Human eye-head gaze shifts in a distractor task. I. Truncated gaze shifts.
(57/2420)
This study examines two current ideas regarding the control of eye-head gaze shifts. The first idea stems from recent studies involving electrical stimulation in the primate superior colliculus that suggest that a residual feedback of gaze displacement persists for approximately 100 ms after completion of a gaze shift. In light of this hypothesis, we examined the accuracy of gaze shifts generated very soon after the end of a preceding gaze shift. Human subjects were presented with a visual or auditory target along with an accompanying stimulus of the other modality. The accompanying stimulus appeared either at the same place as the target or at the diametrically opposite position, in which case it was termed a distractor. Subjects often made an incorrect gaze shift (IGS) in the direction of the distractor, followed by a recorrect gaze shift (RGS) in the direction of the target. We found that RGSs were accurately driven to the target, even when they followed IGSs by <5 ms, regardless of the size of the IGS. The second idea is that a gaze shift cannot be cancelled in midflight. The end point of IGSs frequently fell short of the distractor. The dynamics of these movements, and of the head movement components during the IGSs in particular, suggests that these hypometric IGSs were planned for a much larger excursion but were truncated and superceded by the reversing RGSs. These results emphasize that the gaze shifting system can change the desired goal of a gaze shift in midflight and that the superceding movement is accurate regardless of the metrics or timing of the preceding movement. (+info)
Human eye-head gaze shifts in a distractor task. II. Reduced threshold for initiation of early head movements.
(58/2420)
This study was motivated by the observation of early head movements (EHMs) occasionally generated before gaze shifts. Human subjects were presented with a visual or auditory target, along with an accompanying stimulus of the other modality, that either appeared at the same location as the target (enhancer condition) or at the diametrically opposite location (distractor condition). Gaze shifts generated to the target in the distractor condition sometimes were preceded by EHMs directed either to the side of the target (correct EHMs) or the side of the distractor (incorrect EHMs). During EHMs, the eyes performed compensatory eye movements to keep gaze stable. Incorrect EHMs were usually between 1 and 5 degrees in amplitude and reached peak velocities generally <50 degrees /s. These metrics increased for more eccentric distractors. The dynamics of incorrect EHMs initially followed a trajectory typical of much larger head movements. These results suggest that incorrect EHMs are head movements that initially were planned to orient to the peripheral distractor. Furthermore gaze shifts preceded by incorrect EHMs had longer reaction latencies than gaze shifts not preceded by incorrect EHMs, suggesting that the processes leading to incorrect EHMs also serve to delay gaze-shift initiation. These results demonstrate a form of distraction analogous to the incorrect gaze shifts (IGSs) described in the previous paper and suggest that a motor program encoding a gaze shift to a distractor is capable of initiating either an IGS or an incorrect EHM. A neural program not strong enough to initiate an IGS nevertheless can initiate an incorrect EHM. (+info)
Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments.
(59/2420)
Eye position was recorded in different viewing conditions to assess whether the temporal and spatial characteristics of saccadic eye movements in different individuals are idiosyncratic. Our aim was to determine the degree to which oculomotor control is based on endogenous factors. A total of 15 naive subjects viewed five visual environments: (1) The absence of visual stimulation (i.e. a dark room); (2) a repetitive visual environment (i.e. simple textured patterns); (3) a complex natural scene; (4) a visual search task; and (5) reading text. Although differences in visual environment had significant effects on eye movements, idiosyncrasies were also apparent. For example, the mean fixation duration and size of an individual's saccadic eye movements when passively viewing a complex natural scene covaried significantly with those same parameters in the absence of visual stimulation and in a repetitive visual environment. In contrast, an individual's spatio-temporal characteristics of eye movements during active tasks such as reading text or visual search covaried together, but did not correlate with the pattern of eye movements detected when viewing a natural scene, simple patterns or in the dark. These idiosyncratic patterns of eye movements in normal viewing reveal an endogenous influence on oculomotor control. The independent covariance of eye movements during different visual tasks shows that saccadic eye movements during active tasks like reading or visual search differ from those engaged during the passive inspection of visual scenes. (+info)
The response to prism deviations in human infants.
(60/2420)
Previous research has suggested that infants are unable to make a corrective eye movement in response to a small base-out prism placed in front of one eye before 14-16 weeks [1]. Three hypotheses have been proposed to explain this early inability, and each of these makes different predictions for the time of onset of a response to a larger prism. The first proposes that infants have a 'degraded sensory capacity' and so require a larger retinal disparity (difference in the position of the image on the retina of each eye) to stimulate disparity detectors [2]. This predicts that infants might respond at an earlier age than previously reported [1] when tested using a larger prism. The second hypothesis proposes that infants learn to respond to larger retinal disparities through practice with small disparities [3]. According to this theory, using a larger prism will not result in developmentally earlier responses, and may even delay the response. The third hypothesis proposes that the ability to respond to prismatic deviation depends on maturational factors indicated by the onset of stereopsis (the ability to detect depth in an image on the basis of retinal disparity cues only) [4] [5], predicting that the size of the prism is irrelevant. To differentiate between these hypotheses, we tested 192 infants ranging from 2 to 52 weeks of age using a larger prism. Results showed that 63% of infants of 5-8 weeks of age produced a corrective eye movement in response to placement of a prism in front of the eye when in the dark. Both the percentage of infants who produced a response, and the speed of the response, increased with age. These results suggest that infants can make corrective eye movements in response to large prismatic deviations before 14-16 weeks of age. This, in combination with other recent results [6], discounts previous hypotheses. (+info)
Shift in smooth pursuit initiation and MT and MST neuronal activity under different stimulus conditions.
(61/2420)
The activity of neurons in extrastriate middle temporal (MT) and medial superior temporal (MST) areas were studied during the initiation of pursuit eye movements in macaque monkeys. The intersecting motion of two stimuli was used to test hypotheses about how these direction- and speed-sensitive neurons contribute to the generation of pursuit. The amplitude and direction of the initial saccade to the target and the initial speed and direction of pursuit were best predicted by a vector-average model of the underlying neuronal activity with relatively short time and spatial separation before a visual pursuit target and a distracter stimulus crossed in the visual field. The resulting eye movements were best described by a winner-take-all model when the time and spatial separation between the two stimuli was increased before the stimuli crossed. Neurons in MT and MST also shifted their activity from that best described by a vector average to a winner-take-all model under the same stimulus conditions. The changes in activity of neurons in both areas were generally similar to each other during these changes in pursuit initiation. Thus a slight alteration in the target motion produced a concurrent shift in both the neuronal processing and the movement execution. We propose that the differences in the oculomotor behavior can be accounted for by shifts in the overlap of active neuronal populations within MT and MST. (+info)
Evidence for on-line visual guidance during saccadic gaze shifts.
(62/2420)
Rapid orientating movements of the eyes are believed to be controlled ballistically. The mechanism underlying this control is thought to involve a comparison between the desired displacement of the eye and an estimate of its actual position (obtained from the integration of the eye velocity signal). This study shows, however, that under certain circumstances fast gaze movements may be controlled quite differently and may involve mechanisms which use visual information to guide movements prospectively. Subjects were required to make large gaze shifts in yaw towards a target whose location and motion were unknown prior to movement onset. Six of those tested demonstrated remarkable accuracy when making gaze shifts towards a target that appeared during their ongoing movement. In fact their level of accuracy was not significantly different from that shown when they performed a 'remembered' gaze shift to a known stationary target (F3,15 = 0.15, p > 0.05). The lack of a stereotypical relationship between the skew of the gaze velocity profile and movement duration indicates that on-line modifications were being made. It is suggested that a fast route from the retina to the superior colliculus could account for this behaviour and that models of oculomotor control need to be updated. (+info)
Gaze direction modulates finger movement activation patterns in human cerebral cortex.
(63/2420)
We investigated whether gaze direction modified the pattern of finger movement activation in human cerebral cortex using functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Participants performed a sequential finger-tapping task or made no finger movements while maintaining gaze in the direction of the moving hand (aligned conditions) or away from the location of the moving hand. Functional MR signals, measured in the hemisphere contralateral to the moving hand, revealed finger movement-related activation in primary motor cortex, lateral and medial premotor cortex, and a wide extent of the lateral superior and inferior parietal lobules. In each area, the extent of the finger movement activation increased when static gaze was more aligned with the moving hand compared to when gaze was directed away from the moving hand. These data suggest the existence of large-scale cortical networks related to finger actions and indicate that skeletomotor processing in the cerebral cortex is consistently modified by gaze direction signals. (+info)
Properties of delay-period neuronal activity in the monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during a spatial delayed matching-to-sample task.
(64/2420)
The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) has been implicated in visuospatial memory, and its cellular basis has been extensively studied with the delayed-response paradigm in monkeys. However, using this paradigm, it is difficult to dissociate neuronal activities related to visuospatial memory from those related to motor preparation, and few studies have provided evidence for the involvement of PFC neurons in visuospatial memory of a sensory cue, rather than in motor preparation. To extend this finding, we examined neuronal activities in the dorsolateral PFC while a rhesus monkey performed a spatial delayed matching-to-sample (SDMTS) task, which allows us to adequately access visuospatial memory independent of any sensorimotor components. The SDMTS task required the subject to make a lever-holding NOGO response or a lever-releasing GO response when a visuospatial matching cue (white spot, one of four peripheral locations, 15 degrees in eccentricity) matched or did not match a sample cue (physically the same as the matching cue) that had been presented prior to a delay period (3 s). Thus, the SDMTS task requires the subject to remember visuospatial information regarding the sample cue location during the delay period and is suitable for accessing visuospatial memory independent of any sensorimotor components, such as motor preparation, for directed movements. Of a total of 385 task-related neurons, 184 showed a sustained increase in activity during the delay period ("delay-period activity"). Most of these neurons (n = 165/184, 90%) showed positional delay-period activity, i.e., delay-period activity where the magnitude differed significantly with the position of the sample cue. This activity appears to be involved in visuospatial memory and to form a "memory field." To quantitatively examine the properties of positional delay-period activity, we introduced a tuning index (TI) and a discriminative index (DI), which represent the sharpness of tuning and the discriminative ability, respectively, of positional delay-period activity. Both TI and DI varied among neurons with positional delay-period activity and were closely related to the time from the onset of the sample cue to the onset of positional delay-period activity; positional delay-period activity with sharper tuning and a greater discriminative ability had a slower onset. Furthermore, at the population level, both TI and DI were increased during the delay period in the neuronal population with a high DI value. These results extend previous findings to suggest that integrative, convergent processes of neuronal activities for increasing the accuracy of visuospatial memory may occur in the dorsolateral PFC. Thus, a critical role of the dorsolateral PFC in visuospatial memory may be to sharpen it to guide behaviors/decisions requiring accurate visuospatial memory. (+info)