Acalculous cholecystitis in a two year old.
(57/789)
The patient is a 2-year-old Caucasian boy with acute acalculous cholecystitis (AC) but none of the predisposing factors that are typically found in patients with this disease. The presentation and clinical course of the disease was typical of AC. Nonsurgical intervention resulted in resolution of the child's initial symptoms. After recurrent bouts of biliary colic over the ensuing ten weeks, further evaluations were completed. Persistent inflammation of the gallbladder was seen on computerized tomographic scans and a nonfunction of the gallbladder was demonstrated through radio-nucleotide scanning. After discussing the findings with the parents, we performed a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the child. The typical presentation, diagnosis, and pathogenesis of AC are discussed. (+info)
Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial clinical experience with 25 patients.
(58/789)
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and feasibility of performing telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomies. This will serve as a preliminary step toward the integration of computer-rendered three-dimensional preoperative imaging studies of anatomy and pathology onto the patient's own anatomy during surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) increases the surgeon's dexterity and precision during minimally invasive surgery, especially when using microinstruments. Clinical trials have shown the improved microsurgical precision afforded by CAS in the minimally invasive setting in cardiac and gynecologic surgery. Future applications would allow integration of preoperative data and augmented-reality simulation onto the actual procedure. METHODS: Beginning in September 1999, CAS was used to perform cholecystectomies on 25 patients at a single medical center in this nonrandomized, prospective study. The operations were performed by one of two surgeons who had previous laboratory experience using the computer interface. The entire dissection was performed by the surgeon, who remained at a distance from the patient but in the same operating room. The operation was evaluated according to time of dissection, time of assembly/disassembly of robot, complications, immediate postoperative course, and short-term follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty of the 25 patients had symptomatic cholelithiasis, 1 had a gallbladder polyp, and 4 had acute cholecystitis. Twenty-four of the 25 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were successfully completed by CAS. There was one conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Set-up and takedown of the robotic arms took a median of 18 minutes. The median operative time for dissection and the overall operative time were 25 and 108 minutes, respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. There was one postoperative complication of a suspected pulmonary embolus, which was treated with anticoagulation. All patients were tolerating diet at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by CAS is safe and feasible, with operative times and patient recovery similar to those of conventional laparoscopy. At present, CAS cholecystectomy offers no obvious advantages to patients, but the potential advantages of CAS lie in its ability to convert the surgical act into digitized data. This digitized format can then interface with other forms of digitized data, such as pre- or intraoperative imaging studies, or be transmitted over a distance. This has the potential to revolutionize the way surgery is performed. (+info)
Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
(59/789)
OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of triage guidelines for patients with cholelithiasis and suspected choledocholithiasis, incorporating selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: ERCP is the most frequently used modality for the diagnosis and resolution of choledocholithiasis before LC. MRC has recently emerged as an accurate, noninvasive modality for the detection of choledocholithiasis. However, useful strategies for implementing this diagnostic modality for patient evaluation before LC have not been investigated. METHODS: During a 16-month period, the authors prospectively evaluated all patients before LC using triage guidelines incorporating patient information obtained from clinical evaluation, serum chemistry analysis, and abdominal ultrasonography. Patients were then assigned to one of four groups based on the level of suspicion for choledocholithiasis (group I, extremely high; group 2, high; group 3, moderate; group 4, low). Group 1 patients underwent ERCP and clearance of common bile duct stones; group 2 patients underwent MRC; group 3 patients underwent LC with intraoperative cholangiography; and group 4 patients underwent LC without intraoperative cholangiography. RESULTS: Choledocholithiasis was detected in 43 of 440 patients (9.8%). The occurrence of choledocholithiasis among patients in the four groups were 92.6% (25/27), 32.4% (12/37), 3.8% (2/52), and 0.9% (3/324) for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (P <.001). MRC was used for 8.4% (37/440) of patients. Patient triage resulted in the identification of common bile duct stones during preoperative ERCP in 92.3% (36/39) of the patients. Unsuspected common bile duct stones occurred in six patients (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The probability of choledocholithiasis can be accurately assessed based on information obtained during the initial noninvasive evaluation. Stratification of risks for choledocholithiasis facilitates patient management with the most appropriate diagnostic studies and interventions, thereby improving patient care and resource utilization. (+info)
Real-time Internet connections: implications for surgical decision making in laparoscopy.
(60/789)
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a low-bandwidth Internet connection can provide adequate image quality to support remote real-time surgical consultation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Telemedicine has been used to support care at a distance through the use of expensive equipment and broadband communication links. In the past, the operating room has been an isolated environment that has been relatively inaccessible for real-time consultation. Recent technological advances have permitted videoconferencing over low-bandwidth, inexpensive Internet connections. If these connections are shown to provide adequate video quality for surgical applications, low-bandwidth telemedicine will open the operating room environment to remote real-time surgical consultation. METHODS: Surgeons performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Ecuador or the Dominican Republic shared real-time laparoscopic images with a panel of surgeons at the parent university through a dial-up Internet account. The connection permitted video and audio teleconferencing to support real-time consultation as well as the transmission of real-time images and store-and-forward images for observation by the consultant panel. A total of six live consultations were analyzed. In addition, paired local and remote images were "grabbed" from the video feed during these laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Nine of these paired images were then placed into a Web-based tool designed to evaluate the effect of transmission on image quality. RESULTS: The authors showed for the first time the ability to identify critical anatomic structures in laparoscopy over a low-bandwidth connection via the Internet. The consultant panel of surgeons correctly remotely identified biliary and arterial anatomy during six laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Within the Web-based questionnaire, 15 surgeons could not blindly distinguish the quality of local and remote laparoscopic images. CONCLUSIONS: Low-bandwidth, Internet-based telemedicine is inexpensive, effective, and almost ubiquitous. Use of these inexpensive, portable technologies will allow sharing of surgical procedures and decisions regardless of location. Internet telemedicine consistently supported real-time intraoperative consultation in laparoscopic surgery. The implications are broad with respect to quality improvement and diffusion of knowledge as well as for basic consultation. (+info)
Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis is not indicated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
(61/789)
OBJECTIVES: Recent publications have discussed the risk of deep venous thrombosis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the need for routine deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of clinically detectable DVT in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy without a standard DVT prophylaxis regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed completed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 587 patients over a 4-year period. Eighteen of these patients received some form of perioperative DVT prophylaxis, and 569 patients did not. Routine screening with a duplex Doppler was not used. Patients were followed postoperatively for 4 weeks after discharge from the hospital. RESULTS: In an average of 4 weeks follow-up, 31 complications and 4 deaths were reported. These complications included wound infection (16), postoperative bleeding (3), persistent pain (3), pneumonia (3), retained CBD stones (2), asthma (1), papillary stenosis (1), ileus (1), and intraoperative bowel injury (1). None of the 587 patients in this study had symptoms of DVT or pulmonary embolism. DISCUSSION: Despite the fact that DVT in this patient population is rare, many reports suggest the use of routine DVT prophylaxis with sequential compression devices (SCDs) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Because no clinically detectable evidence was found of DVT in our study group despite the lack of any perioperative DVT prophylaxis, we question whether routine DVT prophylaxis is indicated or cost effective for routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A large prospective trial addressing this question is needed. (+info)
The advantages of preview cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
(62/789)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Despite the numerous and often cited benefits of routine cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, universal application of this technique has not been realized. Surgeons who advocate selective cholangiography cite the extra cost, the low yield of unanticipated findings, and the marked increase in the duration of the operation when cholangiography is added to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We present our experience with preview cholangiography and compare it with the transcystic-duct approach. METHODS: We attempted preview cholangiograms on 11 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Successful cholangiography was determined by using established radiologic criteria. RESULTS: Preview cholangiogram was successful in all 11 patients. No complications occurred. The average time required was 110 seconds. The mean operating time was 52 minutes. These times are far better than our best accomplishments using the cystic duct cannulation method for cholangiography (mean cholangiogram time, 22 minutes, and mean operative time, 75 minutes) following the first 100 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Preview cholangiography is a safe, relatively easy, quick method for outlining the anatomy of the extrahepatic biliary tree prior to dissection necessary to remove the gallbladder with laparoscopic techniques. The ease of this approach should result in more widespread use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. (+info)
Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.
(63/789)
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgical residency training has influenced the occurrence of common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and to asses the anatomic and technical details of bile duct injuries from the practices of surgeons trained in laparoscopic cholecystectomy after residency versus surgeons trained in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Shortly after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the rate of injury to the common bile duct increased to 0.5%, and injuries were more commonly reported early in each surgeon's experience. It is not known whether learning laparoscopic cholecystectomy during surgery residency influences this pattern. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was mailed to 3,657 surgeons across the United States who completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved residency between 1980 and 1990 (group A) or 1992 and 1998 (group B). All surgeons in group A learned laparoscopic cholecystectomy after residency, and all those in group B learned laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency. Information obtained included practice description, number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies completed since residency, postgraduate training in laparoscopy, and annual volume of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the surgeon's hospital. In addition, technical details queried included the completion of a cholangiogram, the interval between injury and identification, the method of repair, and the site of definitive treatment. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (bile leaks without a major bile duct injury were not tabulated). RESULTS: Forty-five percent (n = 1,661) of the questionnaires were completed and returned. Mean practice experience was 13.6 years for group A and 5.4 years for group B. At least one injury occurrence was reported by 422 surgeons (37.6%) in group A and 143 surgeons (26.5%) in group B. Forty percent of the injuries in group A occurred during the first 50 cases compared with 22% in group B. Thirty percent of bile duct injuries in group A and 32.9% of all injuries in group B occurred after a surgeon had performed more than 200 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Independent of the number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies completed since residency, group A surgeons were 39% more likely to report one or more biliary injuries and 58% more likely to report two or more injuries than their counterparts in group B. Bile duct injuries were more likely to be discovered during surgery if a cholangiogram was completed than if cholangiography was omitted (80.9% vs. 45.1%). Sixty-four percent of all major bile duct injuries required biliary reconstruction, and most injuries were definitively treated at the hospital where the injury occurred. Only 14.7% of injuries were referred to another center for repair. CONCLUSIONS: Accepting that the survey bias underestimates the true frequency of bile duct injuries, residency training decreases the likelihood of injuring a bile duct, but only by decreasing the frequency of early "learning curve" injuries. If one accepts a liberal definition of the learning curve (200 cases), it appears that at least one third of injuries are not related to inexperience but may reflect fundamental errors in the technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as practiced by a broad population of surgeons in the United States. Intraoperative cholangiography is helpful for intraoperative discovery of injuries when they occur. Most injuries are repaired in the hospital where they occur and are not universally referred to tertiary care centers. (+info)
Xenon anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with Eisenmenger's syndrome.
(64/789)
There are few reports on anaesthesia for patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome requiring non-cardiac surgery and none of the use of xenon. We describe the use of xenon with a closed-circuit system in a patient with Eisenmenger's syndrome having a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. (+info)