How to draw the skin ellipse for a mastectomy. (9/282)

The size of the skin ellipse for a mastectomy varies between patients and the accurate marking and tailoring of the skin flaps is often learnt by the surgical trainee only with increasing experience. Within the Breast Unit, a mathematical model was calculated to predict the required width of the skin ellipse for a successful mastectomy. Measurements of the straight-line distance from mid-clavicular point to the infra-mammary fold and maximum vertical height of the nipple above the infra-mammary fold were taken with the patient relaxed and supine. A close correlation (r = 0.85) was noted. Further analysis demonstrated a linear relationship between the pre-operative height to which the nipple could be suspended above the infra-mammary fold and the required maximum skin ellipse width (r = 0.87, P < 0.001). This linear relationship is easy to remember and is a useful check to ensure that the skin flaps intended will be just right. This same technique may be applicable to skin ellipses elsewhere.  (+info)

Cellular retinol-binding protein expression and breast cancer. (10/282)

BACKGROUND: The biologic activity of vitamin A depends, in part, on its metabolism to active nuclear receptor ligands, chiefly retinoic acid. The cellular retinol-binding protein (CRBP) binds vitamin A with high affinity and is postulated to regulate its uptake and metabolism. In this report, we analyze the expression of CRBP in normal and malignant breast tissues. METHODS: We evaluated CRBP expression by in situ hybridization in six reduction mammoplasty specimens and 49 human breast carcinoma specimens by use of digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes and in nine cultured mammoplasty specimens by northern or western blot analysis. Statistical significance was evaluated with the chi(2) test or Fisher's exact test if the sample sizes were small. All P values are from two-sided tests. RESULTS: CRBP was expressed in all 15 mammoplasty specimens (normal breast tissue) and in 33 of 35 available specimens of normal tissue adjacent to carcinoma. In contrast, 12 (24%) of 49 carcinoma lesions were uniformly negative for CRBP (P =.023 for comparison with adjacent normal breast tissue). The loss of CRBP expression was as frequent in ductal carcinoma in situ (six [27%] of 22) as in invasive lesions (six [22%] of 27), suggesting that it is a relatively early event in carcinogenesis and not associated with patient age, tumor grade, and expression of steroid receptors or c-Myc. Preliminary experiments did not find an association between CRBP and retinoic acid receptor beta loss, but most (four of five) CRBP-negative tumors were also retinoic acid receptor beta negative. CONCLUSION: CRBP is underexpressed in 24% (95% confidence interval = 12.5%-36.5%) of human breast carcinomas, implying a link between cellular vitamin A homeostasis and breast cancer. We hypothesize that the loss of CRBP restricts the effects of endogenous vitamin A on breast epithelial cells.  (+info)

Ultra-conservative skin-sparing 'keyhole' mastectomy and immediate breast and areola reconstruction. (11/282)

The popularity of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) which preserves the breast skin envelope is increasing, but the risks and benefits of this approach are only beginning to emerge. A technique involving ultra-conservative SSM and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has been evaluated to establish the surgical and oncological sequelae of skin conservation. Between 1994-1998, 67 consecutive patients underwent 71 SSM and expander-assisted immediate latissimus dorsi (LD) breast reconstructions (follow up, 24.1 months; range, 2-52 months). Breast resection, axillary dissection and reconstruction were performed through a 5-6 cm circular peri-areolar 'keyhole' incision. Patients were discharged 6.5 days (range, 5-15 days) after the 3.9 h (range, 3.0-5.5 h) procedure, and expansion was completed by 4.0 months (range, 0-10 months). Local recurrence occurred in 3% of breasts at risk, skin envelope necrosis occurred in 10%, and contralateral surgery was required to achieve symmetry in 14%. SSM and IBR is an oncologically safe, minimal-scar procedure which can be performed by surgeons trained in 'oncoplastic' techniques. It results in low rates of local recurrence and complication, and reduces the need for contralateral surgery.  (+info)

Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. (12/282)

Women diagnosed and surgically treated for regional breast cancer (N = 190) were studied to determine the sexual and body change sequelae for women receiving modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with breast reconstruction in comparison with the sequelae for women receiving breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or MRM without breast reconstruction. The sexuality pattern for women receiving reconstructive surgery was one that was significantly different--with lower rates of activity and fewer signs of sexual responsiveness--than that for women in either of the other groups. Significantly higher levels of traumatic stress and situational distress regarding the breast changes were reported by the women receiving an MRM in contrast to the women treated with BCT. Using a model to predict sexual morbidity, regression analyses revealed that individual differences in sexual self-schema were related to both sexual and body change stress outcomes.  (+info)

Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. (13/282)

BACKGROUND: Tissue-sparing approaches to primary treatment and reconstructive options provide improved cosmetic outcomes for women with breast cancer. Earlier research has suggested that conservation or restitution of the breast might mitigate the negative effects of breast cancer on women's sexual well-being. Few studies, however, have compared psychosocial outcomes of women who underwent lumpectomy, mastectomy alone, or mastectomy with reconstruction. To address some of these issues, we examined women's adaptation to surgery in two large cohorts of breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A total of 1957 breast cancer survivors (1-5 years after diagnosis) from two major metropolitan areas were assessed in two waves with the use of a self-report questionnaire that included a number of standardized measures of health-related quality of life, body image, and physical and sexual functioning. All P: values are two-sided. RESULTS: More than one half (57%) of the women underwent lumpectomy, 26% had mastectomy alone, and 17% had mastectomy with reconstruction. As in earlier studies, women in the mastectomy with reconstruction group were younger than those in the lumpectomy or mastectomy-alone groups (mean ages = 50.3, 55.9, and 58.9, respectively; P: =.0001); they were also more likely to have a partner and to be college educated, affluent, and white. Women in both mastectomy groups complained of more physical symptoms related to their surgeries than women in the lumpectomy group. However, the groups did not differ in emotional, social, or role function. Of interest, women in the mastectomy with reconstruction group were most likely to report that breast cancer had had a negative impact on their sex lives (45.4% versus 29.8% for lumpectomy and 41.3% for mastectomy alone; P: =. 0001). CONCLUSIONS: The psychosocial impact of type of primary surgery for breast cancer occurs largely in areas of body image and feelings of attractiveness, with women receiving lumpectomy experiencing the most positive outcome. Beyond the first year after diagnosis, a woman's quality of life is more likely influenced by her age or exposure to adjuvant therapy than by her breast surgery.  (+info)

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction: current techniques. (14/282)

BACKGROUND: The techniques of breast reconstruction have evolved and matured over the past 25 years. Recent studies have proven the benefit of breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients. METHODS: The authors reviewed the recent literature on the techniques of breast reconstruction and the effects of reconstruction on patients following surgery for breast cancer. The findings in recent studies are correlated with the experience of the authors. RESULTS: A better understanding has been gained regarding surgical techniques of breast reconstruction as well as the proper indications for the various methods. The criteria of patient benefit have been defined by recent long-term studies. CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy has been proven to be a safe and beneficial procedure.  (+info)

New approaches to surgery for breast cancer. (15/282)

The surgical management of breast cancer is rapidly evolving towards less invasive procedures. Alternative biopsy techniques, including fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy, are replacing excisional biopsy as the treatment standard. Breast conservation therapy is now widely used in place of mastectomy, both for small tumors and for larger tumors that have been downstaged through induction chemotherapy. Less invasive procedures for axillary treatment such as lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph-node biopsy are being explored in an effort to avoid the morbidity associated with axillary lymph-node dissection. For women who still prefer or need to receive a mastectomy, immediate breast reconstruction with autologous tissue provides an excellent cosmetic outcome that is oncologically sound. This is especially appealing to high-risk women who opt to have a prophylactic mastectomy. High-risk women are also being offered the option of receiving chemopreventive treatment that may reduce their lifetime risk of cancer by almost 50%. These new, less invasive approaches require the close cooperation of a team of physicians,including surgeons, pathologists, radiologists, and medical and radiation oncologists.  (+info)

Breast augmentation should be on the NHS: a discussion of the ethics of rationing. (16/282)

Every NHS clinician is under constant pressure to match limited resources to increasing demands. The GMC provides guidelines about how we should ration: 'you should always seek to give priority to the treatment of patients solely on the basis of clinical need'. However, this gives no indication as to what is 'need'. Often, in its application, certain assumptions are made about the nature of clinical need. To examine some of these assumptions in more detail, I will argue the case for a treatment that is on the borderline of the remit of NHS care--breast augmentation.  (+info)