Effects of multiple doses of isoprinosine on Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes. (1/29)

Isoprinosine was given at daily doses of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 g kg-1 of body weight to jirds that were infected for 3 months with Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes. The effects of the different drug doses on metacestodes were studied by transmission electron microscopy and biochemical methods. At lower doses, increases in uric acid and adenosine deaminase activity were noted. At 4 g kg-1 of body weight, marked ultrastructural damage with metabolic perturbations was observed.  (+info)

Acyclovir vs isoprinosine (immunovir) for suppression of recurrent genital herpes simplex infection. (2/29)

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral acyclovir (400 mg twice daily) with oral isoprinosine (500 mg twice daily) in the suppression of recurrent genital herpes. DESIGN: Double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, parallel group trial. SETTING: 13 centres in UK, Belgium and Germany. SUBJECTS: 127 immunocompetent patients with frequently recurring genital herpes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of patients reporting recurrences, recurrence frequency, and mean duration of lesions during breakthrough recurrences in each treatment group during a 6 month treatment period; time to first recurrence during treatment and follow-up after treatment cessation. RESULTS: During treatment, acyclovir recipients showed significant differences (p < 0.05) when compared with isoprinosine recipients in terms of a lower proportion reporting recurrences (31% vs 96%), a reduced mean number of reported recurrences per patient (0.6 vs 3.6), a shorter mean duration of breakthrough lesions (6.4 days vs 8.2 days), and a longer mean time (standard error) to first recurrence (143.7 (9.1) days vs 40.5 (5.4) days. The mean time to first recurrence after treatment cessation did not differ between the two groups. As compared with placebo recipients, isoprinosine treated patients had an increased recurrence frequency (3.6 vs 2.5) during treatment, and a shorter time to first recurrence after treatment cessation. All treatments were well tolerated without serious adverse events or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Acyclovir is very effective in suppressing recurrent genital herpes and is clearly superior to isoprinosine which is not clinically useful in the dosage studied.  (+info)

Evaluation of isoprinosine in experimental human rhinovirus infection. (3/29)

The prophylactic efficacy of isoprinosine was evaluated in a double-blind fashion in volunteers challenged with two types of rhinovirus. In the rhinovirus 44 and 32 trials, each of 9 men received a placebo, and eight and 11 men received the drug, respectively. Oral isoprinosine, 6 g a day, was given for 2 days prior to intranasal challenge with 100 mean tissue culture infective doses of the virus and for 7 postchallenge days. In both trials the occurrence and severity of colds were greater in the placebo group, but the difference between the two groups was not significant. Higher antibody titers for both viruses and a greater number of rhinovirus 32 isolations were demonstrated in the drug group but without statistically significant differences. The prophylactic isoprinosine treatment may suppress the cold syndrome, but its effect was not convincingly apparent.  (+info)

Role of CSF serology in follow-up of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis patients on treatment. (4/29)

Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) is a progressive inflammatory disease of the central nervous system with poor prognosis and high mortality. No effective treatment has a proven role; oral isoprinosine and intrathecal administration of alpha-interferon may prolong survival. We report an unusual case of adult onset SSPE patient on treatment with significant clinical improvement, even in the absence of conversion to seronegativity in either CSF or serum, on follow-up serological examination.  (+info)

Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of inosine pranobex in rheumatoid arthritis. (5/29)

In a randomised, placebo controlled, double blind study inosine pranobex was assessed as a possible second line drug in rheumatoid arthritis. Twenty four patients received inosine pranobex (3 g/day) and 26 patients received placebo for up to 24 weeks. Morning stiffness, articular index, grip strength, pain score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein, IgG, IgM, and serum urate were assessed at weeks 0, 12, and 24. Baseline characteristics were similar except for a significantly higher C reactive protein in the placebo group. No significant improvement occurred in any variable: (a) when comparing week 0 with week 12 or week 24 for either group, (b) comparing active drug with placebo at week 12 or 24, or (c) taking all 50 patients as one group. Withdrawal from the study for lack of response or side effects was similar in both groups. Serum urate increased transiently but significantly with inosine pranobex (a recognised side effect). It is concluded that inosine pranobex has no second line activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Further, 50 patients effectively given placebo showed no spontaneous improvement in their disease activity.  (+info)

The efficacy of inosine pranobex in preventing the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The Scandinavian Isoprinosine Study Group. (6/29)

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of inosine pranobex (Isoprinosine) [corrected] in the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection but without manifest acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). A total of 866 patients were enrolled in 21 centers in Denmark and Sweden. The patients were stratified in three groups according to their CD4+ cell count and randomly assigned to receive either inosine pranobex (1 g three times a day) (n = 429) or matching placebo (n = 437) for 24 weeks. Of the 831 patients who could be evaluated, AIDS developed in 17 in the placebo group as compared with 2 in the inosine pranobex group (P less than 0.001; odds ratio, 8.6 [95 percent confidence limits, 2.2 and 52.6]). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to changes in CD4+ cell count or the development of other HIV-related conditions, with the exception of thrush, which developed in fewer patients in the inosine pranobex group (P = 0.05). No serious side effects were observed. We conclude that treatment with inosine pranobex delays progression to AIDS in patients with HIV infection. The duration of this beneficial effect, the optimal dose, and the mode of action of inosine pranobex remain to be clarified.  (+info)

Inosiplex for treatment of alopecia areata: a randomized placebo-controlled study. (7/29)

Treatment of alopecia areata remains unsatisfactory. We decided to test if systemic therapy with inosiplex (Isoprinosine(R)), an immunomodulator could influence the disease. Thirty-two subjects with recalcitrant alopecia areata, aged 16-48 years (mean 30.3+/-5.1 years), were randomized into two treatment groups of 16 subjects each. They were assigned to receive either oral inosiplex (group 1), or placebo (group 2) on a double-blind basis. Inosiplex dosage was 50 mg/kg/day in five divided doses for 12 weeks. Of the 15 evaluable patients in group 1, 5 (33.3%) had full remission, 8 (53.3%) responded partially and 2 (13.3%) did not respond. Of the 14 evaluable patients in the placebo group, none had full remission, 4 (28.5%) responded partially and 10 (71.4%) did not respond. The therapeutic difference between patients receiving active and placebo therapy was statistically significant (?2=7.82, p<0.01). Compared with placebo, oral inosiplex showed considerable efficacy in alopecia areata with insignificant side-effects. Larger studies are required, however, before inosiplex may be recommended as an efficacious and safe alternative systemic form of therapy for recalcitrant alopecia areata.  (+info)

Protective effect of isoprinosine in genetically susceptible BALB/c mice infected with Leishmania major. (8/29)

The effects of an immunopotentiating drug Inosine Pranobex (isoprinosine) were investigated in an experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis model. The highly susceptible BALB/c mice treated orally with isoprinosine developed significantly delayed onset of disease when infected with Leishmania major compared to untreated mice. The drug itself is not toxic to the parasite up to millimolar levels in vitro. The increase in resistance to L. major infection is accompanied by a marked decrease in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and the leishmanial antigen-specific proliferative response of the spleen cells of isoprinosine-treated mice compared to untreated mice. There was a significant increase in the production of IFN-gamma but a decrease in the secretion of IL-3 and IL-4 by the spleen cells of isoprinosine-treated mice in response to concanavalin A with or without L. major infection compared to untreated controls. There was, however, no significant difference in the level of IL-2 production by the spleen cells between mice with or without isoprinosine treatment. These data are consistent with the interpretation that isoprinosine potentiates the resistance to leishmanial infection by up-regulating the host-protective Th1 cells and down-regulating the disease-promoting Th2 cells or, alternatively, by increasing CD8+ T-cell function.  (+info)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4