An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.
The concurrent or retrospective review by practicing physicians or other health professionals of the quality and efficiency of patient care practices or services ordered or performed by other physicians or other health professionals (From The Facts On File Dictionary of Health Care Management, 1988).
The evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. Peer review is used by editors in deciding which submissions warrant publication, by granting agencies to determine which proposals should be funded, and by academic institutions in tenure decisions.
Group composed of associates of same species, approximately the same age, and usually of similar rank or social status.
Organizations representing designated geographic areas which have contracts under the PRO program to review the medical necessity, appropriateness, quality, and cost-effectiveness of care received by Medicare beneficiaries. Peer Review Improvement Act, PL 97-248, 1982.
Critical and exhaustive investigation or experimentation, having for its aim the discovery of new facts and their correct interpretation, the revision of accepted conclusions, theories, or laws in the light of newly discovered facts, or the practical application of such new or revised conclusions, theories, or laws. (Webster, 3d ed)
The act or practice of literary composition, the occupation of writer, or producing or engaging in literary work as a profession.
The guidelines and policy statements set forth by the editor(s) or editorial board of a publication.
'Medical manuscripts' are written documents that present original research, review articles, case studies, or theoretical discussions in the field of medicine, prepared following specific guidelines and structures for scientific communication, intended for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals.
"The business or profession of the commercial production and issuance of literature" (Webster's 3d). It includes the publisher, publication processes, editing and editors. Production may be by conventional printing methods or by electronic publishing.
Compositions written by hand, as one written before the invention or adoption of printing. A manuscript may also refer to a handwritten copy of an ancient author. A manuscript may be handwritten or typewritten as distinguished from a printed copy, especially the copy of a writer's work from which printed copies are made. (Webster, 3d ed)
A publication issued at stated, more or less regular, intervals.
Financial support of research activities.
The profession of writing. Also the identity of the writer as the creator of a literary production.
A plan for collecting and utilizing data so that desired information can be obtained with sufficient precision or so that an hypothesis can be tested properly.
A specialty concerned with the nature and cause of disease as expressed by changes in cellular or tissue structure and function caused by the disease process.
Passing off as one's own the work of another without credit.
A quantitative measure of the frequency on average with which articles in a journal have been cited in a given period of time.
A system for verifying and maintaining a desired level of quality in a product or process by careful planning, use of proper equipment, continued inspection, and corrective action as required. (Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2d ed)
Activities and programs intended to assure or improve the quality of care in either a defined medical setting or a program. The concept includes the assessment or evaluation of the quality of care; identification of problems or shortcomings in the delivery of care; designing activities to overcome these deficiencies; and follow-up monitoring to ensure effectiveness of corrective steps.
Copies of a work or document distributed to the public by sale, rental, lease, or lending. (From ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science, 1983, p181)
The science or philosophy of law. Also, the application of the principles of law and justice to health and medicine.
'Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499' is a term used to describe healthcare facilities that have a bed capacity ranging between three hundred to four hundred and ninety-nine beds, which enables them to accommodate and manage a substantial number of patients while providing essential medical services.'
Methods and procedures for the diagnosis of disease or dysfunction by examination of the pathological site or operative field during surgical intervention.
Certification as complying with a standard set by non-governmental organizations, applied for by institutions, programs, and facilities on a voluntary basis.
The moral obligations governing the conduct of research. Used for discussions of research ethics as a general topic.
Participation of employees with management as a labor-management team, in decisions pertaining to the operational activities of the organization or industry.
The integration of epidemiologic, sociological, economic, and other analytic sciences in the study of health services. Health services research is usually concerned with relationships between need, demand, supply, use, and outcome of health services. The aim of the research is evaluation, particularly in terms of structure, process, output, and outcome. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed)
The science concerned with the detection, chemical composition, and biological action of toxic substances or poisons and the treatment and prevention of toxic manifestations.
Those individuals engaged in research.
Insurance providing benefits for the costs of care by a physician which can be comprehensive or limited to surgical expenses or for care provided only in the hospital. It is frequently called "regular medical expense" or "surgical expense".
Research that involves the application of the natural sciences, especially biology and physiology, to medicine.
The term "United States" in a medical context often refers to the country where a patient or study participant resides, and is not a medical term per se, but relevant for epidemiological studies, healthcare policies, and understanding differences in disease prevalence, treatment patterns, and health outcomes across various geographic locations.
The application of industrial management practice to systematically maintain and improve organization-wide performance. Effectiveness and success are determined and assessed by quantitative quality measures.
The teaching staff and members of the administrative staff having academic rank in an educational institution.
The study of natural phenomena by observation, measurement, and experimentation.
An operating division of the US Department of Health and Human Services. It is concerned with the overall planning, promoting, and administering of programs pertaining to health and medical research. Until 1995, it was an agency of the United States PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE.
A situation in which an individual might benefit personally from official or professional actions. It includes a conflict between a person's private interests and official responsibilities in a position of trust. The term is not restricted to government officials. The concept refers both to actual conflict of interest and the appearance or perception of conflict.
The capability to perform the duties of one's profession generally, or to perform a particular professional task, with skill of an acceptable quality.
A detailed review and evaluation of selected clinical records by qualified professional personnel for evaluating quality of medical care.
Research carried out by nurses, generally in clinical settings, in the areas of clinical practice, evaluation, nursing education, nursing administration, and methodology.
Laws and regulations concerning hospitals, which are proposed for enactment or enacted by a legislative body.
All organized methods of funding.
The assessment of the functioning of an employee in relation to work.
A private, voluntary, not-for-profit organization which establishes standards for the operation of health facilities and services, conducts surveys, and awards accreditation.
Conferences, conventions or formal meetings usually attended by delegates representing a special field of interest.
A systematic statement of policy rules or principles. Guidelines may be developed by government agencies at any level, institutions, professional societies, governing boards, or by convening expert panels. The text may be cursive or in outline form but is generally a comprehensive guide to problems and approaches in any field of activity. For guidelines in the field of health care and clinical medicine, PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC is available.
The use of statistical methods in the analysis of a body of literature to reveal the historical development of subject fields and patterns of authorship, publication, and use. Formerly called statistical bibliography. (from The ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science, 1983)
The interaction of two or more persons or organizations directed toward a common goal which is mutually beneficial. An act or instance of working or acting together for a common purpose or benefit, i.e., joint action. (From Random House Dictionary Unabridged, 2d ed)
Educational institutions providing facilities for teaching and research and authorized to grant academic degrees.
The educational process of instructing.
The application of discoveries generated by laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and studies in humans. A second area of translational research concerns enhancing the adoption of best practices.
Systematic gathering of data for a particular purpose from various sources, including questionnaires, interviews, observation, existing records, and electronic devices. The process is usually preliminary to statistical analysis of the data.
An organized procedure carried out through committees to review admissions, duration of stay, professional services furnished, and to evaluate the medical necessity of those services and promote their most efficient use.
Societies whose membership is limited to physicians.
The reciprocal interaction of two or more persons.
Predetermined sets of questions used to collect data - clinical data, social status, occupational group, etc. The term is often applied to a self-completed survey instrument.
Research into the cause, transmission, amelioration, elimination, or enhancement of inherited disorders and traits.
Studies determining the effectiveness or value of processes, personnel, and equipment, or the material on conducting such studies. For drugs and devices, CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DRUG EVALUATION; and DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL are available.
A mechanism of communication within a system in that the input signal generates an output response which returns to influence the continued activity or productivity of that system.
A way of providing health care that is guided by a thoughtful integration of the best available scientific knowledge with clinical expertise. This approach allows the practitioner to critically assess research data, clinical guidelines, and other information resources in order to correctly identify the clinical problem, apply the most high-quality intervention, and re-evaluate the outcome for future improvement.
The process of formulating, improving, and expanding educational, managerial, or service-oriented work plans (excluding computer program development).
Educational programs designed to inform physicians of recent advances in their field.
The statistical reproducibility of measurements (often in a clinical context), including the testing of instrumentation or techniques to obtain reproducible results. The concept includes reproducibility of physiological measurements, which may be used to develop rules to assess probability or prognosis, or response to a stimulus; reproducibility of occurrence of a condition; and reproducibility of experimental results.
Methods for quantitatively assessing and measuring interpersonal and group relationships.
The capability to perform acceptably those duties directly related to patient care.
A loose confederation of computer communication networks around the world. The networks that make up the Internet are connected through several backbone networks. The Internet grew out of the US Government ARPAnet project and was designed to facilitate information exchange.
Theoretical representations and constructs that describe or explain the structure and hierarchy of relationships and interactions within or between formal organizational entities or informal social groups.

Research, ethics and conflicts of interest. (1/372)

In this paper, I have tried to develop a critique of committee procedures and conflict of interest within research advisory committees and ethical review committees (ERCs). There are specific features of conflict of interest in medical research. Scientists, communities and the subjects of research all have legitimate stakeholdings. The interests of medical scientists are particularly complex, since they are justified by the moral and physical welfare of their research subjects, while the reputations and incomes of scientists depend on the success of their science. Tensions of this kind must at times produce conflict of interest. It is important to recognise that conflicts of interest may unwittingly lead to manipulation of research subjects and their lay representatives on research committees. It is equally important to recognise distinctions between the legal and moral aspects of conflict of interest. Some practical suggestions are made which may go some way towards resolving these difficulties. They indicate what might be needed to ensure the validity of ethical discourse, and to reduce the risks associated with conflict of interest.  (+info)

Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines. (2/372)

OBJECTIVES: To review the characteristics and performance of research ethics committees in Spain in the evaluation of multicentre clinical trial drug protocols. DESIGN: A prospective study of 100 applications. SETTING: Forty-one committees reviewing clinical trial protocols, involving 50 hospitals in 25 cities. MAIN MEASURES: Protocol-related features, characteristics of research ethics committees and evaluation dynamics. RESULTS: The 100 applications involved 15 protocols (of which 12 were multinational) with 12 drugs. Committees met monthly (except one). They had a mean number of 12 members, requested a mean of six complete dossiers and nine additional copies of the protocol with a mean deadline of 14 days before the meeting. All applications were approved except three (two of the three were open-label long-term safety trials rejected by the same committee), which were approved by the other committees involved. The mean time from submission to approval was 64 days. The mean time from submission to arrival of the approval document at our offices was 85 days. Twenty-five committees raised queries for 38 of the 97 finally approved applications. Impact of evaluation fee, number of members, queries raised and experience of committees on timings were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Obtaining ethical approval is time-consuming. There is much diversity in the research ethics committees' performance. A remarkable delay (> 20 days) exists between the decision and the arrival of the written approval, suggesting administrative or organisational problems.  (+info)

Responses by four Local Research Ethics Committees to submitted proposals. (3/372)

BACKGROUND: There is relatively little research concerning the processes whereby Local Research Ethics Committees discharge their responsibilities towards society, potential participants and investigators. OBJECTIVES: To examine the criteria used by LRECs in arriving at their decisions concerning approval of research protocols through an analysis of letters sent to investigators. DESIGN: Four LRECs each provided copies of 50 letters sent to investigators after their submitted proposals had been considered by the committees. These letters were subjected to a content analysis, in which specific comments and requests for additional information and changes in the protocols were recorded and compared. FINDINGS: Overall 24% of proposals were approved without request for changes or clarifications, but this varied by committee: one committee approved only 6% of proposals without change or clarification while the others ranged from 26% to 32%. The content analyses of responses indicated that they could be placed into four categories: (i) further information for the committee to aid in their deliberations; (ii) requests for changes to the design or justification for the design used; (iii) changes to the information sheets provided to potential participants; and (iv) changes to consent procedures. Of these, alterations to information sheets were the most common type of request. These four types of response could be seen as safeguarding the wellbeing of potential participants (the principle of non-maleficence), of promoting the scientific validity of the research (the principle of beneficence), and of enhancing the rights of potential participants (the principle of autonomy). CONCLUSIONS: The committees were consistent in the types of requests they made of investigators, which can be seen as attempts to protect participants' rights and ensure the scientific validity of studies. Without an analysis of the proposals sent to the committees, however, it is difficult to account for the variation in the requirements set by the committees before approval was given.  (+info)

Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review. (4/372)

The objectives of this study were to see whether, in the opinion of authors, blinding or unmasking or a combination of the two affects the quality of reviews and to compare authors' and editors' assessments. In a trial conducted in the British Medical Journal, 527 consecutive manuscripts were randomized into one of three groups, and each was sent to two reviewers, who were randomized to receive a blinded or an unblinded copy of the manuscript. Review quality was assessed by two editors and the corresponding author. There was no significant difference in assessment between groups or between editors and authors. Reviews recommending publication were scored more highly than those recommending rejection.  (+info)

Alternative tests make the grade. (5/372)

Toxicity testing is absolutely necessary for assessing the safety of substances in food, air, and water, in the workplace and at home. Although there are several tried-and-true toxicity assays, the search is always on for methods that can even better predict toxic effects. As scientific understanding of the effects of environmental toxicants grows, new tests are needed to evaluate previously unexamined end points and to take advantage of advances in biotechnology and the growing knowledge of how toxicants work at the molecular and cellular levels. Another issue is how to develop tests that can reliably and accurately assess toxicity using less time, money, and materials, and with greater regard for animal welfare. The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) was established in 1997 to address these needs through the development, validation, acceptance, and harmonization of new and revised toxicological test methods throughout the federal government.  (+info)

Croatian Medical Journal at the turn of the millennium. (6/372)

The turn of the millennium coincided with the inclusion of the Croatian Medical Journal into the bibliographic databases MEDLINE (1998), and Current Contents/Clinical Medicine (1999), which greatly increased the number of submitted manuscripts. The increased pressure on the editorial office prompted us to modify the editorial procedure and sharpen our acceptance criteria. At the same time, we extended our author-friendly policy to all for global medicine and (2) medicine in translational and emerging countries. The Editorial Board and the Advisory Board were critical in developing and improving the Journal and setting the highest standards in all aspects of publication, especially in manuscript selection by high-quality peer review. In this editorial, we finally meet the members of the two Boards in person, or rather, in photographs and short biographies.  (+info)

Biomedicine's electronic publishing paradigm shift: copyright policy and PubMed Central. (7/372)

Biomedical publishing stands at a crossroads. The traditional print, peer-reviewed, subscription journal has served science well but is now being called into question. Because of spiraling print journal costs and the worldwide acceptance of the Internet as a valid publication medium, there is a compelling opportunity to re-examine our current paradigm and future options. This report illustrates the conflicts and restrictions inherent in the current publishing model and examines how the single act of permitting authors to retain copyright of their scholarly manuscripts may preserve the quality-control function of the current journal system while allowing PubMed Central, the Internet archiving system recently proposed by the director of the National Institutes of Health, to simplify and liberate access to the world's biomedical literature.  (+info)

A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy. (8/372)

A study was designed to test the hypothesis that experts who review papers for publication are prejudiced against an unconventional form of therapy. Two versions were produced (A and B) of a 'short report' that related to treatments of obesity, identical except for the nature of the intervention. Version A related to an orthodox treatment, version B to an unconventional treatment. 398 reviewers were randomized to receive one or the other version for peer review. The primary outcomes were the reviewers' rating of 'importance' on a scale of 1-5 and their verdict regarding rejection or acceptance of the paper. Reviewers were unaware that they were taking part in a study. The overall response rate was 41.7%, and 141 assessment forms were suitable for statistical evaluation. After dichotomization of the rating scale, a significant difference in favour of the orthodox version with an odds ratio of 3.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 8.25), was found. This observation mirrored that of the visual analogue scale for which the respective medians and interquartile ranges were 67% (51% to 78.5%) for version A and 57% (29.7% to 72.6%) for version B. Reviewers showed a wide range of responses to both versions of the paper, with a significant bias in favour of the orthodox version. Authors of technically good unconventional papers may therefore be at a disadvantage in the peer review process. Yet the effect is probably too small to preclude publication of their work in peer-reviewed orthodox journals.  (+info)

Peer review is a process in which experts in a field assess the quality and validity of scientific research, scholarly articles, or other professional works prior to publication. In the context of medical research, peer review typically involves one or more researchers with similar expertise evaluating a manuscript or study proposal to ensure that it meets established standards for design, methodology, analysis, and interpretation of results. The goal of peer review is to maintain the integrity and credibility of the scientific record by identifying and correcting errors, biases, or other shortcomings in the research before it is published. Peer review is a standard practice in medical publishing and is considered an essential component of the scientific process.

Peer review in the context of health care is a process used to maintain standards and improve the quality of healthcare practices, research, and publications. It involves the evaluation of work or research conducted by professionals within the same field, who are considered peers. The purpose is to provide an objective assessment of the work, identify any errors or biases, ensure that the methods and conclusions are sound, and offer suggestions for improvement.

In health care, peer review can be applied to various aspects including:

1. Clinical Practice: Healthcare providers regularly review each other's work to maintain quality standards in patient care, diagnoses, treatment plans, and adherence to evidence-based practices.

2. Research: Before research findings are published in medical journals, they undergo a rigorous peer-review process where experts assess the study design, methodology, data analysis, interpretation of results, and conclusions to ensure the validity and reliability of the research.

3. Publications: Medical journals use peer review to evaluate and improve the quality of articles submitted for publication. This helps to maintain the credibility and integrity of the published literature, ensuring that it is accurate, unbiased, and relevant to the field.

4. Education and Training Programs: Peer review is also used in evaluating the content and delivery of medical education programs, continuing professional development courses, and training curricula to ensure they meet established standards and are effective in enhancing the knowledge and skills of healthcare professionals.

5. Healthcare Facilities and Institutions: Accreditation bodies and regulatory authorities use peer review as part of their evaluation processes to assess the quality and safety of healthcare facilities and institutions, identifying areas for improvement and ensuring compliance with regulations and standards.

Peer review in the context of research refers to the evaluation of scientific, academic, or professional work by others working in the same field. The purpose of peer review is to ensure that the research is rigorous, valid, and relevant to the field. In a peer-review process, experts in the relevant field assess the research article, report, or other type of scholarly work for its accuracy, quality, and significance before it is published or presented at a conference.

The peer-review process typically involves several stages:

1. Submission: The author(s) submit their manuscript to a journal, conference, or other publication venue.
2. Assignment: The editor of the publication assigns the manuscript to one or more reviewers who are experts in the field.
3. Review: The reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on criteria such as originality, methodology, data analysis, interpretation of results, and contribution to the field. They provide feedback and recommendations to the editor.
4. Decision: Based on the feedback from the reviewers, the editor makes a decision about whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to the manuscript.
5. Revision: If the manuscript is rejected or requires revisions, the author(s) may have an opportunity to revise and resubmit the manuscript for further consideration.

Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process, as it helps ensure that research is held to high standards of quality and integrity. It also provides a mechanism for identifying and correcting errors or weaknesses in research before it is published or disseminated widely.

In the context of public health and medical research, a peer group is a social group whose members have similar interests, concerns, or social positions. Peer groups can play an important role in shaping individual behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs, particularly during adolescence and young adulthood. In research, studying peer groups can help researchers understand how social norms and influences affect health-related behaviors, such as substance use, sexual behavior, and mental health. It's worth noting that the term "peer group" doesn't have a specific medical definition, but it is widely used in public health and medical research to refer to these types of social groups.

Professional Review Organizations (PROs) are entities that are contracted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the United States to evaluate the performance of healthcare providers and suppliers who participate in the Medicare program. PROs conduct medical review activities to ensure that the services billed to Medicare meet the necessary standards of care and are medically necessary.

The primary goal of PROs is to promote quality healthcare, prevent fraud and abuse, and reduce unnecessary costs in the Medicare program. They achieve this by reviewing medical records, conducting site visits, and performing other activities to assess the appropriateness and quality of healthcare services provided to Medicare beneficiaries. Based on their findings, PROs may recommend corrective actions, impose sanctions, or take other measures to ensure that providers comply with Medicare regulations and policies.

PROs are typically composed of practicing physicians and other healthcare professionals who have expertise in the relevant medical specialties. They work collaboratively with CMS and other stakeholders to promote continuous quality improvement in the Medicare program and help ensure that beneficiaries receive high-quality, cost-effective healthcare services.

Research, in the context of medicine, is a systematic and rigorous process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting information in order to increase our understanding, develop new knowledge, or evaluate current practices and interventions. It can involve various methodologies such as observational studies, experiments, surveys, or literature reviews. The goal of medical research is to advance health care by identifying new treatments, improving diagnostic techniques, and developing prevention strategies. Medical research is typically conducted by teams of researchers including clinicians, scientists, and other healthcare professionals. It is subject to ethical guidelines and regulations to ensure that it is conducted responsibly and with the best interests of patients in mind.

I believe there may be some confusion in your question. "Writing" is a common term used to describe the act or process of creating written content, whether it's for literary, professional, or personal purposes. However, if you're asking for a medical term related to writing, perhaps you meant "graphomotor," which refers to the fine motor skills required to produce handwriting or signing one's name. If this is not what you were looking for, please clarify your question so I can provide a more accurate answer.

Editorial policies refer to a set of guidelines and principles that govern the development, selection, peer-review, production, and publication of manuscripts in a medical journal. These policies aim to ensure the integrity, transparency, and quality of the published research while adhering to ethical standards and best practices in scientific publishing.

Some essential components of editorial policies include:

1. Authorship criteria: Defining who qualifies as an author, their roles, and responsibilities, and specifying the order of authorship based on contribution.
2. Conflict of interest disclosure: Requiring authors, reviewers, and editors to declare any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their judgment or objectivity in the manuscript's evaluation.
3. Peer-review process: Outlining the steps involved in the peer-review process, including the selection of reviewers, the number of required reviews, and the criteria for accepting or rejecting a manuscript.
4. Plagiarism detection: Employing plagiarism detection software to ensure originality and prevent unethical practices such as self-plagiarism or duplicate publication.
5. Data sharing: Encouraging or requiring authors to share their data, code, or materials to promote transparency and reproducibility of the research findings.
6. Corrections and retractions: Establishing procedures for correcting errors, addressing scientific misconduct, and retracting published articles when necessary.
7. Post-publication discussions: Encouraging open dialogue and constructive criticism through post-publication discussions or letters to the editor.
8. Accessibility and copyright: Describing how the journal ensures accessibility of its content, such as through open-access models, and outlining the terms of copyright and licensing agreements.
9. Archiving and preservation: Ensuring long-term preservation and availability of published content by depositing it in appropriate digital archives or repositories.
10. Compliance with international standards: Adhering to guidelines and best practices established by organizations such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Medical manuscripts are written documents that describe original research, analysis, or experiences in the field of medicine. These can take various forms such as:

1. Research papers: These report on original studies and include an abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion sections. They may also include tables, figures, and appendices.

2. Review articles: These provide a comprehensive overview of a specific topic in medicine, summarizing recent developments and findings from multiple sources.

3. Case reports: These describe unusual or interesting medical cases, often serving as educational tools for other healthcare professionals.

4. Clinical trials: These are detailed descriptions of clinical research studies involving human subjects, following a standardized format that includes information on the study's design, methods, results, and conclusions.

5. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: These involve a rigorous evaluation of all available evidence on a specific research question, using systematic methods to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant studies.

6. Letters to the editor: These are brief communications that may comment on previously published articles or raise new issues for discussion in the medical community.

Medical manuscripts must adhere to strict ethical guidelines and should be written in a clear, concise, and well-organized manner, following the standards set by reputable medical journals. They undergo rigorous peer review before publication to ensure their quality, accuracy, and relevance to the field of medicine.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "publishing" is not a term that has a medical definition. Publishing typically refers to the process of preparing and disseminating information, such as books, journals, or articles, to the public or a specific audience. It could involve both print and digital media. If you have any questions related to medicine or healthcare, I'd be happy to try to help answer those!

A medical definition of "Manuscripts as Topic" refers to the study and analysis of written documents that report original research or scholarly work in the field of medicine. This can include research articles, review articles, case reports, and other types of manuscripts that are submitted for publication in medical journals. The study of manuscripts as a topic may involve analyzing their content, structure, and quality, as well as evaluating the peer-review process and editorial policies of medical journals. Additionally, it can also cover the historical development of medical knowledge and practices through the examination of ancient and medieval medical manuscripts.

A "periodical" in the context of medicine typically refers to a type of publication that is issued regularly, such as on a monthly or quarterly basis. These publications include peer-reviewed journals, magazines, and newsletters that focus on medical research, education, and practice. They may contain original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorials, letters to the editor, and other types of content related to medical science and clinical practice.

As a "Topic," periodicals in medicine encompass various aspects such as their role in disseminating new knowledge, their impact on clinical decision-making, their quality control measures, and their ethical considerations. Medical periodicals serve as a crucial resource for healthcare professionals, researchers, students, and other stakeholders to stay updated on the latest developments in their field and to share their findings with others.

"Research Support as Topic" is not a specific medical term or diagnosis. However, in the context of medical literature and research, "research support" refers to the resources, funding, and infrastructure that enable and facilitate the conduct of scientific research. This can include financial support from various sources such as government agencies, private organizations, or institutions; access to laboratory facilities, equipment, and databases; and technical assistance in study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript preparation.

When "research support" is designated as a topic in medical literature, it typically refers to articles that discuss the various aspects of research funding, ethics, and management, including best practices for grant writing, financial conflict of interest disclosures, and responsible conduct of research. It may also include studies that examine the impact of research support on the quality, quantity, and outcomes of scientific research.

In the context of medical research, authorship refers to the recognition of individuals who have made significant contributions to the development and completion of a scientific paper or research project. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has established guidelines for determining authorship, which include the following four criteria:

1. Substantial contribution to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work.
2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content.
3. Final approval of the version to be published.
4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

All authors should meet these criteria, and their contributions should be clearly described in the manuscript. It is important to note that authorship should not be granted based on position or status alone, but rather on the basis of substantial intellectual contribution and commitment to the work.

A research design in medical or healthcare research is a systematic plan that guides the execution and reporting of research to address a specific research question or objective. It outlines the overall strategy for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data to draw valid conclusions. The design includes details about the type of study (e.g., experimental, observational), sampling methods, data collection techniques, data analysis approaches, and any potential sources of bias or confounding that need to be controlled for. A well-defined research design helps ensure that the results are reliable, generalizable, and relevant to the research question, ultimately contributing to evidence-based practice in medicine and healthcare.

Pathology is a significant branch of medical science that deals with the study of the nature of diseases, their causes, processes, development, and consequences. It involves the examination of tissues, organs, bodily fluids, and autopsies to diagnose disease and determine the course of treatment. Pathology can be divided into various sub-specialties such as anatomical pathology, clinical pathology, molecular pathology, and forensic pathology. Ultimately, pathology aims to understand the mechanisms of diseases and improve patient care through accurate diagnosis and effective treatment plans.

Plagiarism is not a term that has a specific medical definition. It is a more general term that refers to the practice of using someone else's ideas, words, or creative expressions without giving credit to the original author. This can include copying and pasting text from another source without providing proper citation, failing to put quotation marks around borrowed language, or presenting another person's work as one's own.

Plagiarism is considered unethical in academic, professional, and creative settings because it involves stealing someone else's intellectual property and passing it off as one's own. It can have serious consequences, including damage to one's reputation, loss of credibility, and even legal action in some cases.

In the context of medical research and writing, plagiarism is taken very seriously and can result in sanctions such as retraction of published articles, loss of funding, or damage to professional standing. It is important for medical professionals and researchers to always give credit where credit is due and to properly cite any sources they use in their work.

The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is a measure of the frequency with which the "average article" in a journal has been cited in a particular year. It is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years. For example, if a journal has an Impact Factor of 3 in 2020, that means articles published in 2018 and 2019 were cited 3 times on average in 2020. It is used to gauge the importance or rank of a journal by comparing the times it's articles are cited relative to other journals in the field. However, it has been criticized for various limitations such as being manipulated by editors and not reflecting the quality of individual articles.

"Quality control" is a term that is used in many industries, including healthcare and medicine, to describe the systematic process of ensuring that products or services meet certain standards and regulations. In the context of healthcare, quality control often refers to the measures taken to ensure that the care provided to patients is safe, effective, and consistent. This can include processes such as:

1. Implementing standardized protocols and guidelines for care
2. Training and educating staff to follow these protocols
3. Regularly monitoring and evaluating the outcomes of care
4. Making improvements to processes and systems based on data and feedback
5. Ensuring that equipment and supplies are maintained and functioning properly
6. Implementing systems for reporting and addressing safety concerns or errors.

The goal of quality control in healthcare is to provide high-quality, patient-centered care that meets the needs and expectations of patients, while also protecting their safety and well-being.

Quality Assurance in the context of healthcare refers to a systematic approach and set of activities designed to ensure that health care services and products consistently meet predetermined standards of quality and safety. It includes all the policies, procedures, and processes that are put in place to monitor, assess, and improve the quality of healthcare delivery.

The goal of quality assurance is to minimize variability in clinical practice, reduce medical errors, and ensure that patients receive evidence-based care that is safe, effective, timely, patient-centered, and equitable. Quality assurance activities may include:

1. Establishing standards of care based on best practices and clinical guidelines.
2. Developing and implementing policies and procedures to ensure compliance with these standards.
3. Providing education and training to healthcare professionals to improve their knowledge and skills.
4. Conducting audits, reviews, and evaluations of healthcare services and processes to identify areas for improvement.
5. Implementing corrective actions to address identified issues and prevent their recurrence.
6. Monitoring and measuring outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of quality improvement initiatives.

Quality assurance is an ongoing process that requires continuous evaluation and improvement to ensure that healthcare delivery remains safe, effective, and patient-centered.

In the context of medicine, "publications" typically refers to the dissemination of research findings or other medical information through various forms of media. This can include:

1. Peer-reviewed journals: These are scientific or medical publications that undergo a rigorous review process by experts in the field before they are accepted for publication. They represent some of the most reliable sources of medical information.

2. Conference proceedings: Medical conferences often publish abstracts, presentations, or posters from the event. These can provide early insights into ongoing research and new developments in the field.

3. Books and book chapters: Medical texts and reference books are a common form of publication, offering comprehensive overviews of specific topics or conditions.

4. Online platforms: Websites, blogs, and social media platforms have become increasingly popular ways to share medical information. While these can be valuable resources, it's important to critically evaluate the quality and reliability of the information presented.

5. News articles and press releases: Media outlets may report on new medical research or developments, although these should also be approached with caution as they may not always accurately represent the findings or context of the original research.

It's worth noting that all publications should be evaluated based on their source, methodology, and relevance to the specific question or issue at hand.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Jurisprudence" is not a term typically used in medical definitions. Jurisprudence refers to the theory and philosophy of law, or the study of legal systems, principles, and practices. It is a subject that falls under the purview of lawyers, judges, and scholars of law. If you have any questions about medical terminology, I'd be happy to help with those!

'Hospital Bed Capacity, 3

Diagnostic techniques, surgical refers to the use of surgical procedures or methods to diagnose and evaluate various medical conditions. These techniques are often used when non-invasive tests are inconclusive or when more detailed information is required. Here are some examples:

1. Biopsy: A small sample of tissue is removed from the body for examination under a microscope. This can help to confirm a diagnosis of cancer, infection, or other diseases.
2. Endoscopy: A flexible tube with a light and camera on the end is inserted into the body through a natural opening (such as the mouth or anus) or a small incision. This allows the doctor to visualize internal organs and tissues, and may also involve taking biopsy samples.
3. Imaging studies: Various imaging techniques such as X-rays, CT scans, MRI scans, and ultrasound can be used to produce detailed images of internal structures. These can help to diagnose a wide range of medical conditions, from broken bones to tumors.
4. Exploratory surgery: In some cases, a surgical incision may be made to directly visualize and examine an organ or tissue. This can help to diagnose conditions that are difficult to detect with non-invasive tests.
5. Functional testing: Some surgical techniques involve stimulating or measuring the function of an organ or system. For example, a cardiac stress test may be performed during surgery to assess heart function.

Overall, diagnostic techniques, surgical play an important role in the diagnosis and management of many medical conditions. They can provide valuable information that helps doctors to make informed decisions about treatment options and improve patient outcomes.

Accreditation is a process in which a healthcare organization, facility, or program is evaluated and certified as meeting certain standards and criteria established by a recognized accrediting body. The purpose of accreditation is to ensure that the organization, facility, or program provides safe, high-quality care and services to its patients or clients.

Accreditation typically involves a thorough review of an organization's policies, procedures, practices, and outcomes, as well as an on-site survey by a team of experts from the accrediting body. The evaluation focuses on various aspects of the organization's operations, such as leadership and management, patient safety, infection control, clinical services, quality improvement, and staff competence.

Accreditation is voluntary, but many healthcare organizations seek it as a way to demonstrate their commitment to excellence and continuous improvement. Accreditation can also be a requirement for licensure, reimbursement, or participation in certain programs or initiatives.

Examples of accrediting bodies in the healthcare field include The Joint Commission, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF), and the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA).

Research ethics refers to the principles and guidelines that govern the conduct of research involving human participants or animals. The overarching goal of research ethics is to ensure that research is conducted in a way that respects the autonomy, dignity, and well-being of all those involved. Research ethics are designed to prevent harm, promote fairness, and maintain trust between researchers and study participants.

Some key principles of research ethics include:

1. Respect for Persons: This means treating all individuals with respect and dignity, and recognizing their autonomy and right to make informed decisions about participating in research.
2. Beneficence: Researchers have a duty to maximize the benefits of research while minimizing potential harms.
3. Justice: Research should be conducted fairly, without discrimination or bias, and should benefit all those who are affected by it.
4. Confidentiality: Researchers must protect the privacy and confidentiality of study participants, including their personal information and data.
5. Informed Consent: Participants must give their voluntary and informed consent to participate in research, after being fully informed about the nature of the study, its risks and benefits, and their rights as a participant.

Research ethics are typically overseen by institutional review boards (IRBs) or research ethics committees (RECs), which review research proposals and monitor ongoing studies to ensure that they comply with ethical guidelines. Researchers who violate these guidelines may face sanctions, including loss of funding, suspension or revocation of their research privileges, or legal action.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Management Quality Circles" is not a recognized medical term or concept in healthcare management. It appears to be a term that combines the general business concept of "Quality Circles" with "Management," which may refer to a specific approach used in management and continuous improvement.

In the context of business and management, Quality Circles are small groups of employees who meet regularly to identify, analyze, and solve work-related problems and issues, with an aim to improve quality and productivity. The concept is often associated with Total Quality Management (TQM) and Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI).

However, if you're looking for a term related to healthcare management or medical definitions, please provide more context so I can give you a more accurate answer.

Health services research (HSR) is a multidisciplinary field of scientific investigation that studies how social factors, financing systems, organizational structures and processes, health technologies, and personal behaviors affect access to healthcare, the quality and cost of care, and ultimately, our health and well-being. The goal of HSR is to inform policy and practice, improve system performance, and enhance the health and well-being of individuals and communities. It involves the use of various research methods, including epidemiology, biostatistics, economics, sociology, management science, political science, and psychology, to answer questions about the healthcare system and how it can be improved.

Examples of HSR topics include:

* Evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different healthcare interventions and technologies
* Studying patient-centered care and patient experiences with the healthcare system
* Examining healthcare workforce issues, such as shortages of primary care providers or the impact of nurse-to-patient ratios on patient outcomes
* Investigating the impact of health insurance design and financing systems on access to care and health disparities
* Analyzing the organization and delivery of healthcare services in different settings, such as hospitals, clinics, and long-term care facilities
* Identifying best practices for improving healthcare quality and safety, reducing medical errors, and eliminating wasteful or unnecessary care.

Toxicology is a branch of medical science that deals with the study of the adverse effects of chemicals or toxins on living organisms and the environment, including their detection, evaluation, prevention, and treatment. It involves understanding how various substances can cause harm, the doses at which they become toxic, and the factors that influence their toxicity. This field is crucial in areas such as public health, medicine, pharmacology, environmental science, and forensic investigations.

Research personnel, in the context of medical and scientific research, refers to individuals who are involved in the design, conduct, or reporting of research studies. This can include, but is not limited to, principal investigators, co-investigators, research assistants, research coordinators, data managers, biostatisticians, and laboratory technicians. These individuals may have various levels of education, training, and expertise, and their roles and responsibilities will depend on the specific research study and their individual qualifications. It is important for research personnel to adhere to ethical guidelines and regulations in order to ensure the integrity and validity of research findings.

Physician services insurance refers to a type of health insurance coverage that helps pay for medically necessary services provided by licensed physicians. This can include office visits, hospital care, diagnostic tests, and treatments for injuries and illnesses. The specific services covered and the amount reimbursed will depend on the terms of the individual's insurance policy. Some policies may also have restrictions on which providers are considered in-network and covered under the plan. It is important to understand the details of one's coverage to know what is included and what out-of-pocket costs may be required.

Biomedical research is a branch of scientific research that involves the study of biological processes and diseases in order to develop new treatments and therapies. This type of research often involves the use of laboratory techniques, such as cell culture and genetic engineering, as well as clinical trials in humans. The goal of biomedical research is to advance our understanding of how living organisms function and to find ways to prevent and treat various medical conditions. It encompasses a wide range of disciplines, including molecular biology, genetics, immunology, pharmacology, and neuroscience, among others. Ultimately, the aim of biomedical research is to improve human health and well-being.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "United States" is a geopolitical entity, specifically the name of the country consisting of 50 states, and it is not a medical term or concept. Therefore, I can't provide a medical definition for it. If you have any questions related to health, medicine, or biology, I would be happy to try to help answer those!

Total Quality Management (TQM) is not a medical term per se, but rather a management approach that has been adopted in various industries, including healthcare. Here's a general definition:

Total Quality Management (TQM) is a customer-focused management framework that involves all employees in an organization in continuous improvement efforts to meet or exceed customer expectations. It is based on the principles of quality control, continuous process improvement, and customer satisfaction. TQM aims to create a culture where all members of the organization are responsible for quality, with the goal of providing defect-free products or services to customers consistently.

In healthcare, TQM can be used to improve patient care, reduce medical errors, increase efficiency, and enhance patient satisfaction. It involves the use of data-driven decision-making, process improvement techniques such as Lean and Six Sigma, and a focus on evidence-based practices. The ultimate goal of TQM in healthcare is to provide high-quality, safe, and cost-effective care to patients.

In a medical context, "faculty" most commonly refers to the inherent abilities or powers of a normal functioning part of the body or mind. For example, one might speak of the "faculties of perception" to describe the senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. It can also refer to the teaching staff or body of instructors at a medical school or other educational institution. Additionally, it can be used more generally to mean a capability or skill, as in "the faculty of quick thinking."

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Science" is a broad field that refers to a systematic and logical process used to discover how things in the universe work. It's not typically used as a medical term. However, within the context of medicine, "science" often refers to evidence-based practices, which are treatments and preventions that have been scientifically researched and proven to be effective. This could include areas like pharmacology (the study of drugs), pathophysiology (the study of changes in the body due to disease), or clinical trials (studies used to test new treatments). If you're looking for a specific medical term, could you please provide more context?

A conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person or organization has dual loyalties or is in a position to exploit their professional or personal relationships for personal or institutional gain. In the medical field, COIs can arise when healthcare providers, researchers, or institutions have financial or other interests that may influence their judgment or actions in providing care, conducting research, or making recommendations.

Examples of conflicts of interest in medicine include:

* A physician who has a financial relationship with a pharmaceutical company and receives compensation for promoting the company's products to patients or colleagues.
* A researcher who owns stock in a company that is funding their study and may stand to benefit financially from positive results.
* An institution that accepts funding from industry partners for research or educational programs, which could potentially influence the outcomes of the research or bias the education provided.

COIs can compromise the integrity of medical research, patient care, and professional judgment. Therefore, it is essential to disclose and manage COIs transparently to maintain trust in the healthcare system and ensure that decisions are made in the best interests of patients and society as a whole.

Professional competence, in the context of medicine, refers to the possession of the necessary skills, knowledge, and behaviors required for the provision of high-quality healthcare services. It involves the ability to apply medical knowledge and clinical skills effectively in practice, make informed and evidence-based decisions, communicate clearly and effectively with patients and colleagues, demonstrate professionalism and ethical behavior, and engage in continuous learning and improvement.

Professional competence is evaluated through various means, including assessments of clinical skills, knowledge tests, patient feedback, and peer reviews. It is an ongoing process that requires healthcare professionals to continually update their knowledge and skills, adapt to changes in medical practice, and strive for excellence in patient care. Maintaining professional competence is essential for ensuring the safety and quality of healthcare services and is a key component of medical regulation and licensure.

A medical audit is a systematic review and evaluation of the quality of medical care against established standards to see if it is being delivered efficiently, effectively, and equitably. It is a quality improvement process that aims to improve patient care and outcomes by identifying gaps between actual and desired practice, and implementing changes to close those gaps. Medical audits can focus on various aspects of healthcare delivery, including diagnosis, treatment, medication use, and follow-up care. The ultimate goal of medical audits is to ensure that patients receive the best possible care based on current evidence and best practices.

Nursing research is a scientific investigation that systematically studies nursing phenomena and related outcomes to establish best practices, improve patient care, and advance the profession of nursing. It utilizes various research methods and theories to address questions and problems relevant to nursing practice, education, administration, and policy-making. The ultimate goal of nursing research is to generate evidence-based knowledge that informs nursing interventions, enhances patient outcomes, and contributes to the development of nursing science.

I'm not aware of a specific medical definition for "Legislation, Hospital." However, I can provide some information related to legislation that affects hospitals and the healthcare industry.

Healthcare legislation refers to laws, regulations, and policies that govern the delivery, financing, and regulation of healthcare services. These laws have a significant impact on hospitals, as they set standards for patient care, establish guidelines for reimbursement, and shape the overall healthcare system. Some examples of major federal healthcare legislation in the United States include:

1. The Social Security Act (1935): Established the framework for federal involvement in healthcare, including funding for public health programs and income support for vulnerable populations.
2. The Hill-Burton Act (1946): Provided federal funding to construct and modernize hospitals, with a requirement that they provide a certain amount of free or reduced-cost care to uninsured patients.
3. The Medicare Act (1965): Created the federal health insurance program for people aged 65 and older, as well as some younger individuals with disabilities. This legislation significantly expanded access to healthcare services for millions of Americans.
4. The Medicaid Act (1965): Established a joint federal-state program that provides health insurance coverage for low-income individuals and families.
5. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA, 2010): Expanded healthcare coverage to millions of uninsured Americans through the creation of state-based health insurance marketplaces, Medicaid expansion, and various insurance reforms.

Hospitals must comply with these laws and regulations, which can impact their operations, finances, and patient care delivery. Additionally, hospitals may also be subject to state and local healthcare legislation that further shapes the regulatory environment in which they operate.

Organized financing in a medical context generally refers to the planning and coordination of financial resources and arrangements to support healthcare programs, services, or research. This can involve various funding sources, such as governmental agencies, private insurance, charitable organizations, and individual donors. The goal of organized financing is to ensure sustainable and equitable access to high-quality healthcare for all individuals, while also promoting cost-effective and efficient use of resources. Organized financing may also include efforts to address financial barriers to care, such as high out-of-pocket costs or lack of insurance coverage, and to promote transparency and accountability in the use of healthcare funds.

An "Employee Performance Appraisal" is a systematic and periodic process in which an organization evaluates the job performance of its employees. The purpose of this process is to provide feedback to employees about their strengths and areas for improvement, as well as to set goals and development plans for their future growth and performance enhancement.

The appraisal typically involves a review of the employee's job responsibilities, objectives, and achievements during a specific period, along with an assessment of their skills, behaviors, and competencies. The evaluation may be based on various factors such as job knowledge, productivity, quality of work, communication skills, teamwork, leadership, and attendance.

The performance appraisal is usually conducted by the employee's supervisor or manager, but it can also involve self-evaluation, peer review, or 360-degree feedback from multiple sources. The results of the appraisal are used to inform decisions about promotions, salary increases, training and development opportunities, and corrective actions when necessary.

Overall, the employee performance appraisal is a critical tool for organizations to manage their workforce effectively, improve productivity, and promote a culture of continuous learning and development.

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) is a non-profit organization in the United States that evaluates and accredits healthcare services and organizations. It was originally established in 1951 as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH), and changed its name to JCAHO in 1987 to reflect its expansion beyond hospital accreditation to include other types of healthcare organizations. In 2007, the organization became known simply as "The Joint Commission."

The Joint Commission's mission is to continuously improve the safety and quality of care provided by healthcare organizations through evaluation, accreditation, and education. It accomplishes this by setting standards for healthcare services and facilities, and then conducting unannounced surveys to assess whether these standards are being met. The survey process includes an on-site review of the organization's policies, procedures, and practices, as well as interviews with staff, patients, and their families.

Healthcare organizations that meet or exceed The Joint Commission's standards can earn accreditation, which is recognized as a mark of quality by consumers, insurers, and regulatory bodies. Accreditation is voluntary, but many healthcare organizations choose to participate because it demonstrates their commitment to excellence and helps them identify areas for improvement.

In addition to hospital accreditation, The Joint Commission also offers accreditation programs for ambulatory care facilities, behavioral health care organizations, home health agencies, laboratories, long-term care facilities, and office-based surgery practices.

The term "Congresses as Topic" refers to large, formal meetings that are held to discuss and exchange information on a specific topic or field, usually academic or professional in nature. In the context of medical science, a congress is an event where healthcare professionals, researchers, and experts gather to present and discuss the latest research, developments, and innovations in their field. Medical congresses can cover a wide range of topics, including specific diseases, treatments, medical specialties, public health issues, or healthcare policies. These events often include keynote speeches, panel discussions, workshops, poster sessions, and networking opportunities for attendees. Examples of well-known medical congresses are the annual meetings of the American Medical Association, the American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology.

'Guidelines' in the medical context are systematically developed statements or sets of recommendations designed to assist healthcare professionals and patients in making informed decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. They are based on a thorough evaluation of the available evidence, including scientific studies, expert opinions, and patient values. Guidelines may cover a wide range of topics, such as diagnosis, treatment, prevention, screening, and management of various diseases and conditions. They aim to standardize care, improve patient outcomes, reduce unnecessary variations in practice, and promote efficient use of healthcare resources.

Bibliometrics is the use of statistical methods to analyze books, articles, and other publications. In the field of information science, bibliometrics is often used to measure the impact of scholarly works or authors by counting the number of times that a work has been cited in other publications. This can help researchers identify trends and patterns in research output and collaboration, as well as assess the influence of individual researchers or institutions.

Bibliometric analyses may involve a variety of statistical measures, such as citation counts, author productivity, journal impact factors, and collaborative networks. These measures can be used to evaluate the performance of individual researchers, departments, or institutions, as well as to identify areas of research strength or weakness.

It is important to note that while bibliometrics can provide useful insights into research trends and impact, they should not be the sole basis for evaluating the quality or significance of scholarly work. Other factors, such as the rigor of the research design, the clarity of the writing, and the relevance of the findings to the field, are also important considerations.

Cooperative behavior, in a medical or healthcare context, refers to the actions and attitudes displayed by individuals or groups working together to achieve a common goal related to health and well-being. This may involve patients following their healthcare providers' advice, healthcare professionals collaborating to diagnose and treat medical conditions, or communities coming together to promote healthy behaviors and environments. Cooperative behavior is essential for positive health outcomes, as it fosters trust, communication, and shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers, and helps to ensure that everyone involved in the care process is working towards the same goal.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "universities" is a term that refers to institutions of higher education and research, and it is not a medical term. A university typically offers undergraduate and postgraduate programs leading to the award of degrees such as bachelor's, master's, and doctoral degrees.

If you have any questions related to medicine or healthcare, I would be happy to try to help answer them for you.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "teaching" is a general term that refers to the act of imparting knowledge or skills to others and is not a medical term. However, in the context of medical education, teaching refers to the instruction and training of medical students, residents, fellows, and other healthcare professionals to develop their knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for providing high-quality patient care. This can take place in various settings such as classrooms, clinical wards, simulation centers, or online platforms, and can involve a range of teaching methods including lectures, small group discussions, bedside teaching, case-based learning, and hands-on training.

Translational medical research, also known as "translational research," refers to the process of turning basic scientific discoveries into clinical interventions that improve human health and well-being. This type of research aims to "translate" findings from laboratory, animal, or cellular studies into practical applications for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of human diseases.

Translational medical research typically involves a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together researchers from various fields such as biology, chemistry, engineering, genetics, and medicine to work collaboratively on solving complex health problems. The process often includes several stages, including:

1. Identifying basic scientific discoveries that have the potential to be translated into clinical applications.
2. Developing and optimizing new diagnostic tools, drugs, or therapies based on these discoveries.
3. Conducting preclinical studies in the laboratory or with animal models to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these interventions.
4. Designing and implementing clinical trials to test the effectiveness and safety of the new interventions in human patients.
5. Disseminating research findings to the scientific community, healthcare providers, and the public to facilitate the adoption of new practices or treatments.

Translational medical research is essential for bridging the gap between basic scientific discoveries and clinical applications, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.

Data collection in the medical context refers to the systematic gathering of information relevant to a specific research question or clinical situation. This process involves identifying and recording data elements, such as demographic characteristics, medical history, physical examination findings, laboratory results, and imaging studies, from various sources including patient interviews, medical records, and diagnostic tests. The data collected is used to support clinical decision-making, inform research hypotheses, and evaluate the effectiveness of treatments or interventions. It is essential that data collection is performed in a standardized and unbiased manner to ensure the validity and reliability of the results.

Utilization review (UR) is a comprehensive process used by healthcare insurance companies to evaluate the medical necessity, appropriateness, and efficiency of the healthcare services and treatments that have been rendered, are currently being provided, or are being recommended for members. The primary goal of utilization review is to ensure that patients receive clinically necessary and cost-effective care while avoiding unnecessary or excessive treatments.

The utilization review process may involve various steps, including:

1. Preauthorization (also known as precertification): A prospective review to approve or deny coverage for specific services, procedures, or treatments before they are provided. This step helps ensure that the planned care aligns with evidence-based guidelines and medical necessity criteria.
2. Concurrent review: An ongoing evaluation of a patient's treatment during their hospital stay or course of therapy to determine if the services remain medically necessary and consistent with established clinical pathways.
3. Retrospective review: A retrospective analysis of healthcare services already provided to assess their medical necessity, appropriateness, and quality. This step may lead to adjustments in reimbursement or require the provider to justify the rendered services.

Utilization review is typically conducted by a team of healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, and case managers, who apply their clinical expertise and adhere to established criteria and guidelines. The process aims to promote high-quality care, reduce wasteful spending, and safeguard patients from potential harm caused by inappropriate or unnecessary treatments.

Medical societies are professional organizations composed of physicians, surgeons, and other healthcare professionals who share a common purpose of promoting medical research, education, and patient care. These societies can focus on specific medical specialties, such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) for cancer specialists or the American College of Surgeons (ACS) for surgeons. They may also address broader issues related to healthcare policy, advocacy, and ethics. Medical societies often provide resources for continuing medical education, publish scientific journals, establish clinical practice guidelines, and offer networking opportunities for members.

Interpersonal relations, in the context of medicine and healthcare, refer to the interactions and relationships between patients and healthcare professionals, as well as among healthcare professionals themselves. These relationships are crucial in the delivery of care and can significantly impact patient outcomes. Positive interpersonal relations can lead to improved communication, increased trust, greater patient satisfaction, and better adherence to treatment plans. On the other hand, negative or strained interpersonal relations can result in poor communication, mistrust, dissatisfaction, and non-adherence.

Healthcare professionals are trained to develop effective interpersonal skills, including active listening, empathy, respect, and cultural sensitivity, to build positive relationships with their patients. Effective interpersonal relations also involve clear and concise communication, setting appropriate boundaries, and managing conflicts in a constructive manner. In addition, positive interpersonal relations among healthcare professionals can promote collaboration, teamwork, and knowledge sharing, leading to improved patient care and safety.

A questionnaire in the medical context is a standardized, systematic, and structured tool used to gather information from individuals regarding their symptoms, medical history, lifestyle, or other health-related factors. It typically consists of a series of written questions that can be either self-administered or administered by an interviewer. Questionnaires are widely used in various areas of healthcare, including clinical research, epidemiological studies, patient care, and health services evaluation to collect data that can inform diagnosis, treatment planning, and population health management. They provide a consistent and organized method for obtaining information from large groups or individual patients, helping to ensure accurate and comprehensive data collection while minimizing bias and variability in the information gathered.

Genetic research is a branch of biomedical science that involves the study of genes, their functions, and heredity. It aims to understand how genetic variations contribute to human health and disease by using various scientific approaches such as genetics, genomics, molecular biology, biochemistry, and bioinformatics.

Genetic research can be conducted on humans, animals, or plants, and it can focus on a variety of areas including:

1. Identifying genes associated with specific diseases or traits
2. Understanding how genes are regulated and expressed
3. Investigating the role of genetic mutations in disease development
4. Developing new diagnostic tests and treatments based on genetic information
5. Exploring evolutionary relationships between species
6. Examining ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic research.

Genetic research has led to significant advances in our understanding of many diseases, including cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and neurological disorders. It also holds great promise for personalized medicine, which tailors treatments to individual patients based on their genetic makeup.

"Evaluation studies" is a broad term that refers to the systematic assessment or examination of a program, project, policy, intervention, or product. The goal of an evaluation study is to determine its merits, worth, and value by measuring its effects, efficiency, and impact. There are different types of evaluation studies, including formative evaluations (conducted during the development or implementation of a program to provide feedback for improvement), summative evaluations (conducted at the end of a program to determine its overall effectiveness), process evaluations (focusing on how a program is implemented and delivered), outcome evaluations (assessing the short-term and intermediate effects of a program), and impact evaluations (measuring the long-term and broad consequences of a program).

In medical contexts, evaluation studies are often used to assess the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of new treatments, interventions, or technologies. These studies can help healthcare providers make informed decisions about patient care, guide policymakers in developing evidence-based policies, and promote accountability and transparency in healthcare systems. Examples of evaluation studies in medicine include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the outcomes of a new treatment to those of a standard or placebo treatment, observational studies that examine the real-world effectiveness and safety of interventions, and economic evaluations that assess the costs and benefits of different healthcare options.

In a medical context, feedback refers to the information or data about the results of a process, procedure, or treatment that is used to evaluate and improve its effectiveness. This can include both quantitative data (such as vital signs or laboratory test results) and qualitative data (such as patient-reported symptoms or satisfaction). Feedback can come from various sources, including patients, healthcare providers, medical equipment, and electronic health records. It is an essential component of quality improvement efforts, allowing healthcare professionals to make informed decisions about changes to care processes and treatments to improve patient outcomes.

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is a medical approach that integrates the best available research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values and preferences to make informed decisions about appropriate health care for individual patients. It is a process of lifelong learning and critical appraisal of new evidence to inform clinical practice. The goal of EBP is to provide high-quality, cost-effective healthcare that is based on the most current and valid scientific research, as well as the unique needs and preferences of each patient. This approach emphasizes the importance of using rigorous, systematic methods to evaluate medical research and to translate findings into clinical practice, while also taking into account individual patient circumstances and values.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Program Development" is not a medical term. It is a general term that refers to the process of creating, planning, and implementing a new program or project, typically in a business, education, or community setting. In a healthcare context, it might refer to the development of a new healthcare service, treatment program, or educational initiative.

If you have any questions related to medical terminology or concepts, I'd be happy to try and help!

Continuing medical education (CME) refers to the process of ongoing learning and professional development that healthcare professionals engage in throughout their careers. The goal of CME is to enhance knowledge, skills, and performance in order to provide better patient care and improve health outcomes.

CME activities may include a variety of formats such as conferences, seminars, workshops, online courses, journal clubs, and self-study programs. These activities are designed to address specific learning needs and objectives related to clinical practice, research, or healthcare management.

Healthcare professionals are required to complete a certain number of CME credits on a regular basis in order to maintain their licensure, certification, or membership in professional organizations. The content and quality of CME activities are typically overseen by accreditation bodies such as the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) in the United States.

Overall, continuing medical education is an essential component of maintaining competence and staying up-to-date with the latest developments in healthcare.

Reproducibility of results in a medical context refers to the ability to obtain consistent and comparable findings when a particular experiment or study is repeated, either by the same researcher or by different researchers, following the same experimental protocol. It is an essential principle in scientific research that helps to ensure the validity and reliability of research findings.

In medical research, reproducibility of results is crucial for establishing the effectiveness and safety of new treatments, interventions, or diagnostic tools. It involves conducting well-designed studies with adequate sample sizes, appropriate statistical analyses, and transparent reporting of methods and findings to allow other researchers to replicate the study and confirm or refute the results.

The lack of reproducibility in medical research has become a significant concern in recent years, as several high-profile studies have failed to produce consistent findings when replicated by other researchers. This has led to increased scrutiny of research practices and a call for greater transparency, rigor, and standardization in the conduct and reporting of medical research.

Sociometry is a method used in social science to measure the pattern of interpersonal relationships within a group. Sociometric techniques are thus the tools or methods employed to collect and analyze sociometric data, which typically involve individuals rating or choosing others in the group with whom they would prefer to work or interact. These techniques can be used to study various aspects of group dynamics, social structure, and individual social status within a group. Examples of sociometric techniques include surveys, questionnaires, interviews, and observation.

Clinical competence is the ability of a healthcare professional to provide safe and effective patient care, demonstrating the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for the job. It involves the integration of theoretical knowledge with practical skills, judgment, and decision-making abilities in real-world clinical situations. Clinical competence is typically evaluated through various methods such as direct observation, case studies, simulations, and feedback from peers and supervisors.

A clinically competent healthcare professional should be able to:

1. Demonstrate a solid understanding of the relevant medical knowledge and its application in clinical practice.
2. Perform essential clinical skills proficiently and safely.
3. Communicate effectively with patients, families, and other healthcare professionals.
4. Make informed decisions based on critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.
5. Exhibit professionalism, ethical behavior, and cultural sensitivity in patient care.
6. Continuously evaluate and improve their performance through self-reflection and ongoing learning.

Maintaining clinical competence is essential for healthcare professionals to ensure the best possible outcomes for their patients and stay current with advances in medical science and technology.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Internet" is a term that pertains to the global network of interconnected computers and servers that enable the transmission and reception of data via the internet protocol (IP). It is not a medical term and does not have a specific medical definition. If you have any questions related to medicine or health, I'd be happy to try to help answer them for you!

Organizational models in the context of medicine refer to frameworks that are used to describe, analyze, and improve the structure, processes, and outcomes of healthcare organizations. These models provide a systematic way of understanding how different components of an organization interact with each other and how they contribute to the overall performance of the system.

Examples of organizational models in healthcare include:

1. The Donabedian model: This model focuses on the structure, process, and outcome of healthcare as interrelated components that influence the quality of care.
2. The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program: This model provides a framework for organizations to evaluate their performance and identify areas for improvement in seven categories: leadership, strategic planning, customer focus, measurement, analysis, and knowledge management; workforce focus; process management; and results.
3. The Institute of Medicine's (IOM) six aims for improvement: The IOM has identified six aims that should be the focus of healthcare quality improvement efforts: safety, timeliness, patient-centeredness, effectiveness, efficiency, and equity.
4. The Lean management system: This model is a process improvement approach that focuses on eliminating waste and maximizing value for customers through continuous improvement and respect for people.
5. The Six Sigma methodology: This model is a data-driven approach to quality improvement that seeks to reduce variation and defects in processes through the use of statistical tools and techniques.

These are just a few examples of organizational models used in healthcare. Each model has its own strengths and limitations, and organizations may choose to adopt one or more models depending on their specific needs and goals.

Metascience "Research Integrity and Peer Review". Research Integrity and Peer Review. Retrieved 3 June 2019. (Articles with ... Research Integrity and Peer Review is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal that was launched in 2016. It is ... Peer review, English-language journals, Open access journals, Academic journals established in 2016, BioMed Central academic ... published by BioMed Central and focuses on problems in peer review, replication, and the scientific process. ...
Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles https://engineering.purdue.edu/INSPIRE/Research/publications-presentations https://engineering. ... Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 6(1), Article 2. ... A systematic literature review. Paper presented at the 2016 American Educational Research Association (AERA) meeting, ... Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 237-251.. Douglas, K. A., Rynearson A., Purzer, S., & Strobel, J. (2016 ...
Peer Review. For much of the last century, peer review has been the principal mechanism by which the quality of research is ... Despite its flaws, peer review does work to improve the quality of research. Considering the possible failings of peer review, ... Responsible peer review is a researchers responsibility. By definition, peer review depends on the willingness of peers to ... Effective peer review depends on academic integrity. Peer review must be conducted so that better scientific work is the result ...
Regard to Sham Peer Review. Posted 02/02/2006. Mark F. McDonnell, MD; Lawrence R. Huntoon, MD, PhD, FAAN; John Majerus; John ... Bad faith peer. review is a crime against patients, physicians, and medicine itself. Mark F. McDonnell, MD. Houston, Texas. _ ... I read with interest the recent article on sham peer review.[1] I was even more interested in the recent editorial by Mr. Bond ... I think that the term bad faith peer review (with all of its legal. implications) better describes the situation and should ...
Gulf War Illness, Lung Cancer, and Peer Reviewed Medical Research Programs. Sponsor. United States Department of Defense (DOD) ... Office of Research. Angela Vuk, Senior Grants and Contracts Specialist. Research Services Office. 519-824-4120 x55026. avuk@ ... Please note that research activities carried out in the context of COVID-19 need to adhere to the University of Guelph COVID-19 ... If you are interested in applying, please contact the Office of Research as soon as possible so we can work through the ...
Re: Peer -reviewed research on the efficacy of TEACCH. Home/TEACCH DISCUSSION FORUM/Peer -reviewed research on the efficacy of ... Home › Forums › TEACCH DISCUSSION FORUM › Peer -reviewed research on the efficacy of TEACCH › Re: Peer -reviewed research on ... Re: Peer -reviewed research on the efficacy of TEACCH2017-03-28T14:17:10+01:00 ...
Anti-Fracking Activists March on Science; EID Compiles Peer-Reviewed Research on Fracking and Health. BY Aileen Yeung Apr. 21 ... "Energy In Depth released a new compendium and a new health microsite highlighting peer-reviewed research and studies by ... EID developed a new compendium that includes data from 23 peer-reviewed studies, 17 government health and regulatory agencies, ... The research by regulatory agencies in top oil- and gas-producing states includes Colorado Department of Public Health and ...
Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review ... using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process. ... Background: The peer review process has been questioned as it may fail to allow the publication of high-quality articles. This ... Implementing a two-step peer-review process could help improve the quality of reporting. ...
... peer-reviewed paper published by Chinese research team. Research laboratories and companies all over the world are doing their ... A Chinese research team published a peer-reviewed paper, stating, Antibody production was confirmed in a clinical trial of the ... Review. Coverage. Interview. Gastronomic Adventure. Mobile. Software. Web Service. Web Application. Hardware. Ride. Science. ... The research team divided the subjects into three groups and administered the vaccine to each group in three stages: high dose ...
Instruction Delphi Panel ResultsMethodPanel 4 convened RCR and research experts to address the following question:Within RCR ... 1. The significance of peer review. 100* (3.64). 73 (3.09). a. Peer review as a mechanism for quality assurance in publication ... research compliance, research ethics, research integrity and bioethics education including: "Teaching Research Ethics" at ... 2. Peer review?. The panel used a version of the Delphi method to achieve consensus. Panelists were asked to complete three ...
What changes do they want to see in peer review? And how can peer review quality be improved? Read on to know more. ... What do authors think about peer review? Do they think its working? ... Since this years theme for Peer Review Week is "Quality in Peer Review," we would like to share in some detail the author ... Sense about Science (2009). Peer Review Survey 2009: Full Report.. *Taylor & Francis (2015). Peer review in 2015: A global view ...
The result of the pending peer review is a so called Peer Challenger Report. The aim of the report is to discuss the strengths ... The Peer Review process will be supported substantially and organizationally by the FFU and its partners. The main task will be ... New project: Peer Challenger Report - Facilitating the Review of German Sustainability Policies. News from Feb 25, 2009 ... The aim of the Peer Challenger Report is to review the actual implementation of Germanys sustainability goals and to improve ...
Meta-Research: Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts. ... Meta-Research: Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts ... Meta-Research: Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts ... Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the following individual involved in review of your submission has ...
The Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program (PRMRP) respiratory health research advocates Kenneth Benson and John Linnell ... More information about the Department of Defense Peer Review Medical Research Program is available on PRMRP website. ... U.S. COPD Coalition Board Members Lend Patient Perspective to Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program. ... They bring with them a sense of urgency and remind us all, of the human element involved in medical research." ...
The process allows peer reviewers to read about research before it is generally known and to gain insight into how other ... Box 1: Become a peer-review legend. * Formal courses in peer review are rare or absent, so seize the opportunity if lecturers ... The review itself involves several steps (see Become a peer-review legend). The first is to plan enough time and to stay in ... Peer review is the backbone of modern science, and academic researchers are expected to participate in the endeavour. Although ...
Research Assistance *Find materials by subject + course *Find materials by format + type *Research tutorials *Frequently asked ... For more about peer-reviewed articles, see What is a peer-reviewed journal? ... If you are searching for scholarly or peer-reviewed articles in a database, you may be able to limit your results to peer- ... reviewed or scholarly journal articles. Watch for check boxes with wording such as "scholarly journals" or "peer-reviewed." ...
... research articles, and information products and services supporting advancement across all fields of chemical sciences. ... ACS Publications provides high quality peer-reviewed journals, ... Chemical Research in ToxicologyChemical ReviewsChemistry of ... From agriculture to pharmaceuticals, discover how our peer-reviewed journals, e-books, and educational content can provide new ... AAccounts of Chemical ResearchAccounts of Materials ResearchACS Agricultural Science & TechnologyACS Applied Bio MaterialsACS ...
... review process and journal editors share their knowledge about the process and advice about how to create meaningful reviews. ... Why Peer Review?. Peer review has two main purposes: (a) to filter out research of poor quality or content that does not fit ... Peer Review: A Practice That Sustains Science. Peer Review: A Practice That Sustains Science. ... Peer review "is one of the most important things we do as scholars," Tone said. "Peer review sustains science," Goldstone added ...
I got involved with the Peer Reviewed Orthopaedic Research Program when Dr. Hooper was running the Center for the Intrepid at ... Defense Medical Research and Development. *Medical Simulation and Information Sciences Research Program (JPC-1) ... We need Service members that are recently wounded that can get through all the harder research without too much issue. ... Ive seen guys with terrible, life-altering, devastating injuries and, because of the prior research thats been done, because ...
The UK Research Councils peer review system is overwhelmed by the growing number of grant propo ... The UK Research Councils peer review system is overwhelmed by the growing number of grant proposals. They finally have decided ... Since the fix ignores that free peer reviews pose an externality and distort demand, the new policy is a joy only for research- ... Do you have negative results from your research youd like to share?. Submit Negative Results ...
Peer-reviewed Articles. *Environmental Research *Linking Exposure and Health in Environmental Public Health Tracking, October ... Environmental Research. 2014; 134:453.. *Dunlop TS, Porter D, Washam R, Li J, Ho J, Johnson R. Local perspectives on the ... Cancer Incidence Statistical Review - Five Year Update for Moab, Grand County, Utah Covering the Period from 1980 to 2014. ... Environmental Research. 2014. 134:435-452.. *Harris G, Thompson WD, Fitzgerald E, Wartenberg D. The association of PM 5 with ...
... the authors examine the relationship between exposure to Russian Internet Research Agency activities on Twitter and voting ... Peer review. Peer review information. Nature Communications thanks Dean Eckles and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their ... contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. ... which we combine with data from Pew Research and US census data. Pew Research estimates that in 2016, Twitter penetration in ...
Peer Review is such an important part of the research process and highlighting the role it plays is key to retaining and ... its Peer Review week again! Peer Review is such an important part of the research process and highlighting the role it plays ... Register peer reviews and contribute to the Research Nexus. At Crossref, we talk a lot about the research nexus, and its a ... As the Peer Review Week team states:. "Maintaining trust in the peer review decision-making process is paramount if we are to ...
In this study, we investigate how negative peer feedback shapes user behavior in an online review platform. Leveraging fine- ... Moreover, for users who are retained and write their next reviews, we find that negative feedback improves review frequency and ... These novel findings demonstrate that, contrary to the conventional wisdom, negative peer feedback can benefit the platforms ... we find interesting insights regarding the impact of negative peer feedback. First, negative feedback improves user retention ...
I show how the SP network can greatly improve review and dissemination of research articles in areas that are not well- ... I present a three phase plan for building a basic SP network, and making it an effective peer review platform that can be used ... Instead of reviewing a manuscript in secret for the Editor of a journal, each reviewer simply publishes his review (typically ... Once the SP network reviewers complete their review decisions, the authors can invite any journal editor they want to consider ...
Peer review is a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods ... Problems in research[edit]. Meta-research[edit]. Main article: Meta-research. Meta-research is the study of research through ... Main article: Documentary research. Steps in conducting research[edit]. Research design and evidence. Research cycle. Research ... Original research, also called primary research, is research that is not exclusively based on a summary, review, or synthesis ...
Foodie Body recommends that you talk to your physician first so you can modify the program plan based on known health issues as a more complete solution. ...
... peer review process. Its after this review of the article by the experts in the field (the authors peers) that the journal ... in which case you can easily limit your searches to the peer-reviewed articles only. To find out if a journal is peer-reviewed ... They could also accept pending minor revisions, or request more substantial revisions and then review it again. ...
Research Scientist. Organizational Affiliation(s). Department of Environmental Health. Indiana University. IU Innovation Center ... homeNCEH/ATSDR Scientific Information Quality - Peer Review Agenda. *Assessment of the Evidence for the Drinking Water ... Timing of Review (including deferrals): September 2014. Type of Review (panel, individual or alternative procedure): Individual ... Page last reviewed: August 18, 2015 Content source: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...
InterSystems was selected to earn a 2020 Gartner Peer Insights Customers Choice for a second year in a row. ... Gartner Research. Gartner Peer Insights Reviews are completed by InterSystems customers. Vendors placed in the upper-right ... If you are a current InterSystems customer, submit a Gartner Peer Insights review to claim a $25 gift card or donate to a ... The "Voice of the Customer" is a document that synthesizes Gartner Peer Insights reviews into insights for IT decision makers ...
  • Several studies and some large-scale global surveys focusing on peer review have been conducted over the past ten years in attempts to answer these questions, and these have shed light on how different aspects of peer review are perceived by authors and peer reviewers. (editage.com)
  • Peer reviewers usually provide their feedback in a constructive and actionable way. (editage.com)
  • As consumer reviewers, they were full voting members, along with prominent scientists, at meetings to help determine how the $300 million appropriated by Congress for Fiscal Year 2017 will be spent on PRMRP research covering 48 topic areas. (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • Consumer reviewers are asked to represent the collective view of patients and family members by preparing comments on the impact of the research on issues such as diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life. (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • The process allows peer reviewers to read about research before it is generally known and to gain insight into how other scientists write manuscripts and present data. (nature.com)
  • Editors of EMBO journals encourage senior reviewers to involve trusted early-career lab members in peer reviews, provided that they have done experimentation in the relevant field. (nature.com)
  • These free online courses empower authors and reviewers to prepare and submit strong manuscripts, avoid common errors, and navigate the peer review process. (acs.org)
  • Reviewers not only help to select the content to be published but also are expected to provide meaningful comments that can improve the quality of the manuscripts they review. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • By incorporating reviewers' comments and suggestions, authors can improve their manuscripts and even develop new research ideas. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Peer review sustains science," Goldstone added, noting that reviewers should make their reviews as helpful as they can. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) provides ethical guidelines for peer reviewers. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Publons allows reviewers to track their peer review contributions. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • These individuals send their reviews to the Action Editor, who then makes the decision to accept the manuscript, reject it, or ask the authors to revise it, taking into account the reviewers' and editor's comments before resubmitting it. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • In offering additional advice to peer reviewers, Tone suggested starting young and reviewing as often as you can, to benefit not only the field but also reviewers themselves. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Once the SP network reviewers complete their review decisions, the authors can invite any journal editor they want to consider these reviews and initial audience size, and make a publication decision. (frontiersin.org)
  • if review of a paper requires synthesis - combining the different expertise of the authors and reviewers in order to determine what assumptions and criteria are valid for evaluating it - both of the previous assumptions can fail badly ( Lee, 2006 ). (frontiersin.org)
  • It's after this review of the article by the experts in the field (the authors' peers) that the journal editors, based on the reviewers' comments, determine if the article should be accepted or rejected. (libguides.com)
  • BioMed Central's Research Integrity Group in collaboration with Frank Dudbridge , an academic Associate Editor for BMC Bioinformatics , analysed the quality of reports and recommendations made by reviewers under open and single-blind peer review. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Under single-blind 'closed' peer review the reviewers are anonymous. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Reviewer reports for BMC Infectious Diseases (open peer review) provided more detail on the strengths and weaknesses of the methods, and the reviewers' comments were more constructive and better substantiated compared to reports for BMC Microbiology . (biomedcentral.com)
  • This may have impacted on how the peer reviewers were selected and how they perceived the journal and made recommendations, but not related to the peer review model per se . (biomedcentral.com)
  • Open peer review has both pros and cons , but overall it seems to be gaining in popularity, as shown by a growing number of open peer review journals at BioMed Central, and the success of F1000 Research or PeerJ where about 40% of peer reviewers choose to sign their reports. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Authors who have benefited from the peer review process should consider becoming peer reviewers as a part of their professional responsibilities. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • In order to assign appropriate reviewers, editors must match reviewers with the scope of the content in a manuscript to get the best reviews possible. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • If you cannot review, it is helpful to make suggestions for alternative reviewers if relevant, based on their expertise and without any influence of personal considerations or any intention of the manuscript receiving a specific outcome (either positive or negative). (royalliteglobal.com)
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences (IJPRAS) follows a double blind reviewing, where the reviewers remains anonymous throughout the process. (ijpras.com)
  • Many people, perhaps journalists in particular, take peer review as a guarantee of good research, but peer reviewers mainly convey theoretical arguments and rarely demand to examine the data behind the study. (lu.se)
  • Student peer reviewers are usually not expected to correct mistakes, but rather to identify passages that need revision and to discuss with the writer what kind(s) of problem they have identified. (lu.se)
  • As of August 4, 2023, InterSystems customers have rated the InterSystems platform 4.6 starts or higher, out of 5, in the Cloud Database Management Systems market on Gartner Peer Insights™, 96% of those customers are saying that they will recommend InterSystems to their peers. (intersystems.com)
  • Gartner, Voice of the Customer for Cloud Database Management Systems, Peer Contributors, 29 May 2023. (intersystems.com)
  • 2023). She published several peer-reviewed and popular scientific articles in English, Turkish, and Dutch. (lu.se)
  • For this reason, co-opting an entire manuscript is a clear example of research misconduct. (uaf.edu)
  • One hundred and nineteen ECRs who had never reviewed an RCT manuscript were recruited from December 2017 to January 2018. (nih.gov)
  • To assess accuracy in identifying inadequate reporting, we used two tests: (1) ECRs assessing a manuscript using the COBPeer tool (after completing an online training module) and (2) the usual peer-review process. (nih.gov)
  • Peer reviewer comments are generally insightful and help me improve my manuscript. (editage.com)
  • At APS, after an author submits a manuscript, the Editor in Chief determines whether or not it should be considered for possible publication and, if so, assigns the article to a Senior Editor, who assigns and coordinates with an appropriate Action Editor to determine whether the manuscript should be sent out for review. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Gatekeeper: Make sure a manuscript is of sufficient quality and won't mislead future research. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Instead of reviewing a manuscript in secret for the Editor of a journal, each reviewer simply publishes his review (typically of a paper he wishes to recommend) to his SP network subscribers. (frontiersin.org)
  • Under 'open' peer review, all parties know the players involved, reviewer reports are signed and if the manuscript is accepted, they accompany publication. (biomedcentral.com)
  • When approached to review, agree to review only if you have the necessary expertise to assess the manuscript and can be unbiased in your assessment. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • In addition, you should not agree to review a manuscript just to gain sight of it with no intention of submitting a review, or agree to review a manuscript that is very similar to one you have in preparation or under consideration at another journal. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • If you feel qualified to judge a particular manuscript, you should agree to review only if you are able to return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • Do not involve anyone else in the review of a manuscript (including early career researchers you are mentoring), without first obtaining permission from the journal (e.g. see COPE Case 11-29: Reviewer asks trainee to review manuscript). (royalliteglobal.com)
  • The names of any individuals who have helped with the review should be included so that they are associated with the manuscript in the journal's records and can also receive due recognition for their efforts. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy in identifying inadequate reporting in RCT reports by early career researchers (ECRs) using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process. (nih.gov)
  • Peer review is the backbone of modern science, and academic researchers are expected to participate in the endeavour. (nature.com)
  • Whether or not they plan to pursue an academic career, junior researchers should get involved in peer review, says Sarah Blackford, a career adviser with the Society for Experimental Biology in London. (nature.com)
  • A selected-papers (SP) network is a network in which researchers who read, write, and review articles subscribe to each other based on common interests. (frontiersin.org)
  • Featuring peer-reviewed original papers, editorials translating basic science into patient-oriented research and disease, in-depth reviews, and regular special topic sections, Kidney and Blood Pressure Research is an important source of information for researchers in nephrology and cardiovascular medicine. (karger.com)
  • Research is being created in greater quantity, faster than ever before, making identifying information more difficult for researchers and the public alike. (elsevier.com)
  • For the past year, we have partnered with leading organizations dedicated to advancing research and science to initiate a global dialogue about how confidence in research has been affected by the pandemic and to identify practical solutions that can support researchers. (elsevier.com)
  • A key part of this has been Economist Impact's study Confidence in research: researchers in the spotlight , supported by Elsevier, which surveyed more than 3,000 researchers globally, across different career stages and academic disciplines, to understand their experiences, their own confidence in the research process, and what skills, support or incentive structures they need in this increasingly complex and public-facing environment. (elsevier.com)
  • These sessions - along with the scrutiny of a Global Expert Panel from throughout the research ecosystem - helped to interrogate the findings of the survey and, crucially, gather views on where action and intervention are most needed to help researchers. (elsevier.com)
  • Nearly two-thirds of scientific researchers surveyed (63%) think the pandemic has increased public attention on research. (elsevier.com)
  • Half of all researchers surveyed (51%) say they feel a responsibility to engage in debate online, and over two-thirds (68%) believe the pandemic has increased the importance of separating quality research from misinformation. (elsevier.com)
  • Being published in a peer-reviewed journal is the most important marker of reliability according to 74% of researchers surveyed. (elsevier.com)
  • This is a summary of a preprint research study, "Are US Asian Indians Dying With Atherosclerosis More Likely to Have Concurrent Diabetes Mellitus: Analysis of National Multiple Cause of Mortality Data (2012-2019)," written by researchers from Armed Forces Medical College in Pune, India, and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland. (medscape.com)
  • To gather the scientific data, editors, researchers, and contributors systematically review medical journals from around the world. (medlineplus.gov)
  • For the third year after 2015 and 2016, SASNET invited researchers at Lund University to apply for a one month position ("ansökningsmånad") at SASNET in which to prepare a research application with a South Asian focus. (lu.se)
  • Just when you thought 2020 couldn't go any faster, it's Peer Review week again! (crossref.org)
  • Fast forward to 2020 and over 75k peer reviews have now been registered with us by a range of members including Wiley, Peer J, eLife, Stichting SciPost, Emerald, IOP Publishing, Publons, The Royal Society and Copernicus. (crossref.org)
  • Below are the USGS 2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) research projects related to COVID-19 pathways and wildlife dynamics. (usgs.gov)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969-2020) published peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other high-income countries. (guttmacher.org)
  • Research Integrity and Peer Review is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal that was launched in 2016. (wikipedia.org)
  • Brophy, S. (2016, August) Instructional Shake Table for Engineering and Physical Science Learning Resource presented at P-12 Engineering & Design Education Research Summit, Chicago, Illinois. (purdue.edu)
  • Douglas, K. & Purzer, S. (2016, August), A Framework for Developing Engineering Design Classroom Assessment Paper presented at P-12 Engineering & Design Education Research Summit, Chicago, Illinois. (purdue.edu)
  • An example of such a foreign intervention was the one conducted during the 2016 US election campaign by the Internet Research Agency, an organization closely linked to the Russian government 3 . (nature.com)
  • Ken Benson notes that the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) was originated by Congress "to foster novel approaches to biomedical research in response to the expressed needs of its stakeholders - the American public, the military, and Congress. (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • Trained ECRs using the COBPeer tool were more likely to detect inadequate reporting in RCTs than the usual peer review processes used by journals. (nih.gov)
  • This guide will help you identify and evaluate scholarly (also known as peer-reviewed) journals, magazines, and trade publications - both print and online. (sfu.ca)
  • Watch for check boxes with wording such as "scholarly journals" or "peer-reviewed. (sfu.ca)
  • I present a three phase plan for building a basic SP network, and making it an effective peer review platform that can be used by journals, conferences, users of repositories such as arXiv, and users of search engines such as PubMed. (frontiersin.org)
  • I show how the SP network can greatly improve review and dissemination of research articles in areas that are not well-supported by existing journals. (frontiersin.org)
  • One of the key differences between scholarly journals and popular sources like magazines is that articles submitted for publication in scholarly journals go through the 'peer review' process. (libguides.com)
  • This is reassuring for supporters of open peer review, however our findings do not undermine other journals using closed peer review. (biomedcentral.com)
  • This echoes the research on BMC -series journals from 2006 and research done in other subject areas (for example see here and here ). (biomedcentral.com)
  • From a publisher's perspective, peer review functions as a filter for content, directing better quality articles to better quality journals and so creating journal brands. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • or it could refer to research findings that are locked behind paywalls of academic journals. (lu.se)
  • He is critical of the current way in which research is typically classified as credible: publications in the right journals and peer review. (lu.se)
  • From these journals, hundreds of articles are reviewed and analyzed. (medlineplus.gov)
  • Outcomes of this program are both scientific publications in international peer-review journals and formal. (lu.se)
  • Outcomes of this program are both scientific publications in international peer-review journals and formal postdoctoral degree attainment by the research trainees. (lu.se)
  • The outcome of these projects has been published in peer-reviewed international journals. (lu.se)
  • Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 6 (1), Article 2. (purdue.edu)
  • They might then get invited by the journal to conduct the review. (nature.com)
  • Even if they aren't invited, another natural first step is to review a paper jointly with seasoned colleagues or under their mentorship, says Emma Ganley, co-editor-in-chief of the journal PLoS Biology . (nature.com)
  • Their background experience will help them to carry out the key components of peer review: they must be able to assess whether work is new to the field and original enough to deserve publication - and by the journal in question. (nature.com)
  • What is a scholarly (or peer-reviewed) journal? (sfu.ca)
  • If you are searching for scholarly or peer-reviewed articles in a database , you may be able to limit your results to peer-reviewed or scholarly journal articles. (sfu.ca)
  • Peer review has two main purposes: (a) to filter out research of poor quality or content that does not fit within the scope of a particular journal, and (b) to improve the quality of journal articles. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • A written review usually follows a certain structure that helps the editor to ultimately answer the question: Should this particular article be published in this particular journal? (psychologicalscience.org)
  • To find out if a journal is peer-reviewed, it is typically stated on their website, as part of the 'about this journal' section or the instructions for authors who are interested in submitting an article for the journal. (libguides.com)
  • In order to attempt to control for differences between fields which may have impacted on our findings we also wanted to compare open versus closed peer review on a single journal. (biomedcentral.com)
  • We therefore rated 200 reviewer reports for the Journal of Inflammation from the time when it operated open peer review and 200 reviewer reports submitted after the journal implemented the single blind model in 2010. (biomedcentral.com)
  • However, the change in peer review model was accompanied by a change in editorship and coincided with the journal receiving its first impact factor. (biomedcentral.com)
  • anyone interested in becoming a reviewer should look for the journal guidelines on peer review and follow any requirements posted. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • The decision of Editor of International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences (IJPRAS) is final to accept or reject the article. (ijpras.com)
  • This journal comprises both clinical and basic studies at the interface of nephrology, hypertension, and cardiovascular research. (karger.com)
  • Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. (helsinki.fi)
  • She serves as the BIDMC site principal investigator for the Hospital Medicine Research and Reengineering Network (HOMERUN) - a nationwide research organization focused on measuring and improving the outcomes of hospitalized patients - and as Senior Deputy Editor for the Journal of Hospital Medicine. (bidmc.org)
  • E3 Journal of Microbiology Research (EJMBR) is an open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject. (who.int)
  • While most participants appeared satisfied with the overall quality of peer reviewer comments they had encountered, many reported difficulty in addressing peer reviewer comments and unhappiness with the some aspects of how peer reviews are conducted. (editage.com)
  • Peer reviewer comments are generally clear and easy to understand. (editage.com)
  • When commenting on serving as a consumer reviewer, Linnell said that, "it was both an honor and a privilege to be a true partner with research doctors and scientists in the search for better understanding, more effective treatment, and someday a cure [for COPD]. (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • Valerie Chang, Co-Chair of the U.S. COPD Coalition's board of directors and past peer reviewer for the program, agreed. (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • Her work on beak development in octopus larvae - along with her knowledge, care and keen judgement - had left an impression on scientists in the field and early on in her career, she was invited to become a peer reviewer. (nature.com)
  • Respect the confidentiality of the peer review process and refrain from using information obtained during the peer review process for your own or another's advantage, or to disadvantage or discredit others (e.g. see COPE Case 14-06: Possible breach of reviewer confidentiality). (royalliteglobal.com)
  • The time required for the review process is depends upon the availability and the response of the reviewer. (ijpras.com)
  • The study published in BMJ Open shows that the quality of peer review is slightly higher in BMC Infectious Diseases that operates open peer review compared to BMC Microbiology operating single-blind peer review. (biomedcentral.com)
  • BMC Infectious Diseases operates open peer review while BMC Microbiology operates single-blind peer review. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Is open peer review better than single blind? (biomedcentral.com)
  • Our results have shown that open peer review is of at least as high quality as single blind. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Open peer review is deemed ethically superior by some and as Richard Smith observed , science is moving away from anonymity. (biomedcentral.com)
  • In 2017, SASNET's One Month Position to prepare a research application at Lund University went to PhD scholar Shveta Soam. (lu.se)
  • Before she joined the department in 2017, she worked as a post-doctoral researcher at Centre for Global Cooperation Research (Germany) and Amsterdam Global Change Institute (The Netherlands), and as faculty at the Institute for Environmental Studies , VU University Amsterdam and Institute for Environmental Social Sciences and Geography , Freiburg University. (lu.se)
  • Those manuscripts which meet the minimum criteria are forwarded on to at least 2 experts for review. (ijpras.com)
  • Dividing research findings into the smallest publishable units might increase an investigator's total number of publications, but works against the interests of science. (uaf.edu)
  • While taking credit for someone else's research findings is clearly a greater wrong than copying their methods section, both are examples of plagiarism-- taking personal credit for someone else's words or ideas. (uaf.edu)
  • Findings of previous similar surveys, such as the one by the Publishing Research Consortium and the follow-up Sense about Science study, had shown that respondents from non-Anglophone countries tended to have more positive views about peer review than those from Anglophone countries. (editage.com)
  • These findings will emerge from a Peer Challenger Dialogue, in which 10-12 international sustainability experts will discuss the current state of German sustainability policies and develop policy recommendations. (fu-berlin.de)
  • A preliminary version of our findings was presented as a poster at the 7th Peer Review Congress in Chicago. (biomedcentral.com)
  • We have a yearly research day where learners and faculty are invited to share their research findings. (mun.ca)
  • ACS Publications' commitment to publishing high-quality content continues to attract impactful research that addresses the world's most important challenges. (acs.org)
  • Indeed, publication is central to many disputes about responsible conduct of research. (uaf.edu)
  • Ultimately, the centrality of publication in academic life means that it is implicated to some degree in nearly all aspects of the responsible conduct of research. (uaf.edu)
  • The German Federal Chancellery has mandated the national Council for Sustainable Development to prepare and conduct an independent review of the German sustainable development strategy and policies through a peer review process. (fu-berlin.de)
  • Scientists applying propose to conduct innovative research focused on the treatment and rehabilitation in the areas of respiratory health, including COPD. (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • Graduate students generally are not recognized for their ability to conduct independent peer review unless, like Santos, they are already establishing an academic reputation by publishing first-author papers. (nature.com)
  • In the APS webinar The Basics of Peer Review , Drew was joined by Becca White, the APS peer review manager, alongside Robert L. Goldstone , editor in chief of Current Directions in Psychological Science , and Erin B. Tone , associate editor for Clinical Psychological Science , to share their experiences involving the process of peer review and tips for engaging in meaningful peer review. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Running articles through the process of peer review adds value to them. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • The peer review process has been questioned as it may fail to allow the publication of high-quality articles. (nih.gov)
  • Learn directly from our editor community as they provide expertise and tips for writing research articles, securing funding, handling rejection, and more. (acs.org)
  • Others like Academic Source Complete index both types of sources, in which case you can easily limit your searches to the peer-reviewed articles only. (libguides.com)
  • Theoretical Articles - authors draw on existing research to advance theory. (nsuok.edu)
  • Methodological Articles - generally present new approaches and methods or modify existing methods of research to the academic community. (nsuok.edu)
  • What is the difference between Primary Source Research Articles and Literature Review articles? (nsuok.edu)
  • Primary source research articles are also known as empirical studies. (nsuok.edu)
  • Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • Research Articles report on primary research. (karger.com)
  • Research Articles are reports of original work. (karger.com)
  • Authors are asked to follow the EQUATOR Network for Research Articles. (karger.com)
  • Review Articles are considered reviews of research or summary articles. (karger.com)
  • Review Articles must include a critical discussion of the reported data and give a clear conclusion with potential impacts on the standard of care. (karger.com)
  • All articles published in EJMBR will be peer-reviewed. (who.int)
  • Furthermore, fragmentation of one study into many small publications can give the false impression that a line of research has been extensively pursued. (uaf.edu)
  • Peer review is the process by which outside experts in a particular subject area assess the scientific rigor, validity, and other measures of quality to determine whether a scientific article meets the standards for publication," according to Amy Drew, the APS director of publications. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Original research , also called primary research , is research that is not exclusively based on a summary, review, or synthesis of earlier publications on the subject of research. (wikipedia.org)
  • Dive into our research through our rich and diverse publications. (usgs.gov)
  • It is published by BioMed Central and focuses on problems in peer review, replication, and the scientific process. (wikipedia.org)
  • Shveta Soam was a PhD scholar working at DBT-IOC Centre for Advanced Bioenergy Research, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, R&D Centre, Faridabad. (lu.se)
  • It is important to recognize that impersonation of another individual during the review process is considered serious misconduct (e.g. see COPE Case 12-12: Compromised peer review in published papers). (royalliteglobal.com)
  • Authorship and peer review demand special attention and are included as separate topics. (uaf.edu)
  • For these latter reasons, publication has a prominent role in advancement, promotion, and continued research funding. (uaf.edu)
  • Without such reference, the second publication constitutes a falsification of the research record. (uaf.edu)
  • However, it was the second most commonly desired area of change , after publication delay: poor peer review quality and processes featured in 24% of author responses to a question asking them what changes they would like to see in academic publishing. (editage.com)
  • ACS Authoring Services provides pre- and post-publication assistance to help you excel at communicating your scientific research to the world. (acs.org)
  • Research suggests that scientists based at prestigious institutions receive more credit for their work than scientists based at less prestigious institutions, as do scientists working in certain countries. (elifesciences.org)
  • Peer review has attracted the lion's share of attention in recent discussions around whether the academic publishing system is broken. (editage.com)
  • The Editage Global Author Survey was one such initiative that gathered author perspectives on academic publishing from around the world, with greater representation from emerging research powerhouses such as China, Brazil, Japan, South Korea, and India than seen in most previous surveys (71% of the 6,903 survey respondents belonged to these countries). (editage.com)
  • When we asked respondents to rank eight problems in academic publishing according to the urgency with which they need to be addressed, peer review did not feature among the top five. (editage.com)
  • The top open access diaries are peer looked into academic diaries of Family Medicine and Medical Science Research. (tsijournals.com)
  • Dr. Shoshana Herzig is Associate Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, Associate Chief of Hospital Medicine for Academic Affairs, and Director of Hospital Medicine Research in the Division of General Medicine and the Sections of Hospital Medicine and Research at BIDMC. (bidmc.org)
  • In addition to her research activities, Dr. Herzig remains clinically active as an academic hospitalist at BIDMC, where she cares for patients and teaches residents and Harvard Medical students on the general medicine wards. (bidmc.org)
  • USA is a community of leaders and learners who support and challenge one another through academic experiences, research and service that advance the Gulf Coast region and the world. (southalabama.edu)
  • The pandemic showed just how important quality research is for addressing global challenges and finding solutions that benefit people everywhere. (elsevier.com)
  • But only 38% think that better public understanding of research will be a legacy of the pandemic. (elsevier.com)
  • Opinions about the extent of collective ownership of jointly written materials varies and it may be impractical to determine when plagiarism has occurred (see the Office of Research Integrity, 1994). (uaf.edu)
  • The Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program (PRMRP) respiratory health research advocates Kenneth Benson and John Linnell recently participated in the evaluation of research applications submitted to the PRMRP sponsored by the Department of Defense. (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • The PRMRP fills important gaps not addressed by other funding agencies by supporting groundbreaking, high-risk, high-gain research while encouraging out-of-the-box thinking. (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • More information about the Department of Defense Peer Review Medical Research Program is available on PRMRP website . (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • Since the fix ignores that free peer reviews pose an externality and distort demand, the new policy is a joy only for research-led teaching: as an example of how the failure to follow simple economic insights leads to misguided regulation. (ssrn.com)
  • The "Voice of the Customer" is a document that synthesizes Gartner Peer Insights' reviews into insights for IT decision makers focusing on direct customer experiences implementing and operating InterSystems solution. (intersystems.com)
  • If you are a current InterSystems customer, submit a Gartner Peer Insights review to claim a $25 gift card or donate to a charity. (intersystems.com)
  • The Gartner Peer Insights Segment Customers' Choice badge is a trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc., and/or its affiliates, and is used herein with permission. (intersystems.com)
  • Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences with the vendors listed on the platform, should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. (intersystems.com)
  • Researcher Burak Tunca at Lund University School of Economics and Management sees several possible measures that could make research better - and more open. (lu.se)
  • Materials from the UNT community's research, creative, and scholarly activities and UNT's Open Access Repository. (unt.edu)
  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (gla.ac.uk)
  • The objective of a Systematic Review should be to arrive at an evidence-based conclusion. (karger.com)
  • Most of these pathologies are due to the basic mismatch of the PUSH model versus the highly specialized, interdisciplinary, and rapidly evolving nature of scientific research. (frontiersin.org)
  • Interdisciplinary research group working in the intersection between metaphysics, mereology, social ontology, philosophy of action and moral philosophy. (lu.se)
  • In March 2012, a number of philosophers from the universities of Gothenburg, Lund, Malmö, and Umeå established the interdisciplinary research group Collectivity and Metaphysics. (lu.se)
  • Although it is usually not the peer reviewer's task to mark or correct language errors in the text, the following can help you as you review your peers' texts. (lu.se)
  • Literature reviews, including research syntheses and meta-analyses, are critical evaluations of material that has already been published. (nsuok.edu)
  • This includes ensuring that the peer review process is transparent (easily discoverable, accessible, and understandable by anyone writing, reviewing, or reading peer-reviewed content) and that everyone involved in the process receives the training and education needed to play their part in making it reliable and trustworthy. (crossref.org)
  • A key way that publishers can make peer reviews easily discoverable and accessible is by registering them with Crossref - creating a persistent identifier for each review, linking them to the relevant article, and providing rich metadata to show what part this item played in the evolution of the content. (crossref.org)
  • Linked data and protocols are key for reproducibility, peer reviews increase trust and show the evolution of knowledge, and other research objects help increase the discoverability of content. (crossref.org)
  • Below a letter in response to an article on Medscape by Dr. Mark McDonnel, suggests that 'sham review' is much too mild-'bad faith,' in his opinion, is a more apt term. (ahrp.org)
  • To the Editor, I read with interest the recent article on sham peer review. (ahrp.org)
  • Towards the end of this article, we list aspects of peer review that respondents wanted changes in and pose questions to initiate discussions on review quality. (editage.com)
  • You'll need to read the article very carefully to ensure you have found original research. (nsuok.edu)
  • In some research groups, jointly written text is assumed to be shared property available for use by any of the original authors. (uaf.edu)
  • Specifically, we consider how information about the geographical location and institutional affiliation of authors influence how scientific abstracts are evaluated by their peers. (elifesciences.org)
  • Also ensure that your recommendations and reviews are aligned-if your review only mentions positive aspects and then recommends a rejection, it is not helpful for the authors. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Authors of literature reviews organize, integrate and evaluate previously published material and consider the progress of research in clarifying a problem. (nsuok.edu)
  • By organizing, integrating, and evaluating previously published material, authors of literature reviews consider the progress of research toward clarifying a problem. (nsuok.edu)
  • If you are currently employed at the same institution as any of the authors or have been recent (e.g., within the past 3 years) mentors, mentees, close collaborators or joint grant holders, you should not agree to review. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • The authors have reported no financial disclosures related to the research. (medscape.com)
  • But to make authoritative research on shale development and public health more easily accessible, EID developed a new compendium that includes data from 23 peer-reviewed studies, 17 government health and regulatory agencies, and reports from 10 research institutions - all housed on EID's new one-stop-shop health microsite, EIDHealth.org . (energyindepth.org)
  • Due to this mandate, Germany will follow the EU recommendations to member states to undertake a review of their sustainability strategies. (fu-berlin.de)
  • It is courteous to respond to an invitation to peer review within a reasonable time-frame, even if you cannot undertake the review. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • A vaccine developed by a collaborative research team of the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Hubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiangsu Center for Disease Control and Prevention expresses a spiked glycoprotein on the surface of SARS-CoV-2. (gigazine.net)
  • The UK's Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, leading the way, introduced new rules and regulations on April 1, 2009. (ssrn.com)
  • Approaches to research depend on epistemologies , which vary considerably both within and between humanities and sciences. (wikipedia.org)
  • Research laboratories and companies all over the world are doing their best to research and develop new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines, and some of them are already in the clinical trial stage. (gigazine.net)
  • Please note that research activities carried out in the context of COVID-19 need to adhere to the University of Guelph COVID-19 research principles, policies, guidelines and processes as they may be updated from time to time and communicated on the Office of Research web-page . (uoguelph.ca)
  • The discipline's faculty members come from different specialty areas and therefore their research interests are varied. (mun.ca)
  • The research team includes faculty and students from 4 medical centers, with expertise extending from clinical to technical. (lu.se)
  • Gao Y , Wang C, Merrimen J. (2021) Book Chapter: Genitourinary and Renal Pathology, in the textbook of Pathology Review and Practice Guide 3rd Edition Sent to Publisher, to be published. (mun.ca)
  • Research at the WFRC focuses on the environmental factors responsible for the creation, maintenance, and regulation of fish populations including their interactions in aquatic communities and ecosystems. (usgs.gov)
  • Research in the PPM lab focuses on psychopathy and other personality disorders (with a current focus on DSM-5 developments), the broader integration of personality and psychopathology, and personality assessment with the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF instruments. (otago.ac.nz)
  • The group's research focuses the nature of collectives and social entitites, such as organizations, associations, and informally organized groups. (lu.se)
  • If you are interested in applying, please contact the Office of Research as soon as possible so we can work through the application process and Grants.gov with you. (uoguelph.ca)
  • Does peer review still work the way it is meant to? (editage.com)
  • A research project may be an expansion of past work in the field. (wikipedia.org)
  • Peer review frequently comes under fire for failing to detect important deficiencies or recognize outstanding work , and frustration with its flaws has led to calls to abandon it altogether . (biomedcentral.com)
  • Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competences as the producers of the work (peers). (royalliteglobal.com)
  • Her present work, funded by an RO1 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, aims to improve the care of hospitalized older adults through safer prescribing of opioids and other sedating medications. (bidmc.org)
  • Dr. Burke Johnson's work in the area of mixed methods research is receiving considerable attention nationally and internationally. (southalabama.edu)
  • As NIOSH celebrates half a century of work in occupational safety and health, the Institute's Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing (AgFF) Program reflects on 30 years of research and outreach designed to protect the people who produce our nation's food and fiber. (cdc.gov)
  • The successful candidate will be part of a team of economists whose research and policy work is focused on the economics of tobacco control, alcohol policy, and sugar-sweetened beverage policy. (who.int)
  • If you have been asked to peer review another student's text as part of course work, check the instructions that you have received, as there may be other aspects that need to be taken into consideration than the ones listed below. (lu.se)
  • The following guidelines are intended to be used as a starting point for peer-group discussions of texts. (lu.se)
  • Colonel Wanda L. Salzer, M.D., Director of the CDMRP, expressed her appreciation for the consumer advocates perspective during the scientific review sessions. (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • The scientific study of research practices is known as meta-research . (wikipedia.org)
  • As a scientific publisher and information analytics company, Elsevier has been privileged to play a role, for over 140 years, in helping ensure that research can be trusted, shared and built upon to accelerate progress for society. (elsevier.com)
  • The product has passed a rigorous scientific review equivalent to a review by the FDA, Health Canada, or other governmental authority and has been found to be effective for a specific indication as an OTC drug, orphan drug, or prescription drug product. (medlineplus.gov)
  • The main task will be to prepare a state of the art report to serve as a basis for further peer discussion, to moderate the Peer Challenger Week and to write the final report after the Peer Challenger Week in June 2009. (fu-berlin.de)
  • The Higher Research Seminar is the main collective seminar of the Department. (lu.se)
  • This research group was founded in order to create an institutional framework for already existing informal collaboration on relevant topics by members of the group. (lu.se)
  • Shveta Soam and Pål Börjesson had been working in collaboration since 2014, and have successfully completed three research projects. (lu.se)
  • An essential part of the research process is to be able to evaluate the authority, relevance, and credibility of sources no matter where you find them. (sfu.ca)
  • CPR assignments require students to write an essay, evaluated three 'canned' calibration essays on the same topic, evaluate three of their peers' essays, and finally evaluate their own essay. (unt.edu)
  • Peer review "is one of the most important things we do as scholars," Tone said. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • The research staff and invited national and international leading scholars present ongoing research and analyses of a broad range of exciting topics of relevance for Political Science. (lu.se)
  • Energy In Depth (EID) has taken the charge in pointing out the use of flawed research in the "ban fracking" campaign here in the state on an case-by-case basis - see EID's recent coverage of controversial researcher Lisa McKenzie's latest study here . (energyindepth.org)
  • A researcher is a person engaged in conducting research, possibly recognized as an occupation by a formal job title . (wikipedia.org)
  • We do not single out any individual researcher, we simply say that more research is needed. (lu.se)
  • His view is that many people have an incorrect perception that replication studies are easier than other types of research. (lu.se)
  • Implementing a two-step peer-review process could help improve the quality of reporting. (nih.gov)
  • Since this year's theme for Peer Review Week is " Quality in Peer Review ," we would like to share in some detail the author perspectives on peer review we gathered in our survey and how they varied based on region or discipline. (editage.com)
  • Research in progress blog Does the peer review model affect the quality of peer review? (biomedcentral.com)
  • Does the peer review model affect the quality of peer review? (biomedcentral.com)
  • Systematic Reviews are literature reviews focused on a research question that synthesizes all high-quality research evidence relevant to that question. (karger.com)
  • The higher quality research data carry more weight for addition to the Database and more weight in assigning ratings. (medlineplus.gov)
  • For some time, we have understood that there is significant overlap between the Funder Registry and the Research Organization Registry (ROR), and funders and publishers have been asking us whether they should use Funder IDs or ROR IDs to identify funders. (crossref.org)
  • For this reason publishers need to make sure that peer review is robust. (royalliteglobal.com)
  • Bad faith peer review is a crime against patients, physicians, and medicine itself. (ahrp.org)
  • It is important to add the patient's perspective to the discussions that otherwise would sometimes get bogged down in esoteric points when the bigger picture of whether patients even cared about the research was not given enough consideration without patient input. (uscopdcoalition.org)
  • Study patients are recruited from 2 of the sites, and the correlations between their electrocardiographic and magnetic resonance imaging data are considered by the research team in conference. (lu.se)
  • I begin by briefly outlining the problems in existing peer review that this proposal aims to resolve. (frontiersin.org)

No images available that match "peer review research"