What is the optimal treatment strategy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations?
(1/207)
The present study aims to determine whether treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations with intravenous steroids and aerosol bronchodilators (group I) is superior to oral steroids and multiple dose inhaler (MDI) bronchodilators with a spacer (group II). Group I received 40 mg methylprednisolone x day(-1) intravenously with a decrease to 20 mg after 10 days and a further decrease of 4 mg x 4 days(-1). Aerosol therapy consisted of 10 mg salbutamol and 1 mg ipratropiumbromide x day(-1). Group II received 32 mg methylprednisolone orally for 1 week followed by 24 mg x day(-1) for 4 days and a subsequent decrease of 4 mg x week(-1). Duovent MDI with a spacer was given at a dose of 1.6 mg fenoterol and 640 microg ipratropiumbromide x day(-1). In group I (n=19) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) rose from 0.82+/-0.46 to 0.91+/-0.47 L and average dyspnoea decreased from 6.0+/-1.9 to 4.1+/-2.6 within 10 days. The Chronic Respiratory Disease Index Questionnaire (CRQ) score increased from 78+/-24 to 90+/-24 points after 4 weeks. In group II (n=18) FEV1 increased from 0.70+/-0.27 to 0.90+/-0.29 L, dyspnoea regressed from 6.2+/-2.4 to 2.7+/-2.6 and CRQ from 67+/-17 to 86+/-20. Both groups showed similar results in dropout rate, length of hospital stay and patient satisfaction. In conclusion, the two treatment strategies appear equally effective in treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, although oral steroids and metered dose inhaler bronchodilators appear associated with a higher risk of hospital re-admission. (+info)
Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol metered-dose inhaler in healthy volunteers.
(2/207)
AIM: To study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol metered-dose inhaler (MDI) in healthy volunteers. METHODS: An HPLC method for the determination of salbutamol in human plasma was improved. Ten healthy male Chinese volunteers were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. After the subjects inhaled or orally administered 1.2 mg salbutamol, fourteen blood samples were collected at predetermined time points. The concentrations of salbutamol in plasma were assessed with non-compartment model to obtain the pharmacokinetic parameters. The relative bioavailability of MDI versus water solution was calculated. RESULTS: The HPLC assay was sensitive, specific, accurate, and precise. The pharmacokinetics of salbutamol MDI was described well with two-compartment model. The parameters for salbutamol inhaled and orally administered were as following: T(max) (0.22+/-0.07) and (1.8+/-0.6) h, C(max) (3.4+/-1.1) and (3.9+/-1.4) microg/L, T(1/2) (4.5+/-1.5) and (4.6+/-1.1) h, AUC0-20 min (0.9+/-0.3) and (0.16+/-0.10) microg x h x L(-1), respectively. There were significant differences in T(max) and AUC0-20 min between the two dosage forms. The AUC0-20 min (inhal) was 8 times as high as the AUC0-20 min (po). The relative bioavailability of salbutamol MDI was 57 %+/-24 % compared with oral solution. CONCLUSION: The absorption process of salbutamol MDI in human was significantly different from that of oral solution. (+info)
Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs and systemic circulation following nebulization.
(3/207)
AIMS: Clinical studies comparing nebulized drug delivery systems could be flawed because of the high doses used. We have compared lung and total systemic delivery of salbutamol from a nebuliser with that from a metered dose inhaler by measuring urinary recovery of drug and its sulphate metabolite. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers provided urine samples at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after the start of dosing. Formulations and doses were 5 x 100 microg oral solution (ORAL), 5 x 100 microg from a metered dose inhaler (MDI), 2.5 mg using a nebuliser (NEB) and NEB with 25 g oral charcoal (NEBC). Each study phase was separated by 7 days and the order of dosing was randomized. RESULTS: Mean (s.d.) 30 min urinary salbutamol excretion after ORAL, MDI, NEB and NEBC was 0.4 (0.7), 12.1 (3.7), 15.0 (3.9) and 18.2 (5.7) microg, respectively (all P<0.001 compared with ORAL). When normalized for the dose available for inhalation from MDI, NEB and NEBC, the mean (s.d.) 30 min urinary excretion of salbutamol was 2.4 (0.7), 2.9 (0.6) and 2.7 (0.6)%, respectively, with a mean ratio (90% confidence interval) between NEB and NEBC, of 95.3 (91.1, 99.5)%. The mean (s.d.) excretion of salbutamol plus its metabolite over 24 h post ORAL, MDI, NEB and NEBC dosing was 297.9 (38.3), 290.3 (41.4), 266.5 (44.6) and 151.7 (40.9) microg, respectively. The mean ratio (90% confidence interval) between MDI and ORAL, and NEB and ORAL were 97.5 (94.1, 101.0) and 90.7 (81.2, 100.2)%, respectively. The NEBC data indicate that 6.07 (1.04)% of the nominal nebulized dose was delivered to the lungs. CONCLUSIONS: The 30 min urinary recovery of salbutamol, an index of the relative systemic bioavailability of salbutamol following inhalation, can be used to compare the lung deposition of nebulized systems. Similarly, the urinary 24 h recovery of salbutamol plus its metabolite, an index of the relative systemic bioavailability of salbutamol following inhalation, can be used to compare the delivery of nebulized drug to the systemic circulation. (+info)
Effect of plastic spacer handling on salbutamol lung deposition in asthmatic children.
(4/207)
AIMS: To study the effects of electrostatics in a plastic spacer on the lung deposition of salbutamol in asthmatic children. METHODS: Twenty-five children (5-12 years) with mild asthma were given salbutamol hydrofluoroalkane pressurized metered dose inhaler 400 micro g via a 750 ml plastic spacer on separate days. Blood samples were taken for plasma salbutamol at 5, 10, 15 and 20 min after inhalation to measure lung bioavailability as a surrogate for relative lung dose. With immediate inhalation following actuation, a new rinsed spacer (NewRinsed ) was compared with a used spacer after repeated daily use (Used ), a spacer rinsed after repeated use (UsedRinsed ) and a spacer primed with benzalkonium chloride to avoid electrostatics (Primed1). In addition, spacers were evaluated using a 15 s inhalation delay following actuation with primed (PrimedDelay) and rinsed (RinsedDelay) spacers. Data were log transformed and expressed as geometric mean fold difference for the average plasma salbutamol concentration (Cav) over 20 min. RESULTS: There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in Cav (as geometric mean fold difference and 95% CI) between Primed1 vs NewRinsed 1.92 fold (95% CI 1.15, 3.20) and between Used vs NewRinsed 1.75 fold (1.11, 2.76). There were no significant differences comparing Primed1, Used or UsedRinsed. There were also significant differences (P < 0.05) between Primed1 vs PrimedDelay 2.34 fold (1.31, 4.19), or vs RinsedDelay 3.59 fold (2.15, 5.99); and for Used vs PrimedDelay 2.14 fold (1.24, 3.69), or vs RinsedDelay 3.28 fold (2.13, 5.04). CONCLUSIONS: The relative lung dose of salbutamol from a plastic spacer may differ considerably depending on spacer handling suggesting that nonelectrostatic spacers may be the best way forward. (+info)
Clinical equivalence trial on budesonide delivered either by the Novolizer multidose dry powder inhaler or the Turbuhaler in asthmatic patients.
(5/207)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the therapeutic equivalence of the two formulations of the glucocorticosteroid budesonide delivered either by the budesonide Novolizer, i.e. a multidose dry powder inhaler, or by the Pulmicort Turbuhaler in asthmatic patients in terms of efficacy, safety and tolerability during a 12-week treatment. METHODS: A total of 315 patients were randomised in this open, multicentre study. Inclusion criteria comprised previously diagnosed bronchial asthma of mild to moderate persistent intensity (ranging from 60% to a maximum of 90% predicted FEV(1)), need for anti-inflammatory therapy, inhalation of beta(2)-sympathomimetics on an as needed to regular basis, reversibility of airway obstruction of >12% after inhalation of 2 actuations of 100 microg salbutamol. Primary variable was FEV(1), secondary were other pulmonary function test variables, PC(20)FEV(1) for histamine challenge, morning and evening PEFR, salbutamol usage, asthma symptoms, reactions after inhalation, standard safety variables. RESULTS: The comparison of the FEV(1) at study endpoint indicated that the Novolizer was at least as efficacious as the Turbuhaler (p < 0.001). All other variables of the pulmonary function tests as well as the asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, PEFR measurements, or salbutamol usage indicated no relevant difference. Only 1 patient (Turbuhaler discontinued prematurely due to lack of efficacy. None of the other safety variables (adverse events, laboratory variables, vital signs, etc.) indicated any difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The budesonide Novolizer is therapeutically equivalent to the Pulmicort Turbuhaler for the long-term treatment of patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. (+info)
Systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroid treatment in asthmatic children: corticotrophin releasing hormone test.
(6/207)
BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to assess the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) in a group of asthmatic children before and after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Thirty prepubertal patients of mean (SD) age 6.7 (1.8) years were treated with inhaled corticosteroids. All children underwent a corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) test with evaluation of serum cortisol and adrenocorticotrophin hormone (ACTH) levels before and after 3 months of treatment. Twenty four hour urine samples were also collected to measure free cortisol (UFC) excretion. RESULTS: Subjects showed no difference between basal serum cortisol levels (mean change -18; 95% CI -41 to 5; p=0.118) and delta (peak minus basal) levels (mean change -13; 95% CI -38 to 12; p=0.308) before and after treatment, whereas the peak cortisol level (mean change -31; 95% CI -55 to -7; p=0.013) and area under the curve (AUC) (mean change -175; 95% CI -288 to -63; p=0.003) after CRH were significantly lower following treatment. Basal, peak and AUC ACTH were significantly lower after treatment (p<0.05, p=0.004 and p=0.003, respectively), while delta ACTH was similar before and after treatment ((mean change -12; 95% CI - 31 to -7; p=0.199). No significant reduction in 24 hour UFC was observed after the treatment period (before 14.9 (7.1), after 15.0 (11.6); mean change 0.1, 95% CI -5.2 to 5.4; p=0.967). No correlation was found between UFC and any of the parameters of cortisol excretion following the CRH test, either before or after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that, at the dosage and for the treatment period used, inhaled steroids do not seem to suppress the HPA axis in the majority of patients. The CRH test may be more sensitive than 24 hour UFC and morning plasma cortisol levels in evaluating systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroid treatment. (+info)
Comparative efficacy of terbutaline sulphate delivered by Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler or pressurised metered dose inhaler with Nebuhaler spacer in children during an acute asthmatic episode.
(7/207)
AIMS: To compare the efficacy of terbutaline sulphate delivered via Turbuhaler with a pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) connected to Nebuhaler spacer in a population of asthmatic children presenting to emergency departments because of an acute episode of asthma. METHODS: Randomised double blind, double dummy, parallel study of acute asthma in the emergency department. A total of 112 children (6-16 years), who had a diagnosis of asthma, a baseline FEV1 of 25-60% of predicted normal value (PNV), and the ability to perform spirometry were studied. Patients received two doses of 0.5 mg/10 kg (maximum 2.0 mg) of terbutaline sulphate at time 0 minutes and time 30 minutes. The two groups were also stratified into subgroups based on FEV1: 25-45% and 45.1-60% PNV. FEV1 before treatment and at two 15-minute intervals after each treatment was the main outcome measure. PIF, PEF, heart rate, SpO2, and tremor were also measured at these times. RESULTS: Both the Turbuhaler and pMDI+Nebuhaler groups showed significant increases from baseline to final value in their FEV1 results, 49% and 50% change from baseline to t = 60 min, respectively (p < 0.001) using last value carried forward. No significant difference was found between the two groups for these results. Subanalysis of the stratified groups revealed similar results. In addition, no significant difference was found in the group and subgroup comparisons for heart rate, SpO2, and tremor. CONCLUSION: Results show that Turbuhaler and pMDI+Nebuhaler are similar in terms of benefit and side effects in the treatment of acute moderate to severe asthma attacks in this study population. (+info)
Acquisition and short-term retention of inhaler techniques require intact executive function in elderly subjects.
(8/207)
BACKGROUND: patients with dementia are almost invariably unable to use any form of inhaler. Some elderly patients are unable to learn to use a metered dose inhaler or Turbohaler despite a normal abbreviated mental test score. Studies have shown that in many people this is due to unrecognised cognitive impairment and/or dyspraxia. The executive domains of cognition are particularly important in planning and sequencing; it might be expected therefore that disordered frontal (executive) function could be a predictor of poor inhaler technique in subjects with no overt features of dementia. OBJECTIVE: to explore the relationship between cognitive, and executive, function and the ability to acquire metered dose inhaler and Turbohaler technique in old age. DESIGN: a prospective randomised observational study with blinded evaluation. SUBJECTS: 30 inhaler-naive inpatients (21 female) with a mean age of 85 (range 75-94) and having a normal (8-10) abbreviated mental test score. METHODS: subjects received standardised metered dose inhaler and Turbohaler training and were scored on an analogue scale (for metered dose inhaler) or for competence (Turbohaler) the following day. The Mini-Mental State Examination and EXIT25 (for executive function) were performed by separate observers. RESULTS: significant correlation was found between the metered dose inhaler score and Mini-Mental State Examination (r 0.540, P<0.002) and EXIT25 (r -0.702, P<0.0001). Threshold effects emerged for the metered dose inhaler in that 18/19 with a competent score compared to 2/11 scored as incompetent had a Mini-Mental State Examination of >23 (P<0.01) and 19/19 compared to 0/11 had an EXIT25 of <15 (P<0.01). Similarly, for the Turbohaler 21/21 of the competent subjects had a Mini-Mental State Examination of >23 compared with 3/9 incompetent subjects (P<0.01), with 21/21 competent compared with 0/9 incompetent having an EXIT25 <15 (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: acquisition and short-term retention of metered dose inhaler and Turbohaler techniques is unlikely to be successful in frail elderly people who have an abnormal Mini-Mental State Examination and/or EXIT25 test. The latter test, when abnormal, is probably the superior predictor of inability to learn inhaler techniques. (+info)