Diabetes is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality from acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
(1/44)
OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that diabetes is an independent determinant of outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a hospital-based prospective study The setting was an acute care 350-bed hospital in the city of Barcelona, Spain. Spontaneous ICH was diagnosed in 229 (11%) of 2,000 consecutive stroke patients included in a prospective stroke registry during a 10-year period. Main outcome measures were frequency of demographic variables, risk factors, clinical events, neuroimaging data, and outcome in ICH patients with and without diabetes. Variables related to vital status at discharge (alive or dead) in the univariate analysis plus age were studied in 4 logistical regression models. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients (15.3%) had diabetes. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 54.3% in the diabetic group and 26.3% in the nondiabetic group (P < 0.001). Previous cerebral infarction, altered consciousness, sensory symptoms, cranial nerve palsy, multiple topography of the hematoma, intraventricular hemorrhage, and infectious complications were significantly more frequent in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients. The presence of diabetes was a significant predictive variable in the model based on demographic variables and cardiovascular risk factors (odds ratio 2.98 [95% CI 1.37-6.46]) and in the models based on these variables plus clinical variables (5.76 [2.01-16.51]), neuroimaging variables (5.59 [1.87-16.691), and outcome data (6.10 [2.04-18.291). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is an independent determinant of death after ICH. ICH in diabetic individuals presents some different clinical features compared with ICH in nondiabetic patients. (+info)
Institutionalization of quality improvement programs in Korean hospitals.
(2/44)
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the institutionalization of quality improvement (QI) programs in Korean hospitals, in which organizational efforts to improve the quality of care have been made only recently. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study based upon an initial telephone contact and follow-up mail survey. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: All hospitals with 400 beds or more, 100 as of 1997, were contacted in the initial telephone survey. The survey questionnaire was then sent to all of 28 hospitals found to have a QI department; 26 hospitals returned the completed questionnaire. RESULTS: Hospitals that had larger bed capacities, that provided tertiary levels of care or that were in urban areas were found to have a higher tendency to establish QI departments. These QI departments most frequently cited improvement of patient satisfaction as one of their overall missions. They also reported that their most important responsibilities were monitoring performance and preparing for the two national Korean hospital assessment programs. Participating in these hospital assessment programs helped them to initiate and develop their QI activities. The main difficulties they had in performing their QI programs stemmed from lack of knowledge and resources. These survey findings indicate that hospital assessment programs significantly aided Korean hospitals to institutionalize their QI programs. At the same time, the survey data indicate that the hospital assessment programs may emphasize short-term benefits from QI activities at the expense of long-term QI institutionalization. CONCLUSION: QI programs have not as yet been fully institutionalized in Korean hospitals. More support for QI structure and organizational preparation at both the national and organizational levels will be needed. (+info)
Underutilization of acute care settings in a tertiary care hospital.
(3/44)
OBJECTIVE: To estimate underutilization of acute care settings in a tertiary care hospital. DESIGN: A retrospective and concurrent cohort study using chart reviews and the Intensity of service, Severity of illness, Discharge screen for Acute Care (ISD-AC(R)) tool to measure appropriateness of acute care for patients who were receiving care in a less acute setting, as an indicator of underutilization. SETTING: A 450-bed tertiary care teaching hospital. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Patients discharged from the emergency department, patients discharged from acute care inpatient units and patients in acute, non-critical care settings. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of patients discharged from the emergency department who did not meet the criteria for acute care discharge screens; the percentage of patients discharged from an acute care inpatient unit who did not meet the criteria for discharge screens; and the percentage of patients who were in acute, non-critical care beds and who met the criteria for critical care. RESULTS: It was found that six out of 168 patients [3.57%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-7.61%] did not meet the discharge screens at the time of discharge from the emergency department. Four out of 156 patients (2.56%; 95% CI, 0.70-6.43%) did not meet the discharge screens at the time of discharge from an acute care inpatient service and two out of 156 acute care patients (1.33%; 95% CI, 0.02-4.73%) who were in non-critical care beds met the criteria for critical care. CONCLUSION: These findings of underutilization may help to quantitate an unmet need in health care. (+info)
Improving the quality of the admission process in a French psychiatric hospital: impact on the expertise of the professional team.
(4/44)
INTRODUCTION: A 20-month quality improvement project was undertaken in order to improve the patient admission process at a 350-bed French public psychiatric hospital. In addition to improving the quality of patient admissions, the project was expected to increase the expertise of quality improvement team members. METHODS: The project team consisted of two physicians, three heads of nursing, one senior manager, one member of the admissions staff and one secretary. A pharmacist acted as internal facilitator. The team used problem-solving methodology to identify and correct any shortcomings in the existing admission process. Validated data were collected before and after implementation of corrective actions. The team was trained to become more effective on the basis of a published how-to manual for building an effective work team. Team effectiveness was compared before and after the project. RESULTS: Changes in relevant variables were as follows: (i) patients going through the admissions department (40% after corrective action, versus 20% before); (ii) no delay in admission formalities for patients entering hospital by long-standing arrangement (100% versus 20%); and (iii) no delay in admission formalities for patients whose hospitalisation was not predetermined but foreseen (45% versus 0%). The expertise of team members improved in terms of the four tested items: meeting customers' needs and expectations (P< 2 x 10(-6)); contribution of the team to the internal quality improvement strategy (P< 0.01); understanding of the methodology (P< 0.04) and accountability (P< 2 x 10(-5)). Improvements in adherence to the mission statement were also observed. A total of 728 hours were spent on project management. DISCUSSION: Objective improvements were achieved; in particular, the team was shown to have become more effective. The extent to which the lessons learned here can be extrapolated may depend on the openness to change of members of other project teams. CONCLUSION: This project demonstrated that it is possible to put theory into action and thereby make progress. In order to advance further, a second quality improvement project is planned. (+info)
Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study.
(5/44)
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether earlier clinical intervention by a medical emergency team prompted by clinical instability in a patient could reduce the incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrest in hospital. DESIGN: A non-randomised, population based study before (1996) and after (1999) introduction of the medical emergency team. SETTING: 300 bed tertiary referral teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted to the hospital in 1996 (n=19 317) and 1999 (n=22 847). INTERVENTIONS: Medical emergency team (two doctors and one senior intensive care nurse) attended clinically unstable patients immediately with resuscitation drugs, fluid, and equipment. Response activated by the bedside nurse or doctor according to predefined criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and outcome of unexpected cardiac arrest. RESULTS: The incidence of unexpected cardiac arrest was 3.77 per 1000 hospital admissions (73 cases) in 1996 (before intervention) and 2.05 per 1000 admissions (47 cases) in 1999 (after intervention), with mortality being 77% (56 patients) and 55% (26 patients), respectively. After adjustment for case mix the intervention was associated with a 50% reduction in the incidence of unexpected cardiac arrest (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: In clinically unstable inpatients early intervention by a medical emergency team significantly reduces the incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrest in hospital. (+info)
Assessing the factors influencing continuous quality improvement implementation: experience in Korean hospitals.
(6/44)
OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of continuous quality improvement (CQI) implementation in Korean hospitals and to identify its influencing factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study by mailed questionnaire survey. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and seventeen staff members with responsibility for CQI at 67 hospitals with > or = 400 beds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The degree of CQI implementation was measured using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria (MBNQAC). Factors related to the degree of CQI implementation were the four components of the CQI pyramid, namely the cultural, technical, strategic, and structural attributes of individual hospitals. RESULTS: The average CQI implementation score across the seven dimensions by MBNQAC was 3.34 on a 5-point scale. The highest score was achieved in the dimension of 'customer satisfaction' (3.88), followed by 'information/analysis' (3.59), and 'quality management' (3.35). Regression analysis showed that hospitals which better fulfilled technical requirements, such as improving information systems (P< 0.05), using more scientific CQI tools, and adopting systematic problem-solving approaches (P<0.01), tended to achieve higher degrees of CQI implementation. Although statistically insignificant, positive trends were observed for group/developmental culture and the degree of employee empowerment, and the use of prospective strategy. CONCLUSION: It appears that the most important contributing factors to active CQI implementation in Korean hospitals were the use of scientific skills in decision-making and the adoption of a quality information system capable of producing precise and valid information. (+info)
A rapid usability assessment methodology to support the choice of clinical information systems: a case study.
(7/44)
We present here an adapted methodology integrating usability engineering and early evaluation procedures to support the choice of a Clinical Information System in the context of a standard Call for Tender. We illustrate the application of this methodology with a case study. We integrated a standard 'contextual task and activity analysis' into the choice process and then drew up usability recommendations for the choice of an application. We organized a one-week on-site exhibition and test for each candidate company. During the test sessions, we performed a rapid usability assessment. The final choice of the application is strongly and positively influenced by the results of the usability assessment. (+info)
Quantitative quality assurance in a community hospital pediatric intensive care unit.
(8/44)
Unbiased, objective evaluations of quality of care are preferred over subjective evaluations. We observed 681 admissions to a pediatric intensive care unit of a community hospital from 1989 through 1990 for outcomes and physiologic profiles of the patients on the admission day using the Pediatric Risk of Mortality score to assess severity of illness. Mortality adjusted for severity of illness was compared with that predicted from a pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary medical center: 32.6 deaths were predicted based on the physiologic profiles, and 23 occurred. The number of outcomes and their distribution according to mortality risk indicated close agreement between observed and predicted results. Thus, a quality-assurance technique developed in tertiary care centers can be used to indicate a comparable level of care in a community hospital. (+info)