After the gold rush? A systematic and critical review of general medical podcasts. (25/238)

 (+info)

Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review. (26/238)

 (+info)

The use of bibliometric indicators to help peer-review assessment. (27/238)

 (+info)

Overinterpretation of clinical applicability in molecular diagnostic research. (28/238)

 (+info)

Sequential result refinement for searching the biomedical literature. (29/238)

 (+info)

The use of confidence intervals in reporting orthopaedic research findings. (30/238)

 (+info)

Impact factor and other standardized measures of journal citation: a perspective. (31/238)

The impact factor of journals has been widely used as glory quotients. Despite its limitations, this citation metric is widely used to reflect scientific merit and standing in one's field. Apart from the impact factor, other bibliometric indicators are also available but are not as popular among decision makers. These indicators are the immediacy index and cited half-life. The impact factor itself is affected by a wide range of sociological and statistical factors. This paper discusses the limitations of the impact factor with suggestions of how it can be used and how it should not be used. It also discusses how other bibliometric indicators can be used to assess the quality of publications.  (+info)

Marketing data: has the rise of impact factor led to the fall of objective language in the scientific article? (32/238)

 (+info)