Successful endoscopic ultrasound-guided transduodenal biliary drainage through a pre-existing duodenal stent. (49/81)

CONTEXT: When ERCP fails in the setting of combined biliary and duodenal obstruction, EUS-guided biliary drainage has emerged as an alternate method of biliary decompression. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a 40-year-old man with advanced pancreatic cancer and a pre-existing duodenal wall stent who subsequently develops jaundice due to biliary obstruction. An ERCP was technically unsuccessful as the papilla was inaccessible despite probing within the duodenal stent. Transduodenal biliary drainage was achieved using EUS guidance to create a choledochoduodenostomy tract. A fully covered metal biliary stent was then deployed through the mesh of the duodenal wall stent. The patient's jaundice and pruritus subsequently resolved. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of successful transduodenal EUS-guided biliary drainage performed through an existing enteral wall stent and can still be considered as an alternate mode of biliary drainage in this setting.  (+info)

Life-threatening hemobilia caused by hepatic pseudoaneurysm after T-tube choledochostomy: report of a case. (50/81)

 (+info)

EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for biliary drainage in unresectable pancreatic cancer: a case series. (51/81)

CONTEXT: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the procedure of choice for biliary decompression in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. However, it may be unsuccessful in 3 to 10% of cases. When ERCP is unsuccessful, the usual alternatives are percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage or surgery. Recently, several authors have reported the use of EUS-guided biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary obstructions, with acceptable success and complication rates. We describe three cases of unresectable pancreatic cancer associated with obstructive jaundice, treated by EUS-guided biliary drainage. CASE REPORT: Three patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, associated with obstructive jaundice, were included. ERCP was unsuccessful because of complete tumor obstruction of the distal common bile duct and papilla invasion. An EUS-guided rendezvous maneuver was attempted, without success. Then, EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, with a partially covered self-expanding metal stent, was performed in the same procedure. There were no early complications and the procedure was also clinically effective in relieving jaundice in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided biliary drainage is a feasible alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage or surgery in unresectable pancreatic cancer with obstructive jaundice when ERCP fails. However, the development of new specific instruments and studies comparing this procedure with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and surgery are needed.  (+info)

Portal biliopathy: a study of 39 surgically treated patients. (52/81)

 (+info)

A single-center experience with biliary reconstruction in retransplantation: duct-to-duct or Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy. (53/81)

 (+info)

Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis undergoing liver transplantation. (54/81)

 (+info)

Early complications after biliary enteric anastomosis for benign diseases: a retrospective analysis. (55/81)

 (+info)

Does the bile duct angulation affect recurrence of choledocholithiasis? (56/81)

 (+info)