted as a psychophysical signature of the parallel processing of visual information. (+info)
Configuration specificity in bisection acuity.
(64/677)
Crucial for the perception of form are the spatial relationships between the elements of a visual stimulus. To investigate the mechanisms involved in coding the distance between visual stimuli, thresholds for detecting whether a central marker accurately bisects a spatial interval were compared for a variety of configurations. Thresholds are best when all three members of the bisection configuration are identical. Performance is impaired, often by as much as a factor of two, when the outer delimiters of the spatial interval differ from the central marker in either length, orientation or contrast polarity. Illusory contours act poorly as borders for bisection by a central line. Disparity thresholds are not affected by orientation differences between test and flanking lines. Because in peripheral vision bisection acuity improves with practice, transfer of training between configurations can be used to gauge overlap of neural processing mechanisms. Transfer is complete only between patterns where all markers are similar, reduced when the outer markers differ by 20 degrees in orientation and absent when they are orthogonal. The dependence of bisection discrimination on similarity between the elements of the stimulus demonstrates that the encoding of spatial location and spatial extent are coupled to the coding of other stimulus properties. (+info)