Isolation and some biochemical characteristics of nuclei from AH-66 hepatoma cells. (25/77)

Cetylpyridinium chloride uniquely facilitated the isolation of nuclei from AH-66 hepatoma ascites cells in an isotonic medium without homogenization because of its strong solubilization of their plasma membranes, which were resistant to mechanical shearing with the commonly used nonionic detergents such as Triton X-100, Nonidet P-40, and Tween 80. Virtually all the nuclei in a population of AH-66 cells (10(6)/ml) can be isolated with 0.2% cetylpyridinium chloride. The isolated nuclei were free of adherent cytoplasm, maintained satisfactory morphology, and had high activity of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide pyrophosphorylase. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the acid-soluble nuclear proteins of the AH-66 hepatoma nuclei isolated by the cetylpyridinium chloride procedure as well as by the citric acid procedure revealed that Spots Ac and C16-C18 were significantly intense in the gel pattern. Unexpectedly, Spot A10 was absent from the gel pattern of AH-66 hepatoma nuclei.  (+info)

Comparative antiplaque and antigingivitis efficacy of three antiseptic mouthrinses: a two week randomized clinical trial. (26/77)

 (+info)

Mucositis in irradiated cancer patients: effects of an antiseptic mouthrinse. (27/77)

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of an antiseptic, non-alcohol based mouth-rinse containing chlorhexidine and cetylpyridinium chloride, in preventing the oral complications associated to radiation therapy in head-and-neck cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: This was a parallel, double blind, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Cancer patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments (test mouth-rinse or a placebo). Three visits were scheduled (baseline, 14 and 28 days). Different outcome variables were evaluated: mucositis, plaque and gingival indices, stimulated saliva and salivary pH. RESULTS: 70 patients were screened and 36 were included. The presence and the degree of mucositis significantly increased in both groups and no significant differences were detected between groups, although the median increase in the placebo group (1.81) at 2 weeks was higher than in the test group (1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the small sample size, this study suggests that the use of the tested mouth-rinse may lead to some improvements in clinical parameters in patients irradiated for head-and-neck cancer.  (+info)

Anti-cariogenic effect of a cetylpyridinium chloride-containing nanoemulsion. (28/77)

 (+info)

In-vitro evidence for efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses. (29/77)

 (+info)

Self-performed supragingival biofilm control: qualitative analysis, scientific basis and oral-health implications. (30/77)

 (+info)

Antimicrobial activity of nanoemulsion on cariogenic Streptococcus mutans. (31/77)

 (+info)

Surface thermodynamic homeostasis of salivary conditioning films through polar-apolar layering. (32/77)

 (+info)