The effect of a needle exchange program on numbers of discarded needles: a 2-year follow-up.
(9/229)
OBJECTIVES: This study estimates the quantity and geographic distribution of discarded needles on the streets of Baltimore, Md, during the 2 years after a needle exchange program opened. METHODS: Thirty-two city blocks were randomly sampled. Counts were taken of the number of syringes, drug vials, and bottles before the needle exchange program opened and then at 6 periodic intervals for 2 years after the program opened. Nonparametric and generalized estimating equation models were used to examine change over time. RESULTS: Two years after the needle exchange program opened, there was a significant decline in the overall quantity of discarded needles relative to that of drug vials and bottles (background trash). The block mean of number of needles per 100 trash items was 2.42 before the program opened and 1.30 2 years later (mean within-block change = -0.028, P < .05). There was no difference in the number of discarded needles by distance from the program site. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that this needle exchange program did not increase the number of distribution of discarded needles. (+info)
Syringe availability as HIV prevention: a review of modalities.
(10/229)
This review examines recent research into modalities for improving access to sterile syringes for injection drug users (IDUs) as a means to reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. English language studies with empirical data were collected through Uncover reports and MedLine searches from 1998 to 2000. Although syringe-exchange programs are the most established and well-evaluated means of improving access to sterile syringes, research on alternative modalities-such as pharmacy sale, injector-specific packs, mass distribution, and vending machines-and on coverage of special populations suggests the need to pursue multiple avenues of increasing syringe availability simultaneously and, in particular, to explore modalities other than syringe-exchange programs when HIV incidence is under control. The impacts on HIV transmission of cocaine injection and sex with IDUs need to be explored further. Finally, any evidence of declining hepatitis C incidence among young IDUs might serve as a surrogate for a sharp drop in injection-related HIV risk behaviors in that population. (+info)
Characteristics and utilization patterns of needle-exchange attendees in Chicago: 1994-1998.
(11/229)
The objectives of this study were to describe characteristics and utilization patterns of participants attending a needle-exchange program (NEP) in Chicago, Illinois. Since 1994, demographics of NEP attendees and program utilization data were collected systematically at 22 sites operated by the Chicago Recovery Alliance (CRA). Descriptive statistics were used to assess time trends, site variations, and characteristics of attendees in day sites versus evening sites. A total of 11,855 injection drug users (IDUs) visited the NEP at least once from 1994 to 1998. Median age was 41 years, and 74% were male. Overall race distribution was African-American 50%, Caucasian 38%, Puerto Rican 10%, other 2%. Over time, there was a proportional decrease in African-American users (55.4% to 39.9%, P < .001), a significant increase in Puerto Rican users (1.4% to 14.1%, P < .001), and a stable proportion of Caucasian users (42%). Each year, 15-20% of all clients were first-time attenders. Overall, participants attending evening versus day sites were younger (median age 39 years vs. 42 years, P < .001) and more ethnically diverse. Over a 4-year period, this NEP reached a diverse population of IDUs and recruited a stable proportion of first-time users. Compared to daytime NEP venues, evening NEP sites attracted younger clients and those who were more diverse ethnically. To maximize coverage of sterile syringes, NEPs should strive for diversification in terms of hours of operation and location. (+info)
Drug injection rates and needle-exchange use in New York City, 1991-1996.
(12/229)
Objectives included (1) to develop methods for identifying injection drug users with accelerating injection habits so they might be referred to counseling and treatment and (2) to investigate behavioral correlates of accelerating injection habits, including syringe-exchange program utilization. Data on drug use, enrollment in methadone maintenance, and demographic variables were obtained from 328 subjects who were seronegative for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who attended anywhere from 4 to 11 quarterly study visits for interview, HIV pretest counseling and risk reduction counseling, and blood donation for HIV antibody testing. Subjects were recalled 2 weeks after each study visit to receive their results and post-test counseling. We characterized subjects according to their patterns of drug injection as accelerating, decelerating, or stable, using intraindividual regression analyses and categorization rules, and by syringe-exchange use as consistent users, sporadic users, or nonusers. The present subjects included 52% with decelerating, 29% with stable, and 19% with accelerating rates of drug injection. There were 128 subjects (39%) who were categorized as consistent users of syringe-exchange programs, 84 (25%) were categorized as sporadic users, and 116 (35%) were categorized as nonusers. All syringe-exchange groups showed significantly decelerating drug injection. Rates of decline were significantly less, however, among consistent syringe-exchange users than sporadic or nonusers of syringe exchanges. Categorical analysis also showed significant differences among groups, with 30% of consistent syringe-exchange program users having accelerating rates of drug injection compared to 9% of nonusers and 17% of sporadic users. That consistent syringe-exchange users included a larger proportion of individuals whose drug habits were accelerating than did sporadic users or nonusers of syringe exchanges suggests a need for improved identification and counseling of such subjects by syringe-exchange program staff. The present statistical approaches may be of value in targeting such efforts. The ability of a syringe-exchange program to attract a disproportionate share of drug users with accelerating rates of drug injection underscores the importance of these programs to HIV prevention efforts. (+info)
Changes in injection risk behavior associated with participation in the Seattle needle-exchange program.
(13/229)
We studied the influence of the Seattle, Washington, needle-exchange program on sharing of drug injection equipment (syringes, drug cookers, filtration cotton) to identify potential gaps in risk reduction and to understand in greater detail the lack of an association between exchange use and risk of hepatitis B or C virus transmission. In a cohort of 2,208 injection drug users who completed a 1-year follow-up visit, we measured the association between needle-exchange use at study enrollment (ever vs. never) and injection risk behavior at the follow-up. Control for confounding was carried out using both logistic regression and propensity score analytic methods to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR). In both univariate and multivariate analyses, needle-exchange use was associated with a lower likelihood of injection with a used syringe (AOR = 0.7, 95% confidence limit 0.5, 0.9). There was no association between exchange use and cooker or cotton sharing (AOR = 0.8, 95% confidence limit 0.6, 1.1) or between exchange use and use of a common syringe to divide drugs (AOR = 0.9). This analysis suggests that risk reduction measures adopted by users of the Seattle exchange may not be sufficient to prevent transmission of all blood-borne viruses, including hepatitis C virus. Greater awareness of the infection risk associated with these practices may help curb this type of equipment sharing and ultimately prevent disease transmission. (+info)
Research, politics, and needle exchange.
(14/229)
We now have had 15 years of public discussion of and research on needle exchange programs. The data have shown these programs to be usually, but not always, effective in limiting HIV transmission among injection drug users. Needle exchange programs are conceptualized within a larger framework of providing ready availability of sterile injection equipment for injection drug users. Continuing research is clearly needed regarding how to maximize the availability of sterile injection equipment and how to integrate this with other needed health and social services for drug users. Many initial opponents of needle exchange programs have become supporters of the programs. The number of programs in the United States has been increasing by about 20% per year, and this can be considered substantial progress in reducing HIV infection among injection drug users. Important opposition remains, however, based primarily on the symbolic values expressed in government support for the programs. These value conflicts over needle exchange, which have existed since it was first considered in the United States, cannot be resolved with data. In the late 1980s, the value conflicts greatly hampered the collection of relevant data--there was no federal funding of research on needle exchange programs. Currently, there is considerable research on needle exchange, but many researchers are quite concerned about possible misuse of findings. This may be considered progress to an important but modest degree. Whether current and future research will be used to improve HIV prevention efforts remains to be seen. (+info)
Trends in crime and the introduction of a needle exchange program.
(15/229)
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether introduction of a needle exchange program would be associated with increased crime rates. METHODS: Trends in arrests were compared in program and nonprogram areas before and after introduction of a needle exchange program in Baltimore. Trends were modeled and compared via Poisson regression. RESULTS: No significant differences in arrest trends emerged. Over the study period, increases in category-specific arrests in program and nonprogram areas, respectively, were as follows: drug possession, 17.7% and 13.4%; economically motivated offenses, 0.0% and 20.7%; resistance to police authority, 0.0% and 5.3%; and violent offenses, 7.2% and 8.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of association of overall and type-specific arrest data with program implementation argues against the role of needle exchange programs in increasing crime rates. (+info)
Large decline in injecting drug use in Amsterdam, 1986-1998: explanatory mechanisms and determinants of injecting transitions.
(16/229)
OBJECTIVES: To study community wide trends in injecting prevalence and trends in injecting transitions, and determinants. DESIGN: Open cohort study with follow up every four months (Amsterdam Cohort Study). Generalised estimating equations were used for statistical analysis. SETTING: Amsterdam has adopted a harm reduction approach as drug policy. PARTICIPANTS: 996 drug users who were recruited from 1986 to 1998, mainly at methadone programmes, who paid 13620 cohort visits. MAIN RESULTS: The prevalence of injecting decreased exponentially (66% to 36% in four to six monthly periods). Selective mortality and migration could maximally explain 33% of this decline. Instead, injecting initiation linearly decreased (4.1% to 0.7% per visit), cessation exponentially increased (10.0% to 17.1%), and relapse linearly decreased (21.3% to 11.8%). Non-injecting cocaine use (mainly pre-cooked, comparable to crack) and heroin use strongly increased. Trends were not attributable to changes in the study sample. CONCLUSIONS: Harm reduction, including large scale needle exchange programmes, does not lead to an increase in injecting drug use. The injecting decline seems mainly attributable to ecological factors (for example, drug culture and market). Prevention of injecting is possible and peer-based interventions may be effective. The consequences of the recent upsurge in crack use requires further study. (+info)