I recently watched a fascinating documentary about the crusade of Dr Bertram Wainer in the 1960s to bring the practice of illegal abortion in Victoria to an end. It documented the profound horror of the backyard abortion that so often ended in infection, sterility or death, and served as a potent reminder of a practice to which we must never return. Of course that cant happen again, abortion is legal now, isnt it? In Victoria in 1969 a Supreme Court judge ruled that an abortion is not unlawful if a doctor believed that: the abortion is necessary to preserve the woman from serious danger to her life or physical or mental health (Menhennit ruling). In Australia today however, abortion law remains conditional, unclear and inconsistent and, except in the ACT, is still part of criminal statutes. (+info)
Preembryo Personhood: an assessment of the President's Council arguments.
(42/170)
The President's Council on Bioethics has addressed the moral status of human preembryos in its reports on stem cell research and human therapeutic cloning. Although the Council has been criticized for being hand-picked to favor the right-to-life viewpoint concerning human preembryos, it has embraced the idea that the right-to-life position should be defended in secular terms. This is an important feature of the Council's work, and it demonstrates a recognition of the need for genuine engagement between opposing sides in the debate over stem cell research. To promote this engagement, the Council has stated in secular terms several arguments for the personhood of human preembryos. This essay presents and critiques those arguments, and it concludes that they are unsuccessful. If the best arguments in support of the personhood of human preembryos have been presented by the Council, then there are no reasonable secular arguments in support of that view. (+info)
Perceived conflict in the couple and chronic illness management: preliminary analyses from the Quebec Health Survey.
(43/170)
BACKGROUND: The quality of the relationship with the spouse/partner appears crucial among patients with multiple chronic conditions where illness management is complex and multifaceted. This study draws on data from the Quebec Health Survey (QHS) to examine, among patients with one or more chronic conditions, the relation between marital status, the perceived conflict with the spouse/partner, and what the patients do to manage their illness as well as how they perceive their health. METHODS: Data from the QHS 1998 were used. The sample included 7547 coupled adults who had one or more chronic health problems lasting more than 6 months. Independent variables included marital status, perceived conflict with the spouse/partner, and the number of chronic conditions. Illness management was defined broadly as a measure of the patient's efforts at self-care and an illness status indicator, including visits to the generalist and the specialist, the use of telephone health line in the last 12 months, self-rated general health, mental health, and a measure of psychological distress. Linkages between the independent variables and illness management were assessed for males and females separately with logistic regressions, while accounting for the survey sampling design and household clustering. RESULTS: Female patients who did not live with their partner and had never been married were more likely to report a negative perception of their general health and a higher psychological distress than those who were married. Perceived conflict with the partner was linked to a negative perception of mental health and a higher psychological distress among both men and women. Compared to patients with only one chronic condition, males who reported more than one chronic condition were more likely to have consulted a generalist prior to the survey and used the telephone health line, whereas females were more likely to have consulted a specialist. Both males and females with more than one chronic condition were more likely to have a negative perception of their general health and mental health. CONCLUSION: The study provides a useful preliminary measure of the importance of living arrangements and the quality of the couple relationship in chronic illness management broadly conceived as a measure of the patient's efforts at self-care and an illness status indicator. Results of this study prod us to examine more closely, within longitudinal designs, the influence of living arrangements and the presence of conflict in the couple on chronic illness management as well as the modifying effect of gender on these associations. (+info)
Controversies in follicular lymphoma: "who, what, when, where, and why?" (not necessarily in that order!).
(44/170)
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent lymphoma. Specific "facts" about FL that were generated by past research and have been passed down as dogma to a majority of practicing oncologists over the past 20 to 30 years that need to be revisited, include: (1) do not initiate therapy soon after diagnosis in asymptomatic, advanced-stage patients since it does not change outcome; (2) initiate therapy with single-agent oral alkylators when intervention needed and "save" more aggressive combination chemotherapy for "later" since the standard chemotherapy regimen used did not seem to impact survival; (3) FL is an incurable disease and palliation of symptoms was an acceptable approach to the expected pattern of repeated relapses; (4) transformation of FL is independent of the type or timing of therapies received by a patient; (5) median overall survival (OS) for FL patients is 8-10 years. Although the heterogeneity of FL will never change, we are developing the scientific tools to identify and better understand the biologic and genetic features associated with its clinical variability. In the current exciting era of targeted therapies (e.g., rituximab, radioimmunoconjugates) and novel treatment approaches demonstrating an improvement in treatment outcomes (e.g., disease-free survival and OS), our old beliefs and historically accepted dogma need to be retested and revitalized. The optimal combination(s) of old and new agents and the optimal timing of when to initiate and how to sequence specific therapies will require data from well-designed clinical trials that should include important correlative laboratory studies. (+info)
Medical futility: a conceptual model.
(45/170)
This paper introduces the medical factual matrix as a new and potentially valuable tool in medical ethical analysis. Using this tool it demonstrates the idea that a defined medical intervention can only be meaningfully declared futile in relation to a defined goal(s) of treatment. It argues that a declaration of futility made solely in relation to a defined medical intervention is inchoate. It recasts the definition of goal futility as an intervention that cannot alter the probability of the existence of the important outcome states that might flow from a defined intervention. The idea of value futility and the extent of physician obligations in futile situations are also addressed. It also examines the source of substantive conflicts which commonly arise within the doctor-patient relationship and the ensuing power relations that operate between doctor and patient when questions of futility arise. (+info)
The pressure to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy from critically ill patients in the United States.
(46/170)
Physicians and nurses sometimes exert pressure on the families of critically ill patients to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy from them. This pressure may stem from prognostic, professional, social, and economic factors. Although the pressure to limit life support may be appropriate in some circumstances, in others it is not justified. The pressure also may damage communications and cause resentment. If communications cannot be improved, and if the pressure cannot be relieved, a due process approach to conflict resolution that involves other parties may be required. (+info)
When race matters: disagreement in pain perception between patients and their physicians in primary care.
(47/170)
Patients and physicians often disagree in their assessment of pain intensity. This study explores the impact of patient factors on underestimation of pain intensity in chronic noncancer pain. We surveyed patients and their physicians in 12 primary care centers. To measure pain intensity, patients completed an 11-point numeric rating scale for which pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). Physicians rated patients' pain on the same scale. We defined disagreement of pain intensity as underestimation or overestimation by 22 points. Of 601 patients approached, 463 (77%) completed the survey. The majority of participants were black (39%) or white (47%), 67% were female, and the mean age was 53 years. Physicians underestimated pain intensity relative to their patients 39% of the time. Forty-six percent agreed with their patients' pain perception, and 15% of physicians overestimated their patients' pain levels by > or =2 points. In both the bivariate and multivariable models, black race was a significant variable associated with underestimation of pain by physicians (p < 0.05; OR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.31-2.81). This study finds that physicians are twice as likely to underestimate pain in blacks patients compared to all other ethnicities combined. A qualitative study exploring why physicians rate blacks patients' pain low is warranted. (+info)
Considerable disagreement among definitions of metabolic syndrome for Japanese.
(48/170)
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study is to examine the agreement of various existing definitions of metabolic syndrome for Japanese. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two apparently healthy men and 147 apparently healthy women underwent testing and diagnosis for metabolic syndrome using 5 different definitions of metabolic syndrome for Japanese, including a newly proposed definition: a modified National Cholesterol Education Program definition replacing abdominal obesity with C-reactive protein. The agreement of these various definitions of metabolic syndrome was studied using an agreement index defined as the number of subjects who met both definitions divided by the number of subjects who met either of the 2 definitions. Agreement indices among these various definitions of metabolic syndrome for Japanese were between 0.19 and 0.6 in men and between 0.31 and 0.89 in women. The average agreement index was 0.41 in men and 0.51 in women, and the overall agreement index was 0.15 in men and 0.21 in women. CONCLUSIONS: There was considerable disagreement among various definitions of metabolic syndrome for Japanese. Therefore, diagnosis with this syndrome should not be made until a truly consensual definition of metabolic syndrome can be established. (+info)