Appendicitis in the elderly: what has changed?
(17/742)
BACKGROUND: The course and outcome of appendicitis in the elderly differs from that of the general population. The rates of perforated appendices, error in diagnosis, postoperative complications and mortality may be related to the time lapse between onset of symptoms and admission, and hence delay in surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if these factors have improved in recent years. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out of all 61 patients over age 60 who underwent appendectomies in a major metropolitan hospital during 1988-98. RESULTS: We found that most patients had appendectomies within the first 24 hours of admission and within 3 days of symptoms. Rate of perforation was 43%, error 5.6%, morbidity 41%, and mortality 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of appendix perforation in the elderly is not due to delay. The literature reveals little improvement in the statistics of the disease over the last five decades, despite advances in imaging and surgical technique. This may be explained by the increasing inclusion of octogenarian patients. (+info)
Ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis and provides cost savings to hospitals in Japan.
(18/742)
A cost analysis based on changes in patient care was used to evaluate the utility of abdominal ultrasonography in both the clinical management of patients clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis and in reducing expenditure of hospital resources. Among the 200 patients suspected of having acute appendicitis, 57 actually had acute appendicitis. Interpretation of appendiceal ultrasonographic results was 98.5% accurate. The ultrasonographic result led to changes in the treatment of 103 patients. Moreover, ultrasonography led to the prevention of unnecessary appendectomy in 25 patients, providing a savings to the hospital of about Yen 8,013,450 ($65,150), and prevented unnecessary hospital admission for 78 patient-days, thus saving the hospital approximately Yen 1,199,250 ($9750). The cost of performing the 200 ultrasonographic examinations was about Yen 1,096,176 ($8912), and thus the overall savings to the hospital was approximately Yen 40,590 ($330) per patient. Ultrasonography performed in patients with suspected acute appendicitis improves patient diagnostic accuracy, thus leading to more appropriate selection of patient treatment and reduced hospital expenditure. (+info)
A prospective evaluation of the combined use of the modified Alvarado score with selective laparoscopy in adult females in the management of suspected appendicitis.
(19/742)
BACKGROUND: A diagnostic scoring system such as the modified Alvarado score, combined with selective laparoscopy in adult females, can be used in the assessment of acute abdominal pain suggestive of appendicitis. METHOD: A total of 84 consecutive patients presenting to our surgical team with suspected appendicitis were assessed prospectively using the modified Alvarado score. The definitive management of this study group was instigated according to a set algorithm based on the score. The algorithm included the use of diagnostic laparoscopy in adult female patients with scores suggestive of appendicitis. A negative appendicectomy rate was obtained from those undergoing appendicectomy using this approach and compared to that obtained from the 97 patients that had undergone appendicectomy under the care of the other surgical teams in our unit during the study period. RESULTS: The rate of negative appendicectomy in the study group was 0% compared to 18% in the control group (P < 0.05); 10% of adult female women had negative diagnostic laparoscopies for appendicitis thus saving this group an unnecessary appendicectomy. This was achieved without an increase in total in-patient stay. CONCLUSION: An algorithm combining the modified Alvarado score with selective laparoscopy is recommended for widespread use in the management of suspected acute appendicitis. (+info)
Neurogenic appendicopathy--role of enterochromaffin cells in its pathogenesis.
(20/742)
One hundred cases of neurogenic appendicopathy were histochemically studied for schwann cells and enterochromaffin cells. The early phase, labelled as neuro-appendicopathy (29 cases) showed minimum to moderate number of extraepithelial enterochromaffin cells without neurogenous hyperplasia. In 53 cases, there was intra and submucosal neural hyperplasia with increase in the extraepithelial enterochromaffin cells, representing the active phase. The late phase known as obliterative neurogenic appendicopathy, showed extraepithelial enterochromaffin cells and schwann cell proliferation of variable grades (18 cases). The origin of extraepithelial enterochromaffin cells is related to proliferating nerve plexus, rather than epithelial enterochromaffin cells. (+info)
The impact of diagnostic delay on the course of acute appendicitis.
(21/742)
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is often delayed, which may complicate the further course of the disease. AIMS: To review appendectomy cases in order to determine the incidence of diagnostic delay, the underlying factors, and impact on the course of the disease. METHODS: Records of all children who underwent appendectomy from 1994 to 1997 were reviewed. The 129 cases were divided into group A (diagnostic period within 48 hours) and group B (diagnostic period 48 hours or more). RESULTS: In the group with diagnostic delay, significantly more children had first been referred to a paediatrician rather than to a surgeon. In almost half of the cases in this group initial diagnosis was not appendicitis but gastroenteritis. The perforation rate in group A was 24%, and in group B, 71%. Children under 5 years of age all presented in the delayed group B and had a perforation rate of 82%. The delayed group showed a higher number of postoperative complications and a longer hospitalisation period. CONCLUSIONS: Appendicitis is hard to diagnose when, because of a progressing disease process, the classical clinical picture is absent. The major factor in diagnostic delay is suspected gastroenteritis. Early surgical consultation in a child with deteriorating gastroenteritis is advised. Ultrasonographs can be of major help if abdominal signs and symptoms are non-specific for appendicitis. (+info)
Mucocele of the appendix secondary to endometriosis. Report of two cases, one with localized pseudomyxoma peritonei.
(22/742)
This report documents 2 cases of obstructive mucocele of the appendix secondary to endometriosis of the appendix. In 1 case, the tip of the mucocele was ruptured and associated with localized pseudomyxoma peritonei. Mucoceles of the appendix usually are associated with hyperplastic or neoplastic mucosal proliferation; obstruction, particularly that due to endometriosis, is an infrequent cause. Occurrence of localized pseudomyxoma peritonei associated with appendiceal endometriosis and mucocele has not been reported previously. (+info)
Comparison of intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections.
(23/742)
OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) ciprofloxacin plus IV metronidazole (CIP+MET) with that of IV piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZO) in adults with complicated intraabdominal infections, and to compare the efficacy of sequential IV-to-oral CIP+MET therapy with that of the IV CIP-only regimen. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment of intraabdominal infections remains a challenge, mainly because of their polymicrobial etiology and attendant death and complications. Antimicrobial regimens using sequential IV-to-oral therapy may reduce the length of hospital stay. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial involving 459 patients, clinically improved IV-treated patients were switched to oral therapy after 48 hours. Overall clinical response was the primary efficacy measurement. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients (151 CIP+MET, 131 PIP/TAZO) were valid for efficacy. Of these patients, 64% CIP+MET and 57% PIP/TAZO patients were considered candidates for oral therapy. Patients had a mean APACHE II score of 9.6. The most common diagnoses were appendicitis (33%), other intraabdominal infection (29%), and abscess (25%). Overall clinical resolution rates were statistically superior for CIP+MET (74%) compared with PIP/TAZO (63%). Corresponding rates in the subgroup suitable for oral therapy were 85% for CIP+MET and 70% for PIP/TAZO. Postsurgical wound infection rates were significantly lower in CIP+MET (11%) versus PIP/TAZO patients (19%). Mean length of stay was 14 days for CIP+MET and 17 days for PIP/TAZO patients. CONCLUSION: CIP+MET, initially administered IV and followed by CIP+MET oral therapy, was clinically more effective than IV PIP/TAZO for the treatment of patients with complicated intraabdominal infections. (+info)
Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a comparison of complications.
(24/742)
Although between 4% and 20% of all appendectomies in adults are performed laparoscopically, this procedure is rarely done in the pediatric age group because of the substantially more difficult technique, the expected risks and suspected higher rate of complications. In a prospective study of 500 consecutive appendectomies, we tried to assess the actual rate of complications of each operative approach. We included 362 conventional and 138 laparoscopic appendectomies, the median age of the patients was 10.8 years. The mortality was 0 in both groups. We observed 89 minor and 11 major complications. All major complications (wound infections needing re-operation under general anesthesia, intra-abdominal abscesses, ileus due to adhesions and a case of renal insufficiency because of glomerulonephritis) occurred in the conventional group (n=11, ie, 3% of 362 open appendectomies). Seventy-two minor complications were seen in the same group (20%). In the laparoscopic group, there were 17 (13%) minor complications and no severe complications. This difference was statistically significant. We conclude that in children laparoscopic appendectomy does not carry a greater risk of intra- or postoperative complications and can therefore safely be established as a standard procedure. (+info)