Measurement of thiopurine methyltransferase activity and azathioprine metabolites in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
(41/449)
BACKGROUND: Measurement of 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations may be useful for optimising treatment with azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. METHODS: We conducted a study of 170 patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine to determine the relationship between 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations and both disease activity, as measured by the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (active disease < 170, remission > or = 170) and leucopenia. Blood was submitted for whole blood 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentration and leucocyte count. RESULTS: Mean (SD) inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire score was 176 (32). There was no correlation between inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire scores and 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations (r(s) = -0.09, p = 0.24). Median 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations in 56 patients with active disease and 114 patients in remission were similar (139 v 131 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells; p = 0.26). There was no correlation between 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations and leucocyte counts. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations did not correlate with disease activity, as measured by the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire, or leucocyte count. These findings are discrepant with most previous studies, possibly due to selection of responding patients who tolerated the medications. A prospective, randomised, dose optimisation trial using 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations is warranted. (+info)
Review article: the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with 6-mercaptopurine or azathioprine.
(42/449)
The thioguanine derivative, azathioprine, is a prodrug of 6-mercaptopurine that is further metabolized by various enzymes present in the liver and gut. Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine have been used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, i.e. ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, for more than 30 years. However, widespread use of azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine in inflammatory bowel disease is of more recent origin, the primary reason being a long-standing debate on the efficacy of these agents in inflammatory bowel disease. Both drugs are slow acting, which is why clinical efficacy cannot be expected until several weeks or even months of treatment have elapsed. Consequently, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine have no place as monotherapy in the treatment of acute relapsing inflammatory bowel disease. Today, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are the most commonly used immunomodulatory drugs in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Their clinical effects are probably identical, although their exact mode of action is still unknown. The mode of action of azathioprine is thought to be multifactorial, including conversion to 6-mercaptopurine (which acts as a purine antimetabolite), possible blockade of thiol groups by alkylation, inhibition of several pathways in nucleic acid biosynthesis (preventing proliferation of cells involved in the determination and amplification of the immune response) and damage to DNA through the incorporation of thiopurine analogues. However, 6-thioguanine nucleotides may accumulate in toxic doses in myeloid precursor cells, resulting in life-threatening myelosuppression. Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are further known to alter lymphocyte function, reduce the number of lamina propria plasma cells and affect natural killer cell function. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to suggest guidelines for the application of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. (+info)
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics.
(43/449)
The use of pharmacogenomics to individualize drug therapy offers the potential to improve drug effectiveness, reduce adverse side effects, and provide cost-effective pharmaceutical care. However, the combinations of disease, drug, and genetic test characteristics that will provide clinically useful and economically feasible therapeutic interventions have not been clearly elucidated. The purpose of this paper was to develop a framework for evaluating the potential cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic strategies that will help scientists better understand the strategic implications of their research, assist in the design of clinical trials, and provide a guide for health care providers making reimbursement decisions. We reviewed concepts of cost-effectiveness analysis and pharmacogenomics and identified 5 primary characteristics that will enhance the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics: 1) there are severe clinical or economic consequence that are avoided through the use of pharmacogenomics, 2) monitoring drug response using current methods is difficult, 3) a well-established association between genotype and clinical phenotype exists, 4) there is a rapid and relatively inexpensive genetic test, and 5) the variant gene is relatively common. We used this framework to evaluate several examples of pharmacogenomics. We found that pharmacogenomics offers great potential to improve patients' health in a cost-effective manner. However, pharmacogenomics will not be applied to all currently marketed drugs, and careful evaluations are needed on a case-by-case basis before investing resources in research and development of pharmacogenomic-based therapeutics and making reimbursement decisions. (+info)
The influence of site of metastasis on tumour growth and response to chemotherapy.
(44/449)
Drug screening trials and general treatment of solid tumours in advanced cancer patients have been concerned only with the site of primary origin, regardless of where metastases might have seeded. Since the environment for tumour growth can differ appreciably at various anatomical sites, an investigation was undertaken to determine the effect of metastatic site on response to chemotherapy. Data from 1961 to 1965 of the screening trials of the Eastern Clinical Drug Evaluation Program were utilized. Response and location data extensive enough for analysis represented 6 sites of primary origin and 6 metastatic site groups, totalling 1687 lesions. Analysis of percentage reduction in tumour size after chemotherapy regimens of up to 60 days revealed a significant amount of variation associated with metastatic sites and a non-significant amount associated with sites of primary origin. Advanced primary tumours showed marked variation in responsiveness and some showed a difference in response to different drug groups. Generally, metastases responded better than the advanced primaries from which they were derived, except for those from breast tumours. (+info)
HPLC determination of thiopurine nucleosides and nucleotides in vivo in lymphoblasts following mercaptopurine therapy.
(45/449)
BACKGROUND: Mercaptopurine is a prodrug requiring intracellular activation to thiopurine nucleotides to exert antileukemic effect. We developed a reversed-phase liquid chromatographic assay for the quantification of mercaptopurine, thioguanine, and methylmercaptopurine nucleoside and nucleotide concentrations in the target tissue, the leukemic lymphoblast. METHODS: Leukemic blasts were isolated from peripheral blood and bone marrow by a standard Ficoll-hypaque procedure. Proteins were removed by ultrafiltration in the presence of dithiothreitol. Thiopurine ribonucleotides were converted into their respective ribonucleosides by treatment of ultrafiltrate with acid phosphatase. Thiopurine nucleosides and bases were measured by direct injection of ultrafiltrate into the chromatographic system. Thiopurine nucleotide concentrations were calculated by subtracting the thiopurine nucleoside concentrations measured after treatment with acid phosphatase from those measured after direct injection of ultrafiltrate in the chromatographic system. Analytes were separated on a C18 Supelco column with ammonium phosphate-methanol eluent coupled with ultraviolet detection. RESULTS: CVs for intra- and interday precision were 1.1-14% (median, 4.9%), and recovery of added analyte was 89-126% (median, 105%) at low and high concentrations of analytes, except for mercaptopurine riboside. The median signal for each of the five metabolites in lymphoblast samples was 98% (range, 80-106%) of that in water. Detection limits for thiopurine bases and nucleosides ranged from 0.5 to 4.5 pmol/5 x 10(6) cells. CONCLUSIONS: This method is suitable for measurement of thiopurine metabolite concentrations in lymphoblasts in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia following a single dose of intravenous mercaptopurine. (+info)
Prognostic significance of the null genotype of glutathione S-transferase-T1 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: increased early death after chemotherapy.
(46/449)
We investigated the prognostic significance of genetic polymorphism in glutathione-S transferase mu 1 (GSTM1), glutathione-S transferase theta 1 (GSTT1), NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1) and myeloperoxidase (MPO), the products of which are associated with drug metabolism as well as with detoxication, in 193 patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) other than M3. Of the patients, 64.2% were either homozygous or heterozygous for GSTT1 (GSTT1(+)), while 35.8% showed homozygous deletions of GSTT1 (GSTT1(-)). The GSTT1(-) group had a worse prognosis than the GSTT1(+) group (P = 0.04), whereas other genotypes did not affect the outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed that GSTT1(-) was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (relative risk: 1.53; P = 0.026) but not for disease-free survival of 140 patients who achieved complete remission (CR). The rate of early death after the initiation of chemotherapy was higher in the GSTT1(-) group than the GSTT1(+) group (within 45 days after initial chemotherapy, P = 0.073; within 120 days, P = 0.028), whereas CR rates and relapse frequencies were similar. The null genotype of GSTT1 might be associated with increased toxicity after chemotherapy. (+info)
Effect of methotrexate polyglutamates on thioguanine nucleotide concentrations during continuation therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with mercaptopurine.
(47/449)
Methotrexate is widely administered with mercaptopurine, a prodrug requiring activation into thioguanine nucleotides (TGN) to exert antileukemic effects. In vitro, methotrexate enhances TGN formation, but in vivo, such enhancement has yet to be demonstrated. We investigated whether TGN concentrations were related to methotrexate concentrations in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received a weekly intravenous methotrexate (40 mg/m(2)) dose combined with daily mercaptopurine (75 mg/m(2)). A total of 141 erythrocyte TGN concentrations were measured with erythrocyte methotrexate polyglutamates (MTX-PG) concentrations in 87 patients. Average TGN concentrations ranged from 137 to 958 pmol/8 x 10(8) cells (median 389), average total MTX-PG concentrations (MTX- PG(1-7)) from 0.60 to 97.7 pmol/10(9)cells (median 29), and average long chain polyglutamate concentrations (MTX-PG(5-7)) from 0 to 8.35 pmol/10(9) cells (median 2.43). Higher TGN concentrations correlated with higher MTX-PG(5-7) concentrations (P = 0.002). These data support the practice of administering methotrexate with mercaptopurine during continuation therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. (+info)
Review article: Immunosuppressants in distal ulcerative colitis.
(48/449)
BACKGROUND: Distal ulcerative colitis may prove to be resistant to steroids and aminosalicylates, but total colectomy is more difficult to justify than in severe extensive colitis. Immunosuppression is of established benefit in generalized colitis, but there are no data available specific to distal disease. AIM: To determine whether the protocol-driven use of immunosuppressants in resistant distal ulcerative colitis is of similar efficacy and safety to that in extensive disease. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-eight patients with distal ulcerative colitis seen in a 5-year period were identified from a prospective database. Details of 52 who had received immunosuppression were analysed. RESULTS: The 52 patients received 68 courses of therapy (53 azathioprine, five mercaptopurine, 10 ciclosporin). The thiopurines yielded clinically valuable responses in only 43% of courses, with failure of response in 16% and toxicity in 34%. Ciclosporin was helpful on only two of 10 occasions. Eight patients required total colectomy. Adverse events were typical of those normally associated with immunosuppressants, with potential risk to life in seven patients; treatment was discontinued because of toxicity on a total of 31% of occasions. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression appears to be of lower efficacy and higher toxicity in resistant distal colitis than when used in more extensive colitis. (+info)