Quality of epilepsy treatment and services: the views of women with epilepsy.
(17/1744)
In three focus group discussions, 18 women with epilepsy were asked about their experiences of and satisfaction with care and treatment at both primary and secondary care, and for views on how epilepsy services might be improved. A fourth focus group was held with six epilepsy nurse specialists to seek their opinions on the service needs of women with epilepsy. Criticisms of services identified by both the women and nurses typically concerned four areas of care; organisation of services, technical competence, information provision and interpersonal skills, and health outcomes. Specific criticisms in each area included: lack of continuity of care and shared care; poor provision of information about side-effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and their effect on the contraceptive pill; and apparently haphazard prescribing of AEDs with consequent serious side-effects. Recommendations for improvements in services and treatment for people with epilepsy are suggested. (+info)
The mortality component of health status indexes.
(18/1744)
The mortality component of contemporary health indexes is discussed. Since these indexes reduce to mortality indexes when only life and death states enter the analysis, they share the conceptual weaknesses of mortality indexes. Also, they do not incorporate consumption variables explicity and therefore provide no structure for relating health status and living standard. Some attention is devoted to methodological problems of assessing survival probabilities, either from survey or experimental data or from beliefs of experts or individuals who are affected directly. The final section deals with individual preferences for survival lotteries. Conceptual weaknesses of common indexes are discussed, several canonical models for survival preferences are presented, the interdependence of individual utilities is discussed, and methods for eliciting individual survival preferences are considered, along with some illustrative empirical results. (+info)
Responding to out-of-hours demand: the extent and nature of urgent need.
(19/1744)
BACKGROUND: Little research has been undertaken concerning GPs' perceptions about urgent or 'appropriate' out-of-hours demand. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to measure GPs' perceptions about patients' need for urgent out-of-hours general medical help according to indicators of physical, psychological/emotional and social need, and the medical necessity of a home visit. METHODS: Twenty-five practices participated in an audit and research study whereby GPs completed an audit form for all contacts during November/December 1995 and February/March 1996. Each contact was assessed according to the indicators of urgent need and GPs commented on reasons for making such assessments. RESULTS: Audit forms were completed on 1862 patients, and GPs considered that 66.6% (1027) of contacts had either a physically, psychologically/emotionally or socially urgent need for help and were uncertain about a further 10.7% (165). Over half (53.0%) were considered to have an urgent physical need, almost one-third (31.0%) to have an urgent psychological/emotional need and 10.1% (119) to have an urgent social need for help. Over half (55.2%) of visits were considered to be medically necessary, the majority of which (89.9%) were assessed as having an urgent physical need for help. CONCLUSIONS: The findings raise questions about the strategic direction of newer forms of service delivery (GP Co-operatives) and suggest the need for further research to inform the strategic reduction in home visiting, particularly in inner-city areas where many residents have little access to transport out-of-hours to enable them to attend a primary care centre. GP co-operatives are, however, well placed to improve interagency working and cross-referral to other health and social service personnel, and respond more 'appropriately' to some psychological/emotional and social problems. (+info)
Do postal questionnaires change GPs' workload and referral patterns?
(20/1744)
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine changes in workload in general practice associated with the postal administration of a health needs questionnaire. METHOD: We carried out controlled before-and-after intervention study of the effects of delivering a postal questionnaire to assess needs for care for patients with arthropathies of the hip and knee, groin hernia and varicose veins, and to assess health service utilization, general health status and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The setting was a seven-partner, fundholding, group practice in Avon. The subjects were patients registered with an NHS group practice situated in Backwell and Nailsea, Avon. The outcome measures were the frequency of consultation, home visits and night visits, reasons for consultation, referral to specialist agencies and patterns of prescribing. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the study and control group in the year before and the year after the postal administration of the questionnaire with respect to changes in overall frequency of consultation, frequency of referral (including type of referral) and frequency of prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In the study group there was a significant (P<0.05) reduction in the number of daytime home visits and prescriptions written for analgesics. Analysis of the records of those who had received a medical examination, in addition to a postal questionnaire, showed that there was no significant difference between the study and control group with respect to frequency of consultation, referral to outside agencies or items prescribed. CONCLUSION: Administration of a health needs questionnaire to patients registered with this general practice was not associated with an increase in consultation frequency or referral, or a change in prescribing patterns. No plausible explanation could be identified for the significant reduction in the number of home visits and prescriptions written for analgesics. It was concluded that these results were a statistical artefact. On the basis of the evidence from this study, GPs can be reassured that the administration of health needs questionnaires of the type used in this study will not result in any increase in workload or costs of care incurred by increased referrals to outside agencies or increased prescribing. (+info)
Empiric investigation on direct costs-of-illness and healthcare utilization of Medicaid patients with diabetes mellitus.
(21/1744)
OBJECTIVE: To determine total direct costs-of-illness and to study the influence of different factors affecting these costs. In addition, we examined each type of service (e.g., hospitalization, outpatient care, prescription drugs, physician encounters, and laboratory tests) for diabetic Medicaid patients to provide evidence about the relationship between diabetic patients' healthcare utilization and their related predictors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 7931 patients with diabetes who were 65 years or younger in the Alabama Medicaid program from 1992 to 1995 were studied. Using a relational database created from Medicaid claims, multiple regression and canonical correlation methods were used to analyze the patients' direct costs-of-illness, including the costs associated with each healthcare service used by each patient. RESULTS: The costs of hospitalization, outpatient care, prescription drugs, and physician encounters were the four largest components of the direct costs-of-illness for diabetic Medicaid patients, comprising 29.9%, 21.3%, 28.2%, and 14.3%, respectively. After controlling for other factors in an empiric model, the direct costs-of-illness for a patient with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was $5160 higher than for a patient with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus during the 3-year study. The cost for a patient with renal dysfunction was $59,920 higher than for other diabetic patients. Each increase in the number of different prescribing physicians per patient was associated with a cost increase of $450. Each additional comorbidity increased the cost by $735 per patient. The cost for a male patient was $2140 higher than that for a female patient, and the cost for a white patient was $1330 higher than that for a non-white patient. For a patient who relied on diet to control diabetes, there were $2750 less in costs compared with other patients during the study period. More than 20% of the variability in patients' healthcare utilization costs was explained by the set of predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: The direct costs-of-illness and healthcare utilization for Medicaid diabetic patients were significantly accounted for by the number of comorbidities, the number of different physicians visited, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and complications (especially renal dysfunction). Patients who relied on dietary therapy and exercise to control their diabetes had lower healthcare costs and utilization than other patients. A significant amount of healthcare costs and utilization might be controlled or reduced if diabetes disease management can successfully be aimed at preventing diabetic complications, controlling comorbidities, and minimizing the number of different physicians visited. (+info)
Utilization of health care resources by obese Canadians.
(22/1744)
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity in Canada has been increasing in recent years. Using data from the National Population Health Survey (NPHS), the authors determined the prevalence of obesity among Canadians, the associated comorbidities and the patterns of resource utilization by obese people. METHODS: The NPHS, a cross-sectional survey conducted in 1994, was administered to 17,626 Canadians 12 years of age or older who were not long-term residents of hospitals or long-term care facilities and were not residing on First Nations reserves or Canadian Armed Forces bases, or in the Yukon and Northwest Territories. For the authors' analysis, the study population consisted of 12,318 Canadians aged 20-64 years who were not pregnant and for whom the body mass index (BMI) had been calculated. The prevalence of comorbidities, health status index scores, self-esteem, self-rated health, restriction of activity, health care resource utilization (physician visits, disability days, admissions to hospital and medication use) were determined for obese people (BMI of 27 or greater) and nonobese people. RESULTS: The NPHS data revealed that 35.2% of men and 25.8% of women in Canada were obese in 1994. Obese respondents were more likely than nonobese respondents to suffer from stress (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.31), activity restrictions (adjusted OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.26-1.54) and a number of chronic comorbidities. Obese respondents were also more likely to consult with physicians (adjusted OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.22-1.43), be prescribed a number of medications and to require excess disability days (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.36). INTERPRETATION: Obesity represents a substantial burden on the health of Canadians and on Canada's health care resources. (+info)
Impact of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions on the health-care system--United States, 1997.
(23/1744)
Arthritis and other rheumatic conditions are the leading cause of disability in the United States, affecting approximately 43 million persons and costing $65 billion in 1992. By 2020, these numbers will increase as the population ages. This report examines several measures of the impact of arthritis on the U.S. health-care system; the findings indicate that arthritis and other rheumatic conditions have a large impact on hospitalizations, ambulatory-care visits, and home health care, with women accounting for most of this impact and all persons aged <65 years accounting for a substantial portion. (+info)
Reduced utilization and cost of primary care clinic visits resulting from self-care education for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
(24/1744)
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which the cost of an effective self-care intervention for primary care patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) was offset by savings resulting from reduced utilization of ambulatory medical services. METHODS: In an attention-controlled clinical trial, 211 patients with knee OA from the general medicine clinic of a municipal hospital were assigned arbitrarily to conditions of self-care education (group E) or attention control (group AC). Group E (n = 105) received individualized instruction and followup emphasizing nonpharmacologic management of joint pain. Group AC (n = 106) received a standard public education presentation and attention-controlling followup. A comprehensive clinical database provided data concerning utilization and cost of health services during the following year. RESULTS: Only 25 subjects (12%) were lost to followup. The 94 subjects remaining in group E made 528 primary care visits during the year following intervention, compared with 616 visits by the 92 patients remaining in group AC (median visits 5 versus 6, respectively; P < 0.05). Fewer visits translated directly into reduced clinic costs in group E, relative to controls (median costs [1996 dollars] $229 versus $305, respectively; P < 0.05). However, self-care education had no significant effects on utilization and costs of outpatient pharmacy, laboratory, or radiology services over the ensuing year. The cost per patient to deliver the self-care intervention was estimated to be $58.70. CONCLUSION: Eighty percent of the cost of delivering effective self-care education to the knee OA patients in this study was offset within 1 year by the reduced frequency and costs of primary care visits. For >50% of patients receiving the intervention, the savings associated with fewer primary care visits exceeded the cost of self-care education. (+info)