Comparative in vitro susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria to cefmenoxime, cefotetan, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin. (41/55)

The in vitro activities of cefmenoxime, cefotetan, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin were compared with those of other antimicrobial agents (metronidazole, clindamycin, cefoxitin, and moxalactam) against anaerobic bacteria. The data obtained indicate that N-formimidoyl thienamycin exhibits excellent activity against anaerobic bacteria; cefotetan and cefmenoxime, though less active, should be of value in treating selected anaerobic infections.  (+info)

Liquid-chromatographic assay of cefmenoxime in serum and urine. (42/55)

This is a simple, precise liquid-chromatographic procedure for determining cefmenoxime in patients' serum and urine. p-Anisic acid is used as the internal standard. Protein is precipitated from 0.5 mL of serum or dilute urine with 100 microL of perchloric acid. The clear supernate is injected directly onto a mu-Bondapak CN reversed-phase column. The mobile phase is acetate buffer, pH 3.8 (25 degrees C). The flow rate is 2.5 mL/min. Column effluent is monitored at 254 nm. Extraction recovery from serum averaged 74.6%. Calibration curves were linear from 0.5 mg/L, the lower limit of quantification, to 100 mg/L. We present cefmenoxime concentrations in serum from a patient being treated for pneumonia. The procedure was evaluated in the clinical setting to determine its applicability to the study of cefmenoxime pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients.  (+info)

Antimicrobial activity of cefmenoxime compared with those of other cephalosporins. (43/55)

The antimicrobial activity of cefmenoxime was compared with those of cefamandole, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cephalothin, and moxalactam. In general, the activity of cefmenoxime was equivalent to those of the other cephalosporins. Cefmenoxime appears to be a potent antimicrobial agent against most gram-negative microorganisms other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp.  (+info)

Comparison of susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria to cefmenoxime, ceftriaxone, and other antimicrobial compounds. (44/55)

The minimal inhibitory concentrations of cefmenoxime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, and moxalactam were determined by agar dilution for 202 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria. Cefoxitin and moxalactam were the most active among the cephalosporin-like compounds.  (+info)

Effect of probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of cefmenoxime. (45/55)

In this study, we were concerned with the effect of probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of 1,000 mg of cefmenoxime administered over a 30-min period by intravenous infusion. Each of a total of 10 subjects received cefmenoxime twice, once with and once without adjunctive probenecid. The data were fit by iterative nonlinear regression procedures to a two-compartment open pharmacokinetic model, with elimination from the central compartment. The mean calculated peak concentration, area under the curve from zero to infinity, and half-life without probenecid were 78.1 micrograms/ml, 77.2 micrograms . h/ml, and 1.14 h, respectively. When cefmenoxime was administered with probenecid, these values were 86.7 micrograms/ml, 158.2 micrograms . h/ml, and 1.78 h, respectively. Averages of about 55 and 46% of the administered doses were recovered in urine samples collected at 0 through 24 h for doses administered without and with probenecid, respectively. The mean corrected renal drug clearance was 159 and 66 ml/min without and with probenecid, respectively. Statistical significance (P less than 0.05) was demonstrated for the differences in beta half-life, (K/net), calculated peak concentration, area under the curve from 0 to infinity, and renal clearance, but not for K21, K12, volume of distribution, or alpha-phase distribution rate constant. The results of this study indicate that tubular secretion is the predominant mechanism of clearance for cefmenoxime and that probenecid alters the pharmacokinetics of the compound by competitively inhibiting its tubular secretion without affecting either the rate or the extent of its distribution.  (+info)

Cefmenoxime penetration into gallbladder bile and tissue. (46/55)

Cefmenoxime concentrations in gallbladder bile and tissue were assessed in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. A 0.5-g intravenous dose produced mean concentrations in bile of 54.1 micrograms/ml at 62.9 min and 56.3 micrograms/ml at 194 min after the dose was given. A 1.0-g intravenous dose produced concentrations in bile of 117.9 micrograms/ml at 53 min and 169.7 micrograms/ml of 194 min after the dose was given. Mean concentrations in tissue ranged from 6.1 to 17.9 micrograms/g. Biliary tree penetration was dose and time dependent. Therapeutic concentrations were achieved.  (+info)

Cefmenoxime therapy of serious bacterial infections. (47/55)

The efficacy and safety of cefmenoxime was evaluated in 50 patients with serious bacterial infections. These included 26 pneumonias, 18 urinary tract infections, 2 soft tissue infections, 2 bacteremias, 1 renal abscess, and 1 peritonitis. A satisfactory clinical response was seen in 47 patients (94%). Eosinophilia and thrombocytosis were seen in several patients but were generally mild and transient.  (+info)

Antimicrobial activity of SK&F 88070, an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin with high and prolonged levels in blood. (48/55)

SK&F 88070 (7-[[(2-amino-4-thiazolyl)(methoxyimino)acetyl]amino]-3- [[[1-(2-sulfaminoethyl)-1H-tetrazol-5-yl]thio] methyl]-3-cephem-4-carboxylic acid) is a new parenteral cephalosporin with an expanded-spectrum profile of antibacterial activity, including activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and with high and prolonged levels in sera of experimental animals. The activity of SK&F 88070 was compared with those of cefotaxime and other cephalosporins against more than 500 clinical isolates in vitro by microtiter twofold dilution tests in Mueller-Hinton broth. SK&F 88070 was extremely potent against all of the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae that were tested, including beta-lactamase-producing strains. Its activity against P. aeruginosa was comparable to those of cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, and moxalactam. SK&F 88070 was less potent than cefotaxime or ceftizoxime against Staphylococcus species but was comparable to moxalactam. It had in vivo activity against the same Bacteroides strains as did cefotaxime, although it was less potent. Both SK&F 88070 and cefotaxime had less activity when tested with high inoculum levels of most of the rarer gram-negative bacteria. There was a greater decrease in the activity of SK&F 88070 than of cefotaxime in the presence of human serum, reflecting the higher degree of binding of SK&F 88070 to serum proteins. SK&F 88070 had peak levels and half-lives in serum much greater than those of cefotaxime in experimental animals after parenteral administration. In mouse protection studies, SK&F 88070 was more effective than cefotaxime against gram-negative bacteria but less effective than cefotaxime against Staphylococcus aureus.  (+info)