Targeted HIV screening at a Los Angeles prenatal/family planning health center. (57/139)

In 1988, the Los Angeles County Health Department conducted a blinded human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seroprevalence study at a public prenatal (PN) and family planning (FP) center serving mostly Hispanic women in order to determine seroprevalence and to evaluate the center's targeted HIV screening program. Four women (0.13 percent) tested positive (3/1801 PN and 1/1167 FP). Three reported no risk factors; one reported a history of syphilis since 1978. Voluntary HIV testing was selectively offered to women who reported risk factors for HIV infection. Only 14 percent (96/685) of clients offered testing chose to do it: 28 percent (14/50) of clients classified as being at highest risk of infection, and 27 percent (16/59) of women who judged themselves to have some chance of being exposed to HIV. None of the four women who tested positive by blinded testing chose testing. While few women at this center were infected with HIV, higher risk women were not persuaded to be tested through a targeted screening program. Blinded HIV seroprevalence studies provide a tool for both tracking infection in a population and evaluating screening programs.  (+info)

Assessing the context of health care utilization in Ecuador: a spatial and multilevel analysis. (58/139)

 (+info)

Health services utilisation disparities between English speaking and non-English speaking background Australian infants. (59/139)

 (+info)

Comorbidities of obesity in school children: a cross-sectional study in the PIAMA birth cohort. (60/139)

 (+info)

Design and outcomes of a Mothers In Motion behavioral intervention pilot study. (61/139)

 (+info)

Lessons learned from the mothers' overweight management study in 4 West Virginia WIC offices. (62/139)

 (+info)

Prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) programme in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: an evaluation of PMTCT implementation and integration into routine maternal, child and women's health services. (63/139)

 (+info)

Comparison of costs of home and facility-based basic obstetric care in rural Bangladesh. (64/139)

This study compared the costs of providing antenatal, delivery and postnatal care in the home and in a basic obstetric facility in rural Bangladesh. The average costs were estimated by interviewing midwives and from institutional records. The main determinants of cost in each setting were also assessed. The cost of basic obstetric care in the home and in a facility was very similar, although care in the home was cheaper. Deliveries in the home took more time but this was offset by the capital costs associated with facility-based care. As use-rates increase, deliveries in a facility will become cheaper. Antenatal and postnatal care was much cheaper to provide in the facility than in the home. Facility-based delivery care is likely to be a cheaper and more feasible method for the care provider as demand rises. In settings where skilled attendance rates are very low, home-based care will be cheaper.  (+info)