High-dose BEAM chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin's disease is unlikely to be associated with a major increased risk of secondary MDS/AML.
(25/816)
Hodgkin's disease is curable in the majority of patients, although a proportion of patients are resistant to or relapse after initial therapy. High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell support has become the standard salvage therapy for patients failing chemotherapy, but there have been reports of a high incidence of myelodysplasia/acute myeloid leukaemia (MDS/AML) following such treatment. Patients who receive such therapy form a selected group, however, who have already been subjected to other leukaemogenic factors, such as treatment with alkylating agents. In order to ascertain the true risk of MDS/AML, comparison must be made with other patients subjected to the same risks but not undergoing transplantation. We report a retrospective comparative study of 4576 patients with Hodgkin's disease from the BNLI and UCLH Hodgkin's databases, which includes 595 patients who have received a transplant. Statistical analysis including Cox's proportional hazards multivariate regression model with time-dependent covariates was employed. This analysis reveals that the risk of developing MDS/AML was dominated by three factors, namely quantity of prior therapy (relative risk [RR] 2.01, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.49-2.71, for each treatment block, P < 0.0001) and whether the patient had been exposed to MOPP (RR 3.61, 95% CI 1.64-7.95, P = 0.0009) or lomustine chemotherapy (RR 4.53, 95% CI 1.96-10.44, P = 0.001). Following adjustment for these factors in the multivariate model the relative risk associated with transplantation was 1.83 (95% CI 0.66-5.11, P = 0.25). This study provides no evidence of a significantly increased risk of MDS/AML associated with BEAM therapy and autologous transplantation in Hodgkin's disease. Concern over MDS/AML should not mitigate against the timely use of this treatment modality. (+info)
Salvage chemotherapy with IAPVP-16 for advanced refractory or relapsed follicular lymphomas.
(26/816)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who do not respond to first-line chemotherapy or those who relapse after obtaining a remission have a poor outcome with standard treatment. In an effort to obtain a high rate of responses we designed an intensive brief duration salvage chemotherapy regimen. DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with advanced follicular lymphoma were treated. Nine had primary refractory disease, 13 had achieved a partial remission, 16 were in untreated relapse or progression and six were in chemosensitive relapse. The IAPVP-16 regimen consists in ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) iv on day 1, etoposide 100 mg/m(2) iv on days 1-3, Ara-C 1.2 g/m(2)/12 hours iv on days 1-2 and methylprednisolone, 80 mg/m(2) iv on days 1-5. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used from day 6 in 68 of 114 courses. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (41%) achieved a complete remission and 17 (39%) a partial remission, for an overall response rate of 80%. There were no treatment-related deaths. All treatment courses were followed by severe neutropenia, and 66% also by severe thrombocytopenia, but there were no serious hemorrhagic events. Neutropenic fever occurred in 56% of the courses with only four severe infections. Non-hematologic toxicity was modest. Twenty-eight patients proceeded to a stem cell transplantation. After a median follow-up of 25 months (range 4-95), the median progression-free survival and overall survival are 32 and 58 months, respectively. The median PFS was 33 months for responders and 11 months for non-responders (p=0.05), while the median OS has not been reached in responders and is 23 months in non-responders (p=0.0005). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: . The IAPVP-16 regimen is an effective and well tolerated treatment for advanced FL, allowing most eligible patients to proceed with significant tumor reduction to high-dose therapy and SCT. (+info)
Autologous bone marrow transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: effect of a brief course of G-CSF on harvest and recovery.
(27/816)
This study compares harvest and hematological recovery data of 100 lymphoma patients who underwent BM harvest either after a short course of G-CSF (16 microg/kg for 3 days) (n = 57) or in steady-state conditions (n = 43). G-CSF allowed the attainment of a significantly higher median number of total nucleated cells x 10(8)/kg (4.4, range 1.4-17, vs 2.1, range 0.6-4.2; P < 0.0001), mononuclear cells x 10(8)/kg (0.55, range 0.20-1.4, vs 0.41, range 0.15-0.76, P < 0.0001) and CFU-GM/ml (310, range 10-5500, vs 80, range 10-3800, P = 0.008), with lower volumes of blood collected (17.5 ml/kg, range 8-31 vs 21.0, range 15-30, P = 0.0001). Hematological recovery was faster in patients who received pre-treated BM (median time to PMN >0.5 x 10(9)/l and to platelets >20 x 10(9)/l was 12, range 10-14, and 13, range 10-18, days, respectively) than in those autotransplanted with steady-state BM (median time to PMN >0.5 x 10(9)/l and to platelets >20 x 10(9)/l 13, range 10-18 and 14, range 10-20 days, respectively, P = 0.004 and P = 0.01). Transfusional requirement was significantly different and patients of the G-CSF group needed shorter hospitalization (17 days, range 12-24, vs 20 days, range 14-32; P = 0.02). These data suggest that treating patients with G-CSF before BM harvest improves the quality of the harvest and accelerates engraftment and hematological recovery. (+info)
Pharmacologic disruption of base excision repair sensitizes mismatch repair-deficient and -proficient colon cancer cells to methylating agents.
(28/816)
Previously we showed that a mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient cell line, HCT116 (hMLH1 mut), unlike a MMR wild-type cell line, SW480, was more resistant to the therapeutic methylating agent, temozolomide (TMZ), because the MMR complex fails to recognize TMZ-induced O6-methylguanine DNA adduct mispairings with thymine that arise after replication. TMZ also produces N7-methylguanine and N3-methyladenine adducts that are processed efficiently by the base excision repair (BER) system. After removal of the methylated base by methylpurine glycosylase, which creates the abasic or apurinic-apyrimidinic (AP) site, the phosphodiester bond is hydrolyzed immediately by AP endonuclease, initiating the repair of the AP site. Methoxyamine (MX) reacts with the abasic site and prevents AP endonuclease cleavage, disrupting DNA repair. MX potentiated the cytotoxic effect of TMZ with a dose modification factor (DMF) of 2.3+/-0.12 in SW480 and 3.1+/-0.16 in HCT116. When combined with O6-benzylguanine (BG), MX and TMZ dramatically increased TMZ cytotoxicity (65.8-fold) in SW480, whereas no additive effect was seen in HCT116. This suggests that N7-methylguanine and N3-methyladenine adducts are cytotoxic lesions in MMR-deficient and wild-type cells when BER is interrupted. Because poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) aids in processing of DNA strand breaks induced during MMR and BER, we asked whether PARP inhibitors would also affect BER-mediated cell killing. We found that PARP inhibitors PD128763, 3-aminobenzimide, and 6-aminonicotinamide increased the sensitivity to TMZ in both HCT116 MMR-deficient cells and SW480 MMR wild-type cells. In HCT116 cells, PD128763 remarkably decreased resistance to TMZ, with a DMF of 4.7+/-0.2. However, the combination of PD128763, BG, and TMZ had no greater effect, indicating that persistent O6-methylguanine had no effect on cytotoxicity. In SW480, the DMF for TMZ cytotoxicity was 3.1+/-0.12 with addition of PD128763 and 36 with addition of PD128763 and BG. Synergy analysis by median effect plots indicated a high degree of synergy between TMZ and MX or PD128763. In contrast, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea combined with either MX or PD128763 showed little if any potentiation observed in the absence of BG in either cell line, suggesting that BER pathway has little impact on cytotoxic processing of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea-induced adducts. These studies indicate that targeting BER with MX or PARP inhibitors enhances the cytotoxicity of methylating agents, even in MMR-deficient cells. (+info)
Procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy for anaplastic astrocytoma: A retrospective review of radiation therapy oncology group protocols comparing survival with carmustine or PCV adjuvant chemotherapy.
(29/816)
PURPOSE: To determine any differences in outcome for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) treated with adjuvant carmustine (BCNU) versus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) database was reviewed for patients with newly diagnosed AA treated according to protocols that included either BCNU or PCV adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were treated with radiation therapy. The outcome analysis included overall survival, taking into account patient age, extent of resection, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and treatment group (BCNU v PCV). Stratified and nonstratified Cox proportional hazards models were used, as well as an analysis using matched cases between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were treated with BCNU according to RTOG protocols 70-18, 83-02, and 90-06; 175 patients were treated with PCV according to RTOG protocol 94-04. All pretreatment characteristics except KPS were well balanced by treatment group; 61% of the BCNU group had a KPS of 90 to 100 compared with 73% of the PCV group (P =.0075). No statistically significant difference in survival was observed in any age group or by KPS or extent of surgery. The stratified analysis also showed no trends for improved survival by treatment group (P =. 40). The Cox model identified only age, KPS, and extent of surgery as important variables influencing survival, not treatment group. Matching cases between groups using age, KPS, and surgery resulted in 133 matched pairs. No difference in survival was observed (P =. 41). In a Cox model in which each matched pair is a strata, there was no difference between groups (P =.20). CONCLUSION: Using this retrospective analysis, there does not seem to be any survival benefit to PCV chemotherapy. Future phase III studies for patients with AA may need to consider whether BCNU or PCV is used in the control arm. (+info)
Salvage chemotherapy with mini-BEAM for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's disease prior to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.
(30/816)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) has become the standard approach for most patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's disease. Disease status at transplant has been correlated with outcome following ABMT. In light of this, we employ mini-BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) salvage therapy in order to achieve a state of minimal residual disease prior to transplantation. DESIGN AND METHODS: From February 1992 to June 1998 twenty-four patients receiving mini-BEAM therapy for resistance or relapse of their Hodgkin's disease were included. Four patients had obtained no response with initial chemotherapy (refractory), eight had obtained an incomplete response, seven were in first relapse and five in second or subsequent relapse. Fifteen patients received mini-BEAM as first salvage chemotherapy regimen. The remaining nine patients had previously been exposed to a median of one salvage regimen. Patients received a median of three cycles of mini-BEAM. RESULTS: Sixteen patients achieved complete remission and four partial remission, yielding an overall response rate of 83%. No significant differences in response were observed between patients who received mini-BEAM as initial salvage therapy and those who had received a prior salvage regimen. Eighteen out of the twenty responding patients went on to intensive therapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. With a median follow-up of 52 months, the cumulative probability of 7-year overall survival is 71% for the responders and that of the 6-year disease-free survival is 42%. No treatment-related deaths were observed. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Mini-BEAM is an effective salvage regimen with moderate toxicity that may be useful for cytoreduction prior to stem cell procedures. (+info)
The role of drug transport in resistance to nitrogen mustard and other alkylating agents in L518Y lymphoblsts.
(31/816)
An investigation was undertaken of the mechanism of resistance to nitrogen mustard (HN2) and other alkylating agents, with particular emphasis on the interaction between cross-resistance and drug transport mechanisms in L5178Y lymphoblasts. Dose-survival curves demonstrated that the D0 for HN2-sensitive cells (L5178Y) treated with HN2 in vitro was 9.79 ng/ml and the D0 for HN2-resistant cells (L5178Y/HN2) was 181.11 ng/ml; thus, sensitive cells were 18.5-fold more responsive than were resistant cells and the difference was highly significant (p less than 0.001). A similar evaluation of 5 additional alkylating agents, including chlorambucil, melphalan, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-l-nitrosourea, Mitomycin C, and 2,3,5-tris(ethyleneimino)-1,4-benzoquinone, revealed that L5178Y/HN2 cells were also cross-resistant, in part, to each of these compounds. Furthermore, the degree of cross-resistance was remarkably similar; for each drug, dose-survival studies showed that HN2-resistant cells were approximately 2- to 3-fold more resistant to therapy than were sensitive cells. L5178Y/HN2 cells were also cross-resistant to cyclophosphamide in vivo; after treatment with cyclophosphamide, DBA/2 female mice that were given inoculations of L5178Y cells, but not those given transplants of L5178Y/HN2 cells, showed a significant prolongation of survival time (p less than 0.01). Transport of HN2, hydrolyzed derivative of HN2 and choline by L5178Y lymphoblasts in vitro was not competitively inhibited by any of the other alkylating agents, suggesting that transport of these compounds was by an independent mechanism. These findings suggest that the mechanism whereby L5178Y/HN2 cells are cross-resistant to other alkylating agents may involve nontransport factors and that these other drugs may bypass a major portion of HN2 resistance by using independent transport systems. (+info)
Phase III clinical trial of the combination of cisplatin, dacarbazine, and carmustine with or without tamoxifen in patients with advanced malignant melanoma.
(32/816)
PURPOSE: A prospective randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted to assess whether the addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to the three-agent regimen of cisplatin (CDDP), dacarbazine (DTIC), and carmustine (BCNU) significantly increased the progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with advanced malignant melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced malignant melanoma were treated with CDDP + DTIC + BCNU (CDB) with or without TAM. The dose schedule was CDDP 25 mg/m(2) given intravenously (IV) for 30 to 45 minutes in 500 mL of dextrose and (1/2) normal saline (NS) on days 1 to 3 of a 3-week cycle; DTIC 220 mg/m(2) IV for 1 hour in 500 mL of dextrose and (1/2) NaCl on days 1 to 3 of a 3-week cycle; BCNU 150 mg/m(2) IV for 2 to 3 hours in 750 to 1,000 mL of dextrose and 5% water on day 1 of every odd 3-week cycle; and TAM 20 mg taken orally every morning. RESULTS: There were 184 eligible patients enrolled. These patients were observed until death or for a minimum of 1.3 years. At last contact, 12 were still alive. The median time to progression was 3.4 months on the CDB arm and 3.1 months on the CDB + TAM arm. The median survival time was 6.8 months with CDB and 6.9 months with CDB + TAM. Progression-free survival (P =.429) and overall survival (P =.545) were not found to differ by treatment. CONCLUSION: The addition of TAM to this three-agent regimen of CDB was not found to provide a meaningful clinical advantage in the treatment of patients with advanced malignant melanoma. (+info)