BMP-2/ALK3 and HGF signal in parallel to regulate renal collecting duct morphogenesis. (9/237)

Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) exert antagonistic effects on renal collecting duct formation during embryogenesis. A current model proposes HGF inhibits BMP-2 signaling at the level of Smad1 in a common target cell. Here, we show that BMP-2 and HGF control collecting duct formation via parallel pathways. We examined the interactions between BMP-2 and HGF in the mIMCD-3 model of collecting duct morphogenesis. During tubule formation, HGF rescued the inhibitory effects of BMP-2 and of a constitutive active form of the BMP-2 receptor, ALK3, stably expressed in mIMCD-3 cells. To determine whether the effect of HGF occurs through known mediators which act downstream of the BMP-2/ALK3 complex, we examined the effect of HGF on BMP-2-induced Smad1 phosphorylation, Smad1/Smad4 complex formation, and Smad1 nuclear translocation. Neither HGF nor other receptor tyrosine kinase ligands (EGF, FGF-4) induced phosphorylation of endogenous Smad1 in mIMCD-3 cells or in Mv1Lu, MC3T3-E1 or P19 cells. Furthermore, none of these ligands blocked induction of the BMP-responsive promoter, Tlx2. Thus, HGF overcomes the inhibitory effects of BMP-2 on collecting duct morphogenesis without interrupting any of the known signaling events in the BMP-2 dependent Smad1 signaling pathway. We conclude that BMP-2/ALK3 and HGF function to control parallel pathways downstream of their respective cell surface receptors. Integration of these signals likely occurs at the level of transcriptional or post-transcriptional events.  (+info)

Requirement for anti-dorsalizing morphogenetic protein in organizer patterning. (10/237)

The amphibian Spemann organizer is subdivided in trunk and head organizer and it is unclear how this division is regulated. The Xenopus trunk organizer expresses anti-dorsalizing morphogenetic protein (ADMP), a potent organizer antagonist. We show that ADMP represses head formation during gastrulation and that its expression is activated by BMP antagonists. A specifically acting dominant-negative ADMP anteriorizes embryos and its coexpression with BMP antagonists induces secondary embryonic axes with heads as well as expression of head inducers. Unlike other BMPs, ADMP is not inhibited by a dominant-negative BMP type I receptor, Noggin, Cerberus and Chordin but by Follistatin, suggesting that it utilizes a distinct TGF-beta receptor pathway and displays differential sensitivity to BMP antagonists. The results indicate that ADMP functions in the trunk organizer to antagonize head formation, thereby regulating organizer patterning.  (+info)

Smad6 is a Smad1/5-induced smad inhibitor. Characterization of bone morphogenetic protein-responsive element in the mouse Smad6 promoter. (11/237)

Smad6 is an inhibitory Smad that is induced by bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and interferes with BMP signaling. We have isolated the mouse Smad6 promoter and identified the regions responsible for transcriptional activation by BMPs. The proximal BMP-responsive element (PBE) in the Smad6 promoter is important for the transcriptional activation by BMPs and contains a 28-base pair GC-rich sequence including four overlapping copies of the GCCGnCGC-like motif, which is a binding site for Drosophila Mad and Medea. We generated a luciferase reporter construct (3GC2-Lux) containing three repeats of the GC-rich sequence derived from the PBE. BMPs and BMP receptors induced transcriptional activation of 3GC2-Lux in various cell types, and this activation was enhanced by cotransfection of BMP-responsive Smads, i.e. Smad1 or Smad5. Moreover, direct DNA binding of BMP-responsive Smads and common-partner Smad4 to the GC-rich sequence of PBE was observed. These results indicate that the expression of Smad6 is regulated by the effects of BMP-activated Smad1/5 on the Smad6 promoter.  (+info)

Convergence of the BMP and EGF signaling pathways on Smad1 in the regulation of chondrogenesis. (12/237)

Bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) induces, whereas epidermal growth factor (EGF) inhibits chondrogenesis. We hypothesize that BMP4 and EGF mediated intracellular signals are both coupled in the regulation of Meckel's cartilage development. Two chondrogenic experimental model systems were employed to test the hypothesis: (1) an ex vivo, serum-free, organ culture system for mouse embryonic mandibular processes, and (2) a micromass culture system for chicken embryonic mandibular processes. Chondrogenesis was assayed by alcian blue staining and expression of Sox9 and type II collagen. Exogenous EGF inhibited and BMP4 induced ectopic cartilage in a dose-dependent manner. When BMP4- and EGF-soaked beads were implanted in juxtaposition within embryonic day 10 mouse mandibular processes, the incidence and amount of ectopic cartilage, and Sox9 and type II collagen expression induced by BMP4, were significantly reduced as the concentration of EGF was increased. Similarly, in chicken serum-free micromass cultures, expression of a constitutively active BMP receptor type IB by replication competent avian retrovirus system promoted the rate and extent of chondrogenesis; however, exogenous EGF attenuated this effect. In micromass cultures, BMP signaling resulted in nuclear translocation and accumulation of the signaling molecule Smad1, whereas the addition of EGF inhibited this event. Our results suggest that BMP4 and EGF function antagonistically, yet are coupled in the regulation of initial chondrogenesis. Smad1 serves as a point of convergence for the integration of two different growth factor signaling pathways during chondrogenesis.  (+info)

Bone morphogenetic protein receptor complexes on the surface of live cells: a new oligomerization mode for serine/threonine kinase receptors. (13/237)

The bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) play important roles in embryogenesis and normal cell growth. The BMP receptors belong to the family of serine/threonine kinase receptors, whose activation has been investigated intensively for the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) receptor subfamily. However, the interactions between the BMP receptors, the composition of the active receptor complex, and the role of the ligand in its formation have not yet been investigated and were usually assumed to follow the same pattern as the TGF-beta receptors. Here we demonstrate that the oligomerization pattern of the BMP receptors is different and is more flexible and susceptible to modulation by ligand. Using several complementary approaches, we investigated the formation of homomeric and heteromeric complexes between the two known BMP type I receptors (BR-Ia and BR-Ib) and the BMP type II receptor (BR-II). Coimmunoprecipitation studies detected the formation of heteromeric and homomeric complexes among all the BMP receptor types even in the absence of ligand. These complexes were also detected at the cell surface after BMP-2 binding and cross-linking. Using antibody-mediated immunofluorescence copatching of epitope-tagged receptors, we provide evidence in live cells for preexisting heteromeric (BR-II/BR-Ia and BR-II/BR-Ib) and homomeric (BR-II/BR-II, BR-Ia/ BR-Ia, BR-Ib/ BR-Ib, and also BR-Ia/ BR-Ib) oligomers in the absence of ligand. BMP-2 binding significantly increased hetero- and homo-oligomerization (except for the BR-II homo-oligomer, which binds ligand poorly in the absence of BR-I). In contrast to previous observations on TGF-beta receptors, which were found to be fully homodimeric in the absence of ligand, the BMP receptors show a much more flexible oligomerization pattern. This novel feature in the oligomerization mode of the BMP receptors allows higher variety and flexibility in their responses to various ligands as compared with the TGF-beta receptors.  (+info)

BMP receptors in limb and tooth formation. (14/237)

Members of the TGF-beta superfamily signal through receptor complexes comprised of type I and type II receptors. These receptors, which are serine/threonine kinases, form two new classes of transmembrane receptor kinases. The activity of both of the kinases is necessary for signal transduction in response to ligand binding. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), which are members of the TGF-beta superfamily, bind to multiple type I and type II receptors. There is growing evidence to support the hypothesis that the BMP receptors are differentially regulated during development and that they have both unique and overlapping functions. Thus, the nature and distribution of the BMP receptors, which are reviewed here in the context of the development of limbs and teeth, appear to be critical in the control of the diverse activities of BMPs.  (+info)

Bone morphogenetic protein-9. An autocrine/paracrine cytokine in the liver. (15/237)

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) occupy important roles during development serving to direct cells through specific differentiation programs. While several BMPs are essential for embryonic viability, their significance in mediating intercellular communication in the context of adult organ systems remains largely unknown. In the adult rat we characterized the tissue- and cell-specific transcription and translation of BMP-9. Utilizing a ribonuclease protection assay, we determined that in the adult animal, BMP-9 expression occurs predominantly in the liver. Furthermore, we determined that the non-parenchymal cells of the liver, i.e. endothelial, Kupffer, and stellate cells, are the major sources of this message. Western analyses corroborate the ribonuclease protection assay results, confirming that LEC and KC contain an abundance of immunoreactive BMP-9. Using [(125)I]BMP-9, a receptor with specific binding affinity for BMP-9 was characterized in primary cultures of hepatic endothelial cells and Kupffer cells. BMP-9 binding to these cell types was observed to be fully reversible and highly specific for this ligand. Additionally, we demonstrate that BMP-9 is specifically internalized upon binding to its receptor. This may represent a novel BMP receptor and is the first to be characterized in primary cultures of mature liver non-parenchymal cells. Our results depict BMP-9 as a potential autocrine/paracrine mediator in the hepatic reticuloendothelial system.  (+info)

Mesenchymal cells expressing bone morphogenetic protein receptors are present in the rheumatoid arthritis joint. (16/237)

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence of cells of an early mesenchymal lineage, as judged by the expression of bone morphogenetic protein receptors (BMPRs), in the joints of normal individuals and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Synovial fluids, single cell suspensions of cultured fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS), and synovial tissues were examined by immunohistology with antibodies to BMPR type IA (BMPRIA), BMPRIB, and BMPRII and then quantified using computerized image analysis. Other antibodies were evaluated by cytofluorography. RESULTS: In primary cultures of joint effusions from patients with RA and other forms of inflammatory arthritis, there were large adherent cells with the appearance of either fibroblasts or stromal cells that stained with antibodies to mesenchymal elements-CD44, type I collagen, alpha-actin, and vimentin-but not with antibodies to hematopoietic markers. These cells proliferated rapidly, expressed BMPRIA and BMPRII, and soon became the predominant cells in culture. They were retained through multiple passages and persistently displayed surface vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. Immunohistochemical analysis of cultured RA FLS (passages 3, 4, and 6; n = 6) revealed that 11.6% were BMPR-positive, while only 2.0% of osteoarthritis FLS (passage 4; n = 3) were BMPR-positive, and 1 normal synovial culture had no BMPR-positive cells. In all RA synovial membranes examined (n = 9), BMPRI- and BMPRII-expressing cells were identified in the intimal lining and were also scattered in the subintima. These cells constituted approximately 25% and approximately 7% of the cells in each area, respectively. Double immunostaining showed no coexpression of BMPR-positive cells with CD68, CD34, or CD3. Cells expressing BMPR were not seen in any normal synovial samples (n = 4). Strong staining for BMPR was identified on cells at the invasive front of the pannus and at sites of cartilage erosion. CONCLUSION: The inflamed RA joint contains BMPR-positive mesenchymal cells. Their origin is still speculative, but since their counterparts in the bone marrow are essential for osteoclastogenesis, support lymphocyte development and maturation, and protect T cells and B cells from programmed cell death, the BMPR-positive cells may be essential elements in the pathogenesis of RA and other inflammatory forms of chronic synovitis.  (+info)