Acetabuloplasty in the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip.
(17/505)
The results in 102 acetabuloplasties have been assessed in eighty-six patients, with a minimum follow-up of five years. Clinical and radiological assessment was carried out according to a score system very similar to that used in previous studies, and the results were expressed as excellent, good, fair and poor according to the score obtained. Any hip requiring further stabilising procedures was automatically grouped as a failure. Subtrochanteric femoral ostestomy was used when femoral anteversion was excessive. The results revealed that 73 per cent of the hips were satifactory (excellent or good) overall, but that a steady deterioration was evident when the five- and fifteen-year groups were compared. Few of the hips were regarded as normal on radiological grounds. Homologous bone bank rib was found to be the most satisfactory graft material. Coxa magna was the most common abnormality that was consistent with a good or excellent result. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head was found in only six hips; it was more commonly present in patients subjected to previous operation. Concentric reduction of the femoral head is essential if acetabuloplasty is to maintain stability of the hip. (+info)
Bone grafting in cementless total hip replacement for congenital dysplasia of the hip.
(18/505)
We reviewed 27 cementless primary total hip replacements in patients with osteoarthrosis secondary to congenital dysplasia of the hip. Autogenous bone grafting was used as augmentation. On average the follow-up period was 9 years. Two hips were revised and three acetabular components were considered loose. In hips with loose cups the average graft coverage was significantly greater than in stable hips. The use of a cementless acetabular component is encouraging for reconstruction, although extensive grafting should be avoided. Our study suggests that cementless reconstruction in dysplastic hips yields a satisfactory outcome. (+info)
Patient follow up screening evaluations. Examples with regard to congenital hip dislocation and congenital heart disease.
(19/505)
OBJECTIVE: To discuss the merits of the patient follow up study design for the evaluation of some specific mass screening programmes. DESIGN: Theoretical evaluation illustrated by two examples. SETTING: Department of Public Health Erasmus University Rotterdam. MAIN RESULTS: The gold standard for evaluation of favourable effects of screening is the randomised controlled trial (RCT). Application of an RCT, however, is often not feasible, in which cases observational studies will have to be relied on. The case-control study design is generally considered to be second best. In some situations, however, a patient follow up study design may be applicable and may have some major advantages. The use of the patient follow up design for screening evaluation will often be very problematic or even unacceptable, particularly as far as screening for cancer is concerned. The most important objections are resulting from lead time bias, length bias, selection bias and over-treatment bias. For the evaluation of screening for congenital heart disease and congenital hip dislocation in Dutch child health care, however, these objections may relatively simply be overcome. Lead time bias will be of little importance, as the ages of onset of these disorders are fixed, namely at birth, and their ultimate outcomes may be expected within relatively short time. Length bias may largely be avoided by correction for severity of the disorder, which can be adequately assessed by modern diagnostic procedures. Selection bias is generally hard to rule out, but in these cases it probably plays a minor part. Over-treatment can be avoided by the policy of "watchful waiting", which in these disorders can be applied with little risk for fatal outcomes. In principle bias might be avoided more successfully in a case-control screening evaluation than in a patient follow up study. However, the patient follow up study is for both screening programmes discussed here the more feasible design and can provide more supplementary information. The results of two example studies suggest that both screenings probably yield considerable benefits CONCLUSION: Under a number of specific conditions a patient follow up study is an efficient alternative to more customary designs for screening evaluation. (+info)
Acetabular development in congenital dislocation of the hip. With special reference to the indications for acetabuloplasty and pelvic or femoral realignment osteotomy.
(20/505)
This investigation examined the validity of the hypothesis that the acetabulum in congenital dislocation of the hip will develop satisfactorily provided accurate congruous and concentric reduction is obtained as early as possible, and is maintained throughout growth. Seventy-two patients with eighty-five hips were studied. The children were more than one year old on admission and over ten years at the time of review. Acetabular development was assessed radiologically by measurement of the acetabular angle. Angles of less than 21 degrees were regarded as normal, and more than 21 degrees as indicating some failure of development. Satisfactory acetabular development occurred in 80 per cent (angles 24 degrees or below), and was unsatisfactory in 20 per cent (angles above 24 degrees). If three errors in management, namely failure to obtain congruity, failure to maintain congruity and ischaemic necrosis secondary to manipulative reductions, are excluded from the analysis, it is found that 95 per cent of acetabula develop satisfactorily. The outcome is largely independent of the age on admission up to four years old, and of bilateral involvement. It is concluded that acetabuloplasty should not be necessary if the patient is admitted under the age of four or congruity is obtained in the functional position under four and a half years. (+info)
Ultrasound screening of the neonatal hip: cost-benefit analysis.
(21/505)
AIM: To explore the economic justification for introducing ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in Croatia. METHODS: The analysis was based on the two formulas: that cost-benefit equals benefit/cost, and that net benefit equals benefit minus cost. Screening costs were expressed as a sum of training costs and fee for ultrasound screening of neonates. The neonatologists' working hours and utilization of ultrasound instruments were expressed by multiplying the number of infants born per year in Croatia (N = 47,792) with the standard time needed for one examination and then dividing the product by the number of employed neonatologists (N = 54) and number of ultrasound instruments (N = 58). The benefit was expressed as a late case treatment costs and screening costs ratio. Savings, which would have resulted from the reduction in expected treatment costs of patients with hip problems at later age, represent the indirect benefit. RESULTS: Total hip screening costs would have amounted to US$329,537.80, including the training costs of US$31,035.90. On the average, a neonatologist would spend 71.4 hours screening per year, whereas the instrument utilization would be 64.7 hours. An ultrasound-screening program would save annually US$195,336.50, compared with the existing diagnostic approach. The treatment costs without ultrasound screening were 1.6 times higher than the screening costs. Hospital treatment costs for 165 patients needing endoprosthesis would cover the total screening program in the whole country. CONCLUSION: It is economically justified to introduce ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in neonates in Croatia, a country with transitional and developing economy. (+info)
Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99.
(22/505)
We studied the rates of revision for 53,698 primary total hip replacements (THRs) in nine different groups of disease. Factors which have previously been shown to be associated with increased risk of revision, such as male gender, young age, or certain types of uncemented prosthesis, showed important differences between the diagnostic groups. Without adjustment for these factors we observed an increased risk of revision in patients with paediatric hip diseases and in a small heterogeneous 'other' group, compared with patients with primary osteoarthritis. Most differences were reduced or disappeared when an adjustment for the prognostic factors was made. After adjustment, an increased relative risk (RR) of revision compared with primary osteoarthritis was seen in hips with complications after fracture of the femoral neck (RR = 1.3, p = 0.0005), in hips with congenital dislocation (RR = 1.3, p = 0.03), and in the heterogenous 'other' group. The analyses were also undertaken in a more homogenous subgroup of 16,217 patients which had a Charnley prosthesis implanted with high-viscosity cement. The only difference in this group was an increased risk for revision in patients who had undergone THR for complications after fracture of the femoral neck (RR = 1.5, p = 0.0005). THR for diagnoses seen mainly among young patients had a good prognosis, but they had more often received inferior uncemented implants. If a cemented Charnley prosthesis is used, the type of disease leading to THR seems in most cases to have only a minor influence on the survival of the prosthesis. (+info)
The mechanism of genetic predisposition in congenital dislocation of the hip.
(23/505)
The important role of polygenic acetabular configuration and monogenic joint laxity has again been proved in the aetiology of congenital dislocation of the hip. According to the findings reported these two genetic predispositions seem to be unrelated. The time of diagnosis in accetabular dysplasia type and joint laxity type did not differ, thus the neonatal and late-diagnosed cases do not seem to be two clear-cut entities. (+info)
Two family studies on congenital dislocation of the hip after early orthopaedic screening Hungary.
(24/505)
Two family studies involving 1767 and 379 index patients in Budapest and Bekes county, respectively, were undertaken to examine the effect of early orthopaedic screening on the recurrence risk of congenital dislocation of the hip. About 14%, 2.1-2.3%,1.2-1.4%, and 4.7-6% of sibs, parents, uncles and aunts, and cousins, respectively, had congenital dislocation of the hip in these two surveys. The recurrence risks were eight-fold and four-fold higher in brothers and sisters, four times higher in parents, 2.5-fold higher in uncles and aunts, and 2.0-2.5 times higher in cousins, respectively, than in the general population. This family pattern seems to fit best with a model of polygenic-multifactorial inheritance. In earlier studies higher recurrence risks were found. These may be explained by the change of diagnosis due to early orthopaedic screening which may increase the possibility of over diagnosis and the treatment of mild cases which previously recovered spontaneously. (+info)