The uninsured, the working uninsured, and the public.
(25/868)
Recent opinion surveys show a high level of public support for the current employer-based health insurance system. Many Americans are not aware that this system is endangered or that the number of uninsured persons is growing. The public appears to favor a two-track system for the working uninsured--strengthening the existing employer-based system and developing a parallel system for those without employer coverage. (+info)
Ethical considerations in international HIV vaccine trials: summary of a consultative process conducted by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS).
(26/868)
Research that is initiated, designed or funded by sponsor agencies based in countries with relatively high social and economic development, and conducted in countries that are relatively less developed, gives rise to many important ethical challenges. Although clinical trials of HIV vaccines began ten years ago in the US and Europe, an increasing number of trials are now being conducted or planned in other countries, including several that are considered "developing" countries. Safeguarding the rights and welfare of individuals participating as research subjects in developing countries is a priority. In September, 1997, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) embarked on a process of international consultation; its purpose was further to define the important ethical issues and to formulate guidance that might facilitate the ethical design and conduct of HIV vaccine trials in international contexts. This paper summarises the major outcomes of the UNAIDS consultative process. (+info)
A critical review of 'a critical review': the methodology of the 1993 World Development Report, 'Investing in Health'.
(27/868)
Since its publication in 1993, the World Bank's World Development Report, Investing in Health, has been subjected to much criticism, particularly over the way it proposes to measure the health losses summarized in the concept of the 'burden of disease', and to establish priorities for health interventions according to the reduction in mortality and disability they could produce and what they would cost. Some of these criticisms are justified, and are recognized by the WDR; others arise from misunderstanding or misapplication of the concepts. Sifting these criticisms to arrive at a better understanding requires looking at what kind of analysis is involved, how the subjective elements of the exercise were determined, and how they can be used to choose which interventions deserve priority when a country cannot meet all its citizens' health needs. (+info)
Prioritising referrals to a community mental health team.
(28/868)
BACKGROUND: Current national policies encourage prioritisation of people with severe mental illness (SMI) as well as the development of a primary care-led National Health Service. Where resources for mental health are limited, there is a potential conflict between the needs of people with SMI and the much more common depressive and anxiety disorders that form the bulk of the mental health workload in primary care. AIM: To describe the re-organisation of a community mental health team in order to prioritise people with SMI. METHOD: The number and type of referrals received in the 12 months before and after re-organisation were compared, and general practitioners' (GP) views on the changes sought. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in GP referrals of patients with less severe disorders in the second year. In both years the proportion of patients with a possible psychotic diagnosis or risk of self-harm was much higher among referrals from within the psychiatry department (92% of referrals) than among GP referrals (20% of referrals). Using data from a postal survey, 46% of referring GPs reported a significant improvement in the service provided to patients with SMI, but 34% reported a deterioration in services for other patient groups. GPs were more likely to be satisfied with the service for people with SMI than with the service for other patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in the service provided for those with SMI can be achieved, but this may be at the expense of services for other patient groups. Primary care groups will need to consider this potential conflict in setting priorities for mental health. (+info)
Nutrition and the health care agenda: a primary care perspective.
(29/868)
The current climate of prioritizing in the NHS brings into focus the debate surrounding efficient and effective management of conditions associated with the modern lifestyle. In any such debate, nutrition should be considered a primary issue as there is now international consensus regarding the optimum diet for the prevention of both coronary heart disease and cancer. Over recent years, government has stated that primary care is in an ideal setting to provide nutrition education to the public. However, we present the case that there currently is a mismatch between the attitude of the public, who appear willing to accept dietary advice from primary care professionals, and the reluctance on behalf of these professionals to fulfil this role. Dissatisfaction with the quality of nutrition education received by those working in primary care is often cited as a barrier to providing dietary advice to patients. With that in mind, we go on to discuss educational strategies that may motivate primary care staff to increase their involvement in providing dietary advice for their patients. The challenge to those involved in the delivery of nutrition training to primary care professionals is to convince them that dietary intervention is worthwhile and that they can make a positive contribution to dietary change within the current organization of primary care. Increasing motivation is an essential outcome of such training, along with providing the skills and knowledge to fulfil this role. The contribution which diet could make is significant and, in this time of questioning priorities, the role of nutrition needs to be put firmly on the health care agenda. (+info)
Setting health priorities in a Swiss canton: what do different methods tell us?
(30/868)
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Despite excellent mortality indicators, there is clear evidence that the health status of the population of Geneva could be improved if more attention and resources were devoted to prevention strategies. To identify a set of robust health priorities an original approach was used triangulating results between three methods. METHODS: The study calculated potential years of life lost, disability adjusted years of life lost, and conducted a Delphi survey to gather the opinion of health professionals and the general public. MAIN RESULTS: Several health conditions were unanimously selected by all three methods as top priorities: cardiovascular diseases, AIDS, respiratory cancer, breast cancer for women, suicide and traffic accidents. In addition, two determinants-alcohol abuse and tobacco abuse-for which a clear conceptual link could be established between all methods were chosen. Connections between priorities identified through the DALY and the Delphi method lead to further inclusion of chronic back pain and depression. Some issues solely identified through the Delphi survey were included as they were consistently considered important by professionals and the lay public alike-violence in the family, unemployment, social exclusion. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that health priorities, and by extension health care priorities, would benefit from using a mix of quantitative and qualitative research methods. The triangulation of results allows for a broader perspective and makes results more acceptable. (+info)
Priority setting for health research: lessons from developing countries. The Working Group on Priority Setting.
(31/868)
Research resources for addressing health problems of developing countries remain disproportionately low compared with the tremendous disease burdens borne by these countries. There is a need to focus these scarce resources on research that will optimize health benefits and lead to equity. This paper reviews processes and methods that have been used for setting research priorities. Past and current processes have focused on expert-driven research agenda, emphasizing scientific autonomy and global analyses. Methods for setting priorities have focused on the metrics of disease burdens, while less attention has been placed on who sets priorities and how choices are made. The paper proposes a strategy of priority setting, based on lessons learned from essential national health research (ENHR) approaches attempted in several developing countries. With equity in health and development as its goal, the proposed model is demand-driven, and involves multi-dimensional inputs and multiple stakeholders. Various steps of the process are discussed: getting participants involved; gathering evidence and information; determining criteria for priority setting; and implementation and evaluation. The paper concludes with a discussion of the gap between national research priorities and the research agenda set at regional and global levels, an issue that needs to be satisfactorily addressed in the future. (+info)
Young people's health in developing countries: a neglected problem and opportunity.
(32/868)
Although the number of young people in developing countries is increasing, their health has not been considered a priority. This is partly because of their lower mortality relative to other age groups, but also because of a lack of appropriate data collection and analysis. However, the burden of disease in young people is not trivial, and most importantly, it is during adolescence that long-term health-related behaviours are formed. Most research investigating health problems in young people has tended to concentrate on a narrow conception of problem areas, such as those relating to reproduction and substance abuse. However, in many developing countries diseases such as schistosomiasis and intestinal parasites may also have a disproportionate impact on young people's health. Young people often have radically different perceptions and priorities in terms of health and disease to those of health planners. Successful programmes will need to incorporate the views of young people themselves. Interventions targeted at young people have enormous potential for primary and secondary prevention of a huge range of health problems and present an opportunity that should not be ignored. (+info)