Portable-monitor testing: an alternative strategy for managing patients with obstructive sleep apnea. (41/390)

Portable-monitor testing is being used increasingly in ambulatory management pathways for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Wide varieties of portable monitors are commercially available and they range from single-channel recorders to units that record a full polysomnogram. Recent comparative effectiveness research studies have shown that clinical outcomes of patients with a high pretest probability for obstructive sleep apnea who receive ambulatory management using portable-monitor testing have similar functional outcomes and adherence to continuous positive airway pressure treatment, compared to patients managed with in-laboratory polysomnography. The cost-effectiveness of portable-monitor testing and its potential to improve patient access to diagnosis and treatment requires further investigation.  (+info)

Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: a case study using primary open-angle glaucoma. (42/390)

 (+info)

The economics of comparative effectiveness studies: societal and private perspectives and their implications for prioritizing public investments in comparative effectiveness research. (43/390)

 (+info)

A call for action: Comparative effectiveness research in asthma. (44/390)

 (+info)

Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy. (45/390)

 (+info)

Valuation of scleroderma and psoriatic arthritis health states by the general public. (46/390)

 (+info)

Creating a high-performance system for comparative effectiveness research. (47/390)

 (+info)

An evaluation of recent federal spending on comparative effectiveness research: priorities, gaps, and next steps. (48/390)

 (+info)