The policy on public-private mix in the Ugandan health sector: catching up with reality.
(17/76)
An informal public-private mix in the health sector has always existed in Uganda, and policymakers, planners and the public in general have taken this for granted. There is now renewed effort to develop a comprehensive policy on the mix, but the policy process has proved to be tortuous and the mix has been interpreted differently by different stakeholders. While significant differences in opinion on the mix still remain, it is becoming clear that the new policy should enable health institutions, whether in the public or the private sector, to play roles in which they have clear comparative advantage over others. (+info)
Regulating U.S. nursing homes: are we learning from experience?
(18/76)
The quality of care in U.S. nursing homes has been a recurrent matter of public concern and policy attention for more than thirty years. A complex regulatory system of state licensure and federal certification is in place, but problems of poor quality and neglect and abuse of patients still appear to be endemic. This paper describes how the current system of regulation developed, examines its impact, and draws on the wider literature on regulation to outline some characteristics that may have detracted from its effectiveness and contributed to its disappointing results. Future regulatory reform should pay more attention to the lessons of regulation in other settings and make more use of research and formative evaluation. (+info)
Out of the frying pan: New York City hospitals in an age of deregulation.
(19/76)
For several decades New York City hospitals had been distinguished by their tightly regulated environment, chronically weak finances, high occupancy rates, teaching intensity, dependency on public payers, low managed care penetration, and minimal merger activity. Then in the late 1990s a rapid convergence of forces--the Balanced Budget Act, managed care growth, state deregulation of commercial rates, escalating costs, and plunging hospital occupancy rates--threw the city's hospital industry into turmoil. In this paper we describe this period of turbulent change that has left most of the city's safety-net and small community hospitals near bankruptcy. (+info)
The Department of Managed Care.
(20/76)
California sets a precedent again, with a bold effort to regulate the HMO industry. While the new Department of Managed Health Care is facing down 50,000 consumer gripes monthly, director Daniel Zingale intends to keep administrative red tape from overwhelming plans, patients, providers, and his department. (+info)
Professionalism, regulation, and the market: impact on accountability for quality of care.
(21/76)
This paper examines the interplay of professionalism, regulation, and the market in shaping accountability on the part of hospitals, physicians, and health plans. We pay particular attention to the role of accreditation. We review the development of accountability and examine its recent evolution in the context of changing information technology, consumer demands, the decline of the staff- and group-model HMO, and the reemergence of health care cost inflation. The market is emerging as the dominant influence on accountability; this development will require changes in the roles and structure of regulation, professionalism, and accreditation in assuring accountability. (+info)
Quality in health care: a role for the law?
(22/76)
This paper considers the way in which English law can and does play a part in ensuring quality standards in healthcare practice. It examines the enhanced scope for judicial scrutiny of standards of care and the role played by law in the form of statutory regulation. There is an increasing degree of legal involvement in healthcare decision making. The law may provide some effective checks and balances to quality but, at the same time, the limits of the law as an effective regulator of quality have to be recognised because of the multifaceted nature of clinical judgment. (+info)
Preventing errors in the outpatient setting: a tale of three states.
(23/76)
Although error in medicine has received sustained policy attention recently, the problem of error in the outpatient setting has been relatively neglected. In this paper we review what is known about the incidence and nature of error-related adverse events in physicians' offices, ambulatory care facilities, and surgicenters. We then analyze policies to improve outpatient safety in New Jersey, New York, and Florida, three states that took very different paths toward this goal. Their experience suggests that accreditation, combined with particular attention to ensuring anesthesia safety, can improve quality of care for outpatients. These actions are best accomplished through proactive legislation and the development of regulations, rather than reactive responses to adverse events. (+info)
Relationship between regulatory status, quality of care, and three-year mortality in Canadian residential care facilities: a longitudinal study.
(24/76)
OBJECTIVES: To compare the mortality rate in regulated and unregulated facilities, controlling for confounding variables, and investigate the effect of care quality on residents' length of survival. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: At baseline, subjects were assessed in their living environment with respect to their functional autonomy, cognitive abilities, and quality of care. Vital status, disease-related information, and hospitalization data were retrieved three years later from the subjects' medical files. STUDY DESIGN: A three-year follow-up study of 299 residents from 88 long-term care facilities located in the province of Quebec, Canada. The effect of regulatory status and quality of care on length of survival was investigated by means of multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, from both traditional and competing risks perspectives. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Controlling for age, comorbidity, and baseline functional abilities, a resident's length of survival is not significantly influenced by the regulatory status of the facility in which he or she lived at baseline. However, residents with poor quality ratings at baseline had shorter survival times than those provided with good care. Median survival was 28 months among residents classified as receiving inadequate care compared to 41 months for those adequately cared for (p = 0.0217). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that quality of care has a much stronger influence on resident outcomes than regulation per se. This finding underscores the relevance of testing innovative interventions aimed at improving the quality of care provided in long-term care facilities, regardless of their regulatory status. (+info)