Chlorine inhalation produces nasal congestion in allergic rhinitics without mast cell degranulation. (25/214)

Seasonal allergic rhinitic (SAR) subjects are more sensitive to nasal irritants than nonrhinitic (NR) subjects; however, the mechanism underlying this difference is unclear. This study sought to determine whether irritant-induced nasal congestion involves mast cell degranulation. Eight SAR and eight NR subjects were exposed to both 1.0 parts per million chlorine and filtered air in separate visits; exposures were via nasal mask and lasted 15 min. Rhinomanometry was performed before, immediately after and 15 min after exposure. Following > or = 2 weeks, exposures and symptom reporting were repeated with nasal lavage, rather than rhinomanometry, pre- and postexposure. A separate substudy using rye grass antigen provided a positive control. Mast cell tryptase was measured in nasal lavage fluid from both substudies using an automated fluoroenzyme immunoassay. Chlorine provocation significantly increased nasal airway resistance in SAR but not NR subjects. Conversely, tryptase levels in nasal lavage fluid were unaffected. Nasal allergen challenge significantly increased both nasal obstruction and nasal lavage tryptase in SAR subjects. Irritant-induced nasal congestion is more pronounced among seasonal allergic rhinitic than nonrhinitic subjects. However, unlike nasal allergen challenge, the mechanism of response to chlorine does not appear to involve mast cell degranulation.  (+info)

Inhibition of histamine-induced nasal obstruction by cetirizine in allergic rhinitis. (26/214)

This double-blind randomized crossover placebo-controlled study was designed to assess objectively the nasal antihistamine effect of cetirizine in patients with allergic rhinitis and control subjects. Nasal challenge was performed by nebulization of increasing doubling doses of histamine (0; 0.04 to 1.28 mg/nostril) in six patients with allergic rhinitis and six control subjects on cetirizine (2 x 10 mg daily for 3 days) or placebo. Sneezings were counted and nasal obstruction was assessed by subjective scoring and by objective measurement of nasal airway resistance by posterior rhinomanometry. Histamine induced sneezing and a dose-dependent increase in nasal airway resistance and in perceived sensation of obstruction. Responses were greater in patients with allergic rhinitis compared with controls, although of borderline significance for nasal obstruction. Cetirizine totally abolished sneezing and significantly reduced increase in nasal airway resistance and perceived sensation of nasal obstruction both in normal and rhinitic subjects. Our results demonstrate by an objective measurement the nasal antihistamine effect of cetirizine. We propose this simple provocation test to assess the time-course of the effect of antihistamines and to compare the relative potency of related compounds.  (+info)

Effect of topical nasal corticosteroids on patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and rhinitis. (27/214)

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a disabling illness of persistent fatigue. Recent studies have shown that patients with CFS have an increased prevalence of nonallergic rhinitis. Inflammation of the nasal passages due to allergic rhinitis can cause nasal congestion resulting in an increased number of sleep disturbances and daytime fatigue. While topical nasal corticosteroids have been shown to alleviate nasal obstruction effectively in patients with rhinitis who do not have CFS, it is unknown whether topical nasal corticosteroids will reduce CFS symptoms. STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether topical nasal corticosteroids will reduce daytime sleepiness in patients with CFS and rhinitis. METHODS: Twenty-eight of 31 subjects with rhinitis and a diagnosis of CFS completed the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Two subjects failed screening, and 3 subjects withdrew from the study prior to its completion. Subjects were randomized according to Balaam's crossover design, and one of the following interventions was used for each group in the study: 8-week treatment with a topical nasal corticosteroid, 8-week treatment with a placebo saline spray, 4-week treatment with a topical nasal corticosteroid followed by a 4-week treatment with a placebo saline spray, or a 4-week treatment with a placebo saline spray followed by a 4-week treatment with a topical nasal corticosteroid. Data focusing on rhinitis symptoms, severity of chronic fatigue symptoms, and quality of life were gathered at biweekly office visits and with daily diaries. RESULTS: The results indicated that daytime sleepiness was reduced when patients with rhinitis and CFS were treated with topical nasal corticosteroids. The severity of associated CFS symptoms, specifically fatigue, muscle pain, postexertional fatigue, and daily activity, did not improve with treatment. CONCLUSION: Treating the symptoms of rhinitis in patients with CFS does not appear to alleviate daytime fatigue or associated nasal, musculoskeletal, or cognitive complaints. Therefore, it is unlikely that aggressive treatment of such symptoms with topical nasal corticosteroids will provide significant benefit to patients with CFS who do not have allergic rhinitis. These results indicate that the nonallergic rhinitis seen in patients with CFS may arise from a mechanism other than chronic inflammation.  (+info)

Argon plasma coagulation for intractable nasal obstruction occurring in patients with allergic rhinitis. (28/214)

New surgical treatment for the intractable nasal obstruction in patients with nasal allergy by using Argon Plasma Coagulator (APC) was introduced. Of patients with allergic rhinitis treated at our institute, 28 patients complaining nasal obstruction were treated APC surgery. Epithelization of the mucosa of inferior turbinate was almost completely accomplished at 4 weeks after surgery, at which time mucosal swelling was reduced, and nasal obstruction was ameliorated in all cases, though a crust and fibrin membrane adhered to the mucosa between 2 to 4 weeks after surgery, resulting in temporary exacerbation of nasal obstruction. Nasal obstruction was again aggravated in only one patient about 6 months after surgery, but such symptom could be ameliorated by re-coagulation. No bleeding and no smoke occurred in the operation. No morbidity was also noticed after operation. APC is easy to perform safely and effectively compared with another laser surgeries, and is useful for intractable nasal obstruction occurring in patients with allergic rhinitis.  (+info)

Acquired nasal hyperresponsiveness aggravates antigen-induced rhinitis in the guinea pig. (29/214)

Whether a state of nasal hyperresponsiveness influences antigen-induced biphasic nasal blockage and sneezing were examined using a guinea pig model of allergic rhinitis. Sensitized animals were challenged with an antigen, Japanese cedar pollen, once every week. Before the 13th challenge, the animals were randomly divided into 2 groups, and then the 13th challenge was performed (Groups A-0 and B-0). The 14th challenge was done on day 2 (Group A-2) and on day 7 (Group B-7) after the 13th challenge, on which nasal hyperresponsiveness was present and absent, respectively. Biphasic nasal blockage and sneezing after the challenge in Group A-2 were more severe than those in Group A-0, while those of Group B-7 were almost the same as those of Group B-0. An anti-histaminic, mepyramine, inhibited sneezing but not the biphasic nasal blockage in Group B-7. A cysteinyl leukotriene (CysLT) antagonist, pranlukast, suppressed the late nasal blockage but not the early blockage and sneezing in Group B-7. In contrast, in Group A-2, mepyramine significantly attenuated not only sneezing but also the early nasal blockage. Pranlukast significantly inhibited both nasal blockage and sneezing in Group A-2. In conclusion, nasal hyperresponsiveness aggravated the antigen-induced nasal responses, to which histamine and CysLTs considerably contributed.  (+info)

Metallic taste and retronasal smell. (30/214)

A series of experiments investigated the nature of metallic taste reports and whether they can be attributed to the development of a retronasal smell. Two studies showed that the metallic sensation reports following oral stimulation with solutions of FeSO4 were reduced to baseline when the nose was occluded. No such reduction was seen for CuSO4 or ZnSO4, which were more bitter and astringent, respectively, and less metallic. A discrimination test based on weak but equi-intense levels of FeSO4 and CuSO4 showed that FeSO4 could be discriminated from water with the nose open but not when occluded, but that discrimination of CuSO4 from water was not impaired by nasal occlusion. A discrimination test demonstrated that the headspace over solutions of FeSO4 was not different from water, although some subjects could discriminate FeSO4 solutions from water in the mouth when the nose was occluded, perhaps by tactile or astringent cues. These results confirm that metallic taste reports following oral stimulation with FeSO4 are likely due to development of a retronasal smell, possibly following a lipid oxidation reaction in the mouth. However, metallic taste reports may arise from different mechanisms with copper and zinc salts.  (+info)

Increased prevalence of perennial allergic rhinitis in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. (31/214)

BACKGROUND: Impaired nasal breathing is a risk factor for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether atopy to perennial allergens and existence of perennial allergic rhinitis was a risk factor for OSAS. METHODS: In a case-control study, we compared the proportions of OSAS patients with atopy to perennial allergens and perennial allergic rhinitis to the proportions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Seventy-two OSAS patients (mean age 60.7 years; 79.4% male) and 44 COPD patients (mean age 63.6 years; 88.6% male) were selected from a hospital outpatients' clinic in Switzerland. All patients completed a respiratory symptom questionnaire, performed spirometry and had a skin prick test for atopy. RESULTS: OSAS patients were significantly heavier than COPD patients (BMI 32.4 +/- (SD) 6.6 vs. 29.2 +/- 6.6 kg/m2, p = 0.04) and had a better lung function than COPD patients (FEV1% predicted 91.3 +/- 19.2 vs. 51.6 +/- 18.9%, p < 0.001). Patients with OSAS were more likely to be sensitized to perennial allergens such as house dust mite (23.6 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.009) and dog (18 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.04) than the COPD patients. Perennial allergic rhinitis (having nose problems [nasal obstruction and/or runny nose and/or sneezing] all year and being atopic to at least one perennial allergen) was reported in 11% of OSAS patients but in only 2.3% of COPD patients (p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: We conclude that subjects with OSAS may have an increased risk of being allergic to perennial allergens and suffer from perennial rhinitis. Awareness of this risk may have important consideration in the clinical situation.  (+info)

Rhinosporidiosis: an unusual cause of nasal masses gains prominence. (32/214)

INTRODUCTION: Rhinosporidiosis is a rare cause of nasal masses locally, with only two cases reported over a 35-year period. METHODS: Four patients with rhinosporidiosis, all from the Indian subcontinent, were managed at our tertiary referral centre over a recent five-year period. They presented with nasal masses and the diagnosis was confirmed by histological examination. RESULTS: All patients were treated by local excision of the nasal masses, and two also received dapsone therapy after surgery. During follow-up, local recurrence was found in two patients, one of whom had received dapsone. CONCLUSION: With a significant number of foreign workers from endemic regions, this uncommon disease may be observed more frequently in the future. It is thus important to consider the diagnosis of rhinosporidiosis in patients from endemic regions presenting with nasal masses. The mainstay of treatment should be wide surgical excision.  (+info)