Functional and cytoarchitectural spinal cord protection by ATL-146e after ischemia/reperfusion is mediated by adenosine receptor agonism.
(49/229)
BACKGROUND: ATL-146e protects the spinal cord from ischemia/reperfusion injury, presumably via adenosine A(2A) receptor activation, but this relationship remains unproven. We hypothesized that spinal cord functional and cytoarchitectural preservation from ATL-146e would be lost with simultaneous administration of the specific adenosine A(2A) antagonist ZM241385 (ZM), thus proving that adenosine A(2A) receptor activation is responsible for the protective effects of this compound. METHODS: New Zealand White rabbits underwent 45 minutes of infrarenal aortic cross-clamping. Groups (n = 10) included sham, ischemia, ischemia plus ATL-146e (ATL-146E), ischemia plus ZM, or ischemia with both compounds (agonist-antagonist). Tarlov scores were recorded every 12 hours. After 48 hours, the spinal cord was fixed for histology and microtubule-associated protein 2 immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Tarlov scores at 48 hours were significantly better in the sham and ATL-146E groups (5.0 and 3.9, respectively) compared with the other three groups (all < or =1.3; P < .001). On hematoxylin and eosin, neuronal viability was higher in the sham, ATL-146E, and agonist-antagonist groups compared with the control and ZM groups (P < .05). Microtubule-associated protein 2 expression was preserved in the sham and ATL-146E groups but was lost in the ATL + ZM, ZM241385, and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: ATL-146e preserves the spinal cord in terms of both cytoarchitecture and function after reperfusion of the ischemic spinal cord, but this preservation is not completely blocked by competitive adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonism. Although ATL-146e does seem to partially function through activation of the adenosine A(2A) receptor, the neuroprotective mechanism may not be limited to this particular receptor. (+info)
Cutting edge: Critical role for A2A adenosine receptors in the T cell-mediated regulation of colitis.
(50/229)
A(2A) adenosine receptors (A(2A)AR) inhibit inflammation, although the mechanisms through which adenosine exerts its effects remain unclear. Although the transfer of regulatory Th cells blocks colitis induced by pathogenic CD45RB(high) Th cells, we show that CD45RB(low) or CD25+ Th cells from A(2A)AR-deficient mice do not prevent disease. Moreover, CD45RB(high) Th cells from A(2A)AR-deficient mice were not suppressed by control CD45RB(low) Th cells. A(2A)AR agonists suppressed the production of proinflammatory cytokines by CD45RB(high) and CD45RB(low) T cells in association with a loss of mRNA stability. In contrast, anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-10 and TGF-beta, were minimally affected. Oral administration of the A(2A)AR agonist ATL313 attenuated disease in mice receiving CD45RB(high) Th cells. These data suggest that A(2A)AR play a novel role in the control of T cell-mediated colitis by suppressing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines while sparing anti-inflammatory activity mediated by IL-10 and TGF-beta. (+info)
Long-term stimulation of adenosine A2b receptors begun after myocardial infarction prevents cardiac remodeling in rats.
(51/229)
BACKGROUND: Adenosine inhibits proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts and hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes, both of which may play crucial roles in cardiac remodeling. In the present study, we investigated whether chronic stimulation of adenosine receptors begun after myocardial infarction (MI) prevents cardiac remodeling. METHODS AND RESULTS: MI was produced in Wistar rats by permanent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. One week after the onset of MI, animals were randomized into 8 groups: vehicle, dipyridamole (DIP; the adenosine uptake inhibitor, 50 mg/kg), 2-chroloadenosine (CADO; the stable analogue of adenosine, 2 mg/kg), and CADO in the presence of the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist 8-sulfophenyltheophylline (8-SPT) or the selective antagonist for adenosine A1, A2a, A2b, or A3 receptor. Three weeks after treatment, hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters in the DIP and CADO groups were significantly improved compared with the vehicle group. These hemodynamic and echocardiographic improvements were blunted by either 8-SPT or the selective adenosine A2b antagonist MRS1754 but not by the selective antagonists for other subtypes of adenosine receptors. The collagen volume fraction was smaller, and gene expression of the molecules associated with cardiac remodeling such as matrix metalloproteinase in noninfarcted areas was reduced in the DIP and CADO groups compared with the vehicle group, both of which were attenuated by either 8-SPT or MRS1754. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term stimulation of adenosine A2b receptors begun after MI attenuates cardiac fibrosis in the noninfarcted myocardium and improves cardiac function. Drugs that stimulate adenosine A2b receptors or increase adenosine levels are new candidates for preventing cardiac remodeling after MI. (+info)
Synergistic up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in macrophages by adenosine A2A receptor agonists and endotoxin involves transcriptional regulation via the hypoxia response element in the VEGF promoter.
(52/229)
Macrophages are an important source of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) agonists with Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2, 4, 7, and 9 agonists synergistically induce macrophage VEGF expression. We show here using VEGF promoter-luciferase reporter constructs that the TLR4 agonist Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and the A2AR agonists NECA and CGS21680 synergistically augment VEGF transcription in macrophages and that the HRE in the VEGF promoter is essential for this transcription. We examined whether LPS and/or NECA induce HIF-1alpha expression. HIF-1alpha mRNA levels were increased in LPS-treated macrophages in an NF-kappaB-dependent manner; NECA strongly increased these levels in an A2AR-dependent manner. LPS induced luciferase expression from a HIF-1alpha promoter-luciferase construct in an A2AR-independent manner. Further stimulation with NECA did not increase HIF-1alpha promoter activity, indicating that the A2AR-dependent increase in HIF-1alpha mRNA is post-transcriptional. LPS/NECA treatment also increased HIF-1alpha protein and DNA binding levels. Deletion of putative NF-kappaB-binding sites from the VEGF promoter did not affect LPS/NECA-induced VEGF promoter activity, suggesting that NF-kappaB is not directly involved in VEGF transcription. Taken together, these data indicate that LPS/NECA-induced VEGF expression involves transcriptional regulation of the VEGF promoter by HIF-1alpha through the HRE. HIF-1alpha is transcriptionally induced by LPS and post-transcriptionally up-regulated in an A2AR-dependent manner. (+info)
Cell-specific differential modulation of human trabecular meshwork cells by selective adenosine receptor agonists.
(53/229)
Activation of A1 and A2A subtype adenosine receptors (AR) likely exert opposing effects on outflow of aqueous humor, and thereby, on intraocular pressure. Selective agonists of adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes have previously been applied to trabecular meshwork (TM) and Schlemm's canal (SC) cells to identify the site(s) of differential purinergic modulation. However, the apparent changes in volume monitored by previously measuring projected cell area might have partially reflected cell contraction and relaxation. In addition, whole-cell current responses of the TM cells previously described were highly variable following application of selective A1, A2A and A3 agonists. The complexity of the electrophysiologic responses may have reflected cell heterogeneity of the populations harvested from collagenase digestion of TM explants. We now report measurements of TM-cell volume using calcein fluorescence quenching, an approach independent of contractile state. Furthermore, we have applied selective AR agonists to a uniform population of human TM cells, the hTM5 cell line. A1, but not A2A or A3, AR agonists triggered TM-cell shrinkage. Both A1 and A2A AR agonists produced reproducible increases in TM-cell whole-cell currents of similar magnitude. The results suggest that previous measurements of explant-derived TM cells may have reflected a range of responses from phenotypically different cell populations, and that the opposing effects of A1 and A2A agonists on outflow resistance are not likely to be mediated by actions on a single population of TM cells. These opposing effects might reflect AR responses by two or more subpopulations of TM cells, by TM and SC cells or by inner-wall SC cells, alone. (+info)
ZM241385, DPCPX, MRS1706 are inverse agonists with different relative intrinsic efficacies on constitutively active mutants of the human adenosine A2B receptor.
(54/229)
The human adenosine A(2B) receptor belongs to class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In our previous work, constitutively active mutant (CAM) human adenosine A(2B) receptors were identified from a random mutation bank. In the current study, three known A(2B) receptor antagonists, 4-{2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo-[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl}p henol (ZM241385), 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), and N-(4-acetylphenyl)-2-[4-(2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-2,6-dioxo-1,3-dipropyl-1H-purin-8-yl) phenoxy]acetamide (MRS1706) were tested on wild-type and nine CAM A(2B) receptors with different levels of constitutive activity in a yeast growth assay. All three compounds turned out to be inverse agonists for the adenosine A(2B) receptor because they were able to fully reverse the basal activity of four low-level constitutively active A(2B) receptor mutants and to partially reverse the basal activity of three medium-level constitutively active A(2B) receptor mutants. We also discovered two highly constitutively active mutants whose basal activity could not be reversed by any of the three compounds. A two-state receptor model was used to explain the experimental observations; fitting these yielded the following relative intrinsic efficacies for the three inverse agonists ZM241385, DPCPX, and MRS1706: 0.14 +/- 0.03, 0.35 +/- 0.03, and 0.31 +/- 0.02, respectively. Moreover, varying L, the ratio of active versus inactive receptors in this model, from 0.11 for mutant F84L to 999 for two highly constitutively active mutants yielded simulated dose-response curves that mimicked the experimental curves. This study is the first description of inverse agonists for the human adenosine A(2B) receptor. Moreover, the use of receptor mutants with varying levels of constitutive activity enabled us to determine the relative intrinsic efficacy of these inverse agonists. (+info)
Cardioprotection by adenosine A2A agonists in a canine model of myocardial stunning produced by multiple episodes of transient ischemia.
(55/229)
We sought to determine whether administration of a very low, nonvasodilating dose of a highly selective adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist (ATL-193 or ATL-146e) would be cardioprotective in a canine model of myocardial stunning produced by multiple episodes of transient ischemia. Twenty-four anesthetized open-chest dogs underwent either 4 (n=12) or 10 cycles (n=12) of 5-min left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) occlusions interspersed by 5 or 10 min of reperfusion. Left ventricular thickening was measured from baseline through 180 min after the last occlusion-reperfusion cycle. Regional flow was measured with microspheres. In 12 of 24 dogs, A(2A) receptor agonist was infused intravenously beginning 2 min prior to the first occlusion and continuing throughout reperfusion at a dose below that which produces vasodilatation (0.01 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Myocardial flow was similar between control and A(2A) receptor agonist-treated animals, confirming the absence of A(2) receptor agonist-induced vasodilatation. During occlusion, there was severe dyskinesis with marked LAD zone thinning in all animals. After 180 min of reperfusion following the last cycle, significantly greater recovery of LAD zone thickening was observed in A(2A) receptor agonist-treated vs. control animals in both the 4-cycle (91 +/- 7 vs. 56 +/- 12%, respectively; P<0.05) and the 10-cycle (65 +/- 9 vs. 8 +/- 16%, respectively; P<0.05) occlusion groups. The striking amount of functional recovery observed with administration of low, nonvasodilating doses of adenosine A(2A) agonist ATL-193 or ATL-146e supports their further evaluation for the attenuation of postischemic stunning in the clinical setting. (+info)
Effects of adenosine on adhesion molecule expression and cytokine production in human PBMC depend on the receptor subtype activated.
(56/229)
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adenosine suppresses immune responses through adenosine(2A) (A(2A)) receptors, by raising intracellular cAMP. Interleukin (IL)-18 up-regulates the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 on monocytes, leading to production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12, interferon (IFN)-gamma and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). We have previously demonstrated that elevation of cAMP inhibits this IL-18-induced expression of adhesion molecules. In the present study, we examined the effect of adenosine on the IL-18-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1 on human monocytes and production of IL-12, IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha by PBMC. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The expression of ICAM-1 was examined by flow cytometry. IL-12, IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha were determined by ELISA assay. KEY RESULTS: Adenosine inhibited the IL-18-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1 on human monocytes and it abolished the IL-18-enhanced production of IL-12, IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha. While an A(2A) receptor antagonist reversed the action of adenosine, an A(1) or A(3) receptor antagonist enhanced them. An A(2A) receptor agonist, CGS21680, mimicked the effects of adenosine and its effects were abolished not only by the A(2A) receptor antagonist but also by A(1) or A(3) receptor agonists. Activation via A(2A) receptors resulted in elevation of cAMP in monocytes, whereas the stimulation of A(1) or A(3) receptors inhibited it, suggesting that intracellular signal transduction following ligation of A(2A) receptors might be blocked by activation of A(1) or A(3) receptors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Adenosine differentially regulates IL-18-induced adhesion molecule expression and cytokine production through several subtypes of its receptors. (+info)