Comparative analgesic and mental effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine and alfentanil in humans. (65/235)

BACKGROUND: In animals, systemic and intrathecal administration of the alpha2 -adrenergic receptor agonist dexmedetomidine results in robust antinociceptive effects in models of heat pain. In humans, systemically administered dexmedetomidine is approved for sedating patients in the intensive care unit. However, whether systemic administration of dexmedetomidine in humans produces significant analgesia at doses causing sedation but not unconsciousness remains controversial. METHODS: This study in human volunteers used a placebo-controlled, double-blind, and randomized design to examine whether dexmedetomidine at doses causing mild to severe sedation produces analgesia in experimental models of heat and electrical pain. Results were compared to the effects of the mu-opioid receptor agonist alfentanil. A computer-controlled infusion provided four median step-up plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine (0.09, 0.24, 0.54, and 1.23 ng/ml) and alfentanil (13.4, 33.8, 67.8, and 126.1 ng/ml). RESULTS: Sedative and cognitive effects of dexmedetomidine were dose-dependent, resulting in a median sedation score of 95 of 100 and slowing of cognitive speed (reaction time, trail-making test) by a factor of about two at the highest plasma concentration. Dexmedetomidine did not attenuate heat or electrical pain. Alfentanil caused severe sedation (median sedation score 88 of 100) and slowed cognitive speed by a factor of approximately 1.4 at the highest plasma concentration. Alfentanil attenuated heat and electrical pain dose dependently. CONCLUSION: This study documents that systemic dexmedetomidine lacks analgesic efficacy for heat and electrical pain at doses causing mild to severe sedation. These results provide further evidence suggesting that systemic administration of dexmedetomidine lacks broad analgesic activity in models of acute pain at doses not rendering humans unconscious.  (+info)

Self-Administration of cocaine-opioid combinations by rhesus monkeys: evaluation of the role of mu receptor efficacy using labor supply analysis. (66/235)

Cocaine and heroin often are abused by self-administering the drugs in combination as a "speedball". We evaluated the extent to which intrinsic efficacy at the mu-opioid receptor influences combined cocaine-opioid self-administration and used the behavioral economic model termed "labor supply" to quantitatively evaluate the reinforcing effects of cocaine-opioid combinations. Rhesus monkeys (n = 8) were trained under a progressive-ratio schedule of i.v. cocaine injection in which the response requirement increased during the experimental session and the initial response requirement was varied. Combination of cocaine with heroin enhanced self-administration compared with the drugs individually, with ineffective doses of both drugs maintaining self-administration when combined. These effects also were observed with the high-efficacy mu agonist alfentanil and low-efficacy agonist nalbuphine. Using the labor supply economic model, combinations of heroin, alfentanil, or nalbuphine with relatively low doses of cocaine were found to increase the number of injections per session ("income") and total responses per session ("labor"). Combination of a relatively high dose of cocaine with either heroin or alfentanil, but not nalbuphine, also resulted in only a small reduction in income concomitant with increased labor, suggesting that heroin and alfentanil made cocaine consumption more resistant to increasing response costs, or more "inelastic." Collectively, these findings suggest that speedball self-administration may occur even with relatively low levels of intrinsic efficacy at mu-opioid receptors and that an inelastic relationship between drug consumption and labor may contribute to the persistence of speedball abuse.  (+info)

Metabolism of alfentanil by cytochrome p4503a (cyp3a) enzymes. (67/235)

The synthetic opioid alfentanil is an analgesic and an in vivo probe for hepatic and first-pass CYP3A activity. Alfentanil is a particularly useful CYP3A probe because pupil diameter change is a surrogate for plasma concentrations, thereby affording noninvasive assessment of CYP3A. Alfentanil undergoes extensive CYP3A4 metabolism via two major pathways, forming noralfentanil and N-phenylpropionamide. This investigation evaluated alfentanil metabolism in vitro to noralfentanil and N-phenylpropionamide, by expressed CYP3A5 and CYP3A7 in addition to CYP3A4, with and without coexpressed or exogenous cytochrome b(5). Effects of the CYP3A inhibitors troleandomycin and ketoconazole were also determined. Rates of noralfentanil and N-phenylpropionamide formation by CYP3A4 and 3A5 in the absence of b(5) were generally equivalent, although the metabolite formation ratio differed, whereas those by CYP3A7 were substantially less. CYP3A4 and 3A5 were equipotently inhibited by troleandomycin, whereas ketoconazole was an order of magnitude more potent toward CYP3A4. Cytochrome b(5) qualitatively and quantitatively altered alfentanil metabolism, with b(5) coexpression having a greater effect than exogenous addition. Addition or coexpression of b(5) markedly stimulated the formation of both metabolites and changed the formation of noralfentanil but not N-phenylpropionamide from apparent single-site to multisite Michaelis-Menten kinetics. These results demonstrate that alfentanil is a substrate for CYP3A5 in addition to CYP3A4, and the effects of the CYP3A inhibitors troleandomycin and ketoconazole are CYP3A enzyme-selective. Alfentanil is one of the few CYP3A substrates that is metabolized in vitro as avidly by both CYP3A4 and 3A5. Polymorphic CYP3A5 expression may contribute to inter-individual variability in alfentanil metabolism.  (+info)

Electro-acupuncture versus conventional analgesia: a comparison of pain levels during oocyte aspiration and patients' experiences of well-being after surgery. (68/235)

BACKGROUND: The primary aims were to compare the pain-relieving effect and post-operative well-being between electro-acupuncture analgesia (EA) and conventional analgesia (CA) comprising opiates. Further aims were to compare time for mobilization, and costs for time and drug consumption. METHODS: In all, 160 women undergoing IVF were randomized, according to a computer-generated list, to EA or CA. Well-being was evaluated with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Pain and subjective expectations and experiences were recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Time and drug consumption were recorded. RESULTS: Although VAS pain ratings were significantly higher at oocyte aspiration (P < 0.0001) and after retrieval (P < 0.01) in the EA than in the CA group, they were similar 60 min after surgery. Both groups had similar STAI well-being scores. The EA group was significantly less tired and confused than the CA group after oocyte aspiration. No significant differences in time and costs for drug consumption were noted. CONCLUSION: EA cannot generally be recommended as a pain-relieving method at oocyte aspiration but might be an alternative for women desiring a non-pharmacological method. An advantage of EA is less post-operative tiredness and confusion compared with CA.  (+info)

Cerebral blood flow response to increases in arterial CO2 tension during alfentanil anesthesia in the rabbit. (69/235)

The stability of cerebral function and blood flow (CBF), and the CBF response to changes in arterial carbon dioxide tension (CBF reactivity) during alfentanil anesthesia were examined in rabbits. This model was first shown to provide stable anesthesia, cortical function, and CBF for 4 h. CBF increased significantly to 159% [of baseline] in the left hemisphere and to 167% in the right within 5 min of an exposure to 5% CO2 (p = 0.009 on the left and p = 0.003 on the right), but then decreased to 123% on the left and to 137% on the right (not significantly different from baseline, p = 0.11 on the left and p = 0.07 on the right) while PaCO2 was still rising. Steady state reactivity levels (0.8 ml 100 g-1/min-1/mm Hg-1 CO2 on the left and 0.65 ml 100 g-1/min-1/mm Hg-1 CO2 on the right) were consistent with previous work and were reached at 20 min. These results suggest that mechanisms other than perivascular hydrogen ion concentration mediate the CBF response to changes in arterial CO2 tension during alfentanil anesthesia.  (+info)

Pharmacogenetic determinants of human liver microsomal alfentanil metabolism and the role of cytochrome P450 3A5. (70/235)

BACKGROUND: There is considerable unexplained interindividual variability in the clearance of alfentanil. Alfentanil undergoes extensive metabolism by cytochrome P4503A4 (CYP3A4). CYP3A5 is structurally similar to CYP3A4 and metabolizes most CYP3A4 substrates but is polymorphically expressed. Livers with the CYP3A5*1 allele contain higher amounts of the native CYP3A5 protein than livers homozygous for the mutant CYP3A5*3 allele. This investigation tested the hypothesis that alfentanil is a substrate for CYP3A5 and that CYP3A5 pharmacogenetic variability influences human liver alfentanil metabolism. METHODS: Alfentanil metabolism to noralfentanil and N-phenylpropionamide was determined in microsomes from two groups of human livers, characterized for CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 protein content: low CYP3A5 (2.0-5.2% of total CYP3A, n = 10) and high CYP3A5 (46-76% of total CYP3A, n = 10). Mean CYP3A4 content was the same in both groups. The effects of the CYP3A inhibitors troleandomycin and ketoconazole, the latter being more potent toward CYP3A4, on alfentanil metabolism were also determined. RESULTS: In the low versus high CYP3A5 livers, respectively, noralfentanil formation was 77 +/- 31 versus 255 +/- 170 pmol . min . mg, N-phenylpropionamide formation was 8.0 +/- 3.1 versus 20.5 +/- 14.0 pmol . min . mg, and the metabolite ratio was 9.5 +/- 0.4 versus 12.7 +/- 1.4 (P < 0.05 for all). There was a poor correlation between alfentanil metabolism and CYP3A4 content but an excellent correlation when CYP3A5 (i.e., total CYP3A content) was considered (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001). Troleandomycin inhibited alfentanil metabolism similarly in the low and high CYP3A5 livers; ketoconazole inhibition was less in the high CYP3A5 livers. CONCLUSION: In microsomes from human livers expressing the CYP3A5*1 allele and containing higher amounts of CYP3A5 protein, compared with those with the CYP3A5*3 allele and little CYP3A5, there was greater alfentanil metabolism, metabolite ratios more closely resembled those for expressed CYP3A5, and inhibitors with differing CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 selectivities had effects resembling those for expressed CYP3A5. Therefore, alfentanil is metabolized by human liver microsomal CYP3A5 in addition to CYP3A4, and pharmacogenetic variability in CYP3A5 expression significantly influences human liver alfentanil metabolism in vitro. Further investigation is warranted to assess whether the CYP3A5 polymorphism is a factor in the interindividual variability of alfentanil metabolism and clearance in vivo.  (+info)

Alfentanil and placebo analgesia: no sex differences detected in models of experimental pain. (71/235)

BACKGROUND: To assess whether patient sex contributes to the interindividual variability in alfentanil analgesic sensitivity, the authors compared male and female subjects for pain sensitivity after alfentanil using a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling approach. METHODS: Healthy volunteers received a 30-min alfentanil or placebo infusion on two occasions. Analgesia was measured during the subsequent 6 h by assaying tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation (eight men and eight women) of increasing intensity or using visual analog scale scores during treatment with noxious thermal heat (five men and five women). Sedation was concomitantly measured. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models were applied to the analgesia and sedation data using NONMEM. For electrical pain, the placebo and alfentanil models were combined post hoc. RESULTS: Alfentanil and placebo analgesic responses did not differ between sexes. The placebo effect was successfully incorporated into the alfentanil pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model and was responsible for 20% of the potency of alfentanil. However, the placebo effect did not contribute to the analgesic response variability. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of the electrical and heat pain data yielded similar values for the potency parameter, but the blood-effect site equilibration half-life was significantly longer for electrical pain (7-9 min) than for heat pain (0.2 min) or sedation (2 min). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the ample literature demonstrating sex differences in morphine analgesia, neither sex nor subject expectation (i.e., placebo) contributes to the large between-subject response variability with alfentanil analgesia. The difference in alfentanil analgesia onset and offset between pain tests is discussed.  (+info)

Ventilatory effects of clonidine alone and in the presence of alfentanil, in human volunteers. (72/235)

Clonidine, an alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, can potentiate opioid-induced analgesia. In a double-blind placebo-controlled study in human volunteers, we sought to determine whether clonidine also potentiates opioid-induced respiratory depression. Hypercapnic ventilatory responses (minute ventilation, mean inspiratory flow rate, and mouth occlusion pressure) were measured in five healthy male volunteers on two separate occasions (with or without clonidine, approximately 3.5 micrograms.kg-1 orally) under the following conditions: baseline, 2 h after clonidine/placebo (alfentanil concentration of 0), and during computer-controlled alfentanil infusions to approximate plasma concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 ng.ml-1. Plasma alfentanil concentrations were measured before and after each rebreathing test, and clonidine concentrations were measured after each rebreathing test. The end-tidal CO2 (PET(CO2)) was measured continuously. Data were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance. The PET(CO2) and measured concentrations of alfentanil were included as covariates, and a compound symmetry error analysis was assumed. Statistical significance was achieved when P less than 0.05. For minute ventilation, mean inspiratory flow rate, and mouth occlusion pressure there was a statistically significant relationship to the covariates of PET(CO2) and plasma alfentanil concentration. Clonidine, when compared to placebo, caused a small but significant depression of mean inspiratory flow rate. There was similarly a small, but statistically insignificant, depression of minute ventilation by clonidine. The mouth occlusion pressure was not affected by clonidine treatment. Clonidine treatment did not potentiate alfentanil-induced respiratory depression. Although the combination of an opioid and an alpha 2-adrenergic agonist may act synergistically for the analgesic response, there is no synergistic effect by this drug combination on respiratory depression.  (+info)