An analysis of hospital productivity and product change. (57/421)

We developed a model to measure the contribution of changes in length-of-stay, service intensity, and productivity to the unusually low rate of growth in hospital costs per discharge in recent years. From 1992 through 1996 declining length-of-stay explained 97 percent of the decrease in real costs per discharge. Much of the drop was probably caused by care shifted from inpatient to postacute settings. Although complete data for our model are unavailable beyond that point, we cite several "leading indicators" that suggest that length-of-stay declines have played a smaller role in the continued low cost growth of 1997 and 1998 and that productivity may have risen sharply.  (+info)

Use of business planning methods to monitor global health budgets in Turkmenistan. (58/421)

After undergoing many changes, the financing of health care in countries of the former Soviet Union is now showing signs of maturing. Soon after the political transition in these countries, the development of insurance systems and fee-for-service payment systems dominated the discussions on health reform. At present there is increasing emphasis on case mix adjusted payments in larger hospitals and on global budgets in smaller district hospitals. The problem is that such systems are often mistrusted for not providing sufficient financial control. At the same time, unless further planned restructuring is introduced, payment systems cannot on their own induce the fundamental change required in the health care system. As described in this article, in Tejen etrap (district), Turkmenistan, prospective business plans, which link planned objectives and activities with financial allocations, provide a framework for setting and monitoring budget expenditure. Plans can be linked to the overall objectives of the restructuring system and can be used to ensure sound financial management. The process of business planning, which calls for a major change in the way health facilities examine their activities, can be used as a vehicle to increase awareness of management issues. It also provides a way of satisfying the requirement for a rigorous, bottom-up planning of financial resources.  (+info)

The impact of health insurance market reforms on market competition. (59/421)

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of state and federal health insurance market reforms on the nature and extent of market competition. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative, comparative case studies in 7 states. METHODS: Two rounds of in-depth interviews were conducted with over 100 key informants from the insurance industry. In each state, these sources included 2 to 4 regulators, 5 to 6 independent agents, and several sources at each of 4 to 5 of the top insurers. Extensive documentary data relating to market activity were also collected. These multiple sources of information and data were analyzed with both qualitative and quantitative techniques. RESULTS: (1) Small-group health insurance markets are highly competitive, both in price and in product innovation and diversity. (2) In some of the more heavily regulated states, there is very little competition in less-populated areas, especially for indemnity insurance. (3) The rapid growth of managed care in the small-group market may have been precipitated by these reforms. (4) Standardized benefit plans have not achieved their objectives. (5) Competitive forces still focus to a considerable extent on risk selection techniques. CONCLUSION: Small-group market reforms have not harmed market competition and may have improved competition in several respects. However, these reforms do not alter the fundamental orientation of competitive insurance markets, which is to focus on risk selection factors and techniques to the extent feasible.  (+info)

Stakeholder analysis: a review. (60/421)

The growing popularity of stakeholder analysis reflects an increasing recognition of how the characteristics of stakeholders--individuals, groups and organizations--influence decision-making processes. This paper reviews the origins and uses of stakeholder analysis, as described in the policy, health care management and development literature. Its roots are in the political and policy sciences, and in management theory where it has evolved into a systematic tool with clearly defined steps and applications for scanning the current and future organizational environment. Stakeholder analysis can be used to generate knowledge about the relevant actors so as to understand their behaviour, intentions, interrelations, agendas, interests, and the influence or resources they have brought--or could bring--to bear on decision-making processes. This information can then be used to develop strategies for managing these stakeholders, to facilitate the implementation of specific decisions or organizational objectives, or to understand the policy context and assess the feasibility of future policy directions. Policy development is a complex process which frequently takes place in an unstable and rapidly changing context, subject to unpredictable internal and external factors. As a cross-sectional view of an evolving picture, the utility of stakeholder analysis for predicting and managing the future is time-limited and it should be complemented by other policy analysis approaches.  (+info)

From state to market: the Nicaraguan labour market for health personnel. (61/421)

Few countries in Latin America have experienced in such a short period the shift from a socialist government and centrally planned economy to a liberal market economy as Nicaragua. The impact of such a change in the health field has been supported by the quest for reform of the health system and the involvement of external financial agencies aimed at leading the process. However, this change has not been reflected in the planning of human resources for health. Trends in education reflect the policies of past decades. The Ministry of Health is the main employer of health personnel in the country, but in recent years its capacity to recruit new personnel has diminished. Currently, various categories of health personnel are looking for new opportunities in a changing labour environment where new actors are appearing and claiming an influential role. It may take more than political willingness from the government to redefine the new priorities in the field of human resources for health and subsequently turn it into positive action.  (+info)

A stakeholder analysis. (62/421)

This paper provides guidance on how to do a stakeholder analysis, whether the aim is to conduct a policy analysis, predict policy development, implement a specific policy or project, or obtain an organizational advantage in one's dealings with other stakeholders. Using lessons learned from an analysis of alcohol policy development in Hungary, it outlines issues to be considered before undertaking the stakeholder analysis concerning the purpose and time dimensions of interest, the time-frame and the context in which the analysis will be conducted. It outlines advantages and disadvantages of an individual or team approach, and of the use of insiders and outsiders for the analysis. It describes how to identify and approach stakeholders and considers the use of qualitative or quantitative data collection methods for estimating stakeholder positions, levels of interest and influence around an issue. A key message is that the process of data collection and analysis needs to be iterative; the analyst needs to revise and deepen earlier levels of the analysis, as new data are obtained. Different examples of ways of analyzing, presenting and illustrating the information are provided. Stakeholder analysis is a useful tool for managing stakeholders and identifying opportunities to mobilize their support for a particular goal. However, various biases and uncertainties necessitate a cautious approach in using it and applying its results.  (+info)

Priorities in care and services for elderly people: a path without guidelines? (63/421)

The growing gap between demands and resources is putting immense pressure on all government spending in Sweden. The gap is especially apparent in care and services for elderly people in light of the rapid aging of the population. The article considers the decisions and priorities concerning resource allocation in the welfare sector in general and in elderly care in particular. The aim is to describe the political and administrative setting and to provide a conceptual structure that outlines the nature of the problem. Various levels of decision making are identified and discussed in the context of political accountability. Current transitions in elderly care are described with respect to service provision, marketisation, coverage rates, and eligibility standards. Basic principles of distribution are highlighted in order to clarify some central concepts of efficiency and justice, and a number of strategies for actual prioritising are identified. The article concludes with an endorsement of more conscious decisions in resource allocation. Existing knowledge and information concerning the effects of various strategies must be utilised, and the values and assumptions used for setting priorities must be made explicit.  (+info)

Judging goodness must come before judging quality--but what is the good of health care? (64/421)

The paper argues first that until it is known what the good of health care is there cannot be a judgement about what is better, and second that until it is known what is better there cannot be a judgement about what is quality. It is further suggested that in judging good and better with respect to health care as a social institution, there is no-one better placed to do this than the community. Too little is currently known about what communities want from their health services. Some suggestions as to how this situation might be improved in both principle and practice are discussed and the notion of 'communitarian claims' linked to conjoint analysis posited as a useful way forward. Such an approach will allow the development of a set of community-based principles--what is called a 'communitarian constitution'--on which to base the direction and objectives of health care.  (+info)