Evidence-based practice implementation and staff emotional exhaustion in children's services. (65/665)

 (+info)

Who benefits from supported employment: a meta-analytic study. (66/665)

 (+info)

Building clinical and organizational resilience to reconcile safety threats, tensions and trade-offs: insights from theory and evidence. (67/665)

Healthcare delivery settings are complex adaptive and tightly coupled, interrelated systems. Within the larger healthcare system, a key subsystem is the "clinical microsystem" level. It is at this level that clinicians are faced with high levels of uncertainty in their daily work - uncertainty that impacts the quality and safety of care that patients receive. The first aim of this paper is to enhance healthcare leaders' understanding of what is currently known about safety threats and strategies to manage the inherent tensions and trade-offs that occur in everyday practice. The second aim is to inform strategies that build clinical and organizational resilience through a multi-level framework derived from the collective theoretical and empirical work. Together, this information can strengthen safety practices throughout healthcare organizations.  (+info)

Long-term protective factor outcomes of evidence-based interventions implemented by community teams through a community-university partnership. (68/665)

 (+info)

Guided care and the cost of complex healthcare: a preliminary report. (69/665)

OBJECTIVE: Guided Care (GC) is a model of proactive, evidence-based comprehensive healthcare provided by physician-nurse teams for people with several chronic health conditions. Our objective was to evaluate the preliminary effects of GC on health service utilization and costs. STUDY DESIGN: Cluster-randomized controlled trial of GC involving 14 primary care teams (49 physicians) and 904 of their chronically ill patients age 65 years or older. METHODS: Using insurance claims, we compared the health services used by patients who received GC with the health services used by patients who received usual care during the first 8 months of the study. RESULTS: After adjustment for baseline characteristics, GC patients experienced, on average, 24% fewer hospital days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49% fewer, 13% more), 37% fewer skilled nursing facility days (95% CI: 65% fewer, 5% more), 15% fewer emergency department visits (95% CI: 38% fewer, 18% more), and 29% fewer home healthcare episodes (95% CI: 53% fewer, 8% more), as well as 9% more specialist visits (95% CI: 8% fewer, 29% more). Based on current Medicare payment rates and GC costs, these differences in utilization represent an annual net savings of $75,000 (95% CI: -$244,000, $150,900) per nurse, or $1364 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Initial introduction of GC into primary care practices may be associated with less use of expensive health services and a net savings in healthcare costs among older patients with several chronic health conditions. Final results from the remaining 2 years of this ongoing study will be published in 2011.  (+info)

Cardiac health: primary prevention of heart disease in women. (70/665)

 (+info)

Computer-mediated patient education: opportunities and challenges for supporting women with ovarian cancer. (71/665)

 (+info)

A systematic review of the designs of clinical technology: findings and recommendations for future research. (72/665)

 (+info)