Effect of beta-blockers on circulating levels of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
(49/708)
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the beneficial effect of beta-blockers on circulating cytokine levels in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). BACKGROUND: Elevated circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines have been reported in patients with DCM. However, alterations of the levels of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in association with beta-blocker therapy are unknown. METHODS: We studied 32 patients with idiopathic DCM who had been treated with digitalis, diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In addition to this combination therapy, beta-blockers were started in all patients. Serum levels of interleukin (IL)-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and soluble TNF receptors (sTNF-R1 and R2) were measured at baseline and 12 weeks after the initiation of beta-blocker therapy. We also measured plasma levels of neurohumoral factors, as well as left ventricular (LV) size and function. Ten age-matched subjects with no cardiac disease served as the control group. RESULTS: Baseline levels of IL-10, TNF-alpha and sTNF-R2 were significantly higher in patients with DCM than in control subjects (p < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between IL-10 and TNF-alpha levels (r = 0.545, p = 0.029). The TNF-alpha/IL-10 ratio correlated well with plasma epinephrine levels (r = 0.677, p = 0.025), and the level of sTNF-R2 was closely related to LV size. Serum levels of IL-10, TNF-alpha and sTNF-R2 were significantly decreased during beta-blocker therapy (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that beta-blockers have an important immunoregulatory role in modifying the dysregulated cytokine network in DCM. This effect of beta-blockers may be partly responsible for the efficacy of therapeutic drugs for heart failure. (+info)
Hypertension control improved through patient education. Chinese PEP Investigators.
(50/708)
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of patient education for hypertension on hypertension control. METHODS: Of 169 eligible patients (systolic blood pressure > or = 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 mmHg), 60 were assigned to educational group (group E, antihypertensive drug treatment with an addition of patient education) and 109 to routine group (group R, antihypertensive drug treatment alone). The average follow-up approximated to 3 years. RESULTS: The blood pressure was reduced from at baseline and sustained in the three-year follow-up by 20/13 mmHg in group E and by 22/13 mmHg in group R. For this similar blood pressure reduction, about 10 mg less of metoprolol and 6 mg less of nitrendipine were used in group E than in group R. The percentage of the patients in whom goal blood pressure (under 160/90 mmHg) was achieved during follow-up was higher and progressively increased in group E (1st year: 65%, 2nd year: 72%) in comparison with in group R (1st year: 45%; 2nd year: 55%). Body weight was significantly reduced by 1.36 and 1.81 kg from at baseline to at the 1st and 2nd year repeated measurements in group E. The significant reduction from at baseline to at the 2nd year was significantly different from that in group R (P = 0.02). For 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, it was decreased in the group E, whereas it was increased in the group R. The cumulative rates of hypertension-related complications were 4.43% in group E and 7.02% in group R (absolute difference = 2.59%, P = 0.48). The rate of missed appointments was somewhat higher in group R (10%) than in group E (7%) during the first year but lower in the 2nd and 3rd year (R vs E: 10% vs 2% in the 2nd year; 8% vs 2% in the 3rd year). Four patients lost to follow-up in group R (6.87%) and 1 patient in group E (1.74%, P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that patient education is of some benefits to the hypertension control. (+info)
Sotalol vs metoprolol for ventricular rate control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who have undergone digitalization: a single-blinded crossover study.
(51/708)
AIMS: To compare the effects of sotalol and metoprolol on heart rate, during isotonic (ITE) and isometric (IME) exercise and daily activities, in digitalized patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study had a randomized, single-blinded, crossover design. Twenty-three patients with chronic atrial fibrillation received placebo for 4 weeks, followed by a 4-week period of treatment with sotalol and metoprolol in random order. At the end of each period, the patients were assessed with 24-h ECG monitoring, a cardiopulmonary exercise test and a handgrip manoeuvre. Both agents produced a lower heart rate than placebo at rest and at all levels of isotonic exercise (P < 0.001) without affecting oxygen uptake. Sotalol produced a lower heart rate than metoprolol only at submaximal exercise (116 +/- 9 bpm for sotalol vs 125 +/- 11 bpm for metoprolol, P < 0.001). During isometric exercise, sotalol produced a lower maximum heart rate than did metoprolol (113 +/- 22 vs 129 +/- 18 bpm, respectively). Both agents produced a lower mean heart rate than placebo over 24 h (P < 0.001 for all), while sotalol produced a lower mean heart rate than metoprolol during the daytime (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Sotalol is a safe and effective agent for control of heart rate in digitalized patients with atrial fibrillation. Sotalol is superior to metoprolol at submaximal exercise, resulting in better rate control during daily activities. (+info)
Low-dose metoprolol CR/XL and fluvastatin slow progression of carotid intima-media thickness: Main results from the Beta-Blocker Cholesterol-Lowering Asymptomatic Plaque Study (BCAPS).
(52/708)
BACKGROUND: Statins reduce cardiovascular events and progression of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT). beta-Blockers are also known to reduce cardiovascular events, but less is known about their effects on carotid IMT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center trial to compare the effects of low-dose metoprolol CR/XL (25 mg once daily) and fluvastatin (40 mg once daily) on the progression of carotid IMT during 36 months of treatment in 793 subjects who had carotid plaque but no symptoms of carotid artery disease. Changes in mean IMT in the common carotid artery and maximal IMT in the bulb were the main outcome variables. Death and cardiovascular events were monitored. Progression of IMT(max) in the carotid bulb at both 18 and 36 months was reduced by metoprolol CR/XL (-0.058 mm/y; 95% CI, -0.094 to -0.023; P=0.004; and -0.023 mm/y; 95% CI, -0.044 to -0.003; P=0.014, respectively). Incidence of cardiovascular events tended to be lower in metoprolol CR/XL-treated patients (5 versus 13 patients, P=0.055). Rate of IMT(mean) progression in the common carotid at 36 months was reduced by fluvastatin (-0.009 mm/y; 95% CI, -0.015 to -0.003; P=0.002). Women in the fluvastatin group had increased frequency of transiently high liver enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized trial to show that a beta-blocker can reduce the rate of progression of carotid IMT in clinically healthy, symptom-free subjects with carotid plaque. This suggests that beta-blockers may have a favorable effect on atherosclerosis development. (+info)
Influence of phenylalanine-481 substitutions on the catalytic activity of cytochrome P450 2D6.
(53/708)
Homology models of the active site of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) have identified phenylalanine 481 (Phe(481)) as a putative ligand-binding residue, its aromatic side chain being potentially capable of participating in pi-pi interactions with the benzene ring of ligands. We have tested this hypothesis by replacing Phe(481) with tyrosine (Phe(481)-->Tyr), a conservative substitution, and with leucine (Phe(481)-->Leu) or glycine (Phe(481)-->Gly), two non-aromatic residues, and have compared the properties of the wild-type and mutant enzymes in microsomes prepared from yeast cells expressing the appropriate cDNA-derived protein. The Phe(481)-->Tyr substitution did not alter the kinetics [K(m) (microM) and V(max) (pmol/min per pmol) respectively] of oxidation of S-metoprolol (27; 4.60), debrisoquine (46; 2.46) or dextromethorphan (2; 8.43) relative to the respective wild-type values [S-metoprolol (26; 3.48), debrisoquine (51; 3.20) and dextromethorphan (2; 8.16)]. The binding capacities [K(s) (microM)] of a range of CYP2D6 ligands to the Phe(481)-->Tyr enzyme (S-metoprolol, 22.8; debrisoquine, 12.5; dextromethorphan, 2.3; quinidine, 0.13) were also similar to those for the wild-type enzyme (S-metoprolol, 10.9; debrisoquine, 8.9; dextromethorphan, 3.1; quinidine, 0.10). In contrast, the Phe(481)-->Leu and Phe(481)-->Gly substitutions increased significantly (3-16-fold) the K(m) values of oxidation of the three substrates [S-metoprolol (120-124 microM), debrisoquine (152-184 microM) and dextromethorphan (20-31 microM)]. Similarly, the K(s) values of the ligands to Phe(481)-->Leu and Phe(481)-->Gly mutants were also increased 3 to 10-fold (S-metoprolol, 33.2-41.9 microM; debrisoquine, 85-90 microM; dextromethorphan, 15.7-18.8 microM; quinidine 0.35-0.53 microM). However, contrary to a recent proposal that Phe(481) has the dominant role in the binding of substrates that undergo CYP2D6-mediated N-dealkylation routes of metabolism, the Phe(481)-->Gly substitution did not substantially decrease the capacity of the enzyme to N-deisopropylate metoprolol (wild-type, 1.12 pmol/min per pmol of P450; Phe(481)-->Gly, 0.71), whereas an Asp(301)-->Gly substitution decreased the N-dealkylation reaction by 95% of the wild-type rate. Overall, our results are consistent with the proposal that Phe(481) is a ligand-binding residue in the active site of CYP2D6 and that the residue interacts with ligands via a pi-pi interaction between its phenyl ring and the aromatic moiety of the ligand. However, the relative importance of Phe(481) in binding is ligand-dependent; furthermore, its importance is secondary to that of Asp(301). Finally, contrary to predictions of a recent homology model, Phe(481) does not seem to have a primary role in CYP2D6-mediated N-dealkylation. (+info)
Metoprolol-paroxetine interaction in human liver microsomes: stereoselective aspects and prediction of the in vivo interaction.
(54/708)
This study in human liver microsomes was undertaken to establish whether paroxetine stereoselectively inhibits the oxidative metabolism of metoprolol in vitro, and whether the in vivo observed magnitude of the paroxetine-metoprolol interaction was predictable from these in vitro data. Two distinct approaches were used: inhibitory effect of paroxetine on 1) the formation of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol and O-desmethylmetoprolol from the individual metoprolol enantiomers and 2) on the depletion of the enantiomers from the incubation mixture. Nonspecific binding of both metoprolol and paroxetine to human liver microsomes was also investigated. Whereas metoprolol displayed negligible binding, paroxetine was extensively bound to microsomal proteins. This was taken into account in order to obtain unbiased K(i) values and unbound concentrations of paroxetine. In the substrate depletion experiments, the intrinsic clearance (CL(int)) of (R)-metoprolol was larger than that of (S)-metoprolol. Paroxetine caused a concentration-dependent decrease in CL(int) of both enantiomers and abolished the stereoselectivity. In the metabolite formation experiments paroxetine did not stereoselectively affect alpha-hydroxylation, but preferentially inhibited the O-demethylation of the (R)-enantiomer versus the (S)-enantiomer. The use of unbound paroxetine concentrations in the two in vitro methods yielded comparable predicted increases in area under the curve (1.7-1.9 and 2.2-2.5 for (S)- and (R)-metoprolol, respectively) but underestimated the in vivo observed changes of about 7- and 10-fold, respectively. In conclusion, this study showed that paroxetine abolishes the stereoselective metabolism of metoprolol due to a stereoselective inhibition of the O-demethylation toward (R)-metoprolol. Furthermore, the extent of the in vivo metoprolol-paroxetine interaction was substantially underestimated by either one of the two in vitro approaches used when a competitive mechanism was assumed. (+info)
Angerlike behavioral state potentiates myocardial ischemia-induced T-wave alternans in canines.
(55/708)
OBJECTIVES: The main goal of this study was to determine whether induction of an angerlike state can result in significant levels of T-wave alternans, a marker of electrical instability, in the normal and ischemic heart. BACKGROUND: Outbursts of anger have been implicated in the occurrence of myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death, but the pathophysiologic mechanisms remain unknown. METHODS: A standardized behavioral challenge of eliciting an angerlike state was conducted before and during a 3-min period of coronary artery occlusion in six canines. RESULTS: Precordial T-wave alternans increased from 0.04 +/- 0.02 at baseline to 1.40 +/- 0.32 mV X ms (p < 0.05) during the angerlike response. When the angerlike state and myocardial ischemia were superimposed, the augmentation in T-wave alternans magnitude (to 3.27 +/- 0.61 mV X ms, p < 0.05) exceeded their additive effects, increasing by 130% over the angerlike state alone (p < 0.05) and by 390% over occlusion alone (p < 0.05). Adrenergic influences were reduced by the beta1-adrenergic receptor blocking agent metoprolol (1.5 mg/kg, intravenous), which diminished T-wave alternans magnitude (p < 0.0004 for all) during the angerlike response (from 1.40 +/- 0.32 to 0.80 +/- 0.17 mV x ms) and during the combined intervention (from 3.27 +/- 0.61 to 1.23 +/- 0.13 mV X ms). In five additional normal anesthetized canines, atrial pacing at 180 beats/min did not increase T-wave alternans magnitude monitored from lead II electrocardiogram. CONCLUSIONS: Provocation of an angerlike state results in T-wave alternans in the normal heart and potentiates the magnitude of ischemia-induced T-wave alternans. Elevation in heart rate during arousal does not appear to be the main factor in the development of alternans in the normal heart but may be an important component during myocardial ischemia. Enhanced adrenergic activity appears to mediate the effects in both the normal and ischemic hearts. T-wave alternans may constitute a useful electrophysiologic measure for clinical use in conjunction with behavioral stress testing or ambulatory monitoring. (+info)
Influence of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan, a 5-HT1B/1D agonist: differential effects of propranolol, nadolol and metoprolol.
(56/708)
AIMS: Patients with migraine may receive the 5-HT1B/1D agonist, rizatriptan (5 or 10 mg), to control acute attacks. Patients with frequent attacks may also receive propranolol or other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists for migraine prophylaxis. The present studies investigated the potential for pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between beta-adrenoceptor blockers and rizatriptan. METHODS: Four double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover investigations were performed in a total of 51 healthy subjects. A single 10 mg dose of rizatriptan was administered after 7 days' administration of propranolol (60 and 120 mg twice daily), nadolol (80 mg twice daily), metoprolol (100 mg twice daily) or placebo. Rizatriptan pharmacokinetics were assessed. In vitro incubations of rizatriptan and sumatriptan with various beta-adrenoceptor blockers were performed in human S9 fraction. Production of the indole-acetic acid-MAO-A metabolite of each triptan was measured. RESULTS: Administration of rizatriptan during propranolol treatment (120 mg twice daily for 7.5 days) increased the AUC(0, infinity) for rizatriptan by approximately 67% and the Cmax by approximately 75%. A reduction in the dose of propranolol (60 mg twice daily) and/or the incorporation of a delay (1 or 2 h) between propranolol and rizatriptan administration did not produce a statistically significant change in the effect of propranolol on rizatriptan pharmacokinetics. Administration of rizatriptan together with nadolol (80 mg twice daily) or metoprolol (100 mg twice daily) for 7 days did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan. No untoward adverse experiences attributable to the pharmacokinetic interaction between propranolol and rizatriptan were observed, and no subjects developed serious clinical, laboratory, or other significant adverse experiences during coadministration of rizatriptan with any of the beta-adrenoceptor blockers. In vitro incubations showed that propranolol, but not other beta-adrenoceptor blockers significantly inhibited the production of the indole-acetic acid metabolite of rizatriptan and sumatriptan. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that propranolol increases plasma concentrations of rizatriptan by inhibiting monoamine oxidase-A. When prescribing rizatriptan to migraine patients receiving propranolol for prophylaxis, the 5 mg dose of rizatriptan is recommended. Administration with other beta-adrenoceptor blockers does not require consideration of a dose adjustment. (+info)