Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with multiple myeloma treated with bisphosphonates: evidence of increased risk after treatment with zoledronic acid.
(17/164)
Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been associated with the use of pamidronate and zoledronic acid. ONJ was assessed prospectively since July 2003 in 202 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received bisphosphonates since April 1995. Fifteen patients (7.4%) developed ONJ. The median time of exposure to bisphosphonates was 39 months for patients with ONJ compared to 28 months (p=0.048) for patients with no ONJ. The cumulative hazard of developing ONJ was significantly higher in patients treated with zoledronic acid alone than in those treated with pamidronate alone/pamidronate+zoledronic acid/zoledronic acid+ibandronate sequentially (1% at 1 year and 15% at 4 years vs. 0% and 5%, p=0.003). In conclusion, the risk of ONJ is increased with time of exposure and probably with the use of zoledronic acid. (+info)
Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw: cause and effect or a post hoc fallacy?
(18/164)
BACKGROUND: An increasing amount of reports are being published suggesting a relationship between the use of bisphosphonates (BPs) and the development of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). We reviewed the currently available evidence and explore the potential mechanisms of action based on the known effects of the concerned BP. DESIGN: The MEDLine, Current Contents and Science Citation Index Expanded databases were queried and the results augmented by analyzing cited references and recent congress proceedings. RESULTS: 22 papers were included detailing 225 patients, all based on retrospective chart review without control groups. The prevalence of ONJ was estimated at 1.5%. The involved BPs were pamidronate, zoledronic acid, alendronate and risedronate, all potent nitrogen-containing agents. The most common symptom was pain (81.7%), although 12.2% of cases were asymptomatic. In 69.3% of patients ONJ was preceded by a dental extraction. At the time of diagnosis, 74.5% of patients were receiving chemotherapy and in 38.2% of cases corticosteroids were administered. Although various conservative and surgical treatment modalities were reported, residual sites of ONJ persisted in 72.5% of cases. CONCLUSION: Although not enough evidence is available to prove a causal link, it seems that under specific circumstances local defenses can become overwhelmed resulting in ONJ. (+info)
Bisphosphonates and oral pathology I. General and preventive aspects.
(19/164)
Bisphosphonates constitute a group of drugs capable of modulating bone turnover, and reduce its remodelling when an excessive resorption occurs. This is why they are indicated in a large group of bone diseases like postmenopausal osteoporosis or osteolysis associated with breast cancer or multiple myeloma. Over the last years and due to their extensive use, many cases of complications associated with their use have been published. Among the most important possible adverse effects are the oral ones, with the appearance of ulcerations and, especially, osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with this therapy. In this paper, we have analyzed the general characteristics of these drugs and their mechanisms of action as well as the described adverse effects, especially oral and maxillofacial has been made special reference regarding the prevention of osteonecrosis of the jaws, heightened by cases described in medical and odontological literature. The preventive protocol backs up the fundamental role of the odontologist in the effective prevention of this process before, during and after the treatment. (+info)
Bisphosphonates and jaw osteonecrosis in patients with advanced breast cancer.
(20/164)
BACKGROUND: In recent years, several cases of mandibular necrosis associated with long-term use of bisphosphonates have been reported. The estimated incidence varies from 1% to 4.6%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational study with the aim of determining the incidence of jaw osteonecrosis in advanced breast cancer patients with bone metastases under bisphosphonate treatment and to identify subjects at higher risk of developing this complication evaluating preclinical signs. We considered two groups of patients. All the patients complaining of odontostomatological symptoms underwent maxillary CT scan and maxillo-surgeon clinical examination. Asymptomatic patients were asked to perform a standard orthopantomography (OPT). RESULTS: From February 2005 to October 2005, we observed five patients with jaw bone necrosis (6%). Diagnosis was radiological and clinical. In two patients a confirmatory biopsy was performed. In the same time interval, OPTs were collected from 76 asymptomatic patients. Three OPTs revealed radiological features of suspicious mandibular necrosis. Maxillary CT scan confirmed the presence of an osteolityc area with signs of periosteal reaction. All the three patients were referred to maxillo-surgeon and two out of three patients underwent mandibular biopsy, but histopathological results were not conclusive. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the incidence of jaw bone necrosis in breast cancer patients seems to be higher than in other reports (6%). Radiological features of suspicious jaw necrosis were observed in three asymptomatic patients. We do not know how these findings should be considered. Anyway, standard OPT is a simple procedure, and may allow identification of periodontal conditions that in some way can predispose to the development of this uncommon event. (+info)
Clinical experiences with bisphopsphonate induced osteochemonecrosis of the jaws.
(21/164)
QUESTION: Bisphosphonates are frequently used drugs in the adjuvant therapy of bone metastases and tumour-induced hypercalcaemia, but also for osteoporosis or Pagets disease. Several publications within the last three years considered osteonecrosis of the jaws to be connected with bisphosphonate therapy. Until today possible treatment strategies contain antibiotics, hyperbaric therapy and operative treatment. The tendency of healing however seems to be extremely poor. All clinicians should be aware of this new kind of side effect of bisphosphonate therapy. METHODS: 14 patients with this new kind of osteonecrosis were admitted to the department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery of the University Hospital of Zurich. 8 men and 6 women all received bisphosphonates for cancer therapy. A complete analysis of patients' data was performed. RESULTS: Of 14 patients in 7 the underlying disease disease was multiple myeloma. In one patient it was prostate cancer and in all female patients it was breast cancer. All of them had prior dental treatment and showed inflammatory signs and bacterial colonisation with localisation in the upper or lower jaw or in both. CONCLUSION: The infectious part of the bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis (ONJ) is considered to be more important than thought before. We presume that antimicrobial treatment is of utmost importance in the treatment of this kind of osteonecrosis. Patients with current or previous bisphosphonate therapy should be treated multidisciplinary to assure ideal prevention and treatment. (+info)
Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw.
(22/164)
Recently an association between bisphosphonate use and a rare dental condition termed 'osteonecrosis of the jaw' (ONJ) has been reported. Patients with osteoporosis and Paget disease who take bisphosphonates have a significantly reduced risk of fracture and other skeletal complications. This represents significant health benefits, against which the small risk of ONJ needs to be considered. In patients with bone malignancy, the risk of ONJ needs to be balanced against the benefit of therapy on the underlying malignancy. There are still many uncertainties about this condition. This position paper seeks to summarise what is currently known about ONJ to provide information to medical practitioners and dental practitioners. (+info)
Bisphosphonates and oral pathology II. Osteonecrosis of the jaws: review of the literature before 2005.
(23/164)
Bisphosphonates are bone-turnover modulating drugs which are used in the management of a number of bone diseases ranging from osteoporosis to neoplasic pathology-associated osteolysis. In the last years a number of cases of osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with these drugs have been reported. In this review we analyze the cases published in the literature indexed from 2003 to December 2005. During this period 246 cases were reported, being more frequently associated with women in the sixth decade of life. More frequently associated bisphosphonates were the nitrogenated bisphosphonates (pamidronate, zolendronic acid) and the most common oral antecedent was a dental extraction. Nevertheless more than 25% of the cases were spontaneous. The most frequent site was the mandible and most of the cases presented clinical evidence of bone exposure and pain. Different treatments have been proposed with different antibiotic therapies with or without surgery, showing in general terms an uncertain prognosis with low healing rates. (+info)
Assessment of renal toxicity and osteonecrosis of the jaws in patients receiving zoledronic acid for bone metastasis.
(24/164)
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates (BP) decrease the incidence of skeletal related events among cancer patients with bone metastases from solid tumors and multiple myeloma. Renal safety and osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) are two major concerns of toxicity. Information about safety of using BP beyond 2 years is scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients receiving zoledronic acid (ZA) at the time of the study were reviewed. Serum creatinine levels (SCL) were collected at three different moments: before the start of BP (baseline), at the time of analysis (final), and the highest SCL during the treatment (highest). Oral examination was carried out in every patient. Separated analysis was made for patients on BP for >2 years. Concomitant risk factors for both renal toxicity and ONJ were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included. Median time of BP was 22 months, with 22 patients receiving BP for >2 years. Median baseline and final values of SCL were 0.71 mg/dl and 0.70 mg/dl, respectively (P = 0.121). Median highest SCL during treatment was 0.82 mg/dl (P <0.0001). A notable increase in the SCL was observed in six of the 67 patients (9%), four of them receiving BP for >2 years (P = 0.085). ONJ was also diagnosed in six patients, four of them in the group of prolonged BP treatment. CONCLUSION: ZA showed to be safe with a low rate of reversible renal toxicity. Patients receiving BP should be monitored carefully for renal toxicity and ONJ, especially those with exposure to BP beyond 2 years. (+info)