Chemotherapy for unresectable and recurrent intramedullary glial tumours in children. Brain Tumours Subcommittee of the French Society of Paediatric Oncology (SFOP).
(41/1928)
Adjuvant treatment for intramedullary tumours is based on radiotherapy. The place of chemotherapy in this setting has yet to be determined. Between May 1992 and January 1998, eight children with unresectable or recurrent intramedullary glioma were treated with the BB SFOP protocol (a 16-month chemotherapy regimen with carboplatin, procarbazine, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin). Six children had progressive disease following incomplete surgery and two had a post-operative relapse. Three patients had leptomeningeal dissemination at the outset of chemotherapy. Seven of the eight children responded clinically and radiologically, while one remained stable. At the end of the BB SFOP protocol four children were in radiological complete remission. After a median follow-up of 3 years from the beginning of chemotherapy, all the children but one (who died from another cause) are alive. Five patients remain progression-free, without radiotherapy, 59, 55, 40, 35 and 16 months after the beginning of chemotherapy. The efficacy of this chemotherapy in patients with intramedullary glial tumours calls for further trials in this setting, especially in young children and patients with metastases. (+info)
High-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support for stage IIIB inflammatory carcinoma of the breast.
(42/1928)
The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes for 56 patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin (CTCb) with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support. All patients received the same total amount of chemotherapy but there were differences in the sequence of therapy: 15 received induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy mobilization of PBSC and CTCb after surgery (adjuvant group) while 41 received induction chemotherapy with (n = 17) or without (n = 24) chemotherapy for mobilization of PBSC prior to surgery and CTCb after surgery (neoadjuvant group). Median time from diagnosis to HDC was 5.5 months (range 3.5-12.5). Fifty-one patients (91%) required admission to the hospital following HDC for a median of 11 days (range 5-25). There were two (4%) infectious deaths after HDC. Twenty-four patients (43%) have relapsed at a median of 18 months (range 8-50) from diagnosis resulting in death in 34%. The probabilities of overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years for all 56 patients were 0.72 and 0.53, respectively, with a median follow-up of 44 months (range 15-76) from diagnosis. There were no differences in OS, EFS or patterns of relapse between patients in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant groups. These sequences of combined modality therapy incorporating HDC are comparable or superior to other intensive approaches for the treatment of IBC. Further improvements will be necessary to decrease systemic recurrences. (+info)
Clinical features of hypersensitivity reactions to carboplatin.
(43/1928)
PURPOSE: To characterize the clinical features of carboplatin-associated hypersensitivity reactions. PATIENTS: Patients with gynecologic malignancies treated at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation from June 1995 through July 1998 who experienced a carboplatin-associated hypersensitivity reaction were the subjects of this evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 205 patients treated with carboplatin during this time period, 24 (12%) developed a carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction. The median number of platinum (carboplatin plus cisplatin) courses for the first episode was eight (range, six to 21). Only three patients (13%) developed this toxicity during their initial chemotherapy regimen, with the remainder experiencing a reaction during their second (n = 15) or third (n = 6) carboplatin treatment program for recurrent disease. Thirteen patients (54%) developed at least moderately severe symptoms (diffuse erythroderma, tachycardia, chest tightness, wheezing, facial swelling, dyspnea, hypertension, or hypotension). In approximately one half of patients, the reaction developed after more than 50% of the carboplatin had been infused. Only one of three patients was successfully treated with the agent upon rechallenge. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin hypersensitivity reactions develop in patients who have been extensively pretreated with the agent. The clinical features are highly variable, but they are sufficiently different from those noted after the administration of paclitaxel that it should not be difficult to distinguish between reactions to the two agents. As carboplatin is increasingly used as initial and second-line chemotherapy of ovarian cancer and other malignancies, it can be anticipated that hypersensitivity reactions to the drug will become a more common and difficult clinical management issue. (+info)
Phase I trial of multiple cycles of high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous peripheral-blood stem cells.
(44/1928)
PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of delivering multiple cycles of front-line high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel with hematopoietic peripheral-blood stem cell (PBSC) support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have a malignant solid tumor for which they had received no prior chemotherapy. Mobilization of PBSC was achieved with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). After one cycle of conventional-dose carboplatin and cyclophosphamide with GM-CSF, patients received multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 12 to 20) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) with PBSC and GM-CSF repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 28 patients were assessable for toxicity and clinical outcome. Dose-limiting toxicities were dehydration, diarrhea, and electrolyte imbalances. The maximum-tolerated dose of carboplatin was AUC 16 (equivalent to a median of 1,189 mg/m(2)). The relationship of target AUC to measured AUC was linear (r(2) =. 29; P =.0011). The overall response rate was 96%, with a complete clinical response rate of 67%. The median time to progression from the first PBSC reinfusion was 49.5 weeks (range, 8 to 156+ weeks). CONCLUSION: Multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin (AUC 16) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) can be safely administered with GM-CSF and PBSC support. Although this regimen is safe, feasible, and active, the use of multiple cycles of high-dose chemotherapy as front-line treatment remains experimental and should only be used in the context of a clinical trial. (+info)
High-dose melphalan with autologous stem-cell rescue in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma.
(45/1928)
PURPOSE: The European Collaborative MMT4-91 trial was conducted as a prospective nonrandomized study to evaluate the potential benefit of high-dose melphalan as consolidation of first complete remission in children with stage IV rhabdomyosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients in complete remission after six courses of chemotherapy received "megatherapy": 42 received melphalan alone, whereas 10 received melphalan in combination with etoposide, carboplatin/etoposide, or thiotepa/busulfan and etoposide. The outcome of this group of patients was compared with that observed in 44 patients who were also in complete remission after six courses of identical chemotherapy (plus surgery or radiotherapy) but went on to receive a total of up to 12 courses of conventional chemotherapy (four cycles). No differences were found between the two groups regarding clinical characteristics, chemotherapy received before complete remission, or response to chemotherapy. In particular, there was no significant difference between the groups for site of primary tumor, histologic subtype, age at presentation, presence of bone or bone marrow metastases, or number of metastases. RESULTS: The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 29.7% and 40%, respectively, for those receiving high-dose melphalan or other multiagent high-dose regimens and 19.2% and 27.7%, respectively, for those receiving standard chemotherapy. The difference was not statistically significant (P =.3 and P =.2 for EFS and OS, respectively). There was a significant prolongation in the time from the last day of high-dose chemotherapy or the end of chemotherapy cycle 4 to the time of relapse in those receiving megatherapy (168 days for patients receiving megatherapy v 104 days for those receiving standard therapy; P =.05). CONCLUSION: The addition of a high-dose alkylating agent to consolidation therapy may have prolonged progression-free survival in this poor-risk patient group, but it did not significantly improve the ultimate outcome. (+info)
Phase I trial of intravenous thymidine and carboplatin in patients with advanced cancer.
(46/1928)
PURPOSE: To evaluate the biologic interactions and toxicities of carboplatin combined with a 24-hour infusion of thymidine 75 mg/m(2) in a phase I trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with cancer refractory to conventional therapy were treated. The first set of patients (n = 7) received thymidine alone 4 weeks before subsequent planned courses of thymidine combined with carboplatin followed (4 weeks) by carboplatin alone. Carboplatin was administered over 20 minutes at hour 20 of the 24-hour thymidine infusion. The carboplatin dose was escalated in patient groups: 200 mg/m(2) (n = 3); 300 mg/m(2) (n = 7); 350 mg/m(2) (n = 4); 400 mg/m(2) (n = 3); 480 mg/m(2) (n = 10); and 576 mg/m(2) (n = 5). At the maximum-tolerated dose (480 mg/m(2)), five patients received combined therapy first and carboplatin alone second, and five patients received carboplatin first and combined therapy second. Maintenance therapy for stable or responding patients was combined therapy. RESULTS: Evaluation demonstrated a trend toward thymidine protection of carboplatin-induced treatment-limiting thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia with carboplatin alone or in combination was negligible. Thymidine alone had no myelosuppressive effects and produced reversible grade 1 or 2 nausea and vomiting (57%), headache (25%), and grade 1 neurotoxicity (22%). Thymidine did not enhance expected carboplatin toxicities. There was no therapy-related infection or bleeding. Analysis of platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate and urine showed no effect by thymidine. Similarly, thymidine pharmacokinetics was not affected by carboplatin. As predicted, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide levels in peripheral lymphocytes were increased during exposure to carboplatin and/or thymidine but were decreased by carboplatin alone. In three patients with high-grade glioma, responses included one complete remission (21 months) and one partial remission (14 months) at the 480-mg/m(2)-dose level, and disease stabilization (7 months) at the 400-mg/m(2-dose) level. A minor response was observed in a patient with metastatic colon cancer (5 months) at the 480-mg/m(2)-dose level. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and thymidine as described is well tolerated. The data presented have resulted in a phase II study by the North American Brain Tumor Consortium. (+info)
Enhancement of platinum-drug cytotoxicity in a human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma line and its platinum-resistant variant by liposomal amphotericin B and phospholipase A2-II.
(47/1928)
Platinum drugs comprise one of the main classes of chemotherapy drugs that can induce remissions in various solid tumors. Although tumors often regress on treatment with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II (cisplatin) or cis-diammine-1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylate platinum II (carboplatin), they usually relapse as a drug-resistant tumor. Most mechanisms of platinum resistance could be overcome by increasing the amount of drug that is accumulated by tumor cells. Amphotericin B (Amph B) is efficient at increasing platinum drug uptake, but because of nephrotoxicity associated with extended usage, and the potential for synergistic nephrotoxicity when used with platinum drugs, Amph B has not been used clinically for this purpose. A liposomal preparation of Amph B (LipoAmph B), which is substantially less nephrotoxic, was studied for its ability to enhance platinum-drug toxicity to a human oral squamous cell carcinoma line, HN-5a, and its carboplatin-resistant variant, 5a/carbo-15a, in which cisplatin accumulation was reduced by approximately 40%. Amph B at 10 microg/ml enhanced cisplatin accumulation by approximately 100% in both cell lines, enhancing cytotoxicity of the drugs by 35 to 60%, and completely reversed resistance to both cisplatin and carboplatin. LipoAmph B in the presence of phospholipase A(2)-II (PLA2-II) was able to enhance cisplatin and carboplatin cytotoxicity as effectively as free Amph B in both cell lines. At optimal concentrations, LipoAmph B plus PLA2-II enhanced drug uptake sufficiently to abolish resistance in the platinum-resistant line. Because PLA2-II is elevated in some tumor microenvironments and in plasma of ill patients, LipoAmph B has potential clinical usefulness as a modulator of platinum-drug efficacy. (+info)
Moderate dose-escalation of combination chemotherapy with concomitant thoracic radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: prolonged intrathoracic tumor control and high central nervous system relapse rate. Groupe d'Oncologie-Pneumologie Clinique de l'Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels and Liege, Belgium.
(48/1928)
BACKGROUND: The role of chemotherapy dose-intensification in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. This phase I-II study evaluates feasibility and outcome of combination chemotherapy at moderately elevated doses with concomitant thoracic radiotherapy in limited-disease SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Moderately elevated doses of ifosfamide-epirubicin (cycles 1 and 3) and of carboplatin-etoposide (cycles 2 and 4) were given with G-CSF and peripheral blood stem-cell (PBSC) support. Thoracic radiotherapy (40 Gy) was given once daily during the first five days of each cycle. RESULTS: Overall toxicity was acceptable; most common side-effects were myelosuppression and asthenia. All 35 eligible patients responded (23 CR, 12 PR). Median time to progression was 15 months: median overall survival was 24.6 months. Only 6 of 25 relapsing patients (24%) presented with a locoregional recurrence while 12 of 25 (48%) relapsed in the central nervous system (CNS). CONCLUSIONS: This regimen is a feasible dose-intensification with an acceptable toxicity profile. Its efficacy was demonstrated by a 100% response rate, an excellent local tumor control rate and a median survival of 24.6 months. In the absence of PCI, CNS relapse is a major problem if adequate local control is achieved. (+info)