A comparison of resource utilization in nurse practitioners and physicians.
(17/500)
CONTEXT: Nurse practitioners increasingly provide primary care in a variety of settings. Little is known about how resource utilization for patients assigned to nurse practitioners compares with that for patients assigned to physicians. OBJECTIVE: To compare health care resource utilization for adult patients assigned to a nurse practitioner with that for patients assigned to a resident or attending physician. DESIGN: Prospective, quasi-randomized study. SETTING: Primary care clinic at a Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: 450 new primary care patients: 150 were assigned to a nurse practitioner, 150 to a resident physician, and 150 to an attending physician. OUTCOME MEASURES: We collected data on laboratory and radiologic testing, specialty care, primary care, emergency or walk-in visits, and hospitalizations over a 1-year period. We also collected information on baseline chronic illnesses, blood pressure, and weight. RESULTS: Resource utilization for patients assigned to a nurse practitioner was higher than that for patients assigned to a resident in 14 of 17 utilization measures (3 were statistically significant) and higher in 10 of 17 measures when compared with patients assigned to an attending physician (3 were statistically significant). None of the utilization measures for patients in the nurse practitioner group was significantly lower than those for either physician group. CONCLUSIONS: In a primary care setting, nurse practitioners may utilize more health care resources than physicians. (+info)
General practice nurses' knowledge of alcohol use and misuse: a questionnaire survey.
(18/500)
Nurses in general practice (termed practice nurses) are an under-utilized resource for the detection and management of patients with alcohol misuse. However, little is known about their knowledge and attitudes towards alcohol use and misuse. We therefore conducted a postal questionnaire survey of 132 practice nurses in Liverpool (UK). The results of our survey (response rate 77%) show that a knowledge and skills gap exists in the delivery of effective advice on alcohol-related issues. Indeed, our results suggest that only one in two women and one in three men are receiving correct advice on sensible limits of alcohol consumption, this despite the fact that alcohol histories are taken. Further training was requested by most nurses to develop their screening and health promotion roles, and to become involved in the management of patients with alcohol-related problems in primary care. We suggest practice nurses should be encouraged to become involved in screening for, and management of, alcohol-related problems. However, it is important to ensure that the nurses receive appropriate training and have adequate back-up facilities from doctors and other workers involved in the care of patients with alcohol-related problems. (+info)
Altogether now? Professional differences in the priorities of primary care groups.
(19/500)
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the similarities or differences with which Primary Care Group (PCG) Board members view the relative importance of the three functions with which they are charged, or how representative these views are of local primary care teams in general. This project explores the priorities of medical and nursing PCG Board members in relation to those of local General Practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses they represent. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were sent to GPs (n=236) and practice nurses (n= 137); structured telephone interviews were carried out with PCG Board members (n=61) in East Sussex, Brighton and Hove. RESULTS: There are large differences between the views of GPs and those of their nursing colleagues on how PCG Board members should determine priorities in their work. There are also marked differences in the priorities of PCG Boards (of whom the majority are GPs) and non-Board member GPs. Whereas around two-thirds of PCG Board members believe that improving health generally and reducing inequalities in particular are the most important tasks before them, this view is not shared by most GPs in the same localities, who are generally more concerned about commissioning services. There is some doubt among GPs generally about the suitability of PCG Board members as a vehicle for the tasks they have been set, and this doubt is also found among PCG Board members themselves. CONCLUSIONS: The priorities of PCG Board members of different disciplines need to be aligned in order that they have a clear focus on the tasks before them. PCG Boards must also have priorities that are consistent with the local practitioners who elected them. Effective systems of communication will need to be developed between PCG Board members, Health Authorities and individual Primary Care Groups. Local flexibility is essential to the success of Primary Care Groups, but tackling inequalities in health must always be at the forefront of their role. (+info)
Improving door to needle times with nurse initiated thrombolysis.
(20/500)
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of nurse initiated thrombolysis on door to needle time (the interval between arriving at the hospital and starting thrombolytic treatment) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Comparison of door to needle times before and after the employment of nurses trained and approved to initiate thrombolysis without prescription by a doctor but with a protocol for rapid triage of patients with chest pain. SETTING: A district general hospital. SUBJECTS: All patients admitted with suspected myocardial infarction between April 1995 and March 1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speed (door to needle time) and appropriateness of administration of thrombolytic drugs to patients with acute myocardial infarction who gave a characteristic history and had appropriate criteria on the admission ECG. RESULTS: During seven periods (each of four months) before the introduction of nurse initiated thrombolysis and a new chest pain triage protocol, the median door to needle time varied from 50-58 minutes. In four periods (each of 4-6 months) following the introduction of the changes, the median door to needle time was 25-30 minutes. The improvement was significant (p < 0.001). Nurses trained to initiate thrombolysis currently provide cover for 66% of the time. Median door to needle time for nurses was 15 minutes. Median door to needle time for junior doctors improved to 35 minutes. The median door to needle times when nurses initiated thrombolysis was significantly shorter than when doctors did so (p < 0.001). There have been no inappropriate management decisions by nurses approved to initiate thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of nurse initiated thrombolysis has resulted in a clinically important reduction in the time taken for thrombolysis to be started in patients with acute myocardial infarction. (+info)
The nurse practitioner endoscopist.
(21/500)
Most upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopies in Great Britain and Ireland are performed by surgeons, physicians or radiologists. Since the introduction of the 'nurse endoscopist' by the British Society of Gastroenterology Working Party, few centres in the UK have adopted this policy. We have reviewed the anxiety about nurse practitioner endoscopists among patients and physicians. Finally, the role and future of the nurse practitioner endoscopist in the UK is discussed. (+info)
Atrial fibrillation: a comparison of methods to identify cases in general practice.
(22/500)
The importance of atrial fibrillation as a treatable risk factor for stroke is well established. Less is known about how to find previously unidentified cases within the community so that antithrombotic treatment can be offered to a wider group of at-risk patients. The aim of our study was to examine ways to improve the efficiency of practice-based screening for atrial fibrillation, including issues of time and financial cost. We used different combinations of pulse palpation and interpretation of 12-lead and bipolar electrocardiographs as carried out by practice nurses. The best strategy for the detection of atrial fibrillation in a practice population would appear to be to screen all eligible subjects by nurse pulse palpation, followed by 12-lead electrocardiograph readings in those who have a pulse suggestive of atrial fibrillation. The electrocardiograph interpretation can be undertaken effectively by a trained nurse. (+info)
Factors associated with successful answering of clinical questions using an information retrieval system.
(23/500)
OBJECTIVES: Despite the growing use of online databases by clinicians, there has been very little research documenting how effectively they are used. This study assessed the ability of medical and nurse-practitioner students to answer clinical questions using an information retrieval system. It also attempted to identify the demographic, experience, cognitive, personality, search mechanics, and user-satisfaction factors associated with successful use of a retrieval system. METHODS: Twenty-nine students completed questionnaires of clinical and computer experience as well as tests of cognitive abilities and personality type. They were then administered three clinical questions to answer in a medical library setting using the MEDLINE database and electronic and print full-text resources. RESULTS: Medical students were able to answer more questions correctly than nurse-practitioner students before and after searching, but both had comparable improvements in the number of correct questions before and after searching. Successful ability to answer questions was also associated with having experience in literature searching and higher standardized test-score percentiles. CONCLUSIONS: Medical and nurse-practitioner students obtained comparable benefits in the ability to answer clinical questions from use of the information retrieval system. Future research must examine strategies that improve successful search and retrieval of clinical questions posed by clinicians in practice. (+info)
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and quality of diabetic care in residential and nursing homes. A postal survey.
(24/500)
OBJECTIVE: to investigate the prevalence of known diabetes mellitus in care homes and the patterns of diabetes care in these institutions. DESIGN: a postal questionnaire sent to all 98 care homes in Sheffield. RESULTS: 70 care homes (71%) returned the questionnaire, indicating that 233 (8.8%) of 2648 residents were known to have diabetes. Of these, 76 (33%) were treated with diet alone, 105 (45%) with diet plus oral medication and 52 (22%) with insulin. Only seven registered nurses (2%) in the homes had certified diabetes training. Forty-two homes (60%) did not carry out a structured, diabetes-related assessment of residents on entry and only 29 (42%) had regular review of diabetic residents by a general practitioner or practice nurse. Most homes (89%) were visited by an optician, 56 (80%) also had a regular chiropody service, although 32 (46%) of these charged their residents for this service. CONCLUSIONS: the known prevalence of diabetes is similar to that reported previously. This study highlights the need for structured care with defined standards for care-home residents with diabetes. (+info)