Chromosomal influence on meiotic spindle assembly: abnormal meiosis I in female Mlh1 mutant mice.
(65/6057)
In mouse oocytes, the first meiotic spindle is formed through the action of multiple microtubule organizing centers rather than a pair of centrosomes. Although the chromosomes are thought to play a major role in organizing the meiotic spindle, it remains unclear how a stable bipolar spindle is established. We have studied the formation of the first meiotic spindle in murine oocytes from mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of the DNA mismatch repair gene, Mlh1. In the absence of the MLH1 protein meiotic recombination is dramatically reduced and, as a result, the vast majority of chromosomes are present as unpaired univalents at the first meiotic division. The orientation of these univalent chromosomes at prometaphase suggests that they are unable to establish stable bipolar spindle attachments, presumably due to the inability to differentiate functional kinetochore domains on individual sister chromatids. In the presence of this aberrant chromosome behavior a stable first meiotic spindle is not formed, the spindle poles continue to elongate, and the vast majority of cells never initiate anaphase. These results suggest that, in female meiotic systems in which spindle formation is based on the action of multiple microtubule organizing centers, the chromosomes not only promote microtubule polymerization and organization but their attachment to opposite spindle poles acts to stabilize the forming spindle poles. (+info)
Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation.
(66/6057)
FISH analysis of well-spread chromosomes reveals that homologs are paired in vegetatively growing budding yeast diploid cells, via multiple interstitial interactions, and independent of recA homologs and mating type heterozygosity. Pairing is present during G1 and G2, and in cells arrested at G1 by mating pheromone, but is disrupted during S phase. Thus, somatic pairing is qualitatively analogous to premeiotic and early meiotic pairing. S-phase pairing disruption occurs by a complex intranuclear program involving regional, nucleus-wide, and temporal determinants. Pairing is also disrupted in two G2-arrest conditions (cdc13ts and nocodazole). Together these findings suggest that cell cycle signals may provoke pairing disruption by modulating underlying chromosome and/or chromatin structure. Whether the cell chooses to disrupt pairing contacts or not (e.g., S phase and G2 arrest, but not G1 arrest or normal G1 or G2), could be dictated by functional considerations involving homolog/sister discrimination. (+info)
Subcellular distribution of the Xenopus p58/lamin B receptor in oocytes and eggs.
(67/6057)
The p58/lamin B receptor of vertebrates is localized in the inner nuclear membrane. Antibodies raised against the bacterially expressed amino-terminal half of Xenopus p58 (Xp58) revealed that in Xenopus oocytes the vast majority of this membrane protein is localized in cytoplasmic membranes. Only very small amounts of p58 not detectable by immunofluorescence microscopy were contained in the oocyte nuclear envelope. In contrast, nuclear membranes of 2-cell stage embryos were successfully stained with p58 antibodies, nuclei reconstituted in vitro in Xenopus egg extracts contained p58, and the nucleoplasmic domain of Xp58 could be specifically bound to sperm chromatin in vitro. One major difference between oocytes and early embryonic cells is that no chromatin is associated with the oocyte inner nuclear membrane whereas the complement of lamins is identical in both cell types. To gain insight into the properties of oocyte p58 we microinjected isolated nuclei of cultured rat cells into the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes. The oocyte p58 was detectable by immunofluorescence microscopy within 16-20 hours in the nuclear membrane of rat nuclei. Our data indicate that the peripheral chromatin but not lamins are required for the retention of p58 in the inner nuclear membrane. Sucrose step gradient centrifugation of total oocyte membranes revealed that the oocyte p58 was predominantly recovered in membrane fractions that did not contain lamins whereas membrane associated lamins and p58 of unfertilized eggs were found in the same fractions. By electron microscopical immunolocalizations one major population of meiotic p58 vesicles was identified that contained exclusively p58 and a second minor population (ca. 11% of p58 vesicles) contained in addition to p58 membrane bound B-type lamins. Egg vesicles containing pore membrane proteins were predominantly recovered in gradient fractions that did not contain p58 and B-type lamins. Our data indicate that the targeting of p58 to chromatin at the end of mitosis in the early Xenopus embryo is a process independent from that of lamin targeting. Comparable to the situation in oocytes and eggs, a significant proportion of p58 of interphase cells could be recovered in fractions that did not contain lamins. This population of p58 molecules could be extracted from A6-cells with buffers containing 1% Triton X-100/0.15 M NaCl and could be pelleted by a 50,000 g centrifugation. A- and B-type lamins were not detectable in the p58 containing pellet. (+info)
Physical and meiotic mapping of the region of human chromosome 4q11-q13 encompassing the vitamin D binding protein DBP/Gc-globulin and albumin multigene cluster.
(68/6057)
The vitamin D binding protein/Gc-globulin (DBP) gene is a member of a multigene cluster that includes albumin (ALB), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and alpha-albumin/afamin (AFM). All four genes have structural and functional similarities and map to the same chromosomal regions in humans (4q11-q13), mice, and rats. An accurate physical map of the region encompassing these genes is a prerequisite for study of their respective transcriptional regulation and identification of potential shared regulatory elements. By refining the physical and meiotic maps of the 4q11-q13 region and creating a local PAC contig, the order and transcriptional orientations of these four genes were determined to be centromere-3'-DBP-5'-5'-ALB-3'-5'-AFP-3'-5'-AFM3'-telomere. The ancestral DBP gene was separated from the ALB gene by >1.5 Mb. This organization and spacing establishes a foundation for ongoing functional studies in this region. (+info)
Kinetochore fibers are not involved in the formation of the first meiotic spindle in mouse oocytes, but control the exit from the first meiotic M phase.
(69/6057)
During meiosis, two successive divisions occur without any intermediate S phase to produce haploid gametes. The first meiotic division is unique in that homologous chromosomes are segregated while the cohesion between sister chromatids is maintained, resulting in a reductional division. Moreover, the duration of the first meiotic M phase is usually prolonged when compared with mitotic M phases lasting 8 h in mouse oocytes.We investigated the spindle assembly pathway and its role in the progression of the first meiotic M phase in mouse oocytes. During the first 4 h, a bipolar spindle forms and the chromosomes congress near the equatorial plane of the spindle without stable kinetochore- microtubule end interactions. This late prometaphase spindle is then maintained for 4 h with chromosomes oscillating in the central region of the spindle. The kinetochore-microtubule end interactions are set up at the end of the first meiotic M phase (8 h after entry into M phase). This event allows the final alignment of the chromosomes and exit from metaphase. The continuous presence of the prometaphase spindle is not required for progression of the first meiotic M phase. Finally, the ability of kinetochores to interact with microtubules is acquired at the end of the first meiotic M phase and determines the timing of polar body extrusion. (+info)
Mutations in the essential spindle checkpoint gene bub1 cause chromosome missegregation and fail to block apoptosis in Drosophila.
(70/6057)
We have characterized the Drosophila mitotic checkpoint control protein Bub1 and obtained mutations in the bub1 gene. Drosophila Bub1 localizes strongly to the centromere/kinetochore of mitotic and meiotic chromosomes that have not yet reached the metaphase plate. Animals homozygous for P-element-induced, near-null mutations of bub1 die during late larval/pupal stages due to severe mitotic abnormalities indicative of a bypass of checkpoint function. These abnormalities include accelerated exit from metaphase and chromosome missegregation and fragmentation. Chromosome fragmentation possibly leads to the significantly elevated levels of apoptosis seen in mutants. We have also investigated the relationship between Bub1 and other kinetochore components. We show that Bub1 kinase activity is not required for phosphorylation of 3F3/2 epitopes at prophase/prometaphase, but is needed for 3F3/2 dephosphorylation at metaphase. Neither 3F3/2 dephosphorylation nor loss of Bub1 from the kinetochore is a prerequisite for anaphase entry. Bub1's localization to the kinetochore does not depend on the products of the genes zw10, rod, polo, or fizzy, indicating that the kinetochore is constructed from several independent subassemblies. (+info)
A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis.
(71/6057)
A multisubunit complex, called cohesin, containing Smc1p, Smc3p, Scc1p, and Scc3p, is required for sister chromatid cohesion in mitotic cells. We show here that Smc3p and a meiotic version of Scc1p called Rec8p are required for cohesion between sister chromatids, for formation of axial elements, for reciprocal recombination, and for preventing hyperresection of double-strand breaks during meiosis. Both Rec8p and Smc3p colocalize with chromosome cores independently of synapsis during prophase I and largely disappear from chromosome arms after pachytene but persist in the neighborhood of centromeres until the onset of anaphase II. The eukaryotic cell's cohesion apparatus is required both for the repair of recombinogenic lesions and for chromosome segregation and therefore appears to lie at the heart of the meiotic process. (+info)
Chromatid cohesion during mitosis: lessons from meiosis.
(72/6057)
The equal distribution of chromosomes during mitosis and meiosis is dependent on the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion. In this commentary we review the evidence that, during meiosis, the mechanism underlying the cohesion of chromatids along their arms is different from that responsible for cohesion in the centromere region. We then argue that the chromatids on a mitotic chromosome are also tethered along their arms and in the centromere by different mechanisms, and that the functional action of these two mechanisms can be temporally separated under various conditions. Finally, we demonstrate that in the absence of a centromeric tether, arm cohesion is sufficient to maintain chromatid cohesion during prometaphase of mitosis. This finding provides a straightforward explanation for why mutants in proteins responsible for centromeric cohesion in Drosophila (e.g. ord, mei-s332) disrupt meiosis but not mitosis. (+info)