Use of glass ionomer cement containing antibiotics to seal off infected dentin: a randomized clinical trial. (33/96)

 (+info)

Phase I study of multiple-dose cefprozil and comparison with cefaclor. (34/96)

The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and tolerance of cefprozil, to characterize the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil after administration of multiple doses of the drug, and to compare these pharmacokinetic parameters with those obtained with cefaclor. The volunteers received 28 doses of 250, 500, or 1,000 mg of cefprozil or 500 mg of cefaclor every 8 h for 10 days. Serial blood samples and the total volume of urine voided by each individual were collected for pharmacokinetic evaluation on days 1, 5, and 10. Both cephalosporins were well tolerated after multiple oral dosing. The peak levels in plasma (Cmax) of cefprozil ranged from 5.7 to 18.3 micrograms/ml after oral administration of 250- to 1,000-mg doses. The regression analysis of Cmax on cefprozil dose showed a dose-linear response. The mean Cmax of cefaclor ranged from 15.2 to 16.7 micrograms/ml and did not change significantly on multiple dosing. The overall mean terminal half-life of cefprozil was 1.2 h and was invariant with respect to dose or duration of dosing. The area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of cefprozil increased in a dose-proportional manner with an increase in dose. The overall urinary recovery (61% of dose) and renal clearance values of cefprozil were generally invariant with respect to dose and duration of dosing. While cefprozil was apparently absorbed less rapidly and achieved lower Cmax values than cefaclor, the AUC0-infinity of cefprozil was nearly twofold greater than that of cefaclor. The half-life of cefprozil was also twofold longer than that observed for cefaclor. Although the urinary recovery of cefaclor (75% of dose) was significantly higher than that of cefprozil (61% of dose), the concentrations of cefprozil in urine remained significantly higher than those of cefaclor from 2 to 8 h postdosing. If the therapeutic concept is maintained that levels of beta-lactam antibiotics in plasma should exceed the MIC for the offending organisms over a period that approximates the dosing interval, then cefprozil would appear to be suitable for twice-daily administration, whereas cefaclor should probably be administered three or even four times a day.  (+info)

Comparison of cefprozil and cefaclor pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration. (35/96)

The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration, as judged by skin blister fluid, of cefprozil and cefaclor were examined in 12 healthy male volunteers. Doses of 250 and 500 mg of each drug were given to fasting subjects in a crossover fashion. Serially obtained plasma, skin blister fluid, and urine samples were analyzed for cefprozil or cefaclor by validated high-pressure liquid chromatographic methods. After oral administration of 250 and 500 mg of cefprozil, mean concentrations in plasma rose to peak levels (Cmax) of 6.1 and 11.2 micrograms/ml, respectively, and those of cefaclor were 10.6 and 17.3 micrograms/ml, respectively. The elimination half-life of cefprozil (1.3 h) was significantly longer than that of cefaclor (0.6 h), and as a result, the area under the curve for cefprozil was about two times greater than that for cefaclor. Both cephalosporins were primarily excreted unchanged in urine. The mean skin blister Cmax values were 3.0 and 5.8 micrograms/ml for cefprozil and 3.6 and 6.5 micrograms/ml for cefaclor after the 250- and 500-mg oral doses, respectively. The mean Cmax values in skin blister fluid for both cephalosporins were comparable and were significantly lower than the corresponding Cmax values in plasma. However, the levels of cefprozil and cefaclor in skin blister fluid declined more slowly than they did in plasma. The skin blister fluid half-life estimates for cefprozil were significantly longer than they were for cefaclor. Parallel to the observation in plasma, the mean skin blister fluid areas under the curve for cefprozil were significantly higher than they were for cefaclor. The plasma and skin blister fluid pharmacokinetic analyses suggest that the exposure of humans to cefprozil is significantly greater than that to cefaclor at the same dose.  (+info)

Comparison of the effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil and cefaclor. (36/96)

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil and cefaclor. A group of 12 healthy male volunteers received a single 250-mg dose of cefprozil or cefaclor under fasting conditions as well as after the intake of food. There was a 1-week washout period between each treatment. Serial blood samples were collected and assayed for cefprozil or cefaclor by specific high-pressure liquid chromatographic methods. The mean +/- standard deviation peak concentration (Cmax) of cefprozil in plasma was 6.13 +/- 1.22 micrograms/ml under the fasting condition and 5.27 +/- 1.06 micrograms/ml after breakfast, and these values were not significantly different from each other. The corresponding median time to reach Cmax was prolonged after food intake, but this difference was not significant. The mean Cmax values of cefaclor decreased significantly from 8.70 +/- 2.72 micrograms/ml under the fasting condition to 4.29 +/- 1.52 micrograms/ml after breakfast, and the corresponding median times to reach Cmax were significantly prolonged. The mean half-lives of cefprozil and cefaclor were nearly identical for the two treatments, suggesting that the elimination kinetics of these cephalosporins remained unaltered when the drugs were administered with food. The area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curves for fasted and fed conditions were not significantly different for both drugs. The results of this study indicate that the extent of absorption and rate of elimination of both cephalosporins remain unaltered in the presence of food. However, the absorption rate of cefaclor is significantly reduced in the presence of food, while that of cefprozil remains unaltered. As a result, the Cmax of cefaclor is significantly reduced in the presence of food, whereas that of cefprozil is not significantly affected. Cefprozil can be administered with a meal without markedly affecting levels in blood.  (+info)

In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of KT3777, a new orally active carbacephem. (37/96)

KT3777 is a novel carbacephem antibiotic structurally identical to cefaclor (CCL), except that the sulfur atom of position 1 of the cephem nucleus has been replaced by carbon. KT3777 was investigated for in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities in comparison with CCL, cephalexin (CEX) and amoxicillin. The MIC50 of KT3777 ranged from 0.2 to 3.13 micrograms/ml for clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococci, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. KT3777 possessed an antibacterial spectrum and potency similar to that of CCL. However, against E. coli and K. pneumoniae, KT3777 was about twice as active as CCL. KT3777 was more active than CEX against all strains tested. Killing-curve studies demonstrated bactericidal activity of KT3777 at concentrations above the MIC. KT3777 showed good affinity for penicillin-binding proteins 1A, 1Bs, 3 and 4 of E. coli NIHJ JC-2. The protective effect of KT3777 against systemic infections in mice was comparable to that of CCL with a few exceptions and about 3 to 7 times greater than that of CEX. KT3777 also proved effective against localized infections such as acute pneumonia and ascending urinary tract infections in mice.  (+info)

Single-dose cefuroxime axetil versus multiple-dose cefaclor in the treatment of acute urinary tract infections. (38/96)

Eighty-nine college women with acute urinary tract infections were treated orally with either 1,000 mg of cefuroxime axetil in a single dose (n = 59) or 250 mg of cefaclor three times a day for 7 days (n = 30). At 1 week posttherapy, 88% of the patients in the cefuroxime axetil group and 97% in the cefaclor group were clinically and bacteriologically cured (P greater than 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference between the cure rates of the two treatment groups. However, this study has only a 50% power to detect a 10% difference. Therefore, there is a substantial possibility of a type II error, i.e., failing to find a difference that is actually present. At 4 weeks posttherapy, 78% of the patients in the cefuroxime group and 80% in the cefaclor group remained cured. By 36 weeks posttherapy, the cumulative rate of recurrence in both treatment groups was 60%. Of the patients with a positive antibody-coated bacteria test, fewer achieved a short-term cure after single-dose treatment with cefuroxime axetil than those with a negative antibody-coated bacteria test (67 versus 96%; P less than 0.01).  (+info)

Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic trial of sultamicillin in acute sinusitis. (39/96)

Sultamicillin, an antibiotic combining ampicillin and the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam, was administered to 13 patients diagnosed as having acute sinusitis. Specimens from sinus were obtained for all 13 patients by transantral puncture. Pharmacokinetics, bacteriology, and therapeutic efficacy were assessed. Eighty-five percent (11 of 13) were cured; two treatment failures were subsequently shown to have chronic (rather than acute) sinusitis during surgical exploration. Diarrhea was frequently encountered, and Clostridium difficile-associated enteritis was documented for one patient. Beta-lactamase-producing organisms were not encountered in this study; however, this study provides impetus for further controlled clinical trials.  (+info)

The effect of antimicrobial agents on fecal flora of children. (40/96)

Influences of antibiotics on the fecal flora in children were studied for oral ampicillin, penicillin V, erythromycin, cefaclor, and gentamicin and for intravenous ampicillin, methicillin, cefpiramide, and ceftazidime. All antibiotics affected the normal flora, although the quality and quantity of the changes were variable. No substantial differences were noted between the oral and intravenous use of ampicillin with regard to its effect on the flora. Three penicillins, ampicillin, penicillin V, and methicillin, caused remarkable changes. The characteristic pattern observed was the considerable suppression of Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, and Lactobacillus species. Although enterobacteria did not significantly change in number, Klebsiella spp. frequently replaced Escherichia coli. In patients given erythromycin and cefaclor, the reduction in the number of Bifidobacterium spp. was 1 log10 and that of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae was 3 log10. Gentamicin administered orally caused a drastic change, including a remarkable decline of E. coli to less than 2 log10/g of feces. Cefpiramide, a parenteral expanded-spectrum cephalosporin, suppressed normal flora so markedly that almost all species of organisms were eradicated, and the active growth of yeasts was promoted (2.6 log10 increase). Ceftazidime caused similar changes as cefpiramide, but the changes were less extensive. Yeasts increased after treatment with most antibiotic groups. This increase was particularly prominent in patients given oral penicillins and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins.  (+info)