Anesthetic efficacy of bupivacaine solutions in inferior alveolar nerve block.
(41/166)
The purpose of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2 bupivacaine solutions. Twenty-two volunteers randomly received in a crossover, double-blinded manner 2 inferior alveolar nerve blocks with 1.8 mL of racemic bupivacaine and a mixture of 75% levobupivacaine and 25% dextrobupivacaine, both 0.5% and with 1 : 200,000 epinephrine. Before and after the injection, the first mandibular premolar was evaluated every 2 minutes until no response to the maximal output (80 reading) of the pulp tester and then again every 20 minutes. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon paired test and the paired t test. No differences were found between the solutions for onset and duration of pulpal anesthesia and duration of soft tissue anesthesia (P > .05). It was concluded that the solutions have similar anesthetic efficacy. (+info)
Anatomosurgical study of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve for submandibular surgical approach.
(42/166)
The purpose of this study was to estimate the distance from the mandibular marginal branch of the facial nerve to the inferior margin of the mandible in order to determine the best and safest location to approach the posterior mandibular region. Forty-five hemi-faces of 27 Brazilian adult cadavers were dissected and the distance between the mandibular marginal branch and the inferior margin of the mandible was measured. The number of marginal branches and anastomoses with other branches of the facial nerve was also recorded. The evaluation of the anatomic pieces showed 1 to 3 branches of the marginal mandibular branch, anastomoses with the buccal and cervical branches of the facial nerve and distances between 1.3 cm to +1.2 cm from the inferior margin of the mandible. In 57.7% of the cases, the nerve passed superiorly and along the length of the inferior margin of the mandible. Based on the findings of the present anatomosurgical study, it may be recommended an incision 3 cm below the inferior margin of the mandible associated to a careful dissection in planes and flap retraction. This is expected to reduce the risk of neuropraxia of the marginal mandibular nerve making the submandibular incision a safe approach. (+info)
Anesthetic efficacy of different ropivacaine concentrations for inferior alveolar nerve block.
(43/166)
This study was conducted on 72 American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 patients scheduled for extraction of a mandibular third molar after inferior alveolar nerve block. Each patient was randomly administered one of the following ropivacaine concentrations: 0.75%, 0.5%, 0.375%, or 0.25% (18 patients per group). Onset of block (mean +/- SD) was rapid for both 0.75% (1.4 +/- 0.4 minutes) and 0.5% (1.7 +/- 0.5 minutes) ropivacaine but significantly slower for the 0.375% (4.2 +/- 2.5 minutes) and 0.25% (10.7 +/- 3.0 minutes) concentrations. Tooth extraction was performed successfully with the 0.5% and 0.75% concentrations, and supplemental injections were not required. Second injections, however, were required with 0.375% ropivacaine. Anesthesia was unsuccessful in 13 patients given 0.25% ropivacaine even after 3 injections. The mean durations of soft tissue anesthesia were 3.3 +/- 0.3 hours and 3.0 +/- 0.3 hours for the 0.75% and 0.5% concentrations, but significantly shorter with more dilute concentrations. The duration of analgesia showed a similar pattern, with the 0.75% and 0.5% concentrations producing prolonged analgesia of 6.0 +/- 0.4 hours and 5.6 +/- 0.4 hours. These results indicate that 0.5% and 0.75% concentrations were effective for intraoral nerve blockade, with both a rapid onset and prolonged duration of pain control. (+info)
Percutaneous radio-frequency mandibular nerve rhizotomy guided by CT fluoroscopy.
(44/166)
We describe a new method for radio-frequency mandibular nerve rhizotomy under CT fluoroscopy. A patient with cancer had severe intractable and drug-resistant pain in his left mandibular region. Because he had an anatomic deformity due to cancer invasion and radiation therapy, we planned a mandibular nerve rhizotomy under CT fluoroscopic imaging. The needle was advanced to the mandibular nerve just caudal to the foramen ovale under real-time CT fluoroscopy, avoiding the cancer region. Pain scores of the patient were reduced after the nerve rhizotomy, without any complications. (+info)
The effects of a 2-stage injection technique on inferior alveolar nerve block injection pain.
(45/166)
The purpose of this prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover study was to compare the pain of a traditional 1-stage inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block injection to a 2-stage IAN block technique. Using a crossover design, 51 subjects randomly received, in a single-blinded manner, either the traditional IAN block or the 2-stage IAN block in 2 appointments spaced at least 1 week apart. For the 2-stage injection, the needle was inserted submucosally and 0.4 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine was slowly given over 1 minute. After 5 minutes, the needle was reinserted and advanced to the target site (needle placement), and 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine was deposited. For the traditional IAN block, following needle penetration, the needle was advanced while depositing 0.4 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (needle placement) and then 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine was deposited at the target site. A Heft-Parker visual analogue scale was used to measure the pain of needle insertion, needle placement, and anesthetic solution deposition. There were no significant differences, as analyzed by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, between needle insertion and solution deposition for the 2 techniques in men or women. However, there was significantly less pain with the 2-stage injection for needle placement in women. In conclusion, the 2-stage injection significantly reduced the pain of needle placement for women when compared to the traditional IAN technique. (+info)
Anesthetic efficacy of lidocaine/meperidine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks.
(46/166)
The authors, using a crossover design, randomly administered, in a single-blind manner, inferior alveolar nerve blocks using 36 mg of lidocaine with 18 microg of epinephrine or a combination of 36 mg of lidocaine with 18 microg epinephrine plus 36 mg meperidine with 18 microg of epinephrine, at 2 separate appointments, to 52 subjects. An electric pulp tester was used to test for anesthesia, in 4-minute cycles for 60 minutes, of the molars, premolars, and central and lateral incisors. Anesthesia was considered successful when 2 consecutive 80 readings were obtained within 15 minutes and the 80 reading was continuously sustained for 60 minutes. Using the lidocaine solution, successful pulpal anesthesia ranged from 8 to 58% from the central incisor to the second molar. Using the lidocaine/meperidine solution, successful pulpal anesthesia ranged from 0 to 17%. There was a significant difference (P < .05) between the lidocaine and lidocaine/meperidine solutions for the lateral incisors through the second molars. We conclude that the addition of meperidine to a standard lidocaine solution does not increase the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block. (+info)
Transient loss of power of accommodation in 1 eye following inferior alveolar nerve block: report of 2 cases.
(47/166)
Unintended intravascular injection from inferior alveolar nerve blocks can result in frustrating distant complications affecting such structures as the middle ear and eyes. Possible complications affecting the eyes include blurring of vision, diplopia, mydriasis, palpebral ptosis and amaurosis (temporary or permanent). In this article, we present a complication that has been reported only rarely. Two patients developed transient loss of power of accommodation of the eye resulting in blurred vision after routine inferior alveolar nerve blocks on the ipsilateral side. Clear vision returned within 10-15 minutes after completion of the blocks. The possible explanation for this phenomenon is accidental injection into the neurovascular bundle of local anesthetic agents, which were carried via the blood to the orbital region. This resulted in paralysis of a branch of cranial nerve III, the short ciliary nerves that innervate the ciliary muscle, which controls accommodation. (+info)
A monosynaptic pathway links the vestibular nuclei and masseter muscle motoneurons in rats.
(48/166)
Physiological evidence indicates that vestibular signals modulate the activity of motoneurons innervating the masseter muscle. Recently, experiments using transynaptic retrograde transport of pseudorabies virus provided anatomical evidence that many neurons concentrated in the dorsomedial part of the parvicellular division of the medial vestibular nucleus (MVePC) and the caudal prepositus hypoglossi (PH) provide inputs to motoneurons innervating the lower third of the superficial layer of the masseter muscle. However, it was not clear whether this vestibulo-trigeminal projection was monosynaptic or polysynaptic. The present study sought to determine whether neurons in the MVePC or PH project directly to motoneurons controlling the masseter muscle in rats. For this purpose, an anterograde tracer (biotinylated dextran amine, BDA) was injected into vestibular nuclei (mainly MVePC) or PH and a retrograde tracer (the beta-subunit of cholera toxin, b-CT) was injected into the masseter muscle ipsilateral or contralateral to the BDA injection site. Following injections of BDA into the vestibular nuclei or PH, anterogradely labeled axon terminals were observed bilaterally in the motor trigeminal nucleus (Mo5), particularly in the ventral, medial, and lateral portions of the nucleus; projections to dorsal Mo5 were sparse. In addition, retrogradely labeled motoneurons were located in the ventral and lateral portions of the ipsilateral Mo5. Moreover, anterogradely labeled terminals were observed to be in close proximity to motoneurons in the Mo5 that were retrogradely labeled from b-CT injections into the masseter muscle. This study provides direct evidence that a monosynaptic pathway exists between the MVePC and PH and masseter motoneurons. (+info)