Effect of intrathecal non-NMDA EAA receptor antagonist LY293558 in rats: a new class of drugs for spinal anesthesia.
(73/609)
BACKGROUND: Excitatory amino acid receptors are important for both sensory and motor function in the spinal cord. We studied the effects of intrathecal LY293558, a competitive non-N-methyl-D-aspartate excitatory amino acid receptor antagonist, on motor and sensory function in rats to determine whether drugs blocking these receptors could potentially be used as alternative agents to local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Rats were tested before and 15-240 min after intrathecal injection of 5 nmol (in 10 microl) LY293558. Sensory function was tested at the hind paw using withdrawal response to pin prick and withdrawal to pinch with sharp forceps. Motor performance (ambulation, placing reflex, and Rotorod time), blood pressure, and heart rate were also evaluated. Some tests were repeated the next day. Responses after LY293558 were compared to injection of 40 microl bupivacaine, 0.75%. Pin-prick responses at the forepaw, chest, abdomen, hind leg, and hind paw were also examined after intrathecal LY293558. RESULTS: Intrathecal LY293558 blocked both sensory and motor responses through 180 min; complete recovery was present the following day. No change in blood pressure or heart rate occurred. The effects of LY293558 were more pronounced and sustained than those of bupivacaine. Segmental blockade of the response to pin prick was present after LY293558. CONCLUSION: Drugs like LY293558 that block alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA)/kainate receptors may be an alternative to local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia in humans. (+info)
Ambulatory surgery patients may be discharged before voiding after short-acting spinal and epidural anesthesia.
(74/609)
BACKGROUND: Voiding before discharge is usually required after outpatient epidural or spinal anesthesia because of concern about bladder overdistention and dysfunction. Shorter duration spinal and epidural anesthesia may allow return of bladder function before overdistention occurs in low-risk patients (those younger than age 70, not having hernia, rectal, or urologic surgery, and without a history of voiding difficulty), and predischarge voiding may not be necessary. METHODS: After institutional review board approval and informed consent, 201 low-risk ambulatory patients were prospectively studied in either a standard or accelerated pathway after undergoing spinal or epidural anesthesia with procaine, lidocaine, 2-chloroprocaine, or less than 7 mg bupivacaine; epinephrine was not used in any anesthetic. Standard pathway patients (n = 70) were required to void before discharge. Accelerated pathway (n = 131) patients were not required to void. (After randomization of an initial 163 patients to one of the two tracks, 38 additional patients were assigned to the accelerated pathway.) If accelerated pathway patients voided, they were discharged when all other discharge criteria were met. If they did not spontaneously void after block resolution, a bladder ultrasound (BUS) was performed. If the BUS indicated a urine volume of less than 400 ml, the patients were discharged and instructed to return to the emergency department if they were unable to void within 8 h of discharge. If the BUS indicated a urine volume of greater than 400 ml, the patients were reassessed in 1 h and were discharged if they could void spontaneously. If they could not void spontaneously, they were catheterized to facilitate discharge. All patients were contacted the next day to assess the return of normal bladder function. RESULTS: All standard pathway patients voided without difficulty, and were discharged in 153 +/- 49 (SD) min. 62 patients in the accelerated pathway voided spontaneously after resolution of their block and were discharged in 127 +/- 41 min. 46 patients were discharged with a BUS less than 400 ml in 120 +/- 42 min. 23 patients had a BUS greater than 400 ml: of these, 20 patients voided within an hour and were discharged in 162 +/- 45 min. Three were catheterized after 1 h, and were discharged in 186 +/- 61 min. Mean discharge time for all patients in the accelerated pathway was 22 min shorter than the standard pathway (P = 0.002). No patients had difficulty voiding or returned to the hospital for urinary problems. None reported new urologic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Delay of discharge after outpatient spinal or epidural anesthesia with short-duration drugs for low-risk procedures is not necessary, and may result in prolonged discharge times. (+info)
Low complication rate associated with cesarean section under spinal anesthesia for HIV-1-infected women on antiretroviral therapy.
(75/609)
BACKGROUND: Elective cesarean section decreases the likelihood of vertical human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission from mother to infant. This study aimed to determine whether cesarean section done with spinal anesthesia on HIV-1-infected pregnant women taking antiretroviral therapy is associated with intraoperative hemodynamic instability, postoperative complications, or changes in immune function or HIV-1 viral load. METHODS: A case-controlled study was conducted over a 3-year period in a London academic hospital. Forty-four women infected with HIV-1 and a control group of 45 HIV-negative women undergoing cesarean sections were included. The main outcome measures included intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, blood loss, and ephedrine requirements, and postoperative infective complications, blood transfusion, changes in blood HIV-1 viral load and lymphocyte subsets, and time to hospital discharge. RESULTS: There were no differences in hemodynamic stability and postoperative complications between the HIV-infected group and the controls. There was an acute postoperative increase in the CD4T lymphocyte count (P = 0.01), but the CD4T:CD8T ratio and viral load did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia for women infected with HIV-1 taking antiretroviral therapy was not associated with intraoperative or postoperative complications. (+info)
The epidural "top-up": predictors of increase of sensory blockade.
(76/609)
BACKGROUND: Extension of sensory blockade after an epidural top-up in combined spinal epidural (CSE) anesthesia is partly attributed to compression of the dural sac by the injected volume. This study investigated whether a volume effect plays a significant role when administering an epidural top-up after an initial epidural loading dose and assessed the predictive value of different factors with respect to the increase in sensory blockade. METHODS: After an epidural loading dose of 75 mg ropivacaine, 0.75%, 30 patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups. After the maximum level of sensory blockade (MLSB) had been established, patients received either an epidural top-up with 10 ml ropivacaine, 0.75% (group 1, n = 10) or saline (group 2, n = 10), or no epidural top-up (group 3, n = 10). Subsequently, sensory blockade was assessed at 5-min intervals for a further 30 min by a blinded observer. RESULTS: The MLSB increased significantly in the patients receiving an epidural top-up with ropivacaine but not in the patients receiving normal saline. Sensory block extension was inversely related to the number of segments blocked at the time of the epidural top-up, and female gender was associated with a smaller increase in MLSB. CONCLUSIONS: When using epidural ropivacaine, the extension of sensory blockade after administering an epidural top-up is caused by a local anesthetic effect and not by a volume effect. Under the conditions of this study, predictors of the increase in sensory blockade are the presence of ropivacaine in the top-up injectate, the number of segments blocked at the time of epidural top-up, and gender. (+info)
Cerebrospinal fluid density influences extent of plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.
(77/609)
BACKGROUND: The attempts to explain the unpredictability of extent of spinal block provided by plain local anesthetic solutions have resulted in many clinical reports; however, causes of this uncertainty are as yet unknown. Recently, normal values of the human cerebrospinal fluid densities have been studied showing important interindividual variations, especially between females and males. The current study was designed to evaluate as primary endpoint the influence of cerebrospinal fluid density values on the extent of spinal block with plain bupivacaine. The ancillary endpoints were search of factors explaining the interindividual differences in cerebrospinal fluid density values reported and determination of the relation between upper extent and regression of spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive patients undergoing peripheral orthopedic surgery with spinal block were enrolled. Spinal anesthesia was performed in the lateral decubitus position with the operated side upward. Two milliliters of cerebrospinal fluid was sampled before injection of 3 ml plain bupivacaine 0.5%. The patient was immediately turned supine and remained in the horizontal position until the end of the study. Maximal sensory block level and time to sensory regression to L4 were determined for each patient enrolled. Cerebrospinal fluid and bupivacaine densities as well as cerebrospinal proteins, glucose, sodium, and chloride concentrations were measured. RESULTS: A highly significant correlation between cerebrospinal fluid density and maximal sensory block level was found (P = 0.0004). However, this correlation was poorly predictive (R(2) = 0.37). Cerebrospinal fluid density, proteins, and glucose concentrations were significantly higher in men than in women: 1.000567 +/- 0.000091 versus 1.000501 +/- 0.000109 g/ml (P = 0.014), 0.46 +/- 0.18 versus 0.32 +/- 0.13 g/l (P = 0.001), and 3.27 +/- 0.7 versus 2.93 +/- 0.5 mM (P = 0.023), respectively. A highly significant (P = 0.0004) and predictive (R(2) = 0.73) inverse correlation was found between maximal upper sensory extent and sensory regression to L4. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate an influence of cerebrospinal fluid density on subarachnoid distribution of 3 ml plain bupivacaine 0.5% and show that with higher cerebrospinal fluid densities, a higher spinal block level can be expected. (+info)
A comparison of the 24-gauge Sprotte and Gertie Marx spinal needles for combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labor.
(78/609)
BACKGROUND: Prior experience with the combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) for labor analgesia demonstrated a high (up to 14%) failure rate because of failure to obtain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or lack of response to appropriate doses of intrathecal sufentanil. The current study was designed to test whether a longer needle with a shorter side port (Gertie Marx needle; 127 mm long) would eliminate failures to obtain CSF compared with the needle we had used previously (Sprotte needle; 120 mm long). METHODS: Seventy-three parturients were randomly assigned to have a CSE performed with one of these two needles. After identifying the epidural space with an 18-gauge Touhy needle at the L2-L3 or L3-L4 interspace, the spinal needle was introduced through the Touhy needle until penetration of the dura was felt or until the needle was maximally inserted. If no CSF was obtained, the alternate needle was tried. After obtaining CSF, 10 microg sufentanil diluted in 1.8 ml saline was injected. Verbal pain scores (0-10) were obtained every 5 min for 30 min. RESULTS: Failure to obtain CSF occurred six times in the Sprotte group compared with none in the Gertie Marx group (P < 0.05). In all six failures in the Sprotte group, the Gertie Marx needle subsequently proved successful in obtaining CSF. There were no differences in pain scores between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The extra length of the 127-mm Gertie Marx needle resulted in a higher success rate for obtaining CSF when used in the CSE technique. Side port design was not a factor influencing success in this clinical setting. (+info)
Spinal anaesthesia: comparison of plain ropivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) with bupivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) for major orthopaedic surgery.
(79/609)
BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine provides effective spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of plain ropivacaine with plain bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Sixty-six patients, ASA I or II, were randomized to receive an intrathecal injection of one of two local anaesthetic solutions. Group R (n=32) received 3.5 ml of ropivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) (17.5 mg). Group B (n=34) received 3.5 ml of bupivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) (17.5 mg). The onset and duration of sensory block at dermatome level T10, maximum upper and lower spread of sensory block and the onset, intensity and duration of motor block were recorded, as were safety data. RESULTS: Onset of motor and sensory block was rapid with no significant differences between the two groups. The median time of onset of sensory block at the T10 dermatome was 2 min (range 2-5 min) in Group R and 2 min in Group B (range 2-9 min). The median duration of sensory block at the T10 dermatome was 3.0 h (range 1.5-4.6 h) in Group R and 3.5 h (2.7-5.2 h) in Group B (P<0.0001). The median duration of complete motor block (modified Bromage Scale 3) was significantly shorter in the ropivacaine group compared with the bupivacaine group (2.1 vs 3.9 h, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal administration of either 17.5 mg plain ropivacaine or 17.5 mg plain bupivacaine was well tolerated and an adequate block for total hip arthroplasty was achieved in all patients. A more rapid postoperative recovery of sensory and motor function was seen in Group R compared with Group B. (+info)
Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and diamorphine in addition to bupivacaine for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.
(80/609)
BACKGROUND: Co-administration of small doses of opioids and bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia reduces intraoperative discomfort and may reduce postoperative analgesic requirements in patients undergoing Caesarean section. Fentanyl and diamorphine are the two most frequently used agents in UK obstetric anaesthetic practice. METHODS: Seventy-five healthy parturients scheduled for elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, were randomly allocated to additionally receive intrathecal fentanyl 20 micrograms, diamorphine 300 micrograms or 0.9% saline. Patients also received i.v. cyclizine and rectal diclofenac. RESULTS: Less supplementary intraoperative analgesia was required by patients in either opioid group (4%) compared with the control (32%) (P < 0.05). Twenty four hours after spinal injection, total mean (SD) postoperative morphine requirement was significantly lower if diamorphine was administered (31 (21) mg), in comparison with the other two groups (control 68 (26) mg; fentanyl 62 (26) mg) (P < 0.05). Reduced visual analogue pain scores were evident 12 h following diamorphine, but observed only for 1 h after fentanyl when compared with the control (P < 0.05). Mild pruritus was more common for 2 h after either spinal opioid (P < 0.05), but no inter-group differences were observed for the remainder of the first 24 h. Patients displayed deeper levels of sedation both acutely and 12 h after administration of intrathecal fentanyl (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both intrathecal opioids reduce intraoperative discomfort, but only diamorphine reduced postoperative analgesic requirement beyond the immediate postoperative period. (+info)