Predictors of disability pension in long-term sickness absence: results from a population-based and prospective study in Norway 1994-1999. (25/132)

BACKGROUND: While several socio-demographic predictors of disability pension (DP) have been identified, less is known about the importance of the medical aspects. METHODS: A representative sample of Norwegian long-term sickness absentees, 2043 women and 1585 men, with detailed diagnostic information based on the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) was followed up for 5 years. The date of granting DP was obtained from the Norwegian DP-register and used as the dependent variable in Cox multivariate regression analysis. Medical and socio-demographic factors were entered as explanatory variables. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 5 year risk of DP were 22.9% for the full sample, 22.5% for men and 23.3% for the women. Men on sick leave for mental health disorders had an increased disability risk. Except for pregnancy-related cases, which carried a very low risk for future DP, there was no significant difference between the main diagnostic groups among women. Previous sickness absence increased the disability risk but was significant only for total absence above 20 weeks in the 4 years preceding inclusion. Age was the strongest predictor of future DP. Increasing income decreased the risk, bur not linearly. Unemployment status in the year preceding inclusion increased disability risk for women, but not for men. Among cases with musculoskeletal disorders (54.5% of the sample), subgroups with different disability risks were identified in Cox' regression analysis, with a gender-specific pattern. CONCLUSION: In addition to previously known socio-demographic predictors, medical variables were important in identifying sickness absentees with an increased risk of DP.  (+info)

The importance of social characteristics of communities for the medically based disability pension. (26/132)

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to look for any possible contextual effect of deprivation at municipality level on the risk of being granted the medically based disability pension, controlled for compositional effects due to spatial concentration of people with a high risk of disability. METHODS: The material consists of the residentiary part of a total Norwegian county population aged 20-54 years without disability pension at baseline, n=40,083. This study was performed as a 10-year follow-up study. The relative risk of being granted a disability pension was estimated by logistic regression analyses as odds ratios (OR) between people living in different municipalities according to a municipality deprivation index at three levels, adjusted for individual factors. RESULTS: The OR of disability pension was 1.36 (1.22, 1.51) for people residing in intermediate deprived municipalities and 1.48 (1.31, 1.67) for people residing in the most deprived municipalities compared to the most affluent municipalities, adjusted for gender and age. After adjustment for individual risk factors the OR was 1.26 (1.12, 1.41) and 1.18 (1.04, 1.35) respectively. Analyses stratified by gender showed that the increased risk of receiving a disability pension for men in the most deprived municipalities was explained by individual factors alone. CONCLUSION: Relative municipality deprivation seems to account for an increase in the incidence of disability pension. This effect contributes to marginalization of people living in less affluent areas out of employment and thus to widening socioeconomic inequalities in the population.  (+info)

Revised medical criteria for evaluating malignant neoplastic diseases. Final rules. (27/132)

We are revising the criteria in the Listing of Impairments (the listings) that we use to evaluate claims involving malignant neoplastic diseases. We apply these criteria when you claim benefits based on disability under title II and title XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act). The revisions reflect advances in medical knowledge, treatment, and methods of evaluating malignant neoplastic diseases.  (+info)

Nonpayment of benefits when the Social Security Administration receives notice that an insured person is departed or removed from the United States. Final rule. (28/132)

To implement part of the Social Security Protection Act of 2004 (SSPA), we are revising our regulations that prohibit payment of monthly benefits and the lump sum death payment under title II of the Social Security Act (the Act) when SSA receives notice that an insured person is deported or removed from the United States under certain provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).  (+info)

Extension of the expiration date for several body system listings. Final rule. (29/132)

We use the Listing of Impairments (the listings) at the third step of the sequential evaluation process when we evaluate your claim for benefits based on disability under title II and title XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act). This final rule extends until July 3, 2006, the date on which listings for four body systems will no longer be effective and extends until July 2, 2007, the date on which the listings for eight body systems will no longer be effective. Other than extending the date during which the listings will be effective, we have made no revisions to the listings; they remain the same as they now appear in the Code of Federal Regulations. This extension will ensure that we continue to have the medical evaluation criteria in the listings to adjudicate disability claims in these body systems at step three of the sequential evaluation process.  (+info)

Brief report: needlestick injury and inadequate post-exposure practice in medical students. (30/132)

BACKGROUND: Medical students are at a particularly high risk for needlestick injury and its consequences because of their relative inexperience and lack of disability insurance. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of needlestick injury and the use of post-exposure prophylaxis among medical students. DESIGN: Internet-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: The 2003 graduating medical school class at the University of Toronto. MEASUREMENTS: Number of needlestick injuries, circumstances surrounding those incidents, and post-exposure actions. RESULTS: The response rate was 88% (157/178). Over one third (55/157) of respondents suffered at least 1 needlestick injury. In more than half the high-risk injuries, the students continued working and did not seek medical advice. Six students who suffered a needlestick injury began prophylactic human immunodeficiency virus medications. Of those students who suffered an injury, 15% had purchased disability insurance prior to the incident. CONCLUSIONS: Poor use of post-exposure procedures and a lack of disability insurance leave medical students at high risk for career and life-altering consequences from a needlestick injury.  (+info)

Continuation of benefit payments to certain individuals who are participating in a program of vocational rehabilitation services, employment services, or other support services. Final rule. (31/132)

We are publishing final rules that amend the rules for the continuation of disability benefit payments under titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act) to certain individuals who recover medically while participating in an appropriate vocational rehabilitation (VR) program with a State vocational rehabilitation agency. We are amending these rules to conform with statutory amendments that extend eligibility for these continued benefit payments to certain individuals who recover medically while participating in an appropriate program of services. These include individuals participating in the Ticket to Work and Self-Sufficiency Program or another program of vocational rehabilitation services, employment services, or other support services approved by the Commissioner of Social Security. We are also extending eligibility for these continued benefit payments to students age 18 through 21 who recover medically, or whose disability is determined to have ended as a result of an age-18 redetermination, while participating in an individualized education program developed under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act with an appropriate provider of services. Providers of services we may approve include a public or private organization with expertise in the delivery or coordination of vocational rehabilitation services, employment services, or other support services; or a public, private or parochial school that provides or coordinates a program of vocational rehabilitation services, employment services, or other support services carried out under an individualized program or plan.  (+info)

Revised medical criteria for evaluating genitourinary impairments. Final rules. (32/132)

We are revising the criteria in the Listing of Impairments (the listings) that we use to evaluate claims involving genitourinary impairments. We apply these criteria when you claim benefits based on disability under title II and title XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act). The revisions reflect advances in medical knowledge, treatment, and methods of evaluating genitourinary impairments.  (+info)