The disposition of cocaine and opiate analytes in hair and fingernails of humans following cocaine and codeine administration.
(25/337)
This study investigated the disposition patterns of cocaine and opiates into hair and fingernail specimens collected from 8 volunteers enrolled in a 10-week inpatient clinical study. All subjects were African-American males with a confirmed drug use history. Scalp hair and fingernail scrapings were collected weekly throughout the course of the study. Head hair was collected from the posterior vertex region, and fingernail scrapings were collected along the entire ventral surface of the nail plate. The specimens were introduced to successive decontamination washes including an isopropanol wash and three phosphate buffer washes. All decontamination washes were collected and analyzed. All specimens were enzymatically digested prior to being subjected to solid-phase extraction and derivatization. Analyses were performed using electron impact gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analytes investigated included eight cocaine analytes and five codeine analytes. The limit of quantitation for all analytes ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 ng/mg for both matrices. Cocaine was present at the highest concentrations of any analyte in both hair and nail. Benzoylecgonine and ecgonine methyl ester were the primary metabolites in both matrices and were typically less than 15% of cocaine concentrations. Codeine was the only opiate analyte identified in either hair or nail. Observed drug disposition profiles were different for hair and nails. A significant dose-response relationship was observed for hair specimens. The mean peak concentrations in hair after low dosing were half the concentration observed after high-dose administration. Generally, no clear relationship was evident between nail drug concentrations and dose. Decontamination washes removed less than 20% of the total drug present in hair, but removed most of the drug concentrations (60-100%) in nail. This investigation demonstrated that higher concentrations of drug were found in the subjects' hair than in their fingernails and that cocaine was found in both matrices at a greater concentration than codeine. Although both hair and nail have similar physical and chemical properties and may share common mechanisms of drug incorporation, this clinical study suggests that there are distinct differences in their disposition profiles. (+info)
Identification of hydrocodone in human urine following controlled codeine administration.
(26/337)
Allegations of illicit hydrocodone use have been made against individuals who were taking physician-prescribed oral codeine but denied hydrocodone use. Drug detection was based on positive urine opiate immunoassay results with subsequent confirmation of hydrocodone by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In these cases, low concentrations of hydrocodone (approximately 100 ng/mL) were detected in urine specimens containing high concentrations of codeine (> 5000 ng/mL). Although hydrocodone has been reported to be a minor metabolite of codeine in humans, there has been little study of this unusual metabolic pathway. We investigated the occurrence of hydrocodone excretion in urine specimens of subjects who were administered codeine. In a controlled study, two African-American and three Caucasian male subjects were orally administered 60 mg/70 kg/day and 120 mg/70 kg/day of codeine sulfate on separate days. Urine specimens were collected prior to and for approximately 30-40 h following drug administration. In a second case study, a postoperative patient self-administered 960 mg/day (240 mg four times per day) of physician-prescribed oral codeine phosphate, and urine specimens were collected on the third day of the dosing regimen. Samples from both studies were extracted on copolymeric solid-phase columns and analyzed by GC-MS. In the controlled study, codeine was detected in the first post-drug-administration specimen from all subjects. Peak concentrations appeared at 2-5 h and ranged from 1475 to 61,695 ng/mL. Codeine was detected at concentrations above the 10-ng/mL limit of quantitation for the assay throughout the 40-h collection period. Hydrocodone was initially detected at 6-11 h following codeine administration and peaked at 10-18 h (32-135 ng/mL). Detection times for hydrocodone following oral codeine administration ranged from 6 h to the end of the collection period. Confirmation of hydrocodone in a urine specimen was always accompanied by codeine detection. Codeine and hydrocodone were detected in all specimens collected from the postoperative patient, and concentrations ranged from 2099 to 4020 and 47 to 129 ng/mL, respectively. Analyses of the codeine formulations administered to subjects revealed no hydrocodone present at the limit of detection of the assay (10 ng/mL). These data confirm that hydrocodone can be produced as a minor metabolite of codeine in humans and may be excreted in urine at concentrations as high as 11% of parent drug concentration. Consequently, the detection of minor amounts of hydrocodone in urine containing high concentrations of codeine should not be interpreted as evidence of hydrocodone abuse. (+info)
The effects of collection methods on oral fluid codeine concentrations.
(27/337)
The use of a variety of alternative biological specimens such as oral fluid for the detection and quantitation of drugs has recently been the focus of considerable scientific research and evaluation. A disadvantage of drug testing using alternative specimens is the lack of scientific literature describing the collection and analyses of these specimens and the limited literature about the pharmacokinetics and disposition of drugs in the specimen. Common methods of oral fluid collection are spitting, draining, suction, and collection on various types of absorbent swabs. The effect(s) of collection techniques on the resultant oral fluid drug concentration has not been thoroughly evaluated. Reported is a controlled clinical study (using codeine) that was designed to determine the effects of five collection techniques and devices on oral fluid codeine concentrations. The collection techniques were control (spitting), acidic stimulation, nonacidic stimulation, and use of either the Salivette or the Finger Collector (containing Accu-Sorb) oral fluid collection devices. Preliminary data were collected from two subjects using the Orasure device. The in vitro drug recovery was also evaluated for the Salivette and the Finger Collector devices. With the exception of a single time point, codeine concentrations in specimens collected by the control method (spitting) were consistently higher than concentrations in specimens collected by the other methods. The control collection concentrations averaged 3.6 times higher than concentrations in specimens collected by acidic stimulation and 1.3 to 2.0 higher than concentrations in specimens collected by nonacidic stimulation or collection using either the Salivette or the Finger Collector devices. When calculated using oral fluid codeine concentrations from the clinical study, the elimination rate constant, t(1/2), AUC and the peak oral fluid concentrations demonstrated device differences. The slope of the elimination curve for codeine using the acidic collection method exceeded that of the other four methods. As a result, the t(1/2) for the acidic method was significantly less than that of the control method (1.8 vs. 3.0 h, respectively). Oral contamination contributed to the control method having higher AUC than that calculated using the other methods. There was considerable variation in peak codeine concentrations between devices and between individuals within each collection method. When samples were collected simultaneously with the Salivette and the Finger Collector, the mean codeine concentrations were similar. We were able to recover > or = 500 microL of oral fluid from 81.8% of the clinical samples collected with the Salivette. However, we were able to recover this volume from only 25.5% of the samples collected with the Finger Collector. In addition, the in vitro drug recoveries were lower using the Finger Collector. When oral fluid was collected nearly simultaneously by the control method and by use of the Salivette, mean control codeine concentrations were 2.3 times higher, but the duration of detection was similar for both methods. (+info)
Acute effects of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in human skin--a microdialysis study.
(28/337)
Upon activation nociceptors release neuropeptides in the skin provoking vasodilation and plasma protein extravasation in rodents, but only vasodilation in humans. Pivotal peptides in the induction of neurogenic inflammation comprise calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P, the latter being suggested to act partly via degranulation of mast cells. In this study substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide-induced vasodilation, protein extravasation, histamine release, and sensory effects were investigated simultaneously in human skin by dermal microdialysis. The vasodilatory prostaglandin E(2) and the mast cell activator codeine served as positive controls. Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide applied intradermally via large cut-off plasmapheresis capillaries induced dose-dependent local vasodilation, but only SP provoked protein extravasation in concentrations greater than 10(-9) M. Substance P-induced (10(-8)-10(-6) M) protein extravasation was not accompanied by histamine release and was unaffected by cetirizine (histamine H1 blocker, 200 microg per ml). Only the highest concentration of substance P (10(-5) M) induced significant histamine release. Neither neuropeptide caused any axon reflex erythema or any itch or pain sensation, whereas mast cell degranulation by codeine dose dependently provoked itch, flare, protein extravasation, and histamine release. In human skin calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P induce vasodilation by a mechanism not involving histamine. No evidence for neuropeptide-induced activation of nociceptors was obtained. Our results suggest that endogenous calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P have no acute sensory function in human skin. The lack of neurogenic protein extravasation in humans can most probably be attributed to low local concentrations of this neuropeptide still sufficient to exert trophic and immunomodulatory effects (10(-11) M), but too low to induce protein extravasation (10(-8) M) or even mast cell degranulation (10(-5) M). J Invest Dermatol 115:1015-1020 2000 (+info)
Inhibition by glucocorticoids of the mast cell-dependent weal and flare response in human skin in vivo.
(29/337)
1. This study examines the relative contributions made by inhibition of mast cell degranulation, reduction of mast cell recruitment and maturation, and lowering the responsiveness of the vasculature to histamine, in the inhibition by glucocorticoids of the weal and flare in human skin. 2. One forearm of healthy human volunteers was treated for 24 h (n=6) or daily for 21 days (n=10) with 0.05% clobetasol propionate. The other arm served as control. Weal and flare responses were elicited by intradermal injection of 20 microl of 0.3 mM codeine. The areas of the responses were measured using scanning laser Doppler imaging. Microdialysis was used to assess histamine release. Mast cell numbers and tissue histamine content were assessed in 4-mm punch biopsies. Histamine (20 microl of 1 microM i.d.) was used to assess the status of the vasculature. 3. No significant effects were seen at 24 h. At 21 days, clobetasol reduced the areas of the codeine-induced weal and flare responses by 59 and 58% respectively (both P=0.006). Mast cell numbers were reduced by 47%, (P=0.014) and total tissue histamine content by 52% (P=0.006). Codeine-induced histamine release was reduced by 44% (P=0.022). The weal, but not the flare, induced by histamine was significantly inhibited (P=0.019). Echography revealed a 15% thinning of the skin by clobetasol. 4. These results demonstrate that reduction of the weal and flare responses to codeine following clobetasol treatment, results primarily from reduced mast cell numbers and tissue histamine content rather than inhibition by corticosteroids of mast cell degranulation. (+info)
Detection of acetylcodeine in urine as an indicator of illicit heroin use: method validation and results of a pilot study.
(30/337)
BACKGROUND: Acetylcodeine (AC), an impurity of illicit heroin synthesis, has been suggested as an interesting biomarker of illicit heroin use. METHODS: Procedures were developed for quantification of (a) morphine, 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-AM), and codeine in urine and (b) diacetylmorphine and AC in urine. Solid-phase extraction of the analytes was performed, and the extracted analytes were analyzed by selected-ion monitoring with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. This procedure required prior derivatization with propionic anhydride. RESULTS: Different validation parameters were determined, such as linearity, reproducibility, extraction recoveries, and cutoffs. Seventy-one urine specimens of illicit heroin abusers and 44 urine specimens of subjects in a heroin maintenance program were analyzed. AC was detected in 85.9% of the samples of the first group but not in any of the samples from subjects taking medical heroin. In the two groups, there were 94.4% and 84.1% 6-AM positive urine specimens, respectively. Detection times were determined for AC and codeine by parallel administration of heroin containing various percentages of AC to four voluntary patients in a heroin maintenance program. The measured detection times were 8 and 23 h for AC and codeine, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that, together with detection of 6-AM in urine, AC is a suitable marker of illicit heroin use. (+info)
Using evidence from different sources: an example using paracetamol 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg.
(31/337)
BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis usually restricts the information pooled, for instance using only randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. This neglects other types of high quality information. This review explores using different information for the combination of paracetamol 1000 mg and codeine 60 mg in acute postoperative pain. RESULTS: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of paracetamol 1000 mg and codeine 60 mg had an NNT of 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.9) for at least 50% pain relief over four to six hours in three trials with 197 patients. Computer simulation of randomised trials demonstrated 92% confidence that the simulated NNT was within +/- 0.5 of the underlying value of 2.2 with this number of patients. The result was supported a rational dose-response relationship for different doses of paracetamol and codeine in 17 additional trials with 1,195 patients. Three controlled trials lacking a placebo and with 117 patients treated with of paracetamol 1000 mg and codeine 60 mg had 73% (95%CI 56% to 81%) of patients with at least 50% pain relief, compared with 57% (48% to 66%) in placebo controlled trials. Six trials in acute pain were omitted because of design issues, like the use of different pain measures or multiple dosing regimens. In each paracetamol 1000 mg and codeine 60 mg was shown to be better than placebo or comparators for at least one measure. CONCLUSIONS: Different designs of high quality trials can be used to support limited information used in meta-analysis without recourse to low quality trials that might be biased. (+info)
Acetylcodeine as a marker of illicit heroin in human hair: method validation and results of a pilot study.
(32/337)
Acetylcodeine (AC), which is an impurity of illicit heroin synthesis, was suggested as a marker of heroin abuse. A procedure for simultaneous quantitation of 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), which is the major metabolite of heroin, morphine, codeine, and AC in hair was developed. Fifty-milligram hair samples were incubated in 0.01 M HCl overnight at 60 degrees C. The resulting hydrolyzed solutions were extracted by an automated solid-phase extraction procedure and drugs were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in selected ion monitoring mode (SIM). This required prior derivatization with propionic anhydride. Different validation parameters, such as linearity, intra-assay accuracy, extraction recoveries, and limit of quantitation, were described. Seventy-three hair samples from heroin abusers and 43 hair samples from subjects who had completed a heroin-maintenance program were analyzed. AC was detected in 92% of the first sample group and in only 12% of the second sample group. In the two groups, about 98% of AC-positive samples were found. These results prove that AC can be considered as a suitable marker of illicit heroin use, along with 6-MAM detection. (+info)