United States health care delivery system, reform, and transition to managed care.
(25/1973)
The US health care delivery system, faced with an exponential increase in expenditures during the second part of the 20th century, was forced to explore ways to reduce costs and, at the same time, maintain a high quality of care. Managed care emerged as one of the answers and quickly became one of the predominant health care delivery models. While the cost of health care did go down, it remains unclear what the future holds. Currently, managed care is growing rapidly in publicly funded programs and the changes which are currently underway may be defining those programs in the time to come. (+info)
Breast cancer screening in underserved women in the Bronx.
(26/1973)
This article reports the results of mammography screening among socioeconomically disadvantaged women in Bronx, NY using a federally funded low-cost or no-cost cancer screening service. The New York State Department of Health provided funds for the uninsured through the Bronx Breast Health Partnership. All women < or = 40 years underwent screening mammography using both a mobile van unit and hospital-based mammographic x-ray unit, both American College of Radiology (ACR) accredited. Return visits were coordinated by a follow-up clinic at Montefiore Medical Center using a patient navigator who acted as an advocate for patients with abnormal screening findings. The overall detection rate of 12.9 per 1000 women screened was significantly higher than the New York State detection rate of 6 per 1000 and 5.1 per 1000 nationally. Availability of a patient navigator was an essential factor in the effectiveness of the work-up of problem cases. Low-cost or no-cost breast cancer screening programs can improve the availability, accessibility, acceptability, and utilization of mammography among underserved and uninsured women who are least likely to be screened otherwise. (+info)
Prediction of hospital readmission for heart failure: development of a simple risk score based on administrative data.
(27/1973)
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop a convenient and inexpensive method for identifying an individual's risk for hospital readmission for congestive heart failure (CHF) using information derived exclusively from administrative data sources and available at the time of an index hospital discharge. BACKGROUND: Rates of readmission are high after hospitalization for CHF. The significant determinants of rehospitalization are debated. METHODS: Administrative information on all 1995 hospital discharges in New York State which were assigned International Classification of Diseases-9-Clinical Modification codes indicative of CHF in the principal diagnosis position were obtained. The following were compared among hospital survivors who did and did not experience readmission: demographics, comorbid illness, hospital type and location, processes of care, length of stay and hospital charges. RESULTS: A total of 42,731 black or white patients were identified. The subgroup of 9,112 patients (21.3%) who were readmitted were distinguished by a greater proportion of blacks, a higher prevalence of Medicare and Medicaid insurance, more comorbid illnesses and the use of telemetry monitoring during their index hospitalization. Patients treated at rural hospitals, those discharged to skilled nursing facilities and those having echocardiograms or cardiac catheterization were less likely to be readmitted. Using multiple regression methods, a simple methodology was devised that segregated patients into low, intermediate and high risk for readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics, hospital features, processes of care and clinical outcomes may be used to estimate the risk of hospital readmission for CHF. However, some of the variation in rehospitalization risk remains unexplained and may be the result of discretionary behavior by physicians and patients. (+info)
Empiric investigation on direct costs-of-illness and healthcare utilization of Medicaid patients with diabetes mellitus.
(28/1973)
OBJECTIVE: To determine total direct costs-of-illness and to study the influence of different factors affecting these costs. In addition, we examined each type of service (e.g., hospitalization, outpatient care, prescription drugs, physician encounters, and laboratory tests) for diabetic Medicaid patients to provide evidence about the relationship between diabetic patients' healthcare utilization and their related predictors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 7931 patients with diabetes who were 65 years or younger in the Alabama Medicaid program from 1992 to 1995 were studied. Using a relational database created from Medicaid claims, multiple regression and canonical correlation methods were used to analyze the patients' direct costs-of-illness, including the costs associated with each healthcare service used by each patient. RESULTS: The costs of hospitalization, outpatient care, prescription drugs, and physician encounters were the four largest components of the direct costs-of-illness for diabetic Medicaid patients, comprising 29.9%, 21.3%, 28.2%, and 14.3%, respectively. After controlling for other factors in an empiric model, the direct costs-of-illness for a patient with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was $5160 higher than for a patient with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus during the 3-year study. The cost for a patient with renal dysfunction was $59,920 higher than for other diabetic patients. Each increase in the number of different prescribing physicians per patient was associated with a cost increase of $450. Each additional comorbidity increased the cost by $735 per patient. The cost for a male patient was $2140 higher than that for a female patient, and the cost for a white patient was $1330 higher than that for a non-white patient. For a patient who relied on diet to control diabetes, there were $2750 less in costs compared with other patients during the study period. More than 20% of the variability in patients' healthcare utilization costs was explained by the set of predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: The direct costs-of-illness and healthcare utilization for Medicaid diabetic patients were significantly accounted for by the number of comorbidities, the number of different physicians visited, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and complications (especially renal dysfunction). Patients who relied on dietary therapy and exercise to control their diabetes had lower healthcare costs and utilization than other patients. A significant amount of healthcare costs and utilization might be controlled or reduced if diabetes disease management can successfully be aimed at preventing diabetic complications, controlling comorbidities, and minimizing the number of different physicians visited. (+info)
Integrating healthcare for older populations.
(29/1973)
The complex array of needs posed by older adults has frequently produced fragmentation of care in traditional fee-for-service systems. Integration of care components in newer health systems will maximize patient benefits and organizational efficiency. This article outlines the major issues involved in integration of care for older populations. A health system must integrate its care of older adults in many ways: among providers, both in primary care and specialty services; with community-based sources of care; and across sites of care (clinic, hospital, emergency department, and nursing home). Integrating reimbursement structures for various services will serve to create a client-oriented system, as opposed to a finance-centered system, thereby enhancing coordination of care. The extent to which two experimental comprehensive systems, PACE (Program of All-inclusive Care of the Elderly) and SHMO II (Social Health Maintenance Organization), have achieved clinical and financial integration are discussed in detail. Healthcare organizations are encouraged to create integrated models of care and to study the effects of integration on patient outcomes. (+info)
Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.
(30/1973)
Mailing surveys to low-income populations is often avoided because of concern about low response rates. In this study, the authors used a mailed survey of a low-income population to test whether $1.00 or $2.00 cash-response incentives were worth the expense and whether 2-day priority mail ($2.90 postage) would yield a sufficiently higher response rate than certified mail ($1.52 postage) to justify its cost. In 1994, 2,243 randomly selected families in subsidized health care programs in Pierce County, Washington, were randomly sent no incentive, $1.00, or $2.00 in the first of three mailings. For the third mailing, nonrespondents were randomly assigned to receive either certified or 2-day priority mail. After 4 weeks, the response rates were 36.7%, 48.1%, and 50.3% for the no-incentive, $1.00, and $2.00 groups, respectively. After three mailings, the cost per response was the lowest for the group that received $1.00. The response rate for the certified mailing (28.1%) was significantly higher than the rate for the more expensive priority mailing (21.7%). No incentive-related bias was detected. The authors concluded that the most efficient protocol for this low-income population was to use a $1.00 incentive in the first mailing and a certified third mailing. (+info)
The prevalence of low income among childbearing women in California: implications for the private and public sectors.
(31/1973)
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the income distribution of childbearing women in California and sought to identify income groups at increased risk of untimely prenatal care. METHODS: A 1994/95 cross-sectional statewide survey of 10,132 postpartum women was used. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of all childbearing women had low income (0%-200% of the federal poverty level), and 46% were poor (0%-100% of the federal poverty level). Thirty-five percent of women with private prenatal coverage had low income. Most low-income women with Medi-Cal (California's Medicaid) or private coverage received their prenatal care at private-sector sites. Compared with women with incomes over 400% of the poverty level, both poor and near-poor women were at significantly elevated risk of untimely care after adjustment for insurance, education, age, parity, marital status, and ethnicity (adjusted odds ratios = 5.32 and 3.09, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study's results indicate that low-income women are the mainstream maternity population, not a "special needs" subgroup; even among privately insured childbearing women, a substantial proportion have low income. Efforts to increase timely prenatal care initiation cannot focus solely on women with Medicaid, the uninsured, women in absolute poverty, or those who receive care at public-sector sites. (+info)
The impact of Medicaid managed care on community clinics in Sacramento County, California.
(32/1973)
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of countywide Medicaid managed care on service use at community clinics. METHODS: Clinic use before and after introduction of Medicaid plans in one county was compared with that in a group of comparable counties without such plans. RESULTS: There were significant declines of 40% to 45% in the volumes of Medicaid clients, encounters, and revenues at clinics with the introduction of Medicaid plans. Declines of 23% in uninsured clients and encounters did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of Medicaid managed care with multiple commercial plans can have significant negative effects on nonprofit community clinics. (+info)