Parietal neurons represent surface orientation from the gradient of binocular disparity.
(17/314)
In order to elucidate the neural mechanisms involved in the perception of the three-dimensional (3D) orientation of a surface, we trained monkeys to discriminate the 3D orientation of a surface from binocular disparity cues using a Go/No-go type delayed-matching-to-sample (DMTS) task and examined the properties of the surface-orientation-selective (SOS) neurons. We recorded 57 SOS neurons from the caudal part of the lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus (area CIP) of three hemispheres of two Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata). We tested 29 of 57 SOS neurons using the square plate of a solid figure stereogram (SFS) and random-dot stereogram (RDS) without perspective cues; almost all of the tested neurons (28/29) showed surface orientation selectivity for the SFS and/or the RDS without perspective cues. Eight of these 28 neurons (28.6%) showed selectivity for both the RDS and SFS, 7 (25.0%) were dominantly selective for the RDS, and 13 (46.4%) were dominantly selective for the SFS. These results suggest that neurons that show surface orientation tuning for the RDS without perspective cues compute surface orientation from the gradient of the binocular disparity given by the random-dot across the surface. On the other hand, neurons that show surface orientation tuning for the SFS without perspective cues may represent surface orientation primarily from the gradient of the binocular disparity along the contours. In conclusion, the SOS neurons in the area CIP are likely to operate higher order processing of disparity signals for surface perception by integrating the input signals from many disparity-sensitive neurons with different disparity tuning. (+info)
Comparing extra-retinal information about distance and direction.
(18/314)
The idea that extra-retinal information about the orientation of the eyes could be used to judge an object's distance has a long history, and has been the issue of considerable debate throughout this century. We here show that the poor performance in comparison with judgements of direction has geometrical rather than physiological reasons, and discuss why previous studies have misled us into believing that information about distance is even poorer than the geometry predicts. (+info)
Prism induced accommodation in infants 3 to 6 months of age.
(19/314)
Convergence-accommodation, one of several cross-linkages in the oculomotor system is manifested by opening the accommodative feedback loop and increasing the vergence input. We elicited this response in human infants aged 3-6 months by placing a 15 delta prism (base-out) before one eye while they viewed a diffuse patch of light. Accommodation was measured and ocular alignment was confirmed with a video photorefractor. The convergence-accommodation response is therefore present during a time when blur driven accommodation and disparity vergence are maturing. The gain of convergence-accommodation (expressed as the stimulus CA/C ratio) appeared to be greater for infants than adults. (+info)
The dependence of motion repulsion and rivalry on the distance between moving elements.
(20/314)
We investigated the extent to which motion repulsion and binocular motion rivalry depend on the distance between moving elements. The stimuli consisted of two sets of spatially intermingled, finite-life random dots that moved across each other. The distance between the dots moving in different directions was manipulated by spatially pairing the dot trajectories with various precisions. Data from experiment 1 indicated that motion repulsion occurred reliably only when the average distance between orthogonally moving elements was at least 21.0 arc min. When the dots were precisely paired, a single global direction intermediate to the two actual directions was perceived. This result suggests that, at a relatively small spatial scale, interaction between different directions favors motion attraction or coherence, while interaction at a somewhat larger scale generates motion repulsion. Similarly, data from experiment 2 indicated that binocular motion rivalry was significantly diminished by spatially pairing the dots, which moved in opposite directions in the two eyes. This supports the recent proposal that rivalry occurs at or after the stage of binocular convergence, since monocular cells could not have directly responded to our interocular pairing manipulation. Together, these findings suggest that the neural mechanisms underlying motion perception are highly sensitive to the fine spatial relationship between moving elements. (+info)
Characteristics of saccades and vergence in two kinds of sequential looking tasks.
(21/314)
We determined how saccades were used in the experiments described in Epelboim, Steinman, Kowler, Edwards, Pizlo, Erkelens and Collewijn (1995) [Vision Research, 35, 3401-3422], where unrestrained subjects looked at or tapped nearby targets. We report: (i) the size of binocular saccades; (ii) how well saccade size matched in the two eyes; and (iii) saccadic vergence. A representative sample (3375 saccades) was measured: 83% were <15 degrees, 53% were <5 degrees. Only two were 'microsaccades'. Saccade sizes were very similar in the two eyes. These results imply that subjects prefer avoiding large saccades. They can do this simply by re-orienting the head appropriately. Subjects under-verged by 25-35% and preformed well. None experienced diplopia. (+info)
Neither occlusion constraint nor binocular disparity accounts for the perceived depth in the 'sieve effect'.
(22/314)
Current notions of binocular depth perception include (1) neural computations that solve the correspondence problem and calculate retinal positional disparity, and (2) recovery of ecologically valid occlusion relationships. The former framework works well for stimuli with unambiguous interocular correspondence, but less so for stimuli without well-defined disparity cues. The latter framework has been proposed to account for the phenomenon of perceived depth in stimuli without interocular correspondence, but its mechanism remains unclear. In order to obtain more insight into the mechanism, we studied the depth percept elicited by a family of stereograms - 'sieve' stimuli, adapted from Howard (1995) [Perception, 24, 67-74] - with interocular differences but no well-defined positional disparity cue. The perceived depth was measured by comparison to references at various depths established by standard retinal disparity and was consistently found to lie behind the fixation plane. Moreover, the magnitude of the depth percept depended on both the horizontal and vertical spatial characteristics of the stimulus in ways that were at odds with constraints of occlusion geometry. In comparison to the depth percept elicited by stimuli with well-defined disparity cues, the precision of the percept from the sieve stimuli was 10-20 times worse, suggesting that a different underlying computation was involved. Thus, neither of the above frameworks accounts for the depth percept arising from these stimuli. We discuss implications of our results for physiologically based computations underlying binocular depth perception. (+info)
AC/A ratio, age, and refractive error in children.
(23/314)
PURPOSE: To examine how the response AC/A ratio (the amount of accommodative convergence per unit of accommodative response) varies as a function of refractive error and age, to determine whether it is a risk factor for the onset of myopia, and to examine the relation between ocular structural features and the AC/A ratio. METHODS: Accommodation was stimulated by a letter target presented in a Badal system at 0.00, 2.25, and 4.37 D to 828 children aged 6 through 14 years in 1996. Of these, 726 had no myopia in 1996 and were available for examination the following year. Accommodative response and cycloplegic refractive error were measured by autorefraction and convergence by monitoring the relative movement of Purkinje images I and IV. Lens radii of curvature were measured by video phakometry, corneal radius of curvature by topography, and ocular axial dimensions by A-scan ultrasonography. RESULTS: Adjusted for age, the response AC/A ratio was highest in myopes (6.39 delta/D), intermediate in emmetropes (3.94 delta/D), and lowest in hyperopes (3.40 delta/D; P < 0.0001; two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]). The stimulus AC/A ratio did not vary with refractive error. Adjusted for refractive error, the response AC/A ratio did not change as a function of age. In non-myopic children, having a response AC/A ratio of 5.84 delta/D or more elevated the risk of development of myopia within 1 year by 22.5 times (95% CI = 7.12-71.1). In a subsample of children without myopia who had refractive errors less than +0.75 D, having a response AC/A ratio of 5.84 delta/D or more elevated the risk of development of myopia within 1 year by 3.21 times (95% CI = 1.14-9.07). The AC/A ratio was associated with all measured ocular features except lens spherical volume. Only the negative correlations with refractive error and the shape of the crystalline lens (Gullstrand lens power) were significant in a multiple regression model (adjusted R2 = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: An elevated response AC/A ratio was associated with myopia and was an important risk factor for its rapid onset. The association between higher AC/A ratios and flatter crystalline lens shapes, as well as other reported features of accommodation in myopia, may be explained by "pseudocycloplegia," which the authors define as tension on the crystalline lens that increases the level of effort needed to accommodate. Accommodative deficits in myopia may be the functional consequences of the underlying anatomy of the enlarged eye. (+info)
The influence of repetitive eye movements on vergence performance.
(24/314)
We measured the peak velocity of convergence eye movement responses in four normal subjects before and after a large number of either repetitive vergence or repetitive saccadic eye movements. A 20% decrease in the mean value of peak velocity was observed in vergence responses after 100 repetitive step vergence eye movements. However, 100 cycles of slow sinusoidal vergence tracking did not induce any notable change in vergence dynamics. Five hundred repetitive saccadic eye movements also caused an approximately 20% decrease in peak velocity. The reduction in peak velocity was related to the number of repetitions for both vergence and saccadic fatiguing stimuli. The frequency of occurrence of double-vergences was also used as an index to monitor the influence of repetitive eye movements on convergence performance. Results showed that repetitive step convergence movements could double, or even triple, the frequency of the occurrence of double-vergence responses, while slow sinusoidal vergence tracking or repetitive saccades had no influence on the frequency of response doubles. (+info)