In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage using invasive and noninvasive technique of light cure glass ionomer and flowable polyacid modified composite resin used as pit and fissure sealant.
(49/59)
Effects of different types of adhesive systems on the microleakage of compomer restorations in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser in primary teeth.
(50/59)
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of different types of adhesive systems on the microleakage of compomer restorations in Class V cavities prepared by erbium, chromium: yttrium scandium gallium garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser. There were five test groups according to the type of adhesive applied to the cavities: Adper Single Bond 2 (Group 1), Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (Group 2), Xeno III (Group 3), Clearfil Protect Bond (Group 4), Prime&Bond NT (Group 5). Dye penetration was evaluated under a stereomicroscope, and data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests. Gingival margins showed significantly higher microleakage than occlusal margins in all the test groups (p<0.05). Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly less microleakage than Group 5 (p<0.05), and there were no statistically significant differences among Groups 3, 4, and 5 (p>0.05). None of the dentin bonding agents eliminated microleakage completely, and higher microleakage scores were observed along the gingival margin than the occlusal margin. (+info)
Topical fluoride application is able to reduce acid susceptibility of restorative materials.
(51/59)
This study aimed to investigate the effect of topical fluoride application on the acid susceptibility of restorative materials. Four restorative materials were investigated in this study: 2 composite resins (Tetric EvoCeram and Filtek Silorane), a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract Extra), and a conventional glass-ionomer cement (Ketac Fil Plus). The samples were treated once with 1 of 8 different fluoride solutions (TiF4, NaF, AmF, and SnF2, each at native pH or pH 4) for 3 min or remained untreated (control). The samples were then eroded by citric acid (pH 2.6) for 5 days (6x1 min daily). Erosive substance loss, surface topographic and compositional changes were investigated using surface profilometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), respectively, after fluoride pretreatment and after erosion. The results indicate high-concentrated AmF solution at native pH was effective in inhibiting erosion in the conventional glass-ionomer cement and polyacid-modified resin composite. (+info)
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three pit and fissure sealants using conventional etch or self-etching primer.
(52/59)
Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary fluoride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives.
(54/59)
The aim of this study was to evaluate the fluoride release of five fluoride-releasing restorative materials and three dental adhesives, before and after NaF solution treatment. Five restorative materials (Fuji IX GP, GC Corp.; Ketac N100, 3M ESPE; Dyract Extra, Dentsply; Beautifil II, Shofu Inc.; Wave, SDI) and three dental adhesives (Stae, SDI; Fluorobond II - Shofu Inc.; Prime & Bond NT, Dentsply) were investigated before and after NaF solution treatment. A fluoride ion-selective electrode was to measure fluoride concentrations. During the 86-day period before NaF solution treatment, Fuji IX GP released the highest amount of fluoride among the restorative materials while Prime & Bond NT was the highest among the dental adhesives. After NaF solution treatment, Fuji IX GP again ranked the highest in fluoride release among the restorative materials while Fluorobond II ranked the highest among dental adhesives. It was concluded that the compositions and setting mechanisms of fluoride-containing dental materials influenced their fluoride release and recharge abilities. (+info)
Evaluation of the caries-preventive effect of three orthodontic band cements in terms of fluoride release, retentiveness, and microleakage.
(55/59)
This in vitro study was undertaken to evaluate the caries-preventive effect of three orthodontic band cements (a dual-curing resinmodified glass ionomer cement [RMGIC] and two light-curing polyacid-modified composite resin [compomer] cements) in terms of fluoride release, retentiveness, and microleakage after thermocycling. The RMGIC (Ortholy Band Paste [GC Ortholy, Inc., Tokyo, Japan]) showed a significantly higher amount of cumulative fluoride release over 180 days (p<0.001) and significantly greater tensile bond strength (p<0.001) than the compomer cements (Transbond Plus [3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA] and Ultra Band-Lok [Reliance Orthodontic Products, Inc., Itasca, IL, USA]). Its bond strength was unaffected by thermocycling (2,000 cycles), indicating good retentiveness, whereas that of the compomer cements significantly decreased after thermocycling. Moreover, it had lower dyepenetration scores, indicative of less microleakage. These findings suggest that the RMGIC may have a better caries-preventive effect than the compomer cements and is suitable for long-term orthodontic banding. (+info)
Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded with different light-cured glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study.
(56/59)
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strengths of four light-cured glass ionomer cements used for direct bonding of ceramic brackets, and to compare the results with a two-paste chemically-cured composite resin. Two commercially available polycrystalline ceramic brackets, with either chemically or mechanically retentive bracket bases, were evaluated. The brackets were bonded to 100 freshly extracted bovine incisors, and, after storage in tap water at room temperature for 24 hours, they were subsequently tested in a shear mode using a universal testing machine. The maximum bond strength and the site of bond failure were recorded. With the mechanically retentive base, Fuji Ortho LC produced the highest bond strength (18.50 MPa), which was not significantly different from the values achieved with Concise (14.88 MPa) (P > 0.1) and Photac Bond (13.86 Mpa) (P = 0.1). The lowest bond strength was provided by locomp A20 (5.23 MPa). With the chemically retentive base, the highest bond strength was measured with Concise (29.27 MPa), which was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than the values for Photac Bond (16.27 MPa) and Fuji Ortho LC (13.48 MPa). Again locomp A20 produced the lowest bond strength (3.21 MPa). Three cements (Dyract Ortho, locomp A20 and Fuji Ortho LC) provided higher shear bond strengths with the mechanical retention system, whereas Concise and Photac Bond gave higher strengths with the silane-treated bracket bases. However, the strengths were statistically significantly different only for locomp A20 (P = 0.001) and Concise (P = 0.001). With the mechanically retentive base, Dyract Ortho and locomp A20 failed at the enamel-adhesive interface, whereas Photac Bond and Concise debonded at the bracket-adhesive interface. Fuji Ortho LC failed at both, the bracket-adhesive (40 per cent) and the adhesive-enamel (60 per cent) interface. With the chemically retentive base, all the adhesives failed at the enamel-adhesive interface. Only one bracket fracture occurred in this study, and no enamel damage was detected. (+info)