Improved synthesis and molecular modeling of 4beta,19-dihydroxyandrost-5-en-17-one, an excellent inhibitor of aromatase. (73/981)

4Beta,19-dihydroxyandrost-5-en-17-one (6) is an excellent competitive inhibitor of estrogen synthetase (aromatase). Alternate, improved synthesis of this inhibitor was established. Treatment of 19-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)androst-4-en-17-one (8) with m-chloroperbenzoic acid gave a 1.4:1 mixture of 4alpha,5alpha-epoxide 9 and its 4beta,5beta-isomer 10. The mixture was reacted with diI. HClO4 in dioxane to produce principally 4beta,5alpha-diol 11 (80%) of which acetylation followed by dehydration with SOCl2 yielded 4beta,19-diacetoxy-5-ene compound 14 in good yield. Alkaline hydrolysis of diacetate 14 gave 4beta,19-diol 6. The minimum energy conformation of the powerfull aromatase inhibitor 6 was obtained with the PM3 method and compared with that of the structurally related diol steroid, 4-ene-5beta,19-diol 3, a weak competitive inhibitor.  (+info)

Exemestane, a new steroidal aromatase inhibitor of clinical relevance. (74/981)

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death among women and the contribution of circulating oestrogens to the growth of some mammary tumours has been recognized. Consequently, suppression of oestrogen action by inhibition of their biosynthesis at the androstenedione-oestrone aromatization step, by means of selective inhibitors of the enzyme aromatase, has become an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. Exemestane (6-methylenandrosta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione) is a novel steroidal irreversible aromatase inhibitor recently approved and introduced into the global market under the name Aromasin. The design, laboratory and viable syntheses of exemestane, starting from a variety of steroidal precursors, are presented and discussed. Data from biochemical and pharmacological studies as well as the clinical impact of the compound are briefly reviewed. The drug is an orally active and well-tolerated hormonal therapy for postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer that has become refractory to standard current hormonal therapies.  (+info)

Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer: current and evolving roles. (75/981)

The aromatase inhibitors are established first-line drugs for treating metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women, and are gaining acceptance as adjuvant treatment as well.  (+info)

CA125 response is associated with estrogen receptor expression in a phase II trial of letrozole in ovarian cancer: identification of an endocrine-sensitive subgroup. (76/981)

PURPOSE: This study was an open-label Phase II trial of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole (Femara) in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer with evaluation of possible biological markers for response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 60 patients were treated with letrozole (2.5 mg daily) at the time of CA125 relapse. Disease response was assessed by Union International Contre Cancer (UICC) criteria and by CA125 measurement. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, erbB2, and HSP27 were measured by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-fixed material obtained from the primary tumors at initial surgery. RESULTS: 50 patients were evaluable by UICC criteria, and although no complete or partial responses were obtained, 10 patients had stable disease on scan for at least 12 weeks. CA125 responses were evaluable in 54 patients. A partial marker response (>50% decrease) was seen in 5, and the marker remained stable in an additional 14 patients (25% increase). Tumors from the UICC stable disease group had significantly higher ER (P = 0.027) and progesterone receptor (P = 0.0066) values than the progressive disease group, and a combination of these was strongly associated with stable disease (P < 0.0001). Using CA125 criteria, comparison of the CA125 stable/responding disease with progressive disease indicated that tumors with higher ER (P = 0.013), lower erbB2 (P = 0.026), and higher epidermal growth factor receptor (P = 0.009) were associated with CA125 stable/responsive disease. CONCLUSIONS: These results imply that letrozole treatment can produce disease stabilization and CA125 responses that in turn are linked to higher levels of ER expression. These data suggest the presence of an endocrine-sensitive group that could be targeted in future studies.  (+info)

The effect of second-line antiestrogen therapy on breast tumor growth after first-line treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole: long-term studies using the intratumoral aromatase postmenopausal breast cancer model. (77/981)

PURPOSE: The aromatase inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole have been approvedrecently as first-line treatment options for hormone-dependent advanced breast cancer. Although it is established that a proportion of patients who relapse on first-line tamoxifen therapy show additional responses to aromatase inhibitors, it has not been determined whether tumors that acquire resistance to aromatase inhibitors in the first line remain sensitive to second-line therapy with antiestrogens. The aim of this study was to determine whether aromatase-transfected and hormone-dependent MCF-7Ca human breast cancer cells remain sensitive to antiestrogens after: (a) long-term growth in steroid-depleted medium in vitro; and (b) long-term treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in vivo. METHODS: In the first approach, a variant of the MCF-7Ca human breast cancer cell line was selected that had acquired the ability to grow in estrogen-depleted medium after 6-8 months of culture. Steroid-deprived UMB-1Ca cells were analyzed for aromatase activity levels, hormone receptor levels, and sensitivity to estrogens and antiestrogens in vitro and in vivo. In the second approach, established MCF-7Ca breast tumor xenografts were treated with letrozole 10 microg/day for 12 weeks followed by 100 microg/day for 25 weeks until tumors acquired the ability to proliferate in the presence of the drug. Long-term letrozole-treated tumors were then transplanted into new mice, and the effects of antiestrogens and aromatase inhibitors on tumor growth were determined. RESULTS: Steroid-deprived UMB-1Ca breast cancer cells continued to express aromatase activity at levels comparable with the parental cell line. However, compared with MCF-7Ca cells, UMB-1Ca cells expressed elevated levels of functionally active estrogen receptor. The growth of UMB-1Ca cells in vitro was inhibited by the antiestrogens tamoxifen and faslodex and tumor growth in vivo was inhibited by tamoxifen. In the second approach, the time for MCF-7Ca tumor xenografts to approximately double in volume after being treated sequentially with the increasing doses of letrozole was thirty-seven weeks. Long-term letrozole-treated tumors continued to express functionally active aromatase. When transplanted into new mice, growth of the long-term letrozole-treated tumors was slowed by tamoxifen and inhibited more effectively by faslodex. Tumor growth was refractory to the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and formestane but, surprisingly, showed sensitivity to letrozole. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid-deprived UMB-1Ca human breast cancer cells selected in vitro and long-term letrozole-treated MCF-7Ca breast tumor xenografts remain sensitive to second-line therapy with antiestrogens and, in particular, to faslodex. This finding is associated with increased expression of functionally active estrogen receptor after steroid-deprivation of MCF-7Ca human breast cancer cells in vitro.  (+info)

Signaling through estrogen receptors modulates telomerase activity in human prostate cancer. (78/981)

Sex steroid hormone receptors play a central role in all stages of prostate cancer. Here, we tested whether estrogen receptor (ER) signaling contributes to telomerase activation, an early event in prostate tumorigenesis. Following 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) treatment, both mRNA encoding the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hTERT) and telomerase activity were promptly induced in human prostate normal epithelial cells, fresh explants from benign prostate hyperplasia, and prostate cancer explants and cell lines. Reporter expression studies and in vivo chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed E(2)-dependent hTERT promoter induction and showed that both ERalpha and ERbeta bound this sequence. Crucially, addition of the anti-estrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen caused a differential recruitment in vivo of ERalpha and ERbeta onto the hTERT promoter and inhibited telomerase activity. Treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole, which prevented testosterone-mediated interaction between ER and the hTERT estrogen response element, resulted in a negative regulation of telomerase activity. Thus, intracellular conversion of androgens to estrogens may contribute to the etiopathogenesis of prostate cancer. Given the present evidence for direct control of hTERT gene expression and telomerase activity in the prostate by the ER, we suggest that this transcriptional regulator represents a possible therapeutic target in prostate cancer.  (+info)

American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2002. (79/981)

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an evidence-based technology assessment to determine whether the routine use of anastrozole or any of the aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant breast cancer setting is appropriate for broad-based conventional use in clinical practice. POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS: Anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest include breast cancer incidence, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and net health benefit. EVIDENCE: A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted for relevant topics and is detailed in the text. Testimony was collected from invited experts and interested parties. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-prescribed technology assessment procedure was followed. BENEFITS/HARMS: The ASCO panel recognizes that a woman and her physician's decision regarding adjuvant hormonal therapy is complex and will depend on the importance and weight attributed to information regarding both cancer and non-cancer-related risks and benefits. CONCLUSION: The panel was influenced by the compelling, extensive, and long-term data available on tamoxifen. Overall, the panel considers the results of the Arimidex (anastrozole) or Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial and the extensive supporting data to be very promising but insufficient to change the standard practice at this time (May 2002). A 5-year course of adjuvant tamoxifen remains the standard therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The panel recommends that physicians discuss the available information with patients, and, in making a decision, acknowledge that treatment approaches can change over time. Individual health care providers and their patients will need to come to their own conclusions, with careful consideration of all of the available data. (Specific questions addressed by the panel are summarized in Appendix 3.) VALIDATION: The conclusions of the panel were endorsed by the ASCO Health Services Research Committee and the ASCO Board of Directors.  (+info)

American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition. (80/981)

OBJECTIVE: To update an evidence-based technology assessment of chemoprevention strategies for breast cancer risk reduction. POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS: Tamoxifen, raloxifene, aromatase inhibition, and fenretinide. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest include breast cancer incidence, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and net health benefit. EVIDENCE: A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted for relevant topics. Testimony was collected from invited experts and interested parties. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) prescribed technology assessment procedure was followed. VALUES: More weight was given to published randomized trials. BENEFITS/HARMS: A woman's decision regarding breast cancer risk reduction strategies is complex and will depend on the importance and weight attributed to information regarding both cancer- and noncancer-related risks and benefits. CONCLUSIONS: For women with a defined 5-year projected breast cancer risk of > or= 1.66%, tamoxifen (at 20 mg/d for 5 years) may be offered to reduce their risk. Risk/benefit models suggest that greatest clinical benefit with least side effects is derived from use of tamoxifen in younger (premenopausal) women (who are less likely to have thromboembolic sequelae and uterine cancer), women without a uterus, and women at higher breast cancer risk. Data do not as yet suggest that tamoxifen provides an overall health benefit or increases survival. In all circumstances, tamoxifen use should be discussed as part of an informed decision-making process with careful consideration of individually calculated risks and benefits. Use of tamoxifen combined with hormone replacement therapy or use of raloxifene, any aromatase inhibitor or inactivator, or fenretinide to lower the risk of developing breast cancer is not recommended outside of a clinical trial setting. This technology assessment represents an ongoing process and recommendations will be updated in a timely matter. VALIDATION: The conclusions were endorsed by the ASCO Health Services Research Committee and the ASCO Board of Directors.  (+info)