Defining subregions of Hensen's node essential for caudalward movement, midline development and cell survival.
(1/225)
Hensen's node, also called the chordoneural hinge in the tail bud, is a group of cells that constitutes the organizer of the avian embryo and that expresses the gene HNF-3(&bgr;). During gastrulation and neurulation, it undergoes a rostral-to-caudal movement as the embryo elongates. Labeling of Hensen's node by the quail-chick chimera system has shown that, while moving caudally, Hensen's node leaves in its wake not only the notochord but also the floor plate and a longitudinal strand of dorsal endodermal cells. In this work, we demonstrate that the node can be divided into functionally distinct subregions. Caudalward migration of the node depends on the presence of the most posterior region, which is closely apposed to the anterior portion of the primitive streak as defined by expression of the T-box gene Ch-Tbx6L. We call this region the axial-paraxial hinge because it corresponds to the junction of the presumptive midline axial structures (notochord and floor plate) and the paraxial mesoderm. We propose that the axial-paraxial hinge is the equivalent of the neuroenteric canal of other vertebrates such as Xenopus. Blocking the caudal movement of Hensen's node at the 5- to 6-somite stage by removing the axial-paraxial hinge deprives the embryo of midline structures caudal to the brachial level, but does not prevent formation of the neural tube and mesoderm located posteriorly. However, the whole embryonic region generated posterior to the level of Hensen's node arrest undergoes widespread apoptosis within the next 24 hours. Hensen's node-derived structures (notochord and floor plate) thus appear to produce maintenance factor(s) that ensures the survival and further development of adjacent tissues. (+info)
Compartments and organising boundaries in the Drosophila eye: the role of the homeodomain Iroquois proteins.
(2/225)
The Drosophila eye is patterned by a dorsal-ventral organising centre mechanistically similar to those in the fly wing and the vertebrate limb bud. Here we show how this organising centre in the eye is initiated - the first event in retinal patterning. Early in development the eye primordium is divided into dorsal and ventral compartments. The dorsally expressed homeodomain Iroquois genes are true selector genes for the dorsal compartment; their expression is regulated by Hedgehog and Wingless. The organising centre is then induced at the interface between the Iroquois-expressing and non-expressing cells at the eye midline. It was previously thought that the eye develops by a mechanism distinct from that operating in other imaginal discs, but our work establishes the importance of lineage compartments in the eye and thus supports their global role as fundamental units of patterning. (+info)
Anterior patterning by synergistic activity of the early gastrula organizer and the anterior germ layer tissues of the mouse embryo.
(3/225)
Fragments of the germ layer tissues isolated from the early-primitive-streak (early-streak) stage mouse embryos were tested for axis induction activity by transplantation to late-gastrula (late-streak to early-bud) stage host embryos. The posterior epiblast fragment that contains the early gastrula organizer was able to recruit the host tissues to form an ectopic axis. However, the most anterior neural gene that was expressed in the ectopic axis was Krox20 that marks parts of the hindbrain, but markers of the mid- and forebrain (Otx2 and En1) were not expressed. Anterior visceral endoderm or the anterior epiblast alone did not induce any ectopic neural tissue. However, when these two anterior germ layer tissues were transplanted together, they can induce the formation of ectopic host-derived neural tissues but these tissues rarely expressed anterior neural genes and did not show any organization of an ectopic axis. Therefore, although the anterior endoderm and epiblast together may display some inductive activity, they do not act like a classical organizer. Induction of the anterior neural genes in the ectopic axis was achieved only when a combination of the posterior epiblast fragment, anterior visceral endoderm and the anterior epiblast was transplanted to the host embryo. The formation of anterior neural structures therefore requires the synergistic interaction of the early gastrula organizer and anterior germ layer tissues. (+info)
Cngsc, a homologue of goosecoid, participates in the patterning of the head, and is expressed in the organizer region of Hydra.
(4/225)
We have isolated Cngsc, a hydra homologue of goosecoid gene. The homeodomain of Cngsc is identical to the vertebrate (65-72%) and Drosophila (70%) orthologues. When injected into the ventral side of an early Xenopus embryo, Cngsc induces a partial secondary axis. During head formation, Cngsc expression appears prior to, and directly above, the zone where the tentacles will emerge, but is not observed nearby when the single apical tentacle is formed. This observation indicates that the expression of the gene is not necessary for the formation of a tentacle per se. Rather, it may be involved in defining the border between the hypostome and the tentacle zone. When Cngsc(+) tip of an early bud is grafted into the body column, it induces a secondary axis, while the adjacent Cngsc(-) region has much weaker inductive capacities. Thus, Cngsc is expressed in a tissue that acts as an organizer. Cngsc is also expressed in the sensory neurons of the tip of the hypostome and in the epithelial endodermal cells of the upper part of the body column. The plausible roles of Cngsc in organizer function, head formation and anterior neuron differentiation are similar to roles goosecoid plays in vertebrates and Drosophila. It suggests widespread evolutionary conservation of the function of the gene. (+info)
Spatial and temporal properties of ventral blood island induction in Xenopus laevis.
(5/225)
Questions of dorsoventral axis determination and patterning in Xenopus seek to uncover the mechanisms by which particular mesodermal fates, for example somite, are specified in the dorsal pole of the axis while other mesoderm fates, for example, ventral blood island (VBI), are specified at the ventral pole. We report here that the genes Xvent-1, Xvent-2, and Xwnt-8 do not appear to be in the pathway of VBI induction, contrary to previous reports. Results from the selective inhibition of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) activity, a key regulator of VBI induction, by ectopic Noggin, Chordin, or dominant negative BMP ligands and receptors suggest an alternative route of VBI induction. Injection of noggin or chordin RNA into animal pole blastomeres effectively inhibited VBI development, while marginal zone injection had no effect. Cell autonomous inhibition of BMP activity in epidermis with dominant negative ligand dramatically reduced the amount of (&agr;)T3 globin expression. These results indicate that signaling activity from the Spemann Organizer alone may not be sufficient for dorsoventral patterning in the marginal zone and that an inductive interaction between presumptive VBIs and ectoderm late in gastrulation may be crucial. In agreement with these observations, other results show that in explanted blastula-stage marginal zones a distinct pattern develops with a restricted VBI-forming region at the vegetal pole that is independent of the patterning activity of the Spemann Organizer. (+info)
Neural induction and patterning in the mouse in the absence of the node and its derivatives.
(6/225)
The signals which induce vertebrate neural tissue and pattern it along the anterior-posterior (A-P) axis have been proposed to emanate from Spemann's organizer, which in mammals is a structure termed the node. However, mouse embryos mutant for HNF3 beta lack a morphological node and node derivatives yet undergo neural induction. Gene expression domains occur at their normal A-P axial positions along the mutant neural tubes in an apparently normal temporal manner, including the most anterior and posterior markers. This neural patterning occurs in the absence of expression of known organizer genes, including the neural inducers chordin and noggin. Other potential signaling centers in gastrulating mutant embryos appear to express their normal constellation of putative secreted factors, consistent with the possibility that neural-inducing and -patterning signals emanate from elsewhere or at an earlier time. Nevertheless, we find that the node and the anterior primitive streak, from which the node derives, are direct sources of neural-inducing signals, as judged by expression of the early midbrain marker Engrailed, in explant-recombination experiments. Similar experiments showed the neural-inducing activity in HNF3 beta mutants to be diffusely distributed. Our results indicate that the mammalian organizer is capable of neural induction and patterning of the neural plate, but that maintenance of an organizer-like signaling center is not necessary for either process. (+info)
Endodermal Nodal-related signals and mesoderm induction in Xenopus.
(7/225)
In Xenopus, mesoderm induction by endoderm at the blastula stage is well documented, but the molecular nature of the endogenous inductive signals remains unknown. The carboxy-terminal fragment of Cerberus, designated Cer-S, provides a specific secreted antagonist of mesoderm-inducing Xenopus Nodal-Related (Xnr) factors. Cer-S does not inhibit signalling by other mesoderm inducers such as Activin, Derriere, Vg1 and BMP4, nor by the neural inducer Xnr3. In the present study we show that Cer-S blocks the induction of both dorsal and ventral mesoderm in animal-vegetal Nieuwkoop-type recombinants. During blastula stages Xnr1, Xnr2 and Xnr4 are expressed in a dorsal to ventral gradient in endodermal cells. Dose-response experiments using cer-S mRNA injections support the existence of an endogenous activity gradient of Xnrs. Xnr expression at blastula can be activated by the vegetal determinants VegT and Vg1 acting in synergy with dorsal (beta)-catenin. The data support a modified model for mesoderm induction in Xenopus, in which mesoderm induction is mediated by a gradient of multiple Nodal-related signals released by endoderm at the blastula stage. (+info)
Effects of follistatin and BMP4 proteins on early dorso-ventral patterning in chick.
(8/225)
In Xenopus and zebrafish certain bone morphognetic proteins (BMPs), and proteins that antagonise these by preventing their interaction with receptors, constitute a morphogen system in primary dorso-ventral patterning. This system may be directly involved in the parallel processes, within mesoderm and ectoderm, whereby the boundaries of the dorsal (paraxial) mesoderm and the neural plate are established. The bird blastoderm, amenable to grafting techniques and to direct exposure to specific proteins, has provided an opportunity to explore the phylogenetic conservation of such antagonistic system. We have grafted the gastrular organiser (node) into hosts, testing the effects of prior exposure of either grafted or host tissue to Follistatin (a known antagonist of TGFbeta superfamily ligands including BMP4) or to BMP4 protein. Strong, converse effects are seen from the two agents, the most consistent being on the sizes of new dorsalised areas (second neural plates) induced in host epiblast. Follistatin also enhances extension movements due to grafts, though without clear effect upon the rostro-caudal completeness of new patterns. Neural induction in chick epiblast by grafted mouse nodes are also more extensive, after their pre-incubation in Follistatin. Follistatin potentiates other, unknown but distinctive signals coming from the node, being unable to convert other non-inducing pieces of blastoderm into organisers on grafting. Pre-incubation of early blastoderms in BMP4 has such profound effects on normal dorsal axial development that host responsiveness of these blastoderms as hosts to node grafts is difficult to assess. Follistatin has no such overt effect on host development, but greatly enhances the competence of host epiblast to grafts of untreated nodes. Early chick BMP4 and BMP7 expressions are consistent with the proposed roles, though Follistatin is probably an experimental tool only in the present study. (+info)