Dental students' reflections on their community-based experiences: the use of critical incidents.
(17/53)
Dental schools are challenged to develop new learning methodologies and experiences to better prepare future dental practitioners. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the community-based experiences of dental students as documented in their critical incident essays and explore what learning outcomes and benefits students reported. Following two required community-based clinical rotations, each student wrote a reflection essay on a self-defined critical incident that occurred during the rotations. Rotations took place in settings such as a public health clinic, special needs facility, hospital, or correctional institution. Essays for two classes of students were content-analyzed for recurring themes and categories. Students were confronted in their rotations with a wide range of situations not typically encountered in dental academic settings. Their essays showed that, as a result of these rotations, students developed increased self-awareness, empathy, communications skills, and self-confidence. Critical incidents challenged assumptions and stereotypes, enhanced awareness of the complexities of dental care, and raised complex ethical dilemmas. The essays also illustrated a heightened sense of professional identity and enabled students to appreciate the role dentistry can play in impacting patients' lives. We concluded from the study that community-based dental education that includes a process for reflection holds promise as an educational strategy to facilitate the personal and professional development of future dentists. (+info)
The development of a patient-centered measure of the process and outcome of combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment.
(18/53)
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a patient-based measure of the process and outcome of combined orthodontic and orthognathic care in the National Health Service in the UK. DESIGN: Identification of relevant dimensions through qualitative methods, design of form, determination of psychometric properties of the scale, specific readability, reliability and validity. SETTING: NHS hospitals in the South West Region. SUBJECTS: The sample comprised patients who had received combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment between 01 January 1998 and 31 December 2000. Twenty-six participants (a 25% response rate) took part in four focus group meetings. Thirty subjects (65% response rate) took part in a pilot study to test the properties of the questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six broad themes emerged from the focus groups. These formed the basis of the sections in the questionnaire. RESULTS: The questionnaire developed had a Flesch reading ease score of 72.9 or US grade level 4 equivalent to aged 9-10 years. Test-retest reliability gave kappa values for most questions that exceeded 0.4. Criterion validity of the measure was established by comparing responses to the questionnaire over two periods with a telephone interview on a sample of 30 patients. Criterion related validity was poor for nine of the 16 items. By contrast the construct validity of the questionnaire was satisfactory. CONCLUSION: A patient-based measure of the process and outcome of combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment has been developed. This has sufficient validity and reliability for use in inter-center audit projects. (+info)
Measuring failure of orthodontic treatment: a comparison of outcome indicators.
(19/53)
OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment failure rates on a sample of completed and discontinued orthodontic treatment cases as measured by PAR, IOTN and ICON to determine whether the use of a sole index would suffice. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: All patients completing or discontinuing orthodontic treatment in the hospital orthodontic departments in the Northern Region during two calendar months were identified and pre and post-treatment models were analysed. PAR scores, IOTN (DHC and AC) and ICON were recorded. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-forty-five cases were identified and 15 had incomplete records on the day of analysis. The final sample was therefore 130. The overall treatment discontinuation rate of these 130 patients was 24.6%. The treatment failure rate with respect to occlusal improvement varied from 3.1% when measured by PAR and 10.0% using ICON. With respect to residual need it varied from 0.77 to 20.1% with respect to IOTN depending on the criteria examined. The residual treatment need with respect to ICON was 17.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Different occlusal indices give differing failure rates when used on the same patients with ICON being the most critical index. We felt that ICON was the most valid with respect to identifying treatment failure. Its use would enable international comparison of results. (+info)
Resterilization of instruments used in a hospital-based oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic.
(20/53)
OBJECTIVE: The transmission of pathogens from one patient to another via contaminated devices has been a high profile issue in infection control. Although single-use devices have been promoted as a preventative strategy, resterilization of instruments has been a common practice in dentistry. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of bacterial contamination of instruments resterilized for use in oral and maxillofacial procedures in a hospital-based clinic. METHODS: The experiment was a prospective randomized controlled study. The test group consisted of burs that had been used in surgical procedures. These burs were grossly debrided before being cleaned and gas sterilized in the central sterilizing department of the hospital. The burs were transferred in a sterile fashion into a culture medium selected to grow oral bacteria. The control group comprised new unused instruments treated in an identical fashion before culturing. All burs were incubated and monitored daily for 72 h. RESULTS: The rate of bacterial contamination in the test groups was significantly higher than in the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Reuse of instruments can be cost-effective if the safety of patients can be assured; however, there is increasing evidence that the sterilization process may not be completely effective. Consideration should be given to the classification of certain types of dental burs as single-use devices if sterilization cannot be guaranteed. (+info)
Response shift masks the treatment impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs): the example of individual quality of life in edentulous patients.
(21/53)
BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QoL) is now established as an important outcome for evaluating the impact of disease, and for assessing the efficacy of treatments. However, individuals change with time and the basis on which they make a QoL judgement may also change, a phenomenon increasingly referred to as response shift. Here, the individual may change his or her internal standards, values, and/or conceptualization on the target construct as a result of external factors such as a treatment or a change in health status. This has important implications for assessing the effects of treatments as a change in QoL may reflect a response shift, a treatment effect, or a complex combination of both. In this study, we used an individualised quality of life (IQoL) measure, the SEIQoL, together with a then-test to determine whether response shift would influence the measurement of treatment efficacy in edentulous patients. METHODS: Data are reported here for the first phase of a randomised controlled clinical trial designed to assess the impact, on IQoL, of implant supported dentures compared with high quality conventional dentures. IQoL was measured using the SEIQoL-DW in 117 patients (mean age 64.8; 32% male) at baseline (T1) and 3 months (T2) after receiving high quality conventional dentures. The work was carried out in dental teaching hospitals in Dublin and Belfast. RESULTS: Unadjusted SEIQoL index scores revealed no significant impact of treatment at three months (baseline: 75.0; 3 months: 73.2, p = .33, n.s.). However, the then-test at 3 months revealed that patients retrospectively rated their baseline IQoL as significantly lower (P < .001) than they had rated it at the time (then-test baseline: 69.2). Comparison of the 3 month scores with this readjusted baseline indicated a significant treatment effect (then-test baseline: 69.2; 3 months: 73.2, p = 0.016). 81% of patients nominated at least one different IQoL domain at 3 months. CONCLUSION: The positive impact of denture treatment for edentulous patients on IQoL was seen only when response shifts were taken into consideration. The nature of the response shifts was highly complex but the data indicated a degree of re-conceptualization and reprioritisation. Assessment of the impact of treatments using patient-generated reports must take account of the adaptive nature of patients. (+info)
Oral and maxillofacial surgery: should a district service be retained?
(22/53)
The adult new patient attendances at a District General Hospital for 1988 and 1989 have been analysed and the patients with oral and maxillofacial injuries identified. The injuries were classified using the International Classification of Diseases. The time spent undertaking emergency surgery out of hours by each firm using the operating facility has been analysed. An argument for a national district service in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is developed and advanced drawing on the results obtained from the study. (+info)
Legionella contamination in the water system of hospital dental settings.
(23/53)
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: Among hospital facilities the dental unit is an environment that is at major risk of Legionella due to equipment such as the air/water syringe, the turbine, the micromotor and the scaler which generate potentially harmful aerosols that may to be a source of exposure to Legionella spp. particularly in immunodeficient patients, and those affected by chronic diseases, and also in dental personnel. Therefore, an examination of the extent of Legionella spp. contamination in the dental chairs waterlines and the incoming water supply of some public dental units is the subject of the present study. METHODS: From February 2002 to March 2004, a total of 208 water samples were collected: 160 samples from the water supply of 4 dental chair and 48 samples from the cold incoming tap water of 2 units. RESULTS: Legionella spp. was detected in 46 samples (22.1% ): 19 of them (41.3% of Legionella spp.; 9.1% of the total) were Legionella pneumophila; Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detected in 86 samples (41.4%) and both microorganisms were detected in 2 samples (0.96%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a microbiological condition in dental settings, that is not at all satisfactory due to the presence of Legionella in concentrations that are considered to be a health hazard (> or = 10(3)) in certain cases. Given the extent of the health risk in these surroundings, the difficulty in its assessment, and also considering the wide diffusion of general dental care, our investigation has confirmed the need to regularly monitor the microbiological condition of water in dental units. (+info)
Orthognathic cases: what are the surgical costs?
(24/53)
This multicentre, retrospective, study assessed the cost, and factors influencing the cost, of combined orthodontic and surgical treatment for dentofacial deformity. The sample, from a single region in England, comprised 352 subjects treated in 11 hospital orthodontic units who underwent orthognathic surgery between 1 January 1995 and 31 March 2000. Statistical analysis of the data was undertaken using non-parametric tests (Spearman and Wilcoxon signed rank). The average total treatment cost for the tax year from 6 April 2000 to 5 April 2001 was euro6360.19, with costs ranging from euro3835.90 to euro12 150.55. The average operating theatre cost was euro2189.54 and the average inpatient care (including the cost of the intensive care unit and ward stay) was euro1455.20. Joint clinic costs comprised, on average, 10 per cent of the total cost, whereas appointments in other specialities, apart from orthodontics, comprised 2 per cent of the total costs. Differences in the observed costings between the units were unexplained but may reflect surgical difficulties, differences in clinical practice, or efficiency of patient care. These indicators need to be considered in future outcome studies for orthognathic patients. (+info)