A new mesalazine gel enema in the treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomized controlled multicentre trial.
(1/302)
BACKGROUND: A new mesalazine rectal gel preparation (without propellant gas) has been recently developed to improve topical treatment in distal ulcerative colitis. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and patient tolerability of mesalazine gel enema compared with mesalazine foam enema in the treatment of patients with acute left-sided ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In a randomized multicentre investigator-blind parallel group trial, 103 patients with mild to moderate left-sided colitis or proctosigmoiditis were randomly allocated to mesalazine 2 g gel enema (n = 50 evaluable patients) and mesalazine 2 g foam enema (n = 53 evaluable patients) for 4 weeks. Clinical symptoms, endoscopic and histological findings were assessed at entry, 2 and 4 weeks. Patients' evaluation of treatment tolerability and acceptability was assessed at 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment, clinical remission was achieved by 76% of mesalazine gel enema-treated patients and 69% of patients treated with mesalazine foam enema (P = 0.608). Endoscopic remission rates at week 4 were 51 and 52% for the mesalazine gel and foam enemas, respectively (P = 0.925). Histological remission was achieved by 30% of patients in both groups. Patients reported that the new mesalazine gel preparation was significantly better tolerated than the foam enema. Patients in the foam group had significantly more difficulty in retention (25% vs. 6%, P < 0.05), abdominal bloating (50% vs. 26%, P < 0.005) and discomfort during administration (48% vs. 26%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The new mesalazine gel enema is efficacious and significantly better tolerated than the mesalazine foam enema. (+info)
Randomised trial of two pharmacological methods of bowel preparation for day case colonoscopy.
(2/302)
AIMS: To undertake a prospective, single blind, randomised trial comparing the efficacy and tolerance of two outpatient colonoscopy bowel preparation regimens. METHODS: Patients aged between 18 months and 16 years being admitted for day case colonoscopy were allocated randomly to receive either Picolax (an oral, sugar free powder containing sodium picosulphate 10 mg/sachet with magnesium citrate) and clear fluids or bisacodyl tablets with an unrestricted diet and a phosphate enema just before colonoscopy. Patient compliance, bowel frequency, and associated symptoms were recorded, and the adequacy of the bowel preparation was assessed in a blinded manner. RESULTS: 63 of 66 patients completed the trial. Mean age, mean weight, extent of colonoscopy, and distribution of underlying pathology were similar in both groups. Bowel preparation was good or excellent in all of the patients in the Picolax group (n = 32) compared with 22 patients in the bisacodyl/phosphate enema group (n = 31). The latter group experienced more abdominal discomfort during bowel preparation but three of the Picolax group vomited and the lack of solid food distressed some children. CONCLUSIONS: All bowel preparation methods have limitations and unpleasant side effects but the use of Picolax and clear fluids proved superior to bisacodyl tablets and a phosphate enema in children undergoing day case colonoscopy. (+info)
Colorectal cancer: risk factors and recommendations for early detection.
(3/302)
Spurred by mounting evidence that the detection and treatment of early-stage colorectal cancers and adenomatous polyps can reduce mortality, Medicare and some other payors recently authorized reimbursement for colorectal cancer screening in persons at average risk for this malignancy. A collaborative group of experts convened by the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research has recommended screening for average-risk persons over the age of 50 years using one of the following techniques: fecal occult blood testing each year, flexible sigmoidoscopy every five years, fecal occult blood testing every year combined with flexible sigmoidoscopy every five years, double-contrast barium enema every five to 10 years or colonoscopy every 10 years. Screening of persons with risk factors should begin at an earlier age, depending on the family history of colorectal cancer or polyps. These recommendations augment the colorectal cancer screening guidelines of the American Academy of Family physicians. Recent advances in genetic research have made it possible to identify persons at high risk for colorectal cancer because of an inherited predisposition to develop this malignancy. These patients require aggressive screening, usually by lower endoscopy performed at an early age. In some patients, genetic testing can guide screening and may be cost-effective. (+info)
Physician intention to recommend complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening.
(4/302)
Primary care physicians (PCPs) often do not recommend complete diagnostic evaluation (CDE; i.e., diagnostic colonoscopy or the combination of flexible sigmoidoscopy and barium enema X-ray procedures) for patients with an abnormal screening fecal occult blood test (FOBT+) result. Information is needed to understand why PCPs do not recommend CDE. In the spring of 1994, a telephone survey was carried out using a random sample of 520 PCPs in Pennsylvania or New Jersey who had patients that were targeted for an FOBT screening program. Survey data were obtained from 363 (70%) PCPs on physician practice characteristics; personal background; perceptions concerning FOBT screening, CDE performance, and patient behavior; social influence related to CDE; and intention to recommend CDE for FOBT+ patients. Physician CDE intention scores were distributed as follows: low (22%), moderate (51%), and high (27%). Multivariate analyses demonstrate that physician board certification status, time in practice, belief in CDE efficacy, and belief that CDE is standard practice were positively associated with CDE intention, whereas concern about CDE-related costs was negatively associated with CDE intention. Among physicians in larger practices, perceived FOBT screening efficacy was negatively associated with CDE intention, and belief in the benefit of CDE was positively associated with outcome. There is substantial variability in CDE intention among PCPs. Physician perceptions about FOBT screening and follow-up are associated with CDE intention, are likely to influence CDE performance, and may be amenable to educational intervention. Additional research is needed to evaluate the impact of educational interventions on CDE intention and performance. (+info)
The risks of screening: data from the Nottingham randomised controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.
(5/302)
AIMS: To determine the harm that ensues from faecal occult blood (FOB) screening for colorectal cancer. METHODS: 150 251 people were randomly allocated either to receive biennial Haemoccult FOB tests (n =75 253) or not to be contacted (n=74 998). Study group patients returning positive tests were offered colonic investigation; 1774 underwent complete investigation of the colon. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the stage at presentation of interval versus control group cancers. Survival in the interval cancer group was significantly prolonged compared with the control group. Sensitivity for colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema (DCBE) was 96.7%. There were no complications of DCBE but seven (0.5%) complications of colonoscopy, of which six required surgical intervention. There were no colonoscopy related deaths. No patients without colorectal cancer died within 30 days of colonic investigation. Five patients died within 30 days of surgery for screen detected colorectal neoplasia and a further two died without having surgery. Six patients died after 30 days but within two years of surgery for screen detected benign adenomas or stage A cancers; in all cases the cause of death was not related to colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: There was investigation related morbidity but no mortality and little to support overdiagnosis bias. The group returning falsely negative tests had a better outcome compared with the whole control group. There is a negative side to any screening programme but mortality reduction in this and other trials suggests that a national programme of colorectal cancer screening should be given consideration. (+info)
Scintigraphic imaging and absorption of a 5-aminosalicylic acid enema in patients with ileorectal anastomosis.
(6/302)
Ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is a possible surgical treatment for hyperacute and drug-unresponsive forms of ulcerative colitis (UC). UC relapses in the rectal remnant usually are prevented by chronic administration of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in topical formulations. The relationships between intestinal absorption and pattern of luminal spread of 5-ASA enemas are still unknown in patients with IRA. We correlated the absorption of a 5-ASA enema with its spread in the distal bowel of patients with IRA as assessed by 99mTc radioenema imaging. METHODS: Eight patients with UC in remission and previous IRA received a therapeutic 50-mL 5-ASA enema labeled with 99mTc-sulfer colloid. Absorbed 5-ASA and its major metabolite, acetyl 5-ASA, were measured in plasma, and dynamic images of radiolabeled enema were obtained for 6 h. The retrograde ileal spread (RIS) was determined and expressed as percentage of total enema radioactivity. Plasma levels of 5-ASA and acetyl 5-ASA were measured in six healthy volunteers after administration of the same enema volume with no radiolabeling. RESULTS: The mean 5-ASA plasma level was 0.70 microg/mL (range 0.37-0.95 microg/mL) in patients and 0.96 microg/mL (range 0.78-1.16 microg/mL) in healthy volunteers (P = not significant), and the mean acetyl 5-ASA plasma levels were 0.89 microg/mL (range 0.44-1.19 microg/mL) and 0.84 microg/mL (range 0.51-1.02 microg/mL), respectively (P = not significant). Radioenema imaging allows RIS assessment of patients with IRA. The mean value was 8.5% (range 2%-19.3%) of administered radioactivity, which correlated significantly with the total absorption of 5-ASA in the IRA group (P = 0.033, linear correlation test). Rectal wall contractions recognized by dynamic radioenema imaging were defined as a common cause of RIS episodes. CONCLUSION: In IRA patients, 5-ASA plasma levels were similar to those in healthy volunteers after administration in enema. Only part of a 50-mL 5-ASA enema reaches the ileum, and radiolabeled imaging shows the degree and number of these RIS episodes. The absorption of 5-ASA can increase in patients compared with healthy volunteers, in the presence of either occasional but significant ileal spread associated with postural factors and abdominal wall contraction or multiple moderate episodes of radioenema backdiffusion related to rectal wall motility. (+info)
Mesalazine-induced apoptosis of colorectal cancer: on the verge of a new chemopreventive era?
(7/302)
BACKGROUND: It is an accepted fact that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are potent inhibitors of colorectal carcinogenesis. However, the major disadvantages of NSAIDs are gastrointestinal and renal toxicity. We conducted a prospective pilot study on the effects of the safe salicylic acid derivative, mesalazine, on apoptosis and proliferation of tumour cells and on normal tissue in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer were asked to take mesalazine enemas for 14 days. Biopsies from malignant and normal tissue were taken prior to and after this treatment. Apoptosis was scored on haematoxylin/eosin-stained tissue sections, and cell proliferation was assessed by the proliferation marker Ki-67. RESULTS: Ten out of 14 patients completed the study. The apoptotic score increased significantly in the tumour samples (pre-treatment 14.6 +/- 1.3 vs. post-treatment 19.4 +/- 0.8; P < 0.03). The apoptotic index in the normal mucosa was unchanged (pre-treatment 3.1 +/- 0.4 vs. post-treatment 2.9 +/- 0.3; N.S.). The cell proliferation in malignant tissue, according to the Ki-67 score, was hardly affected by mesalazine (pre-treatment 522 +/- 38 vs. post-treatment 493 +/- 39; N.S.). There was no effect on the Ki-67 index of normal mucosa (pre-treatment 24.2 +/- 2.0 vs. post-treatment 28.3 +/- 2.0; N.S.). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study conducted in patients with colorectal cancer clearly shows that mesalazine selectively induces apoptosis of tumour cells. On the basis of these findings, which need to be confirmed in larger studies, it may be speculated that 5-ASA could be useful in the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. (+info)
Lumbar hernia: a rare cause of large bowel obstruction.
(8/302)
We describe a 70-year-old woman presenting with large bowel obstruction secondary to incarceration of the mid descending colon within a lumbar hernia. This was diagnosed on barium enema and successfully treated surgically. (+info)