Use of sevoflurane inhalation sedation for outpatient third molar surgery.
(9/302)
This study attempted to determine if sevoflurane in oxygen inhaled via a nasal hood as a sole sedative agent would provide an appropriate level of deep sedation for outpatient third molar surgery. Twenty-four patients scheduled for third molar removal were randomly assigned to receive either nasal hood inhalation sevoflurane or an intravenous deep sedation using midazolam and fentanyl followed by a propofol infusion. In addition to measuring patient, surgeon, and dentist anesthesiologist subjective satisfaction with the technique, physiological parameters, amnesia, and psychomotor recovery were also assessed. No statistically significant difference was found between the sevoflurane and midazolam-fentanyl-propofol sedative groups in physiological parameters, degree of amnesia, reported quality of sedation, or patient willingness to again undergo a similar deep sedation. A trend toward earlier recovery in the sevoflurane group was identified. Sevoflurane can be successfully employed as a deep sedative rather than a general anesthetic for extraction of third molars in healthy subjects. (+info)
Comparison of the intubation conditions provided by rapacuronium (ORG 9487) or succinylcholine in humans during anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol.
(10/302)
BACKGROUND: Currently, the only approved muscle relaxant with a rapid onset and short duration of action is succinylcholine, a drug with some undesirable effects. Rapacuronium is an investigational nondepolarizing relaxant that also has a rapid onset and short duration and consequently should be compared with succinylcholine in its ability to facilitate rapid tracheal intubation. METHODS: This prospective, randomized clinical trial involved 336 patients. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol and either 1.5 mg/kg rapacuronium or 1.0 mg/kg succinylcholine. The goal was to accomplish tracheal intubation by 60 s after administration of the neuromuscular blocking drug. Endotracheal intubation was performed, and conditions were graded by a blinded investigator. Recovery of neuromuscular function was assessed by electromyography. RESULTS: Intubation conditions were evaluated in 236 patients. Intubation by 60 s after drug administration occurred in 100% of patients with rapacuronium and in 98% with succinylcholine. Intubation conditions were excellent or good in 87% of patients with rapacuronium and in 95% with succinylcholine (P < 0.05). The time (median and range) to the first recovery of the train-of-four response was 8.0 (2.8-20.0) min with rapacuronium and 5.7 (1.8-17.7) min with succinylcholine (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of adverse effects was similar with both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: A 1.5-mg/kg dose of rapacuronium effectively facilitates rapid tracheal intubation. It can be considered a valid alternative to 1.0 mg/kg succinylcholine for this purpose. (+info)
Minidose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture in the aged.
(11/302)
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture in the elderly is associated with a high incidence of hypotension. The synergism between intrathecal opioids and local anesthetics may make it possible to achieve reliable spinal anesthesia with minimal hypotension using a minidose of local anesthetic. METHODS: Twenty patients aged > or = 70 yr undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture were randomized into two groups of 10 patients each. Group A received a spinal anesthetic of bupivacaine 4 mg plus fentanyl 20 microg, and group B received 10 mg bupivacaine. Hypotension was defined as a systolic pressure of < 90 mmHg or a 25% decrease in mean arterial pressure from baseline. Hypotension was treated with intravenous ephedrine boluses 5-10 mg up to a maximum 50 mg, and thereafter by phenylephrine boluses of 100-200 microg. RESULTS: All patients had satisfactory anesthesia. One of 10 patients in group A required ephedrine, a single dose of 5 mg. Nine of 10 patients in group B required vasopressor support of blood pressure. Group B patients required an average of 35 mg ephedrine, and two patients required phenylephrine. The lowest recorded systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures as fractions of the baseline pressures were, respectively, 81%, 84%, and 85% versus 64%, 69%, and 64% for group A versus group B. CONCLUSIONS: A "minidose" of 4 mg bupivacaine in combination with 20 microg fentanyl provides spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture in the elderly. The minidose combination caused dramatically less hypotension than 10 mg bupivacaine and nearly eliminated the need for vasopressor support of blood pressure. (+info)
Comparison of sevoflurane-nitrous oxide and propofol-alfentanil-nitrous oxide anaesthesia for minor gynaecological surgery.
(12/302)
We studied 44 patients undergoing minor gynaecological surgery, anaesthetized in random order with sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or propofol-alfentanil-nitrous oxide. Operating conditions, recovery and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were assessed. For postoperative analgesia, all patients were given ketoprofen 100 mg rectally at the end of anaesthesia. Patients and gynaecologists were equally satisfied with both anaesthetic techniques. Patients given propofol woke up (3.5 vs 6.5 min), became orientated (5.0 vs 7.5 min) and were able to walk (57 vs 69 min) significantly (P < 0.05) earlier than those given sevoflurane, but there were no differences in times to achieve home readiness (166 vs 149 min) or in psychomotor recovery between the two groups. Intrauterine bleeding and PONV were more common with sevoflurane (incidence of PONV 64%) than with propofol anaesthesia (incidence of PONV 5%). We conclude that propofol-alfentanil is preferable to sevoflurane in ultra-short anaesthesia for minor gynaecological surgery. (+info)
Ropivacaine and bupivacaine for long-term epidural infusion in a small child.
(13/302)
Ropivacaine is assumed to be less toxic than bupivacaine but there are no reports concerning its long-term use in paediatric anaesthesia. We report the use of ropivacaine for long-term epidural anaesthesia in a 21-month-old girl. In two consecutive periods of 3 days each, 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% or 0.75% ropivacaine were administered to facilitate painful vaginal brachytherapy. The mean dose of bupivacaine increased from 1.05 to 1.32 mg kg-1 h-1 and that of ropivacaine increased from 1.40 to 3.86 mg kg-1 h-1. No toxic side effects were observed. We conclude that both epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine were effective and safe during long-term epidural anaesthesia in this particular case. However, the doses were potentially toxic and should therefore be used with extreme caution. (+info)
Comparison of low-dose epidural with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labour.
(14/302)
We have performed a randomized comparison of two low-dose epidural regimens for analgesia in labour, differing only in the manner in which initial analgesia was established. In the epidural (EPI) group, 484 women received a loading dose of 20 ml of 0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 micrograms ml-1. In the combined spinal-epidural (CSE) group, 524 women received a spinal injection of plain bupivacaine 2.5 mg with fentanyl 25 micrograms. In both groups, these initial doses were followed by 0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 micrograms ml-1 infused at a rate of 12 ml h-1, with 20-ml top-ups for breakthrough pain. The groups were compared for midwife assessment of analgesic efficacy, delivery mode, patient assessments of first stage analgesia, second stage analgesia, overall analgesia, motor block and complications. Midwives, who were not blinded to the treatment groups, assessed 61.6% of CSE as providing 'excellent' analgesia compared with 56.4% of epidurals (P = 0.02). Patients assessed overall analgesia as 'excellent' in 74.8% of CSE compared with 71.7% of epidurals (P = 0.14). Other comparisons between groups revealed no differences. These findings may have been affected by an uneven distribution of multiparous women between the groups (25% in the EPI group and 34.2% in the CSE group; P = 0.002). However, subgroup analysis of primiparous and multiparous women did not alter the results. (+info)
Comparison of 1% ropivacaine with 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia.
(15/302)
We have compared the efficacy of 1% ropivacaine with a mixture of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery. We used the time to adequate block for surgery, and ocular and eyelid movement scores at 8 min after block as clinical end-points. Ninety patients were allocated randomly to receive 7-10 ml of a mixture of equal parts of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine or an equal volume of 1% ropivacaine alone. Hyaluronidase 15 iu ml-1 was added to both solutions. There were no differences between groups in clinical end-points. Median time at which the block was adequate to start surgery was 8 min (interquartile range 4-10 min) in each group. Median eyelid movement scores were similar in both groups, but the bupivacaine and lidocaine mixture produced a significantly decreased ocular movement score at 2, 4 and 6 min (P < 0.05). There was no difference between groups in the incidence of minor complications. Based on clinical end-points, time to adequate block for surgery and median ocular and eyelid movement scores at 8 min, 1% ropivacaine as the sole agent for peribulbar anaesthesia was comparable with a mixture of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine. (+info)
Fentanyl and midazolam anaesthesia for coronary bypass surgery: a clinical study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis, drug concentrations and recall.
(16/302)
Bispectral index (BIS) was assessed as a monitor of depth of anaesthesia during fentanyl and midazolam anaesthesia for coronary bypass surgery. In 10 patients given morphine premedication, anaesthesia was induced with a combination of midazolam and fentanyl and thereafter maintained with a continuous infusion of a mixture of midazolam and fentanyl 5 and 50 micrograms kg-1 h-1, respectively. BIS was recorded continuously but not shown to the attending anaesthetist. Plasma concentrations of midazolam and fentanyl were measured five times during the procedure. An auditory stimulus was given during bypass. All patients were interviewed twice after operation for explicit and implicit recall. No patient had any anaesthetic complications. BIS decreased during anaesthesia, but varied considerably during surgery (range 36-91) with eight patients having values > 60. Midazolam and fentanyl drug concentrations did not correlate with BIS. No patient reported explicit or implicit recall. During clinically adequate anaesthesia with midazolam and fentanyl BIS varies considerably. The most likely reason is that BIS is not an accurate measure of the depth of anaesthesia when using this combination of agents. (+info)