Committees established by professional societies, health facilities, or other institutions to consider decisions that have bioethical implications. The role of these committees may include consultation, education, mediation, and/or review of policies and practices. Committees that consider the ethical dimensions of patient care are ETHICS COMMITTEES, CLINICAL; committees established to protect the welfare of research subjects are ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH.
Hospital or other institutional committees established to protect the welfare of research subjects. Federal regulations (the "Common Rule" (45 CFR 46)) mandate the use of these committees to monitor federally-funded biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects.
Hospital or other institutional ethics committees established to consider the ethical dimensions of patient care. Distinguish from ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH, which are established to monitor the welfare of patients or healthy volunteers participating in research studies.
A formal process of examination of patient care or research proposals for conformity with ethical standards. The review is usually conducted by an organized clinical or research ethics committee (CLINICAL ETHICS COMMITTEES or RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES), sometimes by a subset of such a committee, an ad hoc group, or an individual ethicist (ETHICISTS).
The composition of a committee; the state or status of being a member of a committee.
The principles of professional conduct concerning the rights and duties of the physician, relations with patients and fellow practitioners, as well as actions of the physician in patient care and interpersonal relations with patient families.
Services provided by an individual ethicist (ETHICISTS) or an ethics team or committee (ETHICS COMMITTEES, CLINICAL) to address the ethical issues involved in a specific clinical case. The central purpose is to improve the process and outcomes of patients' care by helping to identify, analyze, and resolve ethical problems.
The moral obligations governing the conduct of research. Used for discussions of research ethics as a general topic.
The use of humans as investigational subjects.
The identification, analysis, and resolution of moral problems that arise in the care of patients. (Bioethics Thesaurus)
The moral and ethical obligations or responsibilities of institutions.
Committees of professional personnel who have responsibility for determining policies, procedures, and controls related to professional matters in health facilities.
Persons trained in philosophical or theological ethics who work in clinical, research, public policy, or other settings where they bring their expertise to bear on the analysis of ethical dilemmas in policies or cases. (Bioethics Thesaurus)
The philosophy or code pertaining to what is ideal in human character and conduct. Also, the field of study dealing with the principles of morality.
Clusters of topics that fall within the domain of BIOETHICS, the field of study concerned with value questions that arise in biomedicine and health care delivery.
Persons who are enrolled in research studies or who are otherwise the subjects of research.
Voluntary authorization, by a patient or research subject, with full comprehension of the risks involved, for diagnostic or investigative procedures, and for medical and surgical treatment.
The principles of proper professional conduct concerning the rights and duties of nurses themselves, their patients, and their fellow practitioners, as well as their actions in the care of patients and in relations with their families.
Committees established to review interim data and efficacy outcomes in clinical trials. The findings of these committees are used in deciding whether a trial should be continued as designed, changed, or terminated. Government regulations regarding federally-funded research involving human subjects (the "Common Rule") require (45 CFR 46.111) that research ethics committees reviewing large-scale clinical trials monitor the data collected using a mechanism such as a data monitoring committee. FDA regulations (21 CFR 50.24) require that such committees be established to monitor studies conducted in emergency settings.
The principles of proper conduct concerning the rights and duties of the professional, relations with patients or consumers and fellow practitioners, as well as actions of the professional and interpersonal relations with patient or consumer families. (From Stedman, 25th ed)
Human experimentation that is not intended to benefit the subjects on whom it is performed. Phase I drug studies (CLINICAL TRIALS, PHASE I AS TOPIC) and research involving healthy volunteers are examples of nontherapeutic human experimentation.
Institutional committees established to protect the welfare of animals used in research and education. The 1971 NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals introduced the policy that institutions using warm-blooded animals in projects supported by NIH grants either be accredited by a recognized professional laboratory animal accrediting body or establish its own committee to evaluate animal care; the Public Health Service adopted a policy in 1979 requiring such committees; and the 1985 amendments to the Animal Welfare Act mandate review and approval of federally funded research with animals by a formally designated Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
The use of systematic methods of ethical examination, such as CASUISTRY or ETHICAL THEORY, in reasoning about moral problems.
Fundamental claims of patients, as expressed in statutes, declarations, or generally accepted moral principles. (Bioethics Thesaurus) The term is used for discussions of patient rights as a group of many rights, as in a hospital's posting of a list of patient rights.
Human experimentation that is intended to benefit the subjects on whom it is performed.
The state or quality of being kind, charitable, or beneficial. (from American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed). The ethical principle of BENEFICENCE requires producing net benefit over harm. (Bioethics Thesaurus)
The use of animals as investigational subjects.
An approach to ethics that focuses on theories of the importance of general principles such as respect for autonomy, beneficence/nonmaleficence, and justice.
A branch of applied ethics that studies the value implications of practices and developments in life sciences, medicine, and health care.
Groups set up to advise governmental bodies, societies, or other institutions on policy. (Bioethics Thesaurus)
Self-directing freedom and especially moral independence. An ethical principle holds that the autonomy of persons ought to be respected. (Bioethics Thesaurus)
The informal or formal organization of a group of people based on a network of personal relationships which is influenced by the size and composition, etc., of the group.
A philosophically coherent set of propositions (for example, utilitarianism) which attempts to provide general norms for the guidance and evaluation of moral conduct. (from Beauchamp and Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed)
Research that involves the application of the natural sciences, especially biology and physiology, to medicine.
The obligations and accountability assumed in carrying out actions or ideas on behalf of others.
Documents describing a medical treatment or research project, including proposed procedures, risks, and alternatives, that are to be signed by an individual, or the individual's proxy, to indicate his/her understanding of the document and a willingness to undergo the treatment or to participate in the research.
Research that involves the application of the behavioral and social sciences to the study of the actions or reactions of persons or animals in response to external or internal stimuli. (from American Heritage Dictionary, 4th ed)
The principles of proper professional conduct concerning the rights and duties of the dentist, relations with patients and fellow practitioners, as well as actions of the dentist in patient care and interpersonal relations with patient families. (From Stedman, 25th ed)
Duties that are based in ETHICS, rather than in law.
Exercise of governmental authority to control conduct.
The privacy of information and its protection against unauthorized disclosure.
A legal concept for individuals who are designated to act on behalf of persons who are considered incapable of acting in their own behalf, e.g., minors and persons found to be not mentally competent.
Differences of opinion or disagreements that may arise, for example, between health professionals and patients or their families, or against a political regime.
Interference with the FREEDOM or PERSONAL AUTONOMY of another person, with justifications referring to the promotion of the person's good or the prevention of harm to the person. (from Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 1995); more generally, not allowing a person to make decisions on his or her own behalf.
The evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. Peer review is used by editors in deciding which submissions warrant publication, by granting agencies to determine which proposals should be funded, and by academic institutions in tenure decisions.
The guidelines and policy statements set forth by the editor(s) or editorial board of a publication.
Members of a religious denomination founded in the United States during the late 19th century in which active evangelism is practiced, the imminent approach of the millennium is preached, and war and organized government authority in matters of conscience are strongly opposed (from American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed). Jehovah's Witnesses generally refuse blood transfusions and other blood-based treatments based on religious belief.
An international agreement of the World Medical Association which offers guidelines for conducting experiments using human subjects. It was adopted in 1962 and revised by the 18th World Medical Assembly at Helsinki, Finland in 1964. Subsequent revisions were made in 1975, 1983, 1989, and 1996. (From Encyclopedia of Bioethics, rev ed, 1995)
'Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499' is a term used to describe healthcare facilities that have a bed capacity ranging between three hundred to four hundred and ninety-nine beds, which enables them to accommodate and manage a substantial number of patients while providing essential medical services.'
A situation in which an individual might benefit personally from official or professional actions. It includes a conflict between a person's private interests and official responsibilities in a position of trust. The term is not restricted to government officials. The concept refers both to actual conflict of interest and the appearance or perception of conflict.
A systematic statement of policy rules or principles. Guidelines may be developed by government agencies at any level, institutions, professional societies, governing boards, or by convening expert panels. The text may be cursive or in outline form but is generally a comprehensive guide to problems and approaches in any field of activity. For guidelines in the field of health care and clinical medicine, PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC is available.
Control which is exerted by the more stable organizations of society, such as established institutions and the law. They are ordinarily embodied in definite codes, usually written.
Informed consent given by a parent on behalf of a minor or otherwise incompetent child.
Critical and exhaustive investigation or experimentation, having for its aim the discovery of new facts and their correct interpretation, the revision of accepted conclusions, theories, or laws in the light of newly discovered facts, or the practical application of such new or revised conclusions, theories, or laws. (Webster, 3d ed)
Works about controlled studies which are planned and carried out by several cooperating institutions to assess certain variables and outcomes in specific patient populations, for example, a multicenter study of congenital anomalies in children.
Works about pre-planned studies of the safety, efficacy, or optimum dosage schedule (if appropriate) of one or more diagnostic, therapeutic, or prophylactic drugs, devices, or techniques selected according to predetermined criteria of eligibility and observed for predefined evidence of favorable and unfavorable effects. This concept includes clinical trials conducted both in the U.S. and in other countries.
A self-governing territory formed from the central and eastern portions of the Northwest Territories. It was officially established April 1, 1999. The capital is Iqaluit.
The act or practice of killing or allowing death from natural causes, for reasons of mercy, i.e., in order to release a person from incurable disease, intolerable suffering, or undignified death. (from Beauchamp and Walters, Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, 5th ed)
Testing in which the source of the specimen or the person being tested is not individually identified.
The rights of the individual to cultural, social, economic, and educational opportunities as provided by society, e.g., right to work, right to education, and right to social security.
Revealing of information, by oral or written communication.
A plan for collecting and utilizing data so that desired information can be obtained with sufficient precision or so that an hypothesis can be tested properly.
Withholding or withdrawal of a particular treatment or treatments, often (but not necessarily) life-prolonging treatment, from a patient or from a research subject as part of a research protocol. The concept is differentiated from REFUSAL TO TREAT, where the emphasis is on the health professional's or health facility's refusal to treat a patient or group of patients when the patient or the patient's representative requests treatment. Withholding of life-prolonging treatment is usually indexed only with EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE, unless the distinction between withholding and withdrawing treatment, or the issue of withholding palliative rather than curative treatment, is discussed.
Great Britain is not a medical term, but a geographical name for the largest island in the British Isles, which comprises England, Scotland, and Wales, forming the major part of the United Kingdom.
Standards of conduct that distinguish right from wrong.
Accountability and responsibility to another, enforceable by civil or criminal sanctions.
A person who has not attained the age at which full civil rights are accorded.
Precise and detailed plans for the study of a medical or biomedical problem and/or plans for a regimen of therapy.
Promotion and protection of the rights of patients, frequently through a legal process.
An advisory group composed primarily of staff physicians and the pharmacist which serves as the communication link between the medical staff and the pharmacy department.
Those individuals engaged in research.
The process by which decisions are made in an institution or other organization.
Persons whose profession is to give legal advice and assistance to clients and represent them in legal matters. (American Heritage Dictionary, 3d ed)
A course or method of action selected, usually by an organization, institution, university, society, etc., from among alternatives to guide and determine present and future decisions and positions on matters of public interest or social concern. It does not include internal policy relating to organization and administration within the corporate body, for which ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION is available.
Financial support of research activities.
The quality or state of relating to or affecting two or more nations. (After Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary, 10th ed)
The commitment in writing, as authentic evidence, of something having legal importance. The concept includes certificates of birth, death, etc., as well as hospital, medical, and other institutional records.
The level of governmental organization and function at the national or country-wide level.
Character traits that are considered to be morally praiseworthy. (Bioethics Thesaurus)
Research into the cause, transmission, amelioration, elimination, or enhancement of inherited disorders and traits.
The process by which individuals internalize standards of right and wrong conduct.
The circulation or wide dispersal of information.
Payment, or other means of making amends, for a wrong or injury.
The process of making a selective intellectual judgment when presented with several complex alternatives consisting of several variables, and usually defining a course of action or an idea.
The study of religion and religious belief, or a particular system or school of religious beliefs and teachings (from online Cambridge Dictionary of American English, 2000 and WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, 1997)
Management of the internal organization of the hospital.
An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.
Large hospitals with a resident medical staff which provides continuous care to maternity, surgical and medical patients.
The interaction of persons or groups of persons representing various nations in the pursuit of a common goal or interest.
"The business or profession of the commercial production and issuance of literature" (Webster's 3d). It includes the publisher, publication processes, editing and editors. Production may be by conventional printing methods or by electronic publishing.
Abstract standards or empirical variables in social life which are believed to be important and/or desirable.
That segment of commercial enterprise devoted to the design, development, and manufacture of chemical products for use in the diagnosis and treatment of disease, disability, or other dysfunction, or to improve function.
Any process by which toxicity, metabolism, absorption, elimination, preferred route of administration, safe dosage range, etc., for a drug or group of drugs is determined through clinical assessment in humans or veterinary animals.
I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Germany" is a country and not a medical term or concept. Therefore, it doesn't have a medical definition. It is located in Central Europe and is known for its advanced medical research and facilities.
Predetermined sets of questions used to collect data - clinical data, social status, occupational group, etc. The term is often applied to a self-completed survey instrument.
The expected and characteristic pattern of behavior exhibited by an individual as a member of a particular social group.
The state or condition of being a human individual accorded moral and/or legal rights. Criteria to be used to determine this status are subject to debate, and range from the requirement of simply being a human organism to such requirements as that the individual be self-aware and capable of rational thought and moral agency.
Medical philosophy is a branch of philosophy that deals with the concepts, values, and nature of medicine, including its ethical implications, epistemological foundations, and societal impact, aimed at informing and improving medical practice, research, and education.
Criteria and standards used for the determination of the appropriateness of the inclusion of patients with specific conditions in proposed treatment plans and the criteria used for the inclusion of subjects in various clinical trials and other research protocols.
The term "United States" in a medical context often refers to the country where a patient or study participant resides, and is not a medical term per se, but relevant for epidemiological studies, healthcare policies, and understanding differences in disease prevalence, treatment patterns, and health outcomes across various geographic locations.
Societies whose membership is limited to physicians.
An interactive process whereby members of a community are concerned for the equality and rights of all.
Apparatus, devices, or supplies intended for one-time or temporary use.
The science or philosophy of law. Also, the application of the principles of law and justice to health and medicine.
A publication issued at stated, more or less regular, intervals.
A love or pursuit of wisdom. A search for the underlying causes and principles of reality. (Webster, 3d ed)
Attitudes of personnel toward their patients, other professionals, toward the medical care system, etc.
The philosophical view that conceptions of truth and moral values are not absolute but are relative to the persons or groups holding them. (from American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed)
I'm sorry for any confusion, but 'Europe' is a geographical continent and not a medical term; therefore, it doesn't have a medical definition.
I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Israel" is a country in the Middle East and does not have a medical definition. If you have any medical questions or terms you would like me to define, I'd be happy to help!
Groups of persons whose range of options is severely limited, who are frequently subjected to COERCION in their DECISION MAKING, or who may be compromised in their ability to give INFORMED CONSENT.
A system of medical care regulated, controlled and financed by the government, in which the government assumes responsibility for the health needs of the population.
Systematic gathering of data for a particular purpose from various sources, including questionnaires, interviews, observation, existing records, and electronic devices. The process is usually preliminary to statistical analysis of the data.
Violation of laws, regulations, or professional standards.
The largest country in North America, comprising 10 provinces and three territories. Its capital is Ottawa.
Societal or individual decisions about the equitable distribution of available resources.
The intrinsic moral worth ascribed to a living being. (Bioethics Thesaurus)
Failing to prevent death from natural causes, for reasons of mercy by the withdrawal or withholding of life-prolonging treatment.
The principles of proper professional conduct concerning the rights and duties of the pharmacist, relations with patients and fellow practitioners, as well as actions of the pharmacist in health care and interpersonal relations with patient families. (From Stedman, 25th ed)
Created 7 April 1992 as a result of the division of Yugoslavia.
Works about clinical trials that involve at least one test treatment and one control treatment, concurrent enrollment and follow-up of the test- and control-treated groups, and in which the treatments to be administered are selected by a random process, such as the use of a random-numbers table.
Elements of limited time intervals, contributing to particular results or situations.
Countries in the process of change with economic growth, that is, an increase in production, per capita consumption, and income. The process of economic growth involves better utilization of natural and human resources, which results in a change in the social, political, and economic structures.
The qualitative or quantitative estimation of the likelihood of adverse effects that may result from exposure to specified health hazards or from the absence of beneficial influences. (Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 1988)
The branch of philosophy that treats of first principles, including ontology (the nature of existence or being) and cosmology (the origin and structure of the universe). (From Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2d ed)
A course of study offered by an educational institution.

Selecting subjects for participation in clinical research: one sphere of justice. (1/87)

Recent guidelines from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) mandate the inclusion of adequate numbers of women in clinical trials. Ought such standards to apply internationally? Walzer's theory of justice is brought to bear on the problem, the first use of the theory in research ethics, and it argues for broad application of the principle of adequate representation. A number of practical conclusions for research ethics committees (RECs) are outlined. Eligibility criteria in clinical trials ought to be justified by trial designers. Research ethics committees ought to question criteria that seem to exclude unnecessarily women from research participation. The issue of adequate representation should be construed broadly, so as to include consideration of the representation of the elderly, persons with HIV, mental illness and substance abuse disorders in clinical research.  (+info)

How physician executives and clinicians perceive ethical issues in Saudi Arabian hospitals. (2/87)

OBJECTIVES: To compare the perceptions of physician executives and clinicians regarding ethical issues in Saudi Arabian hospitals and the attributes that might lead to the existence of these ethical issues. DESIGN: Self-completion questionnaire administered from February to July 1997. SETTING: Different health regions in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 457 physicians (317 clinicians and 140 physician executives) from several hospitals in various regions across the kingdom. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the perceptions of physician executives and clinicians regarding the existence of various ethical issues in their hospitals. The vast majority of physician executives did not perceive that seven of the eight issues addressed by the study were ethical concerns in their hospitals. However, the majority of the clinicians perceived that six of the same eight issues were ethical considerations in their hospitals. Statistically significant differences in the perceptions of physician executives and clinicians were observed in only three out of eight attributes that might possibly lead to the existence of ethical issues. The most significant attribute that was perceived to result in ethical issues was that of hospitals having a multinational staff. CONCLUSION: The study calls for the formulation of a code of ethics that will address specifically the physicians who work in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. As a more immediate initiative, it is recommended that seminars and workshops be conducted to provide physicians with an opportunity to discuss the ethical dilemmas they face in their medical practice.  (+info)

Research, ethics and conflicts of interest. (3/87)

In this paper, I have tried to develop a critique of committee procedures and conflict of interest within research advisory committees and ethical review committees (ERCs). There are specific features of conflict of interest in medical research. Scientists, communities and the subjects of research all have legitimate stakeholdings. The interests of medical scientists are particularly complex, since they are justified by the moral and physical welfare of their research subjects, while the reputations and incomes of scientists depend on the success of their science. Tensions of this kind must at times produce conflict of interest. It is important to recognise that conflicts of interest may unwittingly lead to manipulation of research subjects and their lay representatives on research committees. It is equally important to recognise distinctions between the legal and moral aspects of conflict of interest. Some practical suggestions are made which may go some way towards resolving these difficulties. They indicate what might be needed to ensure the validity of ethical discourse, and to reduce the risks associated with conflict of interest.  (+info)

Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines. (4/87)

OBJECTIVES: To review the characteristics and performance of research ethics committees in Spain in the evaluation of multicentre clinical trial drug protocols. DESIGN: A prospective study of 100 applications. SETTING: Forty-one committees reviewing clinical trial protocols, involving 50 hospitals in 25 cities. MAIN MEASURES: Protocol-related features, characteristics of research ethics committees and evaluation dynamics. RESULTS: The 100 applications involved 15 protocols (of which 12 were multinational) with 12 drugs. Committees met monthly (except one). They had a mean number of 12 members, requested a mean of six complete dossiers and nine additional copies of the protocol with a mean deadline of 14 days before the meeting. All applications were approved except three (two of the three were open-label long-term safety trials rejected by the same committee), which were approved by the other committees involved. The mean time from submission to approval was 64 days. The mean time from submission to arrival of the approval document at our offices was 85 days. Twenty-five committees raised queries for 38 of the 97 finally approved applications. Impact of evaluation fee, number of members, queries raised and experience of committees on timings were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Obtaining ethical approval is time-consuming. There is much diversity in the research ethics committees' performance. A remarkable delay (> 20 days) exists between the decision and the arrival of the written approval, suggesting administrative or organisational problems.  (+info)

Responses by four Local Research Ethics Committees to submitted proposals. (5/87)

BACKGROUND: There is relatively little research concerning the processes whereby Local Research Ethics Committees discharge their responsibilities towards society, potential participants and investigators. OBJECTIVES: To examine the criteria used by LRECs in arriving at their decisions concerning approval of research protocols through an analysis of letters sent to investigators. DESIGN: Four LRECs each provided copies of 50 letters sent to investigators after their submitted proposals had been considered by the committees. These letters were subjected to a content analysis, in which specific comments and requests for additional information and changes in the protocols were recorded and compared. FINDINGS: Overall 24% of proposals were approved without request for changes or clarifications, but this varied by committee: one committee approved only 6% of proposals without change or clarification while the others ranged from 26% to 32%. The content analyses of responses indicated that they could be placed into four categories: (i) further information for the committee to aid in their deliberations; (ii) requests for changes to the design or justification for the design used; (iii) changes to the information sheets provided to potential participants; and (iv) changes to consent procedures. Of these, alterations to information sheets were the most common type of request. These four types of response could be seen as safeguarding the wellbeing of potential participants (the principle of non-maleficence), of promoting the scientific validity of the research (the principle of beneficence), and of enhancing the rights of potential participants (the principle of autonomy). CONCLUSIONS: The committees were consistent in the types of requests they made of investigators, which can be seen as attempts to protect participants' rights and ensure the scientific validity of studies. Without an analysis of the proposals sent to the committees, however, it is difficult to account for the variation in the requirements set by the committees before approval was given.  (+info)

The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study. (6/87)

OBJECTIVE: To assess the function of the new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees and to highlight areas where improvement is still needed. DESIGN: Prospectively collected data from a multicentre study was examined with respect to the ethics review process. Administrative, financial, and time elements of the review process were audited. SETTING: A single multicentre research ethics committee and 125 local ethics committees from six regions of England. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to reply, time to approval, and number of non-local changes to the application requested. RESULTS: Only 40% of local ethics committees considered our study in the manner specified in the 1998 directive. Less than a third of committees replied within the 21 day period stipulated, although committees acting by executive subcommittee replied more quickly than those not acting by executive subcommittee. There was a tendency for executive subcommittees to approve studies in a shorter time. Local ethics committees asked for a large number of non-local changes to the application. The financial cost of applying to multiple ethics committees remains high, mainly because multiple copies of research applications are being requested. CONCLUSIONS: The new system of approval by multicentre research ethics committee for multicentre studies was introduced to reduce administrative costs, speed up the process of reviews by multiple research ethics committees, and standardise the conclusions of the local research ethics committees. Since its introduction an improvement has been seen, but the system is not yet universally functioning as intended. Ethics review still remains a hindrance to the financial resources and commencement of national studies. We strongly support the structure of review by multicentre research ethics committees but suggest that the system has yet to achieve its aims.  (+info)

Ethics consultation on demand: concepts, practical experiences and a case study. (7/87)

Despite the increasing interest in clinical ethics, ethics consultation as a professional service is still rare in Europe. In this paper I refer to examples in the United States. In Germany, university hospitals and medical faculties are still hesitant about establishing yet another "committee". One of the reasons for this hesitation lies in the ignorance that exists here about how to provide medical ethics services; another reason is that medical ethics itself is not yet institutionalised at many German universities. The most important obstacle, however, may be that medical ethics has not yet demonstrated its relevance to the needs of those caring for patients. The Centre for Ethics and Law, Freiburg, has therefore taken a different approach from that offered elsewhere: clinical ethics consultation is offered on demand, the consultation being available to clinician(s) in different forms. This paper describes our experiences with this approach; practical issues are illustrated by a case study.  (+info)

Costs of seeking ethics approval before and after the introduction of multicentre research ethics committees. (8/87)

With the advent of multicentre research ethics committees in the UK, local research ethics committees (LRECs) are required to advise only on issues relating to the local acceptability of a project. We looked at the handling of two commercially sponsored studies, one initiated before the change and one after, confining the analysis to 21 LRECs approached in both. As judged by the amount of paper per application, the new system for LRECs is simpler and should be less costly. However, there was an increasing tendency for LRECs to charge for their services (30% study 1, 47% study 2) and these charges varied by more than 400%. If such fees must be levied, a common scale is desirable.  (+info)

Ethics committees, also known as institutional review boards (IRBs), are groups responsible for reviewing and approving research studies involving human subjects. The primary goal of these committees is to ensure that the rights and welfare of study participants are protected, and that the research is conducted in an ethical manner.

Ethics committees typically consist of a diverse group of individuals with expertise in various fields, such as medicine, law, ethics, and community representation. They review the proposed research protocol, informed consent documents, and other relevant materials to ensure that they meet ethical standards and regulations.

The committee assesses several key factors when reviewing a study, including:

1. Risks vs. benefits: The potential risks of the study must be minimized and reasonable in relation to the anticipated benefits.
2. Informed consent: Participants must be adequately informed about the study's purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits, and provide their voluntary consent.
3. Selection and recruitment: Participants should be selected fairly and without discrimination, and recruitment methods should be unbiased.
4. Confidentiality: The privacy and confidentiality of participants' information must be protected throughout the study.
5. Monitoring and reporting: There should be mechanisms in place for monitoring the study's progress and ensuring that any adverse events are reported and addressed promptly.

Ethics committees play a critical role in protecting human subjects and upholding ethical standards in research. They provide oversight and guidance to researchers, helping to ensure that studies are conducted with integrity and respect for participants' rights and welfare.

An Ethics Committee for Research, also known as an Institutional Review Board (IRB), is a group that has been formally designated to review, approve, monitor, and revise biomedical and behavioral research involving humans. The purpose of the committee is to ensure that the rights and welfare of the participants are protected and that the risks involved in the research are minimized and reasonable in relation to the anticipated benefits.

The committee typically includes members with various backgrounds, including scientists, non-scientists, and community members. They review the research protocol, informed consent documents, and any other relevant materials to ensure that they meet ethical standards and regulations. The committee also monitors the progress of the research to ensure that it continues to be conducted in an ethical manner.

The role of ethics committees for research is critical in protecting human subjects from harm and ensuring that research is conducted with integrity, respect, and transparency.

An Ethics Committee in a clinical setting, also known as an Institutional Review Board (IRB), is a group that reviews and monitors biomedical and behavioral research involving humans to ensure that it is conducted ethically. The committee's role is to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects by ensuring that the risks of participation in research are minimized and that the potential benefits of the research are maximized.

The committee reviews the proposed research protocol, informed consent documents, and other study-related materials to ensure that they meet ethical standards and comply with federal regulations. The committee also monitors the conduct of the research to ensure that it is being carried out in accordance with the approved protocol and that any adverse events are reported and addressed promptly.

The members of an Ethics Committee typically include physicians, nurses, scientists, ethicists, and community members, and they may also seek input from other experts as needed. The committee operates independently of the researcher and has the authority to approve, require modifications to, or disapprove the research.

An ethical review is the process of evaluating and assessing a research study or project that involves human participants, medical interventions, or personal data, to ensure that it is conducted in accordance with ethical principles and standards. The purpose of an ethical review is to protect the rights and welfare of the participants and to minimize any potential harm or risks associated with the research.

The ethical review is typically conducted by an independent committee called an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Research Ethics Committee (REC), or Ethics Review Board (ERB). The committee reviews the study protocol, informed consent procedures, recruitment methods, data collection and management plans, and potential conflicts of interest.

The ethical review process is guided by several key principles, including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. These principles require that researchers obtain informed consent from participants, avoid causing harm, minimize risks, maximize benefits, and ensure fairness in the selection and treatment of research participants.

Overall, an ethical review is a critical component of responsible conduct in research and helps to ensure that studies are conducted with integrity, transparency, and respect for the rights and welfare of human participants.

Committee membership, in a medical context, refers to the role of an individual serving on a committee that is responsible for making decisions or providing guidance related to medical issues or healthcare delivery. This could include committees within a hospital or healthcare organization, professional medical societies, or governmental bodies. Committee members may be involved in developing policies, guidelines, or standards; overseeing research or quality improvement initiatives; or addressing ethical or regulatory concerns. Membership on such committees is often composed of medical professionals with relevant expertise and experience.

Medical ethics is a branch of ethics that deals with moral issues in medical care, research, and practice. It provides a framework for addressing questions related to patient autonomy, informed consent, confidentiality, distributive justice, beneficentia (doing good), and non-maleficence (not doing harm). Medical ethics also involves the application of ethical principles such as respect for persons, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice to specific medical cases and situations. It is a crucial component of medical education and practice, helping healthcare professionals make informed decisions that promote patient well-being while respecting their rights and dignity.

An ethics consultation is a process in which healthcare professionals seek guidance and advice on ethical issues related to patient care from an expert panel or individual with specialized knowledge and training in medical ethics. The consultation may be requested by any member of the healthcare team, as well as patients and their families, when there are concerns about moral values, principles, and duties that arise during clinical decision-making.

The primary goal of an ethics consultation is to identify and analyze ethical dilemmas, clarify relevant ethical considerations, and provide recommendations for a course of action that respects the autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice for all parties involved. The process typically involves gathering information about the case, identifying key ethical issues, consulting with relevant stakeholders, and formulating a plan to address the concerns raised.

Ethics consultations can be helpful in situations where there is disagreement among healthcare providers or between patients and their caregivers regarding treatment options, goals of care, end-of-life decisions, informed consent, confidentiality, resource allocation, and other ethical challenges that arise in clinical practice. The recommendations provided by an ethics consultation are advisory in nature and do not replace the legal or professional responsibilities of healthcare providers.

Research ethics refers to the principles and guidelines that govern the conduct of research involving human participants or animals. The overarching goal of research ethics is to ensure that research is conducted in a way that respects the autonomy, dignity, and well-being of all those involved. Research ethics are designed to prevent harm, promote fairness, and maintain trust between researchers and study participants.

Some key principles of research ethics include:

1. Respect for Persons: This means treating all individuals with respect and dignity, and recognizing their autonomy and right to make informed decisions about participating in research.
2. Beneficence: Researchers have a duty to maximize the benefits of research while minimizing potential harms.
3. Justice: Research should be conducted fairly, without discrimination or bias, and should benefit all those who are affected by it.
4. Confidentiality: Researchers must protect the privacy and confidentiality of study participants, including their personal information and data.
5. Informed Consent: Participants must give their voluntary and informed consent to participate in research, after being fully informed about the nature of the study, its risks and benefits, and their rights as a participant.

Research ethics are typically overseen by institutional review boards (IRBs) or research ethics committees (RECs), which review research proposals and monitor ongoing studies to ensure that they comply with ethical guidelines. Researchers who violate these guidelines may face sanctions, including loss of funding, suspension or revocation of their research privileges, or legal action.

Human experimentation is a branch of medical research that involves conducting experiments on human subjects. According to the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki, which sets ethical standards for medical research involving human subjects, human experimentation is defined as "systematic study designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge."

Human experimentation can take many forms, including clinical trials of new drugs or medical devices, observational studies, and interventional studies. In all cases, the principles of informed consent, risk minimization, and respect for the autonomy and dignity of the research subjects must be strictly adhered to.

Human experimentation has a controversial history, with many instances of unethical practices and abuse, such as the notorious Tuskegee syphilis study in which African American men were deliberately left untreated for syphilis without their informed consent. As a result, there are strict regulations and guidelines governing human experimentation to ensure that it is conducted ethically and with the utmost respect for the rights and welfare of research subjects.

Clinical ethics refers to the branch of applied ethics that deals with ethical issues in clinical settings, such as hospitals and other healthcare facilities. It involves the application of moral principles and values to decision-making in clinical practice, with the aim of promoting patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.

Clinical ethics often involves addressing complex ethical dilemmas that arise in the context of patient care, such as end-of-life decisions, informed consent, confidentiality, resource allocation, and research involving human subjects. Clinical ethicists may work as part of an institutional ethics committee or provide consultation services to healthcare providers, patients, and families facing ethical challenges.

The principles of clinical ethics are grounded in respect for patient autonomy, which includes the right to make informed decisions about their own care. Beneficence refers to the obligation to act in the best interests of the patient, while non-maleficence involves avoiding harm to the patient. Justice requires fair and equitable distribution of healthcare resources and respect for the rights and dignity of all patients.

Effective clinical ethics decision-making also involves careful consideration of contextual factors, such as cultural differences, religious beliefs, and social values, that may influence ethical judgments in particular cases. Clinical ethicists use a variety of methods to analyze ethical issues, including case consultation, ethical analysis frameworks, and moral deliberation processes that involve all stakeholders in the decision-making process.

Institutional ethics refers to the ethical principles, guidelines, and practices that are established and implemented within organizations or institutions, particularly those involved in healthcare, research, and other fields where ethical considerations are paramount. Institutional ethics committees (IECs) or institutional review boards (IRBs) are often established to oversee and ensure the ethical conduct of research, clinical trials, and other activities within the institution.

Institutional ethics committees typically consist of a multidisciplinary group of individuals who represent various stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, researchers, community members, and ethicists. The committee's role is to review and approve proposed research studies, ensure that they adhere to ethical guidelines and regulations, protect the rights and welfare of study participants, and monitor ongoing research to identify and address any ethical concerns that may arise during the course of the study.

Institutional ethics also encompasses broader organizational values, policies, and practices that promote ethical behavior and decision-making within the institution. This includes developing and implementing codes of conduct, providing education and training on ethical issues, fostering a culture of transparency and accountability, and promoting open communication and dialogue around ethical concerns.

Overall, institutional ethics plays a critical role in ensuring that organizations and institutions operate in an ethically responsible manner, promote the well-being of their stakeholders, and maintain public trust and confidence.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Professional Staff Committees" is not a medical term or concept. Instead, it likely refers to committees made up of professional staff members in a hospital, healthcare organization, or other professional setting. These committees typically consist of department heads, managers, and other experienced professionals who collaborate on various aspects of organizational operations, such as policy-making, quality improvement, patient care standards, and staff development. They serve as platforms for discussion, decision-making, and problem-solving to ensure the smooth functioning and continuous improvement of the organization's services.

An ethicist is a person who specializes in the study of ethics, which involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct. In medical context, an ethicist is a person who applies ethical theories and principles to address complex issues in healthcare, medicine, and research involving clinical ethics, research ethics, and public health ethics. Medical ethicists may serve as consultants, educators, or researchers to help patients, families, healthcare professionals, and institutions analyze, clarify, and resolve ethical dilemmas related to medical care, treatment decisions, resource allocation, and policy development. They may hold various academic degrees in philosophy, theology, law, medicine, or other relevant fields, and have expertise in bioethics, moral theory, applied ethics, and clinical ethics consultation.

Ethics is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct. In the medical field, ethics refers to the principles that guide doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals in making decisions about patient care. These principles often include respect for autonomy (the right of patients to make their own decisions), non-maleficence (doing no harm), beneficence (acting in the best interests of the patient), and justice (fairness in the distribution of resources). Medical ethics may also involve considerations of confidentiality, informed consent, and end-of-life decision making.

Bioethical issues refer to the ethical dilemmas and challenges that arise in biological research, healthcare, and medical technology. These issues often involve conflicts between scientific or medical advancements and moral, social, legal, and cultural values. Examples of bioethical issues include:

1. End-of-life care: Decisions about life-sustaining treatments, such as artificial nutrition and hydration, mechanical ventilation, and do-not-resuscitate orders, can raise ethical questions about the quality of life, patient autonomy, and the role of healthcare providers.
2. Genetic testing and screening: The use of genetic information for medical decision-making, predictive testing, and reproductive choices can have significant implications for individuals, families, and society, raising concerns about privacy, discrimination, and informed consent.
3. Organ transplantation: Issues surrounding organ donation and allocation, such as fairness, scarcity, and the definition of death, can create ethical dilemmas that require careful consideration of medical, legal, and moral principles.
4. Stem cell research: The use of embryonic stem cells for research and therapy raises questions about the moral status of embryos, potential therapeutic benefits, and the role of government in regulating scientific research.
5. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART): Techniques such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), surrogacy, and gamete donation can challenge traditional notions of family, parenthood, and reproduction, leading to debates about the rights and interests of children, parents, and society.
6. Mental health treatment: The use of psychotropic medications, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and other interventions for mental illness can raise concerns about patient autonomy, informed consent, and the balance between therapeutic benefits and potential risks.
7. Public health emergencies: Responses to infectious disease outbreaks, bioterrorism, and other public health crises can involve difficult decisions about resource allocation, individual rights, and the role of government in protecting population health.
8. Research involving human subjects: The ethical conduct of clinical trials, observational studies, and other research that involves human participants requires careful consideration of issues such as informed consent, risk-benefit analysis, and respect for participant autonomy and privacy.
9. Health care access and financing: Debates about health care reform, insurance coverage, and affordability can raise questions about the role of government in ensuring access to essential medical services, the balance between individual rights and social responsibility, and the ethical implications of rationing limited resources.
10. Global health ethics: Issues such as international cooperation, resource distribution, and cultural sensitivity can challenge traditional notions of global justice, human rights, and the responsibilities of wealthy nations to address health disparities in low- and middle-income countries.

A research subject, also commonly referred to as a "human subject" or "participant," is an individual who takes part in a research study or clinical trial. Research subjects are essential for the advancement of medical and scientific knowledge, as they provide data that can help researchers understand various phenomena, develop new treatments, and improve existing ones.

The term "research subject" emphasizes the ethical considerations involved in conducting research with human participants. It highlights the importance of protecting their rights, dignity, and well-being throughout the study. Researchers must obtain informed consent from subjects before enrolling them in a study, ensuring that they understand the purpose, procedures, potential risks, and benefits associated with the research.

Additionally, researchers are required to follow strict guidelines and regulations to minimize any harm or discomfort to the research subjects during the study. These guidelines may include requirements for data confidentiality, privacy protection, and monitoring of adverse events. Overall, treating research subjects with respect and care is crucial in maintaining the integrity of medical research and ensuring its societal benefits.

Informed consent is a process in medical care where patients are provided with all relevant information about their health status, proposed treatments, potential risks and benefits, and alternative options. This allows patients to make informed decisions regarding their healthcare and understand the consequences of their choices. The process includes ensuring that the patient has adequate mental capacity to make such decisions, is fully aware of the implications, and gives their voluntary agreement for the proposed treatment or procedure. It's a fundamental principle in medical ethics and is required by law in many jurisdictions to protect patients' rights.

Nursing ethics refers to the principles that guide the behavior and decision-making of nurses in their practice. These principles are based on values such as respect for autonomy, non-maleficence (do no harm), beneficence (do good), justice, and veracity (truthfulness). Nursing ethics provides a framework for nurses to make decisions that promote the health and well-being of their patients while also respecting their rights and dignity.

Nurses may encounter ethical dilemmas in their practice, such as when there is conflict between the interests of different patients or between the interests of the patient and those of the nurse or healthcare organization. In these situations, nurses are expected to engage in a process of ethical reasoning and decision-making that involves identifying the ethical issues involved, considering the relevant ethical principles and values, and seeking input from colleagues and other stakeholders as appropriate.

Nursing ethics is an essential component of nursing practice and education, and it is closely linked to broader bioethical considerations related to healthcare and medical research. Nurses are expected to be familiar with relevant ethical guidelines and regulations, such as those established by professional organizations and regulatory bodies, and to engage in ongoing reflection and learning to maintain and develop their ethical competence.

A Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committee (DTMC), also known as a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), is a group of independent experts that oversees the safety and efficacy data of a clinical trial. The committee's primary role is to protect the interests of the study participants and ensure the integrity of the trial by regularly reviewing accumulating data during the trial.

The DTMC typically includes clinicians, statisticians, and other experts who are not involved in the design or conduct of the trial. They review unblinded data from the trial to assess whether any safety concerns have arisen, such as unexpected adverse events, or whether there is evidence that the experimental intervention is significantly more effective or harmful than the control group.

Based on their review, the DTMC may recommend changes to the trial protocol, such as modifying the dose of the experimental intervention, adding or removing study sites, or stopping the trial early if there is clear evidence of benefit or harm. The committee's recommendations are typically confidential and only shared with the trial sponsor and regulatory authorities.

Overall, the role of a DTMC is to ensure that clinical trials are conducted ethically and responsibly, with the safety and well-being of study participants as the top priority.

Professional ethics in the medical field are a set of principles that guide physicians and other healthcare professionals in their interactions with patients, colleagues, and society. These ethical standards are based on values such as respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. They help to ensure that medical professionals provide high-quality care that is safe, effective, and respectful of patients' rights and dignity.

Some key principles of professional ethics in medicine include:

1. Respect for autonomy: Healthcare professionals should respect patients' right to make their own decisions about their healthcare, including the right to refuse treatment.
2. Non-maleficence: Medical professionals have a duty to avoid causing harm to their patients. This includes avoiding unnecessary tests or treatments that may cause harm or waste resources.
3. Beneficence: Healthcare professionals have a duty to act in the best interests of their patients and to promote their well-being.
4. Justice: Medical professionals should treat all patients fairly and without discrimination, and should work to ensure that healthcare resources are distributed equitably.
5. Confidentiality: Medical professionals have a duty to keep patient information confidential, unless the patient gives permission to share it or there is a legal or ethical obligation to disclose it.
6. Professional competence: Medical professionals have a duty to maintain their knowledge and skills, and to provide care that meets accepted standards of practice.
7. Honesty and integrity: Medical professionals should be honest and truthful in their interactions with patients, colleagues, and other stakeholders. They should avoid conflicts of interest and should disclose any potential conflicts to patients and others.
8. Responsibility to society: Medical professionals have a responsibility to contribute to the health and well-being of society as a whole, including advocating for policies that promote public health and addressing health disparities.

Nontherapeutic human experimentation refers to medical research studies in which the primary goal is not to directly benefit the participants, but rather to advance scientific knowledge or develop new medical technologies. These studies often involve some level of risk or discomfort for the participants, and may include the administration of experimental treatments, procedures, or interventions.

Nontherapeutic human experimentation can take many forms, including clinical trials, observational studies, and other types of research involving human subjects. In these studies, researchers must carefully weigh the potential benefits of the research against the risks to the participants, and ensure that all participants are fully informed of the nature of the study, its purposes, and any potential risks or benefits before providing their consent to participate.

It's important to note that nontherapeutic human experimentation is subject to strict ethical guidelines and regulations, designed to protect the rights and welfare of research participants. These guidelines and regulations are intended to ensure that all research involving human subjects is conducted in a responsible and ethical manner, with the goal of advancing scientific knowledge while minimizing harm to participants.

Animal Care Committees (ACCs), also known as Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) in the United States, are committees required by regulations to oversee the humane treatment and use of animals in research and teaching at institutions such as universities, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies.

The main responsibilities of ACCs include reviewing and approving animal use protocols, inspecting animal facilities and laboratories, ensuring compliance with relevant policies and regulations, and providing training and education to researchers and staff on the ethical treatment of animals. The members of ACCs typically include veterinarians, scientists, non-scientists, and community members who can provide a balanced perspective on the use of animals in research and teaching.

Ethical analysis is a process of evaluating and assessing the moral implications and principles surrounding a particular medical situation, treatment, or research. It involves critical thinking and consideration of various ethical theories, principles, and guidelines to determine the right course of action. The steps in an ethical analysis typically include:

1. Identifying the ethical issue: This involves recognizing and defining the problem or dilemma that requires ethical consideration.
2. Gathering relevant information: This includes gathering all necessary medical and contextual information related to the situation, including the patient's values, preferences, and cultural background.
3. Identifying stakeholders: This involves identifying all those who are affected by or have a vested interest in the ethical issue.
4. Applying ethical principles: This involves applying ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice to the situation to determine the right course of action.
5. Considering alternative courses of action: This involves exploring different options and their potential consequences for all stakeholders.
6. Making a decision: This involves weighing the various factors and coming to a conclusion about what is the right thing to do.
7. Reflecting on the decision: This involves reflecting on the decision-making process and considering whether the decision was fair, just, and respectful of all parties involved.

Ethical analysis is an essential tool for healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers to ensure that their actions are guided by moral principles and values.

Patient rights refer to the ethical principles, legal regulations, and professional guidelines that protect and ensure the autonomy, dignity, and well-being of patients during healthcare encounters. These rights encompass various aspects of patient care, including informed consent, privacy, confidentiality, access to medical records, freedom from abuse and discrimination, pain management, and communication with healthcare providers.

The specific components of patient rights may vary depending on the jurisdiction and legal framework but generally include:

1. Right to receive information: Patients have the right to obtain accurate, clear, and comprehensive information about their health status, diagnosis, treatment options, benefits, risks, and prognosis in a manner they can understand. This includes the right to ask questions and seek clarification.
2. Informed consent: Patients have the right to make informed decisions about their care based on complete and accurate information. They must be given sufficient time and support to consider their options and provide voluntary, informed consent before any treatment or procedure is performed.
3. Privacy and confidentiality: Patients have the right to privacy during medical examinations and treatments. Healthcare providers must protect patients' personal and medical information from unauthorized access, disclosure, or use.
4. Access to medical records: Patients have the right to access their medical records and obtain copies of them in a timely manner. They can also request amendments to their records if they believe there are errors or inaccuracies.
5. Freedom from discrimination: Patients have the right to receive care without discrimination based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, disability, or socioeconomic status.
6. Pain management: Patients have the right to appropriate pain assessment and management, including access to palliative and hospice care when appropriate.
7. Refusal of treatment: Patients have the right to refuse any treatment or procedure, even if it may be life-saving, as long as they are competent to make that decision and understand the consequences.
8. Communication and language assistance: Patients have the right to clear, effective communication with their healthcare providers, including access to interpreters or other necessary language assistance services.
9. Respect and dignity: Patients have the right to be treated with respect, dignity, and consideration during all aspects of their care.
10. Complaint resolution: Patients have the right to voice concerns about their care and receive timely responses from healthcare providers or institutions. They also have the right to file complaints with regulatory bodies if necessary.

Therapeutic human experimentation, also known as clinical research or clinical trials, is a branch of medical research that involves the testing of new medical treatments, drugs, devices, or procedures on human subjects. The goal of this type of research is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these interventions in order to determine whether they should be approved for use in clinical practice.

The term "therapeutic" is used to distinguish this type of research from non-therapeutic research, which does not involve direct medical benefit to the participant. In therapeutic human experimentation, participants may receive some potential direct medical benefit from their participation, although they may also experience risks or side effects.

Therapeutic human experimentation is subject to strict ethical guidelines and regulations, including informed consent, risk-benefit analysis, and independent review by ethics committees or institutional review boards (IRBs). These safeguards are designed to protect the rights and welfare of research participants and ensure that the research is conducted in a responsible and transparent manner.

Beneficence is a principle in medical ethics that means to act in the best interest of the patient. It involves providing benefits and balancing benefits against risks and harms. Healthcare providers are expected to promote well-being, prevent harm, and remove harmful conditions for their patients. Beneficence also includes considerations such as respecting autonomy, being honest and transparent, and ensuring fairness and justice in the provision of healthcare.

Animal experimentation, also known as animal testing, refers to the use of non-human animals in scientific research and testing to understand the effects of various substances, treatments, or procedures on living organisms. This practice is performed with the goal of advancing medical and veterinary knowledge, developing new medications, treatments, and surgical techniques, as well as studying basic biological processes and diseases.

In animal experimentation, researchers expose animals to specific conditions, treatments, or substances and then analyze their responses, behaviors, physiological changes, or other outcomes. The selection of animal species for these experiments depends on the research question and the similarities between the animal model and the human or target species under investigation. Commonly used animals include mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, primates, and dogs.

Animal experimentation has been instrumental in numerous scientific breakthroughs and medical advancements throughout history. However, it remains a controversial topic due to ethical concerns regarding the treatment and welfare of animals used in research. Many organizations advocate for the reduction, refinement, or replacement (3Rs) of animal testing, aiming to minimize animal suffering and find alternative methods whenever possible.

Principle-Based Ethics is a framework for moral decision-making that involves the application of several fundamental ethical principles. These principles include:

1. Respect for Autonomy: This principle recognizes and respects an individual's right to make their own decisions, as long as they do not harm others or infringe upon their rights.
2. Nonmaleficence: This principle requires that healthcare providers should not cause harm to their patients. They should avoid doing anything that could potentially harm their patients, unless the potential benefits of an action outweigh its risks.
3. Beneficence: This principle requires healthcare providers to act in the best interests of their patients and promote their well-being. Healthcare providers should take positive actions to benefit their patients and prevent harm.
4. Justice: This principle requires that healthcare resources be distributed fairly and equitably among all members of society, regardless of their social status or ability to pay.

These principles serve as a foundation for ethical decision-making in healthcare and provide guidance for making difficult moral choices. They are often used in conjunction with other ethical theories and frameworks, such as consequentialism and virtue ethics, to help healthcare providers make informed and responsible decisions that promote the well-being of their patients while also respecting their autonomy and rights.

Bioethics is a branch of ethics that deals with the ethical issues and dilemmas arising from biological and medical research and practices. It involves the study of moral principles, values, and conduct in relation to medicine, healthcare, biotechnology, and life sciences. The field of bioethics addresses questions and concerns related to topics such as end-of-life care, genetic engineering, cloning, stem cell research, organ donation, patient autonomy, informed consent, and the allocation of scarce medical resources. Bioethicists aim to provide guidance and recommendations for addressing these complex issues in a way that respects individual rights, promotes social justice, and upholds ethical integrity.

Advisory committees, in the context of medicine and healthcare, are groups of experts that provide guidance and recommendations to organizations or governmental bodies on medical and health-related matters. These committees typically consist of physicians, researchers, scientists, and other healthcare professionals who have expertise in a specific area.

Their roles can include:

1. Providing expert advice on clinical guidelines, treatment protocols, and diagnostic criteria.
2. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of medical products, such as drugs and devices.
3. Making recommendations on public health policies and regulations.
4. Assessing the impact of new research findings on clinical practice.
5. Providing education and training to healthcare professionals.

Advisory committees can be found at various levels, including within hospitals and medical institutions, as well as at the state and federal level. Their recommendations are intended to help inform decision-making and improve the quality of care delivered to patients. However, it's important to note that these committees do not have legislative or regulatory authority, and their recommendations are non-binding.

"Personal Autonomy" is not a medical term per se, but it is often used in medical ethics and patient care. It refers to the ability of an individual to make informed decisions about their own health and healthcare, based on their own values, beliefs, and preferences, without undue influence or coercion from others. This includes the right to accept or refuse medical treatment, to maintain confidentiality, and to participate in shared decision-making with healthcare providers. Personal autonomy is recognized as a fundamental principle in medical ethics and patient rights, and is protected by laws and regulations in many countries.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "group structure" is not a commonly used medical term or concept. The term "group structure" may be used in various contexts such as group therapy, support groups, or organizational structures within healthcare settings. However, it does not have a specific medical definition that applies universally.

In the context of group therapy or support groups, "group structure" might refer to the rules, roles, and dynamics that govern how the group functions and interacts. This can include aspects such as:

* Group size
* Frequency and duration of meetings
* Leadership style (e.g., leader-led vs. peer-led)
* Rules for participation and confidentiality
* Roles assumed by individual members
* Communication norms within the group

If you're referring to a different context or need more specific information, please provide additional details so I can give a more accurate response.

An ethical theory is a structured framework of principles and concepts that helps to guide and inform moral judgments and decisions about right and wrong conduct. It provides a systematic and coherent approach to understanding, analyzing, and resolving ethical issues and dilemmas in various contexts, including healthcare.

There are several types of ethical theories, but some of the most prominent ones include:

1. Deontological theory: This theory emphasizes the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions based on whether they conform to moral rules or duties, regardless of their consequences. It is often associated with the work of Immanuel Kant.
2. Utilitarianism: This theory holds that the morality of an action is determined by its overall usefulness or benefit to society as a whole, measured in terms of the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
3. Virtue ethics: This theory focuses on the character and virtues of the moral agent, rather than on specific rules or consequences. It emphasizes the importance of cultivating good habits, traits, and dispositions that contribute to a flourishing and fulfilling life.
4. Social contract theory: This theory posits that moral norms and rules emerge from mutual agreements or understandings among individuals in society, based on their shared interests and values.
5. Feminist ethics: This theory challenges traditional ethical theories by emphasizing the importance of context, relationships, and power dynamics in moral decision-making, with a focus on promoting justice and equality for marginalized groups.

In healthcare, ethical theories can help guide clinical practice, research, policy, and education, by providing a framework for addressing complex ethical issues such as informed consent, patient autonomy, confidentiality, resource allocation, and end-of-life care.

Biomedical research is a branch of scientific research that involves the study of biological processes and diseases in order to develop new treatments and therapies. This type of research often involves the use of laboratory techniques, such as cell culture and genetic engineering, as well as clinical trials in humans. The goal of biomedical research is to advance our understanding of how living organisms function and to find ways to prevent and treat various medical conditions. It encompasses a wide range of disciplines, including molecular biology, genetics, immunology, pharmacology, and neuroscience, among others. Ultimately, the aim of biomedical research is to improve human health and well-being.

I'm not able to provide a medical definition of "social responsibility" as it is not a term that has a specific meaning within the field of medicine. However, I can tell you that social responsibility generally refers to the idea that individuals and organizations have a duty to act in the best interests of society and to contribute to its overall well-being. This might involve taking actions to protect the environment, promote social justice, or support the needs of vulnerable populations. In a medical context, this could mean providing care to underserved communities, engaging in public health advocacy, or conducting research that addresses important societal issues.

Consent forms are documents used in medical settings to obtain a patient's voluntary and informed agreement to undergo a specific medical procedure, treatment, or participate in research. These forms typically outline the nature of the proposed intervention, its purpose, risks, benefits, alternatives, and any potential complications or side effects. The patient is provided with sufficient time and opportunity to ask questions, seek clarification, and discuss concerns with their healthcare provider before making a decision. By signing the consent form, the patient acknowledges that they have been fully informed about the proposed intervention and understand its implications. Consent forms serve as legal records of the patient's authorization for the medical procedure or treatment, protecting both the patient and the healthcare provider in case of any disputes or complications.

Behavioral research is a branch of scientific study that focuses on observing and analyzing the behaviors of humans and animals in various situations. This type of research aims to understand the underlying factors that influence, shape, and motivate behavior, including cognitive processes, emotional responses, and environmental influences. In medical terms, behavioral research can be used to investigate how certain behaviors or lifestyle factors may contribute to the development, prevention, or management of health conditions. This may include studying patterns of substance use, dietary habits, physical activity levels, adherence to medical treatments, and other health-related behaviors. The goal of behavioral research in a medical context is often to develop interventions or strategies that can help promote positive health behaviors and improve overall health outcomes.

Dental ethics refers to the principles and rules that guide the conduct of dental professionals in their interactions with patients, colleagues, and society. These ethical standards are designed to promote trust, respect, and fairness in dental care, and they are often based on fundamental ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.

Autonomy refers to the patient's right to make informed decisions about their own health care, free from coercion or manipulation. Dental professionals have an obligation to provide patients with accurate information about their dental conditions and treatment options, so that they can make informed choices about their care.

Beneficence means acting in the best interests of the patient, and doing what is medically necessary and appropriate to promote their health and well-being. Dental professionals have a duty to provide high-quality care that meets accepted standards of practice, and to use evidence-based treatments that are likely to be effective.

Non-maleficence means avoiding harm to the patient. Dental professionals must take reasonable precautions to prevent injuries or complications during treatment, and they should avoid providing unnecessary or harmful treatments.

Justice refers to fairness and equity in the distribution of dental resources and services. Dental professionals have an obligation to provide care that is accessible, affordable, and culturally sensitive, and to advocate for policies and practices that promote health equity and social justice.

Dental ethics also encompasses issues related to patient confidentiality, informed consent, research integrity, professional competence, and boundary violations. Dental professionals are expected to adhere to ethical guidelines established by their professional organizations, such as the American Dental Association (ADA) or the British Dental Association (BDA), and to comply with relevant laws and regulations governing dental practice.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Moral Obligations" is not a term that has a specific medical definition. The term "moral obligations" is more related to ethics and philosophy, referring to the duties or actions that are considered right or wrong based on a set of moral principles or values.

However, in a broader sense, healthcare professionals may use the term "moral obligations" to refer to their professional responsibility and commitment to providing compassionate, respectful, and high-quality care to all patients, regardless of their background, beliefs, or circumstances. This concept is closely related to medical ethics and professionalism, which provide guidelines for ethical decision-making in clinical practice.

Government regulation in the context of medicine refers to the rules, guidelines, and laws established by government agencies to control, monitor, and standardize various aspects of healthcare. These regulations are designed to protect patients, promote public health, ensure quality of care, and regulate the healthcare industry. Examples of government regulation in medicine include:

1. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations for drug approval, medical device clearance, and food safety.
2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regulations for healthcare reimbursement, quality measures, and program eligibility.
3. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations for workplace safety in healthcare settings.
4. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations to minimize environmental impacts from healthcare facilities and pharmaceutical manufacturing.
5. State medical boards' regulations for licensing, disciplining, and monitoring physicians and other healthcare professionals.
6. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations for patient privacy and data security.
7. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) regulations for laboratory testing quality and standards.
8. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulations to prevent deceptive or unfair trade practices in healthcare marketing and advertising.
9. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) guidelines for evidence-based practice and patient safety.
10. Public Health Service Act (PHSA) regulations related to infectious diseases, bioterrorism preparedness, and substance abuse treatment.

Confidentiality is a legal and ethical principle in medicine that refers to the obligation of healthcare professionals to protect the personal and sensitive information of their patients. This information, which can include medical history, diagnosis, treatment plans, and other private details, is shared between the patient and the healthcare provider with the expectation that it will be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties without the patient's consent.

Confidentiality is a fundamental component of the trust relationship between patients and healthcare providers, as it helps to ensure that patients feel safe and comfortable sharing sensitive information with their doctors, nurses, and other members of their healthcare team. It also helps to protect patients' privacy rights and uphold their autonomy in making informed decisions about their healthcare.

There are some limited circumstances in which confidentiality may be breached, such as when there is a legal obligation to report certain types of information (e.g., suspected child abuse or neglect), or when the disclosure is necessary to protect the health and safety of the patient or others. However, these exceptions are typically narrowly defined and subject to strict guidelines and safeguards to ensure that confidentiality is protected as much as possible.

A legal guardian is an individual who has been appointed by a court to make decisions on behalf of a minor child or an adult who is incapacitated and unable to make decisions for themselves. The legal guardian is responsible for ensuring the well-being and safety of the person in their care, and may be responsible for making decisions related to their education, medical treatment, financial affairs, and living arrangements.

In the context of medical care, a legal guardian may be asked to make important decisions about a patient's treatment, such as whether to consent to surgery or other medical procedures. They may also be responsible for ensuring that the patient receives appropriate medical care and follows through with recommended treatments.

It is important to note that the specific powers and responsibilities of a legal guardian can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the individual circumstances of the case. In general, however, a legal guardian is expected to act in the best interests of the person they are responsible for caring for.

"Dissent and disputes" in a medical context generally refer to disagreements or differences of opinion among healthcare professionals, researchers, or patients regarding medical diagnoses, treatments, policies, or ethical issues. These disputes can arise from various factors such as differing clinical experiences, conflicting scientific evidence, differing values and beliefs, or lack of clear guidelines. Dissent and disputes can be resolved through open communication, evidence-based decision making, consensus building, and, when necessary, mediation or arbitration. It is essential to address dissent and disputes in a respectful and constructive manner to ensure the best possible outcomes for patients and to advance medical knowledge and practice.

Paternalism, in the context of medical ethics, refers to the practice of healthcare providers making decisions for their patients without obtaining their consent, due to the belief that they know what is best for the patient. This approach can be seen as patronizing and disempowering, as it does not take into account the autonomy and preferences of the patient.

Paternalism can manifest in various forms, such as withholding information from patients, making treatment decisions without consulting them, or coercing patients to follow a particular course of action. While paternalistic attitudes may stem from a desire to protect patients, they can also undermine trust and lead to poorer health outcomes.

Modern medical ethics emphasizes the importance of informed consent, shared decision-making, and respect for patient autonomy, all of which are seen as essential components of ethical healthcare practice.

Peer review in the context of research refers to the evaluation of scientific, academic, or professional work by others working in the same field. The purpose of peer review is to ensure that the research is rigorous, valid, and relevant to the field. In a peer-review process, experts in the relevant field assess the research article, report, or other type of scholarly work for its accuracy, quality, and significance before it is published or presented at a conference.

The peer-review process typically involves several stages:

1. Submission: The author(s) submit their manuscript to a journal, conference, or other publication venue.
2. Assignment: The editor of the publication assigns the manuscript to one or more reviewers who are experts in the field.
3. Review: The reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on criteria such as originality, methodology, data analysis, interpretation of results, and contribution to the field. They provide feedback and recommendations to the editor.
4. Decision: Based on the feedback from the reviewers, the editor makes a decision about whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to the manuscript.
5. Revision: If the manuscript is rejected or requires revisions, the author(s) may have an opportunity to revise and resubmit the manuscript for further consideration.

Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process, as it helps ensure that research is held to high standards of quality and integrity. It also provides a mechanism for identifying and correcting errors or weaknesses in research before it is published or disseminated widely.

Editorial policies refer to a set of guidelines and principles that govern the development, selection, peer-review, production, and publication of manuscripts in a medical journal. These policies aim to ensure the integrity, transparency, and quality of the published research while adhering to ethical standards and best practices in scientific publishing.

Some essential components of editorial policies include:

1. Authorship criteria: Defining who qualifies as an author, their roles, and responsibilities, and specifying the order of authorship based on contribution.
2. Conflict of interest disclosure: Requiring authors, reviewers, and editors to declare any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their judgment or objectivity in the manuscript's evaluation.
3. Peer-review process: Outlining the steps involved in the peer-review process, including the selection of reviewers, the number of required reviews, and the criteria for accepting or rejecting a manuscript.
4. Plagiarism detection: Employing plagiarism detection software to ensure originality and prevent unethical practices such as self-plagiarism or duplicate publication.
5. Data sharing: Encouraging or requiring authors to share their data, code, or materials to promote transparency and reproducibility of the research findings.
6. Corrections and retractions: Establishing procedures for correcting errors, addressing scientific misconduct, and retracting published articles when necessary.
7. Post-publication discussions: Encouraging open dialogue and constructive criticism through post-publication discussions or letters to the editor.
8. Accessibility and copyright: Describing how the journal ensures accessibility of its content, such as through open-access models, and outlining the terms of copyright and licensing agreements.
9. Archiving and preservation: Ensuring long-term preservation and availability of published content by depositing it in appropriate digital archives or repositories.
10. Compliance with international standards: Adhering to guidelines and best practices established by organizations such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

I must clarify that "Jehovah's Witnesses" is not a medical term or condition. It is a religious group with specific beliefs and practices, one of which is the refusal of blood transfusions, even in life-threatening situations, due to their interpretation of biblical passages. This can have significant implications for their healthcare and medical decision-making. However, it does not constitute a medical definition.

The Helsinki Declaration is not a medical definition, but rather it is a set of ethical principles that guide medical research involving human subjects. It was adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly in Helsinki, Finland, in 1964 and has been revised several times since then, with the latest revision in 2013.

The Declaration outlines the responsibilities of physicians and researchers in conducting medical research and sets standards for the treatment of human subjects. It emphasizes the importance of respecting the autonomy and dignity of research participants, obtaining their informed consent, ensuring their safety and well-being, and protecting their privacy and confidentiality.

The Helsinki Declaration is widely regarded as a foundational document in medical ethics and has been endorsed by medical associations and research institutions around the world. It serves as a guide for researchers, ethical review committees, and regulatory bodies in ensuring that medical research is conducted in an ethical and responsible manner.

'Hospital Bed Capacity, 3

A conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person or organization has dual loyalties or is in a position to exploit their professional or personal relationships for personal or institutional gain. In the medical field, COIs can arise when healthcare providers, researchers, or institutions have financial or other interests that may influence their judgment or actions in providing care, conducting research, or making recommendations.

Examples of conflicts of interest in medicine include:

* A physician who has a financial relationship with a pharmaceutical company and receives compensation for promoting the company's products to patients or colleagues.
* A researcher who owns stock in a company that is funding their study and may stand to benefit financially from positive results.
* An institution that accepts funding from industry partners for research or educational programs, which could potentially influence the outcomes of the research or bias the education provided.

COIs can compromise the integrity of medical research, patient care, and professional judgment. Therefore, it is essential to disclose and manage COIs transparently to maintain trust in the healthcare system and ensure that decisions are made in the best interests of patients and society as a whole.

'Guidelines' in the medical context are systematically developed statements or sets of recommendations designed to assist healthcare professionals and patients in making informed decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. They are based on a thorough evaluation of the available evidence, including scientific studies, expert opinions, and patient values. Guidelines may cover a wide range of topics, such as diagnosis, treatment, prevention, screening, and management of various diseases and conditions. They aim to standardize care, improve patient outcomes, reduce unnecessary variations in practice, and promote efficient use of healthcare resources.

Formal social control, in the context of medical sociology or health sciences, refers to the systematic mechanisms and processes through which society regulates and guides the behavior of its members in accordance with established laws, rules, and norms, particularly in relation to health and healthcare. This can include various formal institutions and agencies such as governmental bodies, regulatory authorities, professional organizations, and healthcare providers that are responsible for enforcing standards, policies, and regulations aimed at ensuring quality, safety, and effectiveness of healthcare services and products.

Examples of formal social control in healthcare may include licensing and accreditation requirements for healthcare professionals and facilities, clinical guidelines and protocols for diagnosis and treatment, quality improvement initiatives, and regulatory oversight of pharmaceuticals and medical devices. These mechanisms help to maintain order, promote compliance with ethical and professional standards, and protect the public's health and well-being.

Parental consent refers to the legal right and obligation of parents or guardians to make decisions on behalf of a minor child, including providing authorization for medical treatment. The specific requirements for parental consent may vary depending on jurisdiction, but generally, it involves providing written permission for a medical procedure or treatment after being fully informed about the nature, risks, benefits, and alternatives of the proposed care.

In some cases, parental consent may be required for routine medical procedures, while in other situations, it may only be necessary for more invasive or higher-risk treatments. Healthcare providers must obtain appropriate parental consent before performing medical procedures on minors to ensure that they are acting within the bounds of the law and protecting the best interests of their patients.

It's important to note that in some circumstances, such as when a minor is mature enough to make their own healthcare decisions or if seeking treatment for certain sensitive issues (such as reproductive health), parental consent may not be required, and the minor may be able to provide informed consent themselves.

Research, in the context of medicine, is a systematic and rigorous process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting information in order to increase our understanding, develop new knowledge, or evaluate current practices and interventions. It can involve various methodologies such as observational studies, experiments, surveys, or literature reviews. The goal of medical research is to advance health care by identifying new treatments, improving diagnostic techniques, and developing prevention strategies. Medical research is typically conducted by teams of researchers including clinicians, scientists, and other healthcare professionals. It is subject to ethical guidelines and regulations to ensure that it is conducted responsibly and with the best interests of patients in mind.

A multicenter study is a type of clinical research study that involves multiple centers or institutions. These studies are often conducted to increase the sample size and diversity of the study population, which can improve the generalizability of the study results. In a multicenter study, data is collected from participants at multiple sites and then analyzed together to identify patterns, trends, and relationships in the data. This type of study design can be particularly useful for researching rare diseases or conditions, or for testing new treatments or interventions that require a large number of participants.

Multicenter studies can be either interventional (where participants are randomly assigned to receive different treatments or interventions) or observational (where researchers collect data on participants' characteristics and outcomes without intervening). In both cases, it is important to ensure standardization of data collection and analysis procedures across all study sites to minimize bias and ensure the validity and reliability of the results.

Multicenter studies can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and safety of new treatments or interventions, as well as contribute to our understanding of disease mechanisms and risk factors. However, they can also be complex and expensive to conduct, requiring careful planning, coordination, and management to ensure their success.

Clinical trials are research studies that involve human participants and are designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new medical treatments, drugs, devices, or behavioral interventions. The purpose of clinical trials is to determine whether a new intervention is safe, effective, and beneficial for patients, as well as to compare it with currently available treatments. Clinical trials follow a series of phases, each with specific goals and criteria, before a new intervention can be approved by regulatory authorities for widespread use.

Clinical trials are conducted according to a protocol, which is a detailed plan that outlines the study's objectives, design, methodology, statistical analysis, and ethical considerations. The protocol is developed and reviewed by a team of medical experts, statisticians, and ethicists, and it must be approved by an institutional review board (IRB) before the trial can begin.

Participation in clinical trials is voluntary, and participants must provide informed consent before enrolling in the study. Informed consent involves providing potential participants with detailed information about the study's purpose, procedures, risks, benefits, and alternatives, as well as their rights as research subjects. Participants can withdraw from the study at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which they are entitled.

Clinical trials are essential for advancing medical knowledge and improving patient care. They help researchers identify new treatments, diagnostic tools, and prevention strategies that can benefit patients and improve public health. However, clinical trials also pose potential risks to participants, including adverse effects from experimental interventions, time commitment, and inconvenience. Therefore, it is important for researchers to carefully design and conduct clinical trials to minimize risks and ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Nunavut" is not a medical term. It is a territory located in northern Canada, making up a significant portion of the country's land area. The Inuit people, who have inhabited the region for thousands of years, have a strong cultural presence there. If you have any questions about medical terms or concepts, I would be happy to help with those!

Euthanasia is the act of intentionally ending a person's life to relieve suffering, typically carried out at the request of the person who is suffering and wants to die. This practice is also known as "assisted suicide" or "physician-assisted dying." It is a controversial issue that raises ethical, legal, and medical concerns.

Euthanasia can be classified into two main types: active and passive. Active euthanasia involves taking direct action to end a person's life, such as administering a lethal injection. Passive euthanasia, on the other hand, involves allowing a person to die by withholding or withdrawing medical treatment that is necessary to sustain their life.

Euthanasia is illegal in many countries and jurisdictions, while some have laws that allow it under certain circumstances. In recent years, there has been growing debate about whether euthanasia should be legalized and regulated to ensure that it is carried out in a humane and compassionate manner. Supporters argue that individuals have the right to choose how they die, especially if they are suffering from a terminal illness or chronic pain. Opponents, however, argue that legalizing euthanasia could lead to abuse and coercion, and that there are alternative ways to alleviate suffering, such as palliative care.

Anonymous testing is a type of diagnostic testing in which the identity of the person being tested is kept confidential and not disclosed to anyone, including the healthcare provider or insurance company. This type of testing is often used for sensitive tests, such as those for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) or HIV, where individuals may be concerned about privacy and confidentiality.

In anonymous testing, the individual typically receives a unique identifier or code that is used to access their test results. The testing facility does not keep any personal information linked to the identifier, so there is no way to trace the results back to the individual. This allows people to get tested without fear of their identity being revealed, which can encourage more people to get tested and receive treatment if necessary.

It's important to note that while anonymous testing offers a high level of privacy, it may not be available in all locations or for all types of tests. Additionally, individuals who test anonymously may face limitations when it comes to follow-up care or treatment, as healthcare providers will not have access to their personal information.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Human Rights" is a social, political, and legal concept, rather than a medical one. Human rights are basic rights and freedoms to which all individuals are entitled, regardless of nationality, sex, ethnicity, religion, language, or any other status. They include civil and political rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and freedom of expression; as well as social, cultural and economic rights, like the right to participate in culture, the right to food, and the right to work and receive an education.

However, in the context of healthcare, human rights are crucial. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognizes the right to medical care and the right to enjoy the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. Healthcare providers have a responsibility to respect and protect their patients' human rights, ensuring that they receive care without discrimination, that their privacy is protected, and that they are involved in decisions regarding their healthcare.

Violations of human rights can significantly impact an individual's health and well-being, making the promotion and protection of human rights a critical public health issue.

In medical terms, disclosure generally refers to the act of revealing or sharing confidential or sensitive information with another person or entity. This can include disclosing a patient's medical history, diagnosis, treatment plan, or other personal health information to the patient themselves, their family members, or other healthcare providers involved in their care.

Disclosure is an important aspect of informed consent, as patients have the right to know their medical condition and the risks and benefits of various treatment options. Healthcare providers are required to disclose relevant information to their patients in a clear and understandable manner, so that they can make informed decisions about their healthcare.

In some cases, disclosure may also be required by law or professional ethical standards, such as when there is a legal obligation to report certain types of injuries or illnesses, or when there is a concern for patient safety. It is important for healthcare providers to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of disclosure in each individual case, and to ensure that they are acting in the best interests of their patients while also protecting their privacy and confidentiality.

A research design in medical or healthcare research is a systematic plan that guides the execution and reporting of research to address a specific research question or objective. It outlines the overall strategy for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data to draw valid conclusions. The design includes details about the type of study (e.g., experimental, observational), sampling methods, data collection techniques, data analysis approaches, and any potential sources of bias or confounding that need to be controlled for. A well-defined research design helps ensure that the results are reliable, generalizable, and relevant to the research question, ultimately contributing to evidence-based practice in medicine and healthcare.

"Withholding treatment" in a medical context refers to the deliberate decision not to provide or initiate certain medical treatments, interventions, or procedures for a patient. This decision is typically made after considering various factors such as the patient's wishes, their overall prognosis, the potential benefits and burdens of the treatment, and the patient's quality of life.

The reasons for withholding treatment can vary widely, but some common reasons include:

* The treatment is unlikely to be effective in improving the patient's condition or extending their life.
* The treatment may cause unnecessary discomfort, pain, or suffering for the patient.
* The patient has expressed a desire not to receive certain treatments, particularly if they are deemed to be burdensome or of little benefit.
* The cost of the treatment is prohibitive and not covered by insurance, and the patient cannot afford to pay out-of-pocket.

It's important to note that withholding treatment does not mean abandoning the patient or providing substandard care. Rather, it involves making thoughtful and informed decisions about the most appropriate course of action for a given situation, taking into account the patient's individual needs and preferences.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but the term "Great Britain" is not a medical concept or condition. It is a geographical and political term referring to the largest island in the British Isles, on which the majority of England, Scotland, and Wales are located. It's also used to refer to the political union of these three countries, which is called the United Kingdom. Therefore, it doesn't have a medical definition.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "morals" is not a term that has a medical definition. Morals refer to personal or societal beliefs about right and wrong behavior. It is a concept that falls under the realm of ethics, philosophy, and sociology rather than medicine. If you have any questions related to medical terminologies or concepts, I would be happy to help clarify those for you.

Legal liability, in the context of medical law, refers to a legal obligation or responsibility that a healthcare professional or facility may have for their actions or negligence that results in harm or injury to a patient. This can include failure to provide appropriate care, misdiagnosis, medication errors, or other breaches of the standard of care. If a healthcare provider is found to be legally liable, they may be required to pay damages to the injured party. It's important to note that legal liability is different from medical malpractice, which refers to a specific type of negligence committed by a healthcare professional.

In medical and legal contexts, a minor is a person who has not yet reached the age of majority. The age of majority varies depending on the jurisdiction but is generally 18 or 21 years old. Minors are considered to be legally incompetent to make certain decisions for themselves, such as consenting to medical treatment or signing a contract. Therefore, in healthcare settings, minors typically require the consent of a parent or guardian before receiving medical care, except in specific circumstances where the minor is deemed mature enough to make their own decisions (e.g., emancipated minors).

Clinical protocols, also known as clinical practice guidelines or care paths, are systematically developed statements that assist healthcare professionals and patients in making decisions about the appropriate healthcare for specific clinical circumstances. They are based on a thorough evaluation of the available scientific evidence and consist of a set of recommendations that are designed to optimize patient outcomes, improve the quality of care, and reduce unnecessary variations in practice. Clinical protocols may cover a wide range of topics, including diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and disease prevention, and are developed by professional organizations, government agencies, and other groups with expertise in the relevant field.

Patient advocacy refers to the process of supporting and empowering patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare. Patient advocates may help patients communicate with healthcare providers, access necessary resources and services, understand their health conditions and treatment options, and navigate complex healthcare systems. They may also work to promote patient-centered care, raise awareness of patient rights and concerns, and advocate for policies that improve the quality and accessibility of healthcare services. Patient advocacy can be provided by healthcare professionals, family members, friends, or dedicated patient advocates.

A Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) Committee is a group of healthcare professionals, typically including physicians, pharmacists, and other experts, responsible for the evaluation, recommendation, and monitoring of safe and effective medication use within a healthcare system or organization. They make decisions about the formulary, which is the list of medications that are covered and approved for use within that system. The committee also develops guidelines and policies for medication prescribing, administering, and monitoring to promote quality patient care, reduce medication errors, and control costs.

Research personnel, in the context of medical and scientific research, refers to individuals who are involved in the design, conduct, or reporting of research studies. This can include, but is not limited to, principal investigators, co-investigators, research assistants, research coordinators, data managers, biostatisticians, and laboratory technicians. These individuals may have various levels of education, training, and expertise, and their roles and responsibilities will depend on the specific research study and their individual qualifications. It is important for research personnel to adhere to ethical guidelines and regulations in order to ensure the integrity and validity of research findings.

Organizational decision-making is a management process in which a group or team within an organization makes a judgment or choice among several options or alternatives to achieve specific goals or objectives. This process involves collecting and analyzing information, evaluating alternatives, selecting the best option, and implementing and monitoring the decision. It often requires collaboration, communication, and consensus-building among team members with diverse perspectives and expertise. Effective organizational decision-making can lead to better outcomes, improved performance, and increased innovation, while poor decision-making can result in missed opportunities, wasted resources, and decreased competitiveness.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Lawyers" is not a term that has a medical definition. The term "Lawyer" refers to a person who is qualified and authorized to practice law in a court of law. They offer advice on legal matters and represent clients in court or in other legal proceedings. If you have any questions about medical terminology, I would be happy to help!

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "organizational policy" is not a medical term. It falls under the broader category of management or administrative terminology.

An organizational policy generally refers to a formal statement or set of guidelines that outline an organization's approved course of action or conduct regarding various matters. These policies guide decision-making and help ensure consistent action across the organization. They can cover a wide range of topics, including (but not limited to) employee behavior, data security, patient care standards, and operational procedures.

In a healthcare setting, organizational policies play a crucial role in maintaining quality of care, ensuring patient safety, and complying with relevant laws and regulations.

"Research Support as Topic" is not a specific medical term or diagnosis. However, in the context of medical literature and research, "research support" refers to the resources, funding, and infrastructure that enable and facilitate the conduct of scientific research. This can include financial support from various sources such as government agencies, private organizations, or institutions; access to laboratory facilities, equipment, and databases; and technical assistance in study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript preparation.

When "research support" is designated as a topic in medical literature, it typically refers to articles that discuss the various aspects of research funding, ethics, and management, including best practices for grant writing, financial conflict of interest disclosures, and responsible conduct of research. It may also include studies that examine the impact of research support on the quality, quantity, and outcomes of scientific research.

I must apologize, but there seems to be a misunderstanding. The term "internationality" is not a commonly used medical term with a specific definition in the field of medicine or healthcare. It is a more general term that can refer to the quality or state of being international or global in scope, relevance, or application. If you have any questions related to medical terminology or health-related topics, I would be happy to try and help clarify those for you.

'Healthcare Records' or 'Medical Records' are defined as systematic collections of comprehensive information about a patient's health status, including their medical history, demographics, medications, treatment plans, progress notes, laboratory test results, imaging studies, and any other relevant healthcare-related information. These records serve as a vital tool for healthcare providers to make informed decisions regarding diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care of patients. They also play a crucial role in maintaining continuity of care, supporting research and education, ensuring legal and ethical compliance, and improving overall healthcare quality and safety. Healthcare records may be maintained in paper form or digitally, following specific standards and regulations to ensure accuracy, confidentiality, and easy accessibility.

The Federal Government, in the context of medical definitions, typically refers to the national government of a country that has a federal system of government. In such a system, power is divided between the national government and regional or state governments. The Federal Government is responsible for matters that affect the entire nation, such as foreign policy, national defense, and regulating interstate commerce, including certain aspects of healthcare policy and regulation.

In the United States, for example, the Federal Government plays a significant role in healthcare through programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which are designed to ensure access to affordable healthcare services for specific populations or address broader health reform initiatives. The Federal Government also regulates food and drugs through agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). These federal entities work to ensure the safety, efficacy, and security of medical products, foods, and public health.

I believe there may be some confusion in your question as "virtues" are typically not a term used in medical definitions. Virtues are moral qualities or traits that are considered desirable or commendable, such as honesty, compassion, courage, and loyalty. They are often associated with ethical behavior and personal character. If you have any other medical term in mind, please let me know so I can provide a definition for it.

Genetic research is a branch of biomedical science that involves the study of genes, their functions, and heredity. It aims to understand how genetic variations contribute to human health and disease by using various scientific approaches such as genetics, genomics, molecular biology, biochemistry, and bioinformatics.

Genetic research can be conducted on humans, animals, or plants, and it can focus on a variety of areas including:

1. Identifying genes associated with specific diseases or traits
2. Understanding how genes are regulated and expressed
3. Investigating the role of genetic mutations in disease development
4. Developing new diagnostic tests and treatments based on genetic information
5. Exploring evolutionary relationships between species
6. Examining ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic research.

Genetic research has led to significant advances in our understanding of many diseases, including cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and neurological disorders. It also holds great promise for personalized medicine, which tailors treatments to individual patients based on their genetic makeup.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Moral Development" is not a term that has a specific medical definition. It is a concept that primarily belongs to the fields of psychology and philosophy.

Moral development refers to the process by which individuals acquire, construct, and systematize moral knowledge and make moral judgments. This concept was popularized by psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg through his stages of moral development theory, which posits that individuals go through distinct stages in their understanding and interpretation of moral dilemmas. These stages range from a focus on avoiding punishment (pre-conventional morality) to considering the rights and welfare of others (post-conventional morality).

While medical professionals may take into account a patient's moral development when providing care or counseling, it is not a term that has a specific medical definition.

I'm happy to help! However, I must clarify that "information dissemination" is not a medical term per se, but rather a general term used in various fields, including healthcare and medicine. It refers to the process of spreading or distributing information to a specific audience or the public.

In the context of medicine and healthcare, information dissemination often relates to sharing clinical guidelines, research findings, public health messages, or patient education materials with healthcare professionals, patients, or the general public. This can occur through various channels, such as scientific conferences, peer-reviewed journals, newsletters, websites, social media platforms, and other communication methods.

The goal of information dissemination in medicine is to ensure that accurate, evidence-based, and up-to-date information reaches the intended audience, ultimately improving healthcare quality, patient outcomes, and decision-making processes.

"Compensation and redress" are terms often used in the context of medical law and ethics to refer to the process of addressing harm or injury caused to a patient as a result of medical negligence or malpractice.

Compensation refers to the financial reparation awarded to the victim or their family to cover damages such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. The aim of compensation is to restore the victim to the position they were in before the harm occurred, to the extent that money can.

Redress, on the other hand, refers to the broader process of addressing and remedying the harm caused. This may include an apology, changes to hospital policies or procedures, or disciplinary action against the healthcare provider responsible for the negligence. The goal of redress is to acknowledge the harm that was caused and to take steps to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.

Together, compensation and redress aim to provide a measure of justice and closure for victims of medical harm, while also promoting accountability and transparency within the healthcare system.

Decision-making is the cognitive process of selecting a course of action from among multiple alternatives. In a medical context, decision-making refers to the process by which healthcare professionals and patients make choices about medical tests, treatments, or management options based on a thorough evaluation of available information, including the patient's preferences, values, and circumstances.

The decision-making process in medicine typically involves several steps:

1. Identifying the problem or issue that requires a decision.
2. Gathering relevant information about the patient's medical history, current condition, diagnostic test results, treatment options, and potential outcomes.
3. Considering the benefits, risks, and uncertainties associated with each option.
4. Evaluating the patient's preferences, values, and goals.
5. Selecting the most appropriate course of action based on a careful weighing of the available evidence and the patient's individual needs and circumstances.
6. Communicating the decision to the patient and ensuring that they understand the rationale behind it, as well as any potential risks or benefits.
7. Monitoring the outcomes of the decision and adjusting the course of action as needed based on ongoing evaluation and feedback.

Effective decision-making in medicine requires a thorough understanding of medical evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences. It also involves careful consideration of ethical principles, such as respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. Ultimately, the goal of decision-making in healthcare is to promote the best possible outcomes for patients while minimizing harm and respecting their individual needs and values.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Theology" is not a term that has a medical definition. Theology is the systematic study of the nature of the divine and religious belief. It involves examining and analyzing religious texts, traditions, and beliefs using critical and analytical methods. This field of study is typically associated with religious studies, philosophy, and humanities, not medicine.

Hospital administration is a field of study and profession that deals with the management and leadership of hospitals and other healthcare facilities. It involves overseeing various aspects such as finance, human resources, operations, strategic planning, policy development, patient care services, and quality improvement. The main goal of hospital administration is to ensure that the organization runs smoothly, efficiently, and effectively while meeting its mission, vision, and values. Hospital administrators work closely with medical staff, board members, patients, and other stakeholders to make informed decisions that promote high-quality care, patient safety, and organizational growth. They may hold various titles such as CEO, COO, CFO, Director of Nursing, or Department Manager, depending on the size and structure of the healthcare facility.

Peer review is a process in which experts in a field assess the quality and validity of scientific research, scholarly articles, or other professional works prior to publication. In the context of medical research, peer review typically involves one or more researchers with similar expertise evaluating a manuscript or study proposal to ensure that it meets established standards for design, methodology, analysis, and interpretation of results. The goal of peer review is to maintain the integrity and credibility of the scientific record by identifying and correcting errors, biases, or other shortcomings in the research before it is published. Peer review is a standard practice in medical publishing and is considered an essential component of the scientific process.

A "General Hospital" is a type of hospital that provides a broad range of medical and surgical services to a diverse patient population. It typically offers general medical care, emergency services, intensive care, diagnostic services (such as laboratory testing and imaging), and inpatient and outpatient surgical services. General hospitals may also have specialized departments or units for specific medical conditions or populations, such as pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, geriatrics, oncology, and mental health. They are usually staffed by a variety of healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, therapists, and support personnel. General hospitals can be found in both urban and rural areas and may be operated by governmental, non-profit, or for-profit organizations.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "International Cooperation" is not a medical term. It refers to the collaboration and exchange of resources and information between countries or international organizations in various fields, including politics, economics, culture, environment, and security, among others. In the context of healthcare and medicine, international cooperation can involve joint research projects, sharing of data and clinical trial results, collaborative efforts to combat global health issues (such as infectious diseases or chronic conditions), capacity building in low-resource settings, and standardizing medical practices and guidelines across countries.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "publishing" is not a term that has a medical definition. Publishing typically refers to the process of preparing and disseminating information, such as books, journals, or articles, to the public or a specific audience. It could involve both print and digital media. If you have any questions related to medicine or healthcare, I'd be happy to try to help answer those!

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "social values" is not a term that has a specific medical definition. However, in a broader social context, "social values" refer to the beliefs, principles, and standards that a group or society holds in regard to what is considered important, desirable, or acceptable. These values can influence attitudes, behaviors, and decisions related to health and healthcare. They may also impact medical research, policy-making, and patient care.

The "drug industry" is also commonly referred to as the "pharmaceutical industry." It is a segment of the healthcare sector that involves the research, development, production, and marketing of medications or drugs. This includes both prescription and over-the-counter medicines used to treat, cure, or prevent diseases and medical conditions in humans and animals.

The drug industry comprises various types of organizations, such as:

1. Research-based pharmaceutical companies: These are large corporations that focus on the research and development (R&D) of new drugs, clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals, manufacturing, and marketing their products globally. Examples include Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Merck.

2. Generic drug manufacturers: After the patent for a brand-name drug expires, generic drug manufacturers can produce and sell a similar version of the drug at a lower cost. These companies must demonstrate that their product is bioequivalent to the brand-name drug in terms of safety, quality, and efficacy.

3. Biotechnology companies: These firms specialize in developing drugs using biotechnological methods, such as recombinant DNA technology, gene therapy, or monoclonal antibodies. Many biotech companies focus on specific therapeutic areas, like oncology, immunology, or neurology.

4. Contract research organizations (CROs): CROs provide various services to the drug industry, including clinical trial management, data analysis, regulatory affairs support, and pharmacovigilance. They work with both large pharmaceutical companies and smaller biotech firms to help streamline the drug development process.

5. Drug delivery system companies: These organizations focus on developing innovative technologies for delivering drugs more effectively and safely to patients. Examples include transdermal patches, inhalers, or long-acting injectables.

6. Wholesalers and distributors: Companies that purchase drugs from manufacturers and distribute them to pharmacies, hospitals, and other healthcare providers.

The drug industry plays a crucial role in improving public health by discovering, developing, and delivering new treatments for various diseases and medical conditions. However, it is also subject to criticism and regulation due to concerns about high drug prices, marketing practices, and the potential for conflicts of interest between industry and healthcare professionals.

"Drug evaluation" is a medical term that refers to the systematic process of assessing the pharmacological, therapeutic, and safety profile of a drug or medication. This process typically involves several stages, including preclinical testing in the laboratory, clinical trials in human subjects, and post-marketing surveillance.

The goal of drug evaluation is to determine the efficacy, safety, and optimal dosage range of a drug, as well as any potential interactions with other medications or medical conditions. The evaluation process also includes an assessment of the drug's pharmacokinetics, or how it is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and eliminated by the body.

The findings from drug evaluations are used to inform regulatory decisions about whether a drug should be approved for use in clinical practice, as well as to provide guidance to healthcare providers about how to use the drug safely and effectively.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Germany" is not a medical term or concept. It is the name of a country in central Europe. If you have any questions related to medical topics, I would be happy to try and help answer those for you!

A questionnaire in the medical context is a standardized, systematic, and structured tool used to gather information from individuals regarding their symptoms, medical history, lifestyle, or other health-related factors. It typically consists of a series of written questions that can be either self-administered or administered by an interviewer. Questionnaires are widely used in various areas of healthcare, including clinical research, epidemiological studies, patient care, and health services evaluation to collect data that can inform diagnosis, treatment planning, and population health management. They provide a consistent and organized method for obtaining information from large groups or individual patients, helping to ensure accurate and comprehensive data collection while minimizing bias and variability in the information gathered.

In the context of medicine, a "role" generally refers to the function or position that an individual holds within a healthcare system or team. This could include roles such as:

* Physician
* Nurse
* Allied health professional (e.g., physical therapist, occupational therapist, speech-language pathologist)
* Social worker
* Administrative staff member

Each role comes with its own set of responsibilities and expectations for how the individual in that role will contribute to the overall care and well-being of patients. Effective communication, collaboration, and coordination among team members in their various roles are essential for providing high-quality patient care.

In medical and legal terms, "personhood" refers to the status of being a person, which is typically associated with certain legal rights, protections, and privileges. The concept of personhood is often discussed in the context of bioethics, particularly in relation to questions about the moral and legal status of entities such as fetuses, embryos, and individuals with severe cognitive impairments or in vegetative states.

The criteria for personhood are a subject of debate and vary depending on cultural, religious, philosophical, and legal perspectives. However, some common factors that are often considered include consciousness, the ability to feel pain, the capacity for self-awareness and self-reflection, the ability to communicate, and the presence of a distinct genetic identity.

In medical contexts, personhood may be relevant to issues such as end-of-life care, organ donation, and reproductive rights. For example, some argue that personhood should be granted to fetuses at the moment of conception, while others believe that personhood is only achieved when a fetus becomes viable outside the womb or when a child is born alive.

Overall, the concept of personhood is complex and multifaceted, and it continues to be debated and refined in various fields and disciplines.

Medical philosophy is a branch of philosophy that deals with the concepts, issues, and arguments specific to medicine and healthcare. It involves the application of philosophical inquiry and reasoning to various aspects of medicine, such as:

1. Ethics: Examining moral principles and values that guide medical practice, including patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. This includes issues related to end-of-life care, informed consent, research ethics, and resource allocation.
2. Epistemology: Exploring the nature of knowledge in medicine, including how medical knowledge is acquired, validated, and disseminated. It also involves examining the limitations and uncertainties of medical knowledge.
3. Metaphysics: Examining the fundamental nature of reality as it relates to medicine, such as the nature of disease, health, and the human body. This includes exploring questions about the mind-body relationship and the role of emergent properties in understanding health and illness.
4. Logic and Rationality: Applying logical reasoning and critical thinking skills to medical decision making, including the evaluation of evidence, the assessment of risks and benefits, and the formulation of clinical guidelines.
5. Aesthetics: Exploring the role of values and subjective experience in medicine, such as the importance of empathy, compassion, and communication in the patient-physician relationship. This also includes examining the ethical implications of medical aesthetics, such as cosmetic surgery and enhancement technologies.

Medical philosophy is an interdisciplinary field that draws on insights from a variety of disciplines, including philosophy, medicine, ethics, law, psychology, and sociology. It seeks to provide a deeper understanding of the complex issues that arise in medical practice and to inform the development of evidence-based, ethical, and compassionate healthcare policies and practices.

Patient selection, in the context of medical treatment or clinical research, refers to the process of identifying and choosing appropriate individuals who are most likely to benefit from a particular medical intervention or who meet specific criteria to participate in a study. This decision is based on various factors such as the patient's diagnosis, stage of disease, overall health status, potential risks, and expected benefits. The goal of patient selection is to ensure that the selected individuals will receive the most effective and safe care possible while also contributing to meaningful research outcomes.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "United States" is a geopolitical entity, specifically the name of the country consisting of 50 states, and it is not a medical term or concept. Therefore, I can't provide a medical definition for it. If you have any questions related to health, medicine, or biology, I would be happy to try to help answer those!

Medical societies are professional organizations composed of physicians, surgeons, and other healthcare professionals who share a common purpose of promoting medical research, education, and patient care. These societies can focus on specific medical specialties, such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) for cancer specialists or the American College of Surgeons (ACS) for surgeons. They may also address broader issues related to healthcare policy, advocacy, and ethics. Medical societies often provide resources for continuing medical education, publish scientific journals, establish clinical practice guidelines, and offer networking opportunities for members.

I'm happy to help! However, it's important to note that while "social justice" is a term used in many fields, including public health and medicine, it does not have a single, universally accepted medical definition. Instead, the concept of social justice in healthcare is generally understood as the pursuit of fairness, equity, and equality in the distribution of healthcare resources, opportunities, and outcomes.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines social justice as "the fair and equitable distribution of social determinants of health, which are conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age, including the health system." According to this definition, social justice in healthcare requires addressing the root causes of health disparities, such as poverty, discrimination, and lack of access to education and employment opportunities.

The American Public Health Association (APHA) defines social justice as "the distribution of resources, benefits, and burdens of society to all individuals and groups. When principles of social justice are applied, the resulting distribution is equitable and all members of society have a fair opportunity to benefit from the resources, benefits, and burdens."

In summary, while there may not be a single medical definition of social justice, it is generally understood as the pursuit of fairness, equity, and equality in healthcare and health outcomes. This involves addressing the root causes of health disparities and ensuring that all individuals have access to the resources and opportunities they need to achieve optimal health.

Disposable equipment in a medical context refers to items that are designed to be used once and then discarded. These items are often patient-care products that come into contact with patients or bodily fluids, and are meant to help reduce the risk of infection transmission. Examples of disposable medical equipment include gloves, gowns, face masks, syringes, and bandages.

Disposable equipment is intended for single use only and should not be reused or cleaned for reuse. This helps ensure that the equipment remains sterile and free from potential contaminants that could cause harm to patients or healthcare workers. Proper disposal of these items is also important to prevent the spread of infection and maintain a safe and clean environment.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Jurisprudence" is not a term typically used in medical definitions. Jurisprudence refers to the theory and philosophy of law, or the study of legal systems, principles, and practices. It is a subject that falls under the purview of lawyers, judges, and scholars of law. If you have any questions about medical terminology, I'd be happy to help with those!

A "periodical" in the context of medicine typically refers to a type of publication that is issued regularly, such as on a monthly or quarterly basis. These publications include peer-reviewed journals, magazines, and newsletters that focus on medical research, education, and practice. They may contain original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorials, letters to the editor, and other types of content related to medical science and clinical practice.

As a "Topic," periodicals in medicine encompass various aspects such as their role in disseminating new knowledge, their impact on clinical decision-making, their quality control measures, and their ethical considerations. Medical periodicals serve as a crucial resource for healthcare professionals, researchers, students, and other stakeholders to stay updated on the latest developments in their field and to share their findings with others.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "philosophy" is not a medical term. It is a branch of study that deals with fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, ethics, and reality. In contrast, medical terms typically refer to concepts within the field of medicine, such as diseases, treatments, or anatomical structures. If you have any questions related to medical terminology or concepts, I would be happy to try and help answer those for you!

The "attitude of health personnel" refers to the overall disposition, behavior, and approach that healthcare professionals exhibit towards their patients or clients. This encompasses various aspects such as:

1. Interpersonal skills: The ability to communicate effectively, listen actively, and build rapport with patients.
2. Professionalism: Adherence to ethical principles, confidentiality, and maintaining a non-judgmental attitude.
3. Compassion and empathy: Showing genuine concern for the patient's well-being and understanding their feelings and experiences.
4. Cultural sensitivity: Respecting and acknowledging the cultural backgrounds, beliefs, and values of patients.
5. Competence: Demonstrating knowledge, skills, and expertise in providing healthcare services.
6. Collaboration: Working together with other healthcare professionals to ensure comprehensive care for the patient.
7. Patient-centeredness: Focusing on the individual needs, preferences, and goals of the patient in the decision-making process.
8. Commitment to continuous learning and improvement: Staying updated with the latest developments in the field and seeking opportunities to enhance one's skills and knowledge.

A positive attitude of health personnel contributes significantly to patient satisfaction, adherence to treatment plans, and overall healthcare outcomes.

Ethical relativism is the philosophical view that ethical statements or judgments are true or false only relative to a particular culture, society, or individual. According to this perspective, there are no absolute or universal moral truths that apply to everyone, regardless of their cultural background or personal beliefs. Instead, what is considered right or wrong may vary depending on the specific context and values of the group or person in question.

Ethical relativism can be contrasted with ethical objectivism, which holds that certain moral principles are objective and binding on all rational agents, regardless of their cultural or personal perspectives. Ethical relativism is often associated with cultural relativism, the idea that different cultures should be tolerated and respected for their diverse values and practices, even if they conflict with one's own ethical beliefs.

It's important to note that ethical relativism can have both positive and negative implications. On the one hand, it can promote tolerance and respect for cultural diversity, as well as humility in making moral judgments about others. On the other hand, it can also lead to moral skepticism or nihilism, in which case no moral judgments are considered valid or meaningful.

In medical contexts, ethical relativism may be relevant when considering issues such as end-of-life care, reproductive rights, and cultural competence. For example, a physician who adheres to ethical relativism might recognize that different patients may have different values and preferences regarding their healthcare decisions, and strive to provide culturally sensitive care that respects those differences. However, they may also face challenges in balancing respect for cultural diversity with their professional obligations to promote patient autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but the term "Europe" is a geographical and political designation, rather than a medical one. It refers to the continent located entirely in the Northern Hemisphere and mostly in the Eastern Hemisphere. It is bordered by the Arctic Ocean to the north, the Atlantic Ocean to the west, and the Mediterranean Sea to the south. Europe is made up of approximately 50 countries, depending on how one defines a "country."

If you have any questions related to medical terminology or health-related topics, I'd be happy to help answer them!

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Israel" is not a medical term. It is a country located in the Middle East. If you have any medical questions or terms you would like defined, I would be happy to help!

'Vulnerable populations' is a term used in public health and medicine to refer to groups of individuals who are at a higher risk of negative health outcomes or have limited access to healthcare services. These populations can be defined by various sociodemographic, economic, and environmental factors, including:

1. Age: Older adults and children, especially those with chronic medical conditions, are often considered vulnerable populations due to their increased susceptibility to illness and reduced ability to access care.
2. Race/Ethnicity: Racial and ethnic minorities may face barriers to healthcare access, discrimination, and systemic inequities that contribute to poorer health outcomes.
3. Socioeconomic status: Individuals with low income, limited education, or unstable housing are more likely to experience health disparities due to reduced access to quality healthcare, nutritious food, and safe living environments.
4. Disability status: People with disabilities may face physical, communication, or attitudinal barriers that limit their ability to access healthcare services and contribute to poorer health outcomes.
5. Sexual orientation and gender identity: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) individuals often experience discrimination and stigma in healthcare settings, which can negatively impact their health and access to care.
6. Immigration status: Undocumented immigrants and refugees may face legal barriers to healthcare access, language barriers, and fear of deportation that contribute to poorer health outcomes.
7. Geographic location: Rural areas and urban "food deserts" often lack adequate healthcare resources and access, leading to health disparities for residents in these regions.
8. Incarceration status: Individuals involved in the criminal justice system may experience limited access to healthcare services and face unique health challenges related to their incarceration.
9. Mental health status: People with mental illness or substance use disorders are often considered vulnerable populations due to stigma, discrimination, and reduced access to quality care.

It is important to note that these factors can intersect and compound the vulnerabilities faced by individuals within these groups. Addressing the needs of vulnerable populations requires a comprehensive approach that addresses social determinants of health, systemic inequities, and barriers to healthcare access.

"State Medicine" is not a term that has a widely accepted or specific medical definition. However, in general terms, it can refer to the organization, financing, and delivery of healthcare services and resources at the national or regional level, overseen and managed by the government or state. This can include public health initiatives, regulation of healthcare professionals and institutions, and the provision of healthcare services through publicly funded programs.

In some contexts, "State Medicine" may also refer to the practice of using medical treatments or interventions as a means of achieving political or social objectives, such as reducing crime rates or improving economic productivity. However, this usage is less common and more controversial.

Data collection in the medical context refers to the systematic gathering of information relevant to a specific research question or clinical situation. This process involves identifying and recording data elements, such as demographic characteristics, medical history, physical examination findings, laboratory results, and imaging studies, from various sources including patient interviews, medical records, and diagnostic tests. The data collected is used to support clinical decision-making, inform research hypotheses, and evaluate the effectiveness of treatments or interventions. It is essential that data collection is performed in a standardized and unbiased manner to ensure the validity and reliability of the results.

Professional misconduct, in the context of medical law, refers to any behavior or action by a healthcare professional that fails to meet the expected standards of conduct and violates professional regulations and ethical guidelines. This can include various forms of unethical or illegal behavior, such as:

1. Engaging in sexual relationships with patients or engaging in any form of sexual harassment.
2. Practicing medicine while impaired by drugs, alcohol, or mental illness.
3. Failing to maintain accurate and complete medical records.
4. Performing unnecessary medical procedures or treatments for financial gain.
5. Engaging in fraudulent activities related to medical practice, such as billing fraud.
6. Abandoning patients without providing appropriate care or notification.
7. Discriminating against patients based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics.
8. Failing to obtain informed consent from patients before performing medical procedures.
9. Violating patient confidentiality and privacy.
10. Engaging in unprofessional behavior that harms the reputation of the medical profession.

Professional misconduct can result in disciplinary action by a state medical board or licensing authority, including fines, license suspension or revocation, and mandatory education or treatment.

I apologize, but "Canada" is not a medical term or concept. It is a country located in North America, known for its vast wilderness, multicultural cities, and significant natural resources. If you have any questions related to healthcare or medical terms, I would be happy to help answer those!

Resource allocation in a medical context refers to the process of distributing and managing healthcare resources, such as budget, staff, equipment, and supplies, in an efficient and equitable manner to meet the health needs of a population. This involves prioritizing the use of resources to maximize benefits, improve patient outcomes, and ensure fair access to healthcare services. It is a critical aspect of healthcare planning and management, particularly in situations where resources are limited or there are competing demands for them.

There is no universally accepted medical definition for "Value of Life" as it is a concept that encompasses both medical, ethical, and philosophical considerations. However, in the context of healthcare, the value of life may refer to the benefits, outcomes, or improvements in quality of life that are gained through medical interventions or treatments. This can include extending lifespan, improving functional ability, relieving symptoms, and enhancing overall well-being.

Ultimately, the value of life is subjective and depends on individual and societal values, beliefs, and preferences. Healthcare providers must consider these factors when making treatment decisions and engaging in end-of-life care discussions with patients and their families. It's important to note that the medical community does not assign a monetary value to human life.

Passive euthanasia is the act of withholding or withdrawing medical treatments that are necessary to maintain life, allowing the natural dying process to occur. This can include stopping artificial nutrition and hydration, mechanical ventilation, or other forms of life-sustaining treatment. The goal of passive euthanasia is to allow a person who is suffering from a terminal illness or irreversible condition to die with dignity and in comfort, sparing them from unnecessary pain and suffering. It is important to note that the decision to engage in passive euthanasia should be made carefully, with the full involvement of the patient, their family, and medical team, and in accordance with applicable laws and ethical guidelines.

Pharmacy ethics refers to the principles that guide the behavior and decision-making of pharmacists and other healthcare professionals involved in the provision of medications and related services. These principles are based on values such as respect for autonomy, beneficence (doing good), non-maleficence (doing no harm), justice, and fidelity (faithfulness to commitments).

Pharmacy ethics encompass a wide range of issues, including:

* Informed consent: ensuring that patients understand the risks and benefits of medications and make voluntary decisions about their use.
* Confidentiality: protecting patient information and respecting privacy.
* Professional competence: maintaining knowledge and skills to provide safe and effective care.
* Conflict of interest: avoiding situations where personal or professional interests could compromise patient care.
* Allocation of resources: making fair and equitable decisions about the distribution of medications and related services.
* End-of-life care: respecting patients' wishes and providing appropriate care at the end of life.

Pharmacy ethics are guided by professional codes of conduct, legal regulations, and ethical theories and principles. Pharmacists and other healthcare professionals are expected to uphold these standards and engage in ongoing reflection and education to promote ethical practice.

I apologize for any confusion, but "Croatia" is not a medical term or condition. It is a country located in Central and Southeastern Europe. If you have any questions about Croatian healthcare or medical practices, I would be happy to try to help answer those for you.

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a type of clinical study in which participants are randomly assigned to receive either the experimental intervention or the control condition, which may be a standard of care, placebo, or no treatment. The goal of an RCT is to minimize bias and ensure that the results are due to the intervention being tested rather than other factors. This design allows for a comparison between the two groups to determine if there is a significant difference in outcomes. RCTs are often considered the gold standard for evaluating the safety and efficacy of medical interventions, as they provide a high level of evidence for causal relationships between the intervention and health outcomes.

In the field of medicine, "time factors" refer to the duration of symptoms or time elapsed since the onset of a medical condition, which can have significant implications for diagnosis and treatment. Understanding time factors is crucial in determining the progression of a disease, evaluating the effectiveness of treatments, and making critical decisions regarding patient care.

For example, in stroke management, "time is brain," meaning that rapid intervention within a specific time frame (usually within 4.5 hours) is essential to administering tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), a clot-busting drug that can minimize brain damage and improve patient outcomes. Similarly, in trauma care, the "golden hour" concept emphasizes the importance of providing definitive care within the first 60 minutes after injury to increase survival rates and reduce morbidity.

Time factors also play a role in monitoring the progression of chronic conditions like diabetes or heart disease, where regular follow-ups and assessments help determine appropriate treatment adjustments and prevent complications. In infectious diseases, time factors are crucial for initiating antibiotic therapy and identifying potential outbreaks to control their spread.

Overall, "time factors" encompass the significance of recognizing and acting promptly in various medical scenarios to optimize patient outcomes and provide effective care.

The term "developing countries" is a socio-economic classification used to describe nations that are in the process of industrialization and modernization. This term is often used interchangeably with "low and middle-income countries" or "Global South." The World Bank defines developing countries as those with a gross national income (GNI) per capita of less than US $12,695.

In the context of healthcare, developing countries face unique challenges including limited access to quality medical care, lack of resources and infrastructure, high burden of infectious diseases, and a shortage of trained healthcare professionals. These factors contribute to significant disparities in health outcomes between developing and developed nations.

Risk assessment in the medical context refers to the process of identifying, evaluating, and prioritizing risks to patients, healthcare workers, or the community related to healthcare delivery. It involves determining the likelihood and potential impact of adverse events or hazards, such as infectious diseases, medication errors, or medical devices failures, and implementing measures to mitigate or manage those risks. The goal of risk assessment is to promote safe and high-quality care by identifying areas for improvement and taking action to minimize harm.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Metaphysics" is not a term that has a medical definition. Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that explores fundamental questions about reality, including the relationship between mind and matter, substance and attribute, potentiality and actuality. It's often concerned with topics like existence, time, space, causality, identity, and logic. If you have any questions related to medical terminology or concepts, I'd be happy to help with those!

In the context of medical education, a curriculum refers to the planned and organized sequence of experiences and learning opportunities designed to achieve specific educational goals and objectives. It outlines the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that medical students or trainees are expected to acquire during their training program. The curriculum may include various components such as lectures, small group discussions, clinical rotations, simulations, and other experiential learning activities. It is typically developed and implemented by medical education experts and faculty members in consultation with stakeholders, including learners, practitioners, and patients.

Local terms for a European ethics committee include: A Research Ethics Committee (REC) in the United Kingdom A Medical Research ... Similarly in Canada, the committee is called a Research Ethics Board (REB). In Australia, an ethics committee in medical ... Clinical research ethics, Drug safety, Social research, Ethics organizations, Ethics and statistics, Applied ethics, Regulatory ... In the United States, an ethics committee is usually known as an institutional review board (IRB) or research ethics board (REB ...
... the FIFA Ethics Committee gave the seal of approval on Qatar as the 2022 World Cup host. The FIFA Ethics Committee was put in ... which in turn is being reviewed by the Investigatory Chamber of the Ethics Committee. In addition, the Ethics Committee ... The Ethics Committee is allowed to investigate present as well as previous allegations. In 2016, committee member Juan Pedro ... The Ethics Committee's Investigatory Chamber has the right to investigate into previous allegations of bribery. The FIFA Ethics ...
US ethics committee) United States House Committee on Ethics (popularly known as the Ethics Committee) United States Senate ... Privacy and Ethics Ethics committee (European Union) Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology (Switzerland) FIFA ... An ethics committee is a body that oversees the conduct of medical research and other human experimentation. Ethics committee ... Select Committee on Ethics Ethics commission This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Ethics committee ...
... Retrieved 2019-02-14. "Council Members". Homepage. Committee on Publication Ethics. Retrieved ... The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) is a nonprofit organization whose stated mission is to define best practice in the ... Committee on Publication Ethics. Retrieved 2019-02-14. "COPE Chair, Virginia Barbour, discusses retractions on BBC Radio 4". ... "Membership subscription fees". Committee on Publication Ethics. 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 15, 2019. ...
National ethics committees (EU) New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committees Research Ethics Committees - Documents v t ... Local terms for a European ethics committee include: A Research Ethics Committee (REC) in the United Kingdom A Medical Research ... Research ethics Ethics committee EudraLex Directive 2005/28/EC Qualified Person Institutional Review Board (IRB) Regulation of ... Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity, Journal of Medical Ethics 2006;32:483- ...
Each episode is a discussion of a real life case facing a clinical ethics committee. Deborah Bowman, Professor of Ethics and ... Inside the Ethics Committee is a BBC Radio 4 programme, now[when?] in its ninth series, presented by Vivienne Parry. ... "Inside the Ethics Committee". BBC.co.uk. BBC. Retrieved 19 January 2014. (Use British English from January 2014, Use dmy dates ...
The U.S. House Committee on Ethics, often known simply as the Ethics Committee, is one of the committees of the United States ... Committee on Ethics, official site (Archive) House Ethics Committee. Legislation activity and reports, Congress.gov. (Articles ... Prior to the 112th Congress it was known as the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct. The House Ethics Committee has ... 62) electing members to certain standing committees of the House of Representatives. The Ethics Committee has many functions, ...
Federal Ministry of Health" (PDF). National Health Research Ethics Committee. 2007. "National Code for Health Research Ethics. ... It is also tasked with the registration and auditing of Nigerian health research ethics committees. As of 12 August 2014, the ... The National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (NHREC) is a national body advising the Nigerian Federal Ministry of ... About National Health Research Ethics Committee, Nigeria. v t e (Medical and health organizations based in Nigeria, All stub ...
It is also commonly referred to as the Senate Ethics Committee. Senate rules require the Ethics Committee to be evenly divided ... U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics Official Website (Archive) Senate Ethics Committee. Legislation activity and reports, ... The U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics is a select committee of the United States Senate charged with dealing with matters ... 159, Page S296 Members of the Senate Select Committee on Ethics, 115th Congress List of current United States Senate committees ...
The Joint Committee on Ethics and Members' Interest is a joint committee of the Parliament of South Africa that deals with the ... The committee was established in 1999 at the outset of the 23rd Parliament in a merger between the Committee on Ethics ( ... Joint Committee on Ethics and Members Interests at Parliament of South Africa Ethics and Members' Interest at Parliamentary ... "Ethics and Members' Interest". Parliamentary Monitoring Group. Retrieved 2023-06-25. "Ethics Committee elects chairpersons". ...
A joint statement by the Federal Ethics Committee on Non Human Biotechnology (ECNH) and the Swiss Committee on Animal ... the Swiss Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology (ECNH) is an extra-parliamentary advisory committee, appointed to ... Research on Primates - an Ethical Evaluation, Report by the Swiss Committee on Animal Experiments (SCAE) and the Swiss Ethics ... Website of the Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology Swiss federal extra-parliamentary commissions (in German, ...
The Philippine House Committee on Ethics and Privileges, or House Ethics and Privileges Committee is a standing committee of ... "HOUSE COMMITTEES - ETHICS AND PRIVILEGES". congress.gov.ph. House of Representatives of the Philippines. Retrieved April 15, ... Committees of the House of Representatives of the Philippines, Ethics organizations). ... House of Representatives of the Philippines List of Philippine House of Representatives committees "RULES OF THE HOUSE OF ...
The Philippine Senate Committee on Ethics and Privileges is a standing committee of the Senate of the Philippines. According to ... The committee receives and hears ethics complaints against a senator filed by either another senator, a government official, or ... Based on the Rules of the Senate, the Senate Committee on Ethics and Privileges has 7 members. The President Pro Tempore, the ... Here are the members of the committee in the 18th Congress as of September 24, 2020: Committee secretary: Ethel Hope Dignadice- ...
Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI) v t e (Articles containing French-language text, Ethics ... "Work - Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics". House of Commons Canada. Parliament of Canada. " ... The House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI) (French: Comité permanent de ... the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, and the Commissioner of Lobbying Canada. The committee has undertaken ...
"Committees". Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Retrieved 2023-05-23. "Russia is now talking ... Space ethics, astroethics or astrobioethics is a discipline of applied ethics that discusses the moral and ethical implications ... Environmental ethics Ethics of technology (Articles with short description, Short description matches Wikidata, Astrobiology, ... Viktor Bondarev, chair of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security, responded by saying that if the US were to ...
On 5 October 2018 the Committee's report was tabled, recommending that the law be passed and that all politicians be granted a ... Wong, Rachael (23 August 2016). "Women Deserve Better than the Proposed Abortion Law Reform". ABC Religion & Ethics. Australian ... Liberal National Party members of the Committee raised concerns that if the second bill passed while the first failed, it would ... In August 2016 the Committee released its report, recommending that the bill not be passed. The bill left several policy issues ...
... and served on five additional committees: Budget and Government Operations; Finance, Buildings; Committees, Rules and Ethics; ... Smith was also Chicago's representative on the Transportation, Infrastructure and Service Steering Committee to the National ... Smith was Chairman of the Health Committee, where he led campaigns to promote awareness about sexually transmitted infections ( ... STIs). Smith was vice-chairman on the Zoning committees, ...
Brundrett, Rick (November 10, 2014). "Do-nothing ethics committees". The Times and Democrat. Retrieved 16 March 2015. SCPC ... Jackson, David (April 30, 2014). "South Carolina Republicans battle over ethics case". USA Today. Retrieved 16 March 2015. ...
Muñoz sat on the following committees: Budget and Government Operations; Committees, Rules and Ethics; Education and Child ... political action committee (PAC), for which he had served as the treasurer, on "questionable" expenditures including $13,000 ...
Olivo serves on seven committees: Aviation; Budget and Government Operations; Committees, Rules, and Ethics; Finance; License ... Olivo was the only alderman to report receiving gifts valued at more than $500 in 2006 on their required annual ethics ... which was introduced to the Chicago City Council and referred to the City Council's Committee on Health on September 27, 2007. ...
He served on six other committees: Budget and Government Relations; Finance; Committees, Rules and Ethics; Traffic Control and ... Chicago's 47th Ward Alderman Gene Schulter, website of Citizens for Gene Schulter, Schulter's political action committee City ... Schulter was chairman of the Committee on License and Consumer Protection. ...
Coleman served on six committees: Budget and Government Operations; Committees, Rules and Ethics; Education; Finance; Health; ...
He is a member of the following committees: Budget and Government Operations; Committees, Rules and Ethics; Health and ...
"Ethics Committees in Croatia". CROSBI. 2007. Retrieved 9 July 2022. "Socijalna medicina i organizacija zdravstvene zaštite". ... "Ethics Committees in Croatia", under the mentorship of Henk ten Have. She finished her specialisation in clinical pharmacology ... ISBN 978-953-7031-34-3. Public Health, Ethics and Human Rights, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 2014. ISBN 978-953- ... The use of checklists in clinical ethics (co-author with Hans-Martin Sass), School of Medicine, University of Zagreb and ...
Solis served on seven committees: Aviation, Budget and Government Operations; Committees, Rules and Ethics; Finance; Education ... Solis was a member of Clinton's Illinois Steering Committee. Solis was born in 1949 in Monterrey, Mexico. When he was six, he ... Clinton Campaign Announces Illinois Steering Committee Archived 2008-01-30 at the Wayback Machine "Danny Solis: Alderman and ...
Moore is assigned to the following committees; Committees, Rules and Ethics; Economic, Capital and Technology Development; ...
At Goldman Sachs, Strongin serves on the advisory board to the RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and on the visiting committee ... "Corporate Ethics and Governance". www.rand.org. Retrieved 2019-06-24. "Secure Directory , Visiting Committees & Councils , The ... He was a member of the Management Committee, Firmwide Client and Business Standards Committee and was also co-chair of the ... "Goldman Sachs , Management Committee - Steven H. Strongin". Goldman Sachs. Retrieved 2020-03-19. "Goldman names Steve Strongin ...
He also served on seven other committees: Aviation; Budget and Government Operations; Buildings; Committees, Rules and Ethics; ... Allen was chairman of the Transportation and Public Way Committee. ...
Committees, Rules and Ethics; Finance; Health; Housing and Real Estate; Human Relations; and License and Consumer Protection. ... The committee evolved into the Heart of Uptown Coalition, a political and social service organization steeped in the rhetoric ... After heated debate, the Budget Committee voted 9-5 in favor of Shiller's amendment to remove the grant for the UCC. Upon the ... Shiller gloated during committee hearings that, with Mayor Harold Washington's backing, the decree could not be stopped. ...
Stroger served on seven committees: Budget and Government Operations; Committees, Rules, and Ethics; Housing and Real Estate; ... On July 18, 2006, the Cook County Democratic Central Committee (a collection of 80 county Democratic party leaders also known ...
The Ethics Committee (EC) consists of the Past Chair of POPA and a representative from the Committee on the Status of Women in ... The Ethics Committee will:. *Propose and oversee the implementation of ethics policies for APS, including developing the roles ... If you have questions or concerns, you can contact the Ethics Committee at ethics@aps.org. ... the Committee on Minorities, and the Committee on Education. These representatives are recommended by the respective committees ...
Local terms for a European ethics committee include: A Research Ethics Committee (REC) in the United Kingdom A Medical Research ... Similarly in Canada, the committee is called a Research Ethics Board (REB). In Australia, an ethics committee in medical ... Clinical research ethics, Drug safety, Social research, Ethics organizations, Ethics and statistics, Applied ethics, Regulatory ... In the United States, an ethics committee is usually known as an institutional review board (IRB) or research ethics board (REB ...
See an archive of all ethics committee stories published on Intelligencer. ... Ethics Committee Says Disgraced Senator John Ensign Was More Than UnethicalHe broke the law. ... Devin Nunes Steps Aside From Russia InvestigationNunes will leave the gig to spend more time defending himself against ethics ...
The terms of reference for the Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee, including its functions and procedural rules. ... Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee. The terms of reference for the Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee, including ... Reporting lines and responsibilities of the Committee. This committee reports to the Academic Ethics and Integrity Committee. ... Committee objectives. The purpose of the Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (SocSci REC) is to receive, consider and ...
... the FHML Research Ethics Committee for ethics review.. For questions concerning non-WMO research, the METC or FHML-REC can be ... Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC) Ethical review is obligatory by law for all research that is subject to the WMO. The ... Animal Ethics Committee Maastricht UMC+ and UM are aware of the ethical objections regarding experimentation on animals and ... Ethics Review Committees All research involving human participants or personal data conducted in FHML/ Maastricht UMC+ should ...
... The IRSSTs Ethics Policy on Research Involving Humans is one of the tools the Institute and its ... Composition of the committee. President and Member with Competence in Ethics. *Emmanuelle Marceau, Associate professor at ... The Institutes Research Ethics Committee (REC) supports this process, which is fundamentally based on respect for human ... Committee Coordinator. *Maryse Dion Tremblay, Research Management Professional at the Research Funds and Partnerships Division ...
We use Cookies to give you a better experience on our website. By continuing to browse the site without changing your privacy settings, you are consenting to our use of Cookies. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy Statement.. ...
The Senate Ethics Committee has closed its file on Sen. Bob Menendez, putting a formal end to the ethics controversies that had ... Bob Hugin, Menendezs Republican opponent in last years Senate race, pounced on the ethics committees admonishment throughout ... The committee last spring admonished Menendez over gifts he had received - but had not initially disclosed or repaid - from ... The April 2018 ethics admonishment came five months after Menendez survived a federal corruption trial in which prosecutors ...
The committee does not deliberate on any research ethics issues as these must be submitted to the Health Research Ethics ... Tygerberg Clinical Ethics Committee​. Please be informed that a Clinical Ethics Committee has been established at Tygerberg ... Committees, Faculty of Health Sciences.. Please contact Dawn Marwood on 021 9385966/4499 at Dr Mukosis offices.​​​ ...
... and the colleagues who will be taking them up when our new approach to research ethics governance starts. ... Four new research ethics Committees will operate from 3 April when our new approach to research ethics governance starts.. ... These new Committees will report to the Academic Ethics and Integrity Committee along with the Animal Welfare and Ethical ... Further to our review of our governance of research ethics the University has created four new research ethics Committees which ...
Aalto University Research Ethics Committee is responsible for the ethical evaluation of the universitys non-medical research ... Research Ethics Committee. Aalto University Research Ethics Committee is responsible for the preliminary ethical evaluation of ... In both of the processes for research ethics statemen request, the committee (full) process and concise process with committee ... The Research Ethics Committee meets regularly when convened by the chair. The prepared statements can be discussed and accepted ...
... Fines - Updated: March 21, 2023 Fine Appeal Form House Ethics Committee Memo re: Fine Appeals due to a ... and the House Ethics Committees April 5, 2022 Concurrence with 133 ethics violations and nonconcurrence with 6 ethics ... SC State Ethics Commission Individual Reports Rules of the House Ethics Committee - Updated: January 12, 2023 1997 - 1992 ... Complaint by the House Ethics Committee with Exhibits A-F; State Ethics Commissions Recommendation of Probable Cause; ...
The House Ethics Committee has opened an investigation into Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), who is reportedly also the subject of a ... In a statement, the committee listed a litany of allegations for which it would be investigating Gaetz: that he may have " ... As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that ... As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that ...
The American Finance Association (AFA) is the premier academic organization devoted to the study and promotion of knowledge about financial economics.. ...
The Ethics Advisory Committee has launched an anonymous survey addressed to ESCMID members discussing scientific misconduct in ... The ESCMID Ethical Advisory Committee (EEAC) is an independent body that shall advise the ESCMID Executive Committee (EC) on ... Ethics Advisory Committee Trainee Association of ESCMID Speciality training (UEMS) ESCMID Visiting Professorship Programme ...
The adjudicatory chamber of the independent Ethics Committee has found Mr Kokou Hougnimon Fagla, a referee and football ...
Guest told CNN that the committee would make its report public and allow Congress members to make their own judgment on whether ... According to ABC7, the committee had heard fr ... Julia Nikhinson/ReutersThe House Ethics Committee will not push ... The House Ethics Committee will not push for any penalty against Rep. George Santos (R-NY) following its months-long review, ... Guest told CNN that the committee would make its report public and allow Congress members to make their own judgment on whether ...
"But lets not be fooled! This ethics committee will act without any independence from the government, without any transparency ... Several Cambodian journalists told RSF they were concerned about the impact this ethics committee could have. "I wonder how ... "Monitoring Committee for Journalism Ethics" that is completely lacking in independence, transparency and accountability and is ... In practice, the committee reserves the right to summon and sanction any journalist or media whose reporting displeases the ...
Although the ethics committee received referral for investigations on both lawmakers from the Office of Congressional Ethics - ... The OCE has referred nine investigations to the House ethics committee since its inception. The committee has announced ... The House ethics committee voted Thursday to open formal investigations into unrelated allegations involving Reps. Maxine ... Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), who faces an unrelated ethics committee inquiry into his personal finances and fundraising, as well as ...
Ethics Committee Term of office and members TERM OF OFFICE. Members of the Ethics Committee of the University of Erfurt are ... The rules of procedure of the Ethics Committee can be found here under Committees and Bodies (only available in German). ... Upon request, the Ethics Committee of the University of Erfurt gives its view on ethical aspects of research projects ... The application form and the questionnaire for the civil clause can be found here under Committees and Organs (only available ...
Get notifications about news related to the topics you care about. You can unsubscribe anytime ...
The Committee reports to the Senate, and the key tasks of the UREC are to:. *Uphold adherence to the Universitys Ethics ... Information about the Committee, including Terms of Reference and Membership, is available from the Universitys central ... Keep abreast of the external research ethics environment and ensure that the University responds to all external requirements. ... The actual ethical review of individual research ethics applications is undertaken by academic departments. ...
PURPOSE: The ACRP Professional Ethics Committee maintains ACRPs Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct and reviews ethics ... Thank you for your interest in applying for service on ACRPs 2024 Professional Ethics Committee. The Vice Chair of ACRPs ... What skills will you contribute to fulfill the Professional Ethics Committees responsibilities?*. ... acrpnet.org/about/leadership-governance/professional-ethics-committee/. Questions? Email Christy Herz, Director of Governance ...
... Copyright © 2006 by the Catholic Health Association of the United States ... Patricia Talone, RSM, PhD â€" describes the results of a recent survey of ethics committee chairs concerning their groups role ... Increasingly, health care leaders turn to ethics committees to help resolve such questions. Because thats so, weve made these ... Our guest editors are Ron Hamel, PhD, CHAs senior director, ethics, and Scott McConnaha, a CHA editor specializing in ethics. ...
Now, the Ethics Committee is investigating if this trip was allowed. ... "The committees approval is required prior to the trip," Ethics Committee chairman Yinon Azoulay (Shas) said. "Currently, I am ... Now, the Ethics Committee is investigating if this trip was allowed.. By TROY O. FRITZHAND. AUGUST 9, 2023 18:39 Updated: ... Knesset Ethics Committee var cont = `Sign up for The Jerusalem Post Premium Plus for just $5 Upgrade your reading experience ...
SPJ Ethics Committee condemns major broadcast networks practice of checkbook journalism ... SPJ Ethics Committee condemns major broadcast networks practice of checkbook journalism ... SPJ Ethics Committee Chairman, [email protected]. INDIANAPOLIS -- The Society of Professional Journalists Ethics Committee ... "Paying someone while covering them breaches basic journalism ethics," SPJ Ethics Committee Chairman Andy Schotz said. "ABCs ...
House Ethics Committee to Possibly Uncover More of Eric Massas Original Sex Moves Things you buy through our links may earn ... House Ethics Committee to Possibly Uncover More of Eric Massas Original Sex Moves. By Dan Amira ... The House Ethics Committee has decided it wants to know more about Eric Massas unique, sexual-harassment-heavy management ... Ethics panel opens cover up probe in Massa case [AP via Yahoo] ... the committee doesnt have the authority to look directly into ...
Discussions with the Ethics Committee can be helpful and reassuring when a difficult choice must be made (for example, ... questions on end-of-life care, allocating scarce resources or confidentiality). The Ethics Committee is here to help when ... called the Pediatric Ethics Committee ). Why does the medical center have an Ethics Committee?. The Ethics Committee gives ... What is the Ethics Committee?. The University of Michigan Hospital and Health Centers Ethics Committee advisory groups are ...
Does legislating hospital ethics committees make a difference? A study of hospital ethics committees in Maryland, the District ... Gillon R. Clinical ethics committees-pros and cons. Journal of Medical Ethics 1997;23:203-4. ... Clinical ethics committees and the formulation of health care policy. Len Doyal, Journal of Medical Ethics, 2001 ... Snapshots of five clinical ethics committees in the UK. M Szeremeta et al., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2001 ...
Charles Rangel to the House Ethics Committee; he will remain the Chair of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee. ... Posts Tagged Ethics Committee October 30th, 2009 at 12:46 pm. Nancy Pelosis "Most Honest, Most Open and Most Ethical ... "The House ethics committee said Thursday that it was opening two new investigations - one into the foreclosure scandal of Rep. ... Tags: Charles Rangel, Congress, Ethics Committee, John Carter, New York Times, Washington Post ...
  • The House Ethics Committee has opened an investigation into Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), who is reportedly also the subject of a Justice Department inquiry into whether he had a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old and paid for her travel, potentially violating federal sex trafficking laws. (motherjones.com)
  • The House Ethics Committee will not push for any penalty against Rep. George Santos (R-NY) following its months-long review, Chairman Michael Guest (R-MS) said on Wednesday. (yahoo.com)
  • The House ethics committee voted Thursday to open formal investigations into unrelated allegations involving Reps. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) and Laura Richardson (D-Calif.). In separate statements, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct said it would open investigative subcommittees into each lawmaker. (rollcall.com)
  • The OCE has referred nine investigations to the House ethics committee since its inception. (rollcall.com)
  • The House Ethics Committee has decided it wants to know more about Eric Massa's unique, sexual-harassment-heavy management style, and is opening "a full and complete investigation. (nymag.com)
  • The House ethics committee said Thursday that it was opening two new investigations - one into the foreclosure scandal of Rep. Laura Richardson (D-Calif.) and one involving financial questions about Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) and her husband. (cfif.org)
  • Today, Representative John Carter from Texas introduced a resolution that would have referred Rangel's case to the House Ethics Committee and stripped Rangel of his Chairmanship. (cfif.org)
  • The House Ethics Committee in a report released Thursday said there is clear evidence that Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) committed serious crimes, though it stopped short of recommending formal sanctions, as some had hoped it would do. (kdvr.com)
  • Rep. Michael Guest (R-Miss.), chairman of the House Ethics Committee, introduced the resolution. (fox59.com)
  • House Ethics Committee Chairman Michael Guest, a Mississippi Republican, will make a motion to expel Santos as soon as Friday during the pro forma session, a source familiar told CNN, which would tee up action on the issue for when Congress returns from the Thanksgiving recess. (yahoo.com)
  • This new structure will replace the Faculty-based research ethics Committees, PREC, SSREC and REACH from 3 April 2023, for staff and Doctoral students. (bath.ac.uk)
  • An important element of an ethics committee's oversight is to ensure that informed consent of the subjects has been given. (wikipedia.org)
  • The committee may co-opt additional members to provide areas of specific expertise not offered by the sub-Committee's membership. (bath.ac.uk)
  • Bob Hugin, Menendez's Republican opponent in last year's Senate race, pounced on the ethics committee's admonishment throughout the campaign. (politico.com)
  • What skills will you contribute to fulfill the Professional Ethics Committee's responsibilities? (acrpnet.org)
  • The committee's approval is required prior to the trip," Ethics Committee chairman Yinon Azoulay (Shas) said. (jpost.com)
  • First, we would like to welcome Nam-Hwa Kang as the committee's new co-chair and our new committee members-Sanghee Cho, Mercy Ogunsola-Bandele, and Deniz Saribas. (narst.org)
  • Republican Rep. George Santos announced he will not seek reelection to the House next year, following the Ethics Committee's release of a long-awaited report on Thursday, which concluded that there is "substantial evidence" that the New York congressman used campaign funds for personal purposes. (yahoo.com)
  • I served for many years on the Privacy Commissioner of Canada's External Advisory Board and I have been privileged to appear before multiple committees on privacy issues, including appearances on PIPEDA, Bill S-4, Bill C-13, and this committee's earlier reviews of social and media privacy and the Privacy Act. (michaelgeist.ca)
  • Ellen Averett, associate professor for health policy and management at the University of Kansas Medical Center, and Terry Rosell, the Rosemary Flanigan Chair at the Center for Practical Bioethics, address the question: How do you know if an ethics committee is making a difference? (practicalbioethics.org)
  • 24 December 2019 ‒ WHO, in collaboration with the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), held the second Eastern Mediterranean/Arab States Regional Summit of National Ethics and Bioethics Committees in Cairo, Egypt, on 15‒16 December 2019. (who.int)
  • The main goal of the summit was to foster the development of national ethics/bioethics committees in the Region and establish effective mechanisms for regional cooperation to address emerging issues related to bioethics. (who.int)
  • This was followed by discussions on expanded access policy, the LAS/UNESCO Arab Charter on ethics in science and technology, national and regional collaboration between national ethics/bioethics committees, and the upcoming meetings in 2020, especially the Global Bioethics Summit in March 2020. (who.int)
  • The participants emphasized the importance of establishing/enhancing the work and roles of national ethics/bioethics committees in the Region, in close coordination with UNESCO and WHO, strengthening national/regional coordination between national ethics/bioethics committees, raising public awareness, especially among patients, on bioethics-related matters, and fostering bioethics principles within the health sciences' curricula of academic institutions. (who.int)
  • The guide is the first in a series on the establishment of bioethics committees and has been prepared for ministers, policy advisors, leaders and members of professional and scientific research associ. (bvsalud.org)
  • The IARC Ethics Committee (IEC) meets every two months to evaluate IARC project proposals and ensure that the ethics process is respected. (who.int)
  • The Ethics Committee (EC) consists of the Past Chair of POPA and a representative from the Committee on the Status of Women in Physics, the Committee on Scientific Publications, the Committee on Minorities, and the Committee on Education. (aps.org)
  • The President-Elect will appoint a Chair from among serving members of the Committee. (aps.org)
  • Appointment of the Chair and Committee members is for three years via an open call led by the Chair of AEIC. (bath.ac.uk)
  • There shall be a quorum at meetings of the Chair (or their appointed alternate) plus one-third of the membership of the Committee. (bath.ac.uk)
  • I am therefore very pleased to be taking up the role of Chair of this Committee and look forward to working with colleagues across campus as part of that role. (bath.ac.uk)
  • Professor Brown said: "I am pleased to take up the role of Chair of this Committee. (bath.ac.uk)
  • Professor Ellis commented: "I am delighted to be taking on the role of Chair of this new Committee. (bath.ac.uk)
  • At Aalto University, there are two processes for research ethics statemen request: the committee (full) process and concise process with committee chair decision. (aalto.fi)
  • In both of the processes for research ethics statemen request, the committee (full) process and concise process with committee chair decision, the request for research ethics statement is made by filling in the statement request form and adding relevant appendices. (aalto.fi)
  • The Vice Chair of ACRP's Board of Trustees works with the committee and staff to fill vacancies for his/her year as Chair. (acrpnet.org)
  • he will remain the Chair of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee. (cfif.org)
  • While the committee did not make a formal recommendation on expelling Santos, as Chair Michael Guest (R-Miss.) previously told reporters would be the case, the top lawmakers on the panel said "Santos' conduct warrants public condemnation, is beneath the dignity of the office, and has brought severe discredit to the House. (kdvr.com)
  • If none of the criteria (1-6) is met, and a description of the ethical review system is needed for the party granting the research permit, the party publishing the research, or the party funding it, the researcher(s) may send a request for a signed description letter ( see the attached file/document ) to the chair and secretary of the committee. (oulu.fi)
  • The ACRP Professional Ethics Committee maintains ACRP's Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct and reviews ethics complaints submitted through the organization's review process. (acrpnet.org)
  • All this bill does is impose a code of conduct, a code of ethics on the Supreme Court. (scotusblog.com)
  • WASHINGTON (Nexstar) - Senators on the Judiciary Committee discussed a possible code of ethics for Supreme Court justices and announced attempts to investigate whether extravagant gifts from wealthy donors to the justices created conflicts of interest. (nwahomepage.com)
  • Democrats say it's long past time to implement a code of ethics for Supreme Court justices. (nwahomepage.com)
  • In 2019, the American Public Health Association released the Public Health Code of Ethics to serve as an update of to the Principles of Ethical Practice of Public Health. (cdc.gov)
  • Members of the Ethics Committee of the University of Erfurt are elected for a term of three years (current term of office 01.10.2022 - 30.09.2025), whereas elected representatives from the group of students are elected for a term of one year. (uni-erfurt.de)
  • The House bill, known as the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act of 2022 , would require the court to create a code of conduct for the justices and employees of the court. (scotusblog.com)
  • Narrative Ethics in Public Health: The Value of Stories (2022). (cdc.gov)
  • Queries on the University's institutional ethics processes can be sent to Governance Office . (bath.ac.uk)
  • Aalto University Research Ethics Committee is responsible for the preliminary ethical evaluation of the university's non-medical research projects with human participants. (aalto.fi)
  • Aalto University's Research Ethics Committee sees to the carrying out of research ethical review at the university for non-medical research with research involving human participants. (aalto.fi)
  • Information about the Committee, including Terms of Reference and Membership, is available from the University's central Governance and Management webpages. (sheffield.ac.uk)
  • Although the ethics committee received referral for investigations on both lawmakers from the Office of Congressional Ethics - and faced a deadline next week to determine whether to probe either matter - the panel said it initiated the queries on its own initiative. (rollcall.com)
  • The Office of Congressional Ethics is tasked with reviewing potential rules violations and recommending investigations to the ethics committee. (rollcall.com)
  • But shortly after the committee met, chairs Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Jo Bonner (R-Ala.) interrupted proceedings on the House floor to say that an internal document on secret committee proceedings had been leaked to The Washington Post - and that it would name the names of many other members who had drawn the attention of either the committee or the Office of Congressional Ethics. (cfif.org)
  • The April 2018 ethics admonishment came five months after Menendez survived a federal corruption trial in which prosecutors alleged he did official favors for Melgen in exchange for political contributions, private jet flights and other gifts prosecutors valued at around $1 million. (politico.com)
  • Gabe Roth, the executive director of Fix the Court, said that Republicans' response to the bill was "especially disappointing to me given how hard I worked with them on previous versions of this bill - in 2018, on the bill called the Judiciary ROOM Act which passed the committee unanimously and included SCOTUS ethics and recusals. (scotusblog.com)
  • The Committee reviewed the progress of implementation of the Programme budget 2018-2019 at both its meetings. (who.int)
  • Presentado en el Taller de la Red REA CVSP-BIREME 2018 como Evento satélite del CRICS10. (bvsalud.org)
  • Committee members include doctors, nurses, and social workers as well as a lawyer, a chaplain, a medical ethics professional, and a member of the community. (uofmhealth.org)
  • The Ethics Committee gives advice on moral questions in clinical care, educates clinical staff and the public on issues in medical ethics, and develops policies related to patient care. (uofmhealth.org)
  • As Dworkin has observed, concern for medical ethics has often become a plea for medical law. (bmj.com)
  • I'm Art Caplan, head of medical ethics at the New York University School of Medicine. (medscape.com)
  • In Canada, the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics (IAPRE) promotes "the ethical conduct of research involving human participants" under a document sometimes referred to as TCPS2. (wikipedia.org)
  • The Committee will consider the research ethics implications of projects involving human participants that do not NHS REC approval and fall outside of the remit of the Data & Digital Science or the Biomedical Sciences Research Ethics Committees. (bath.ac.uk)
  • All research involving human participants or personal data conducted in FHML/ Maastricht UMC+ should be submitted for ethics review. (maastrichtuniversity.nl)
  • The METC acts as an accredited independent Ethics Committee for review and approval of all scientific research with human participants subject to the WMO. (maastrichtuniversity.nl)
  • Researchers undertaking work with human participants that falls outside the scope of the WMO and does not include patients from the academic hospital, are able to submit their research proposal to the 'FHML-REC' - the FHML Research Ethics Committee for ethics review. (maastrichtuniversity.nl)
  • These Committees will consider applications for research involving human participants or data that has the potential to identify people. (bath.ac.uk)
  • In 1974, the U.S. National Research Act came into effect, referencing for the first time the concept of an institutional ethics committee as a protective mechanism for participants. (barraquer.com)
  • These representatives are recommended by the respective committees and appointed by the President-Elect as voting members to staggered three (3) year terms. (aps.org)
  • These members will represent a wide variety of backgrounds across the APS membership and are recommended by the APS Committee on Committees. (aps.org)
  • Alongside the new digital system this will embed a collaborative and supportive approach to ethical review that aspires to an improved, enriching experience to staff and student researchers and committee members. (bath.ac.uk)
  • We are very grateful to the Chairs of those Committees, their members and Secretary and thank them for all their work to date. (bath.ac.uk)
  • The Ethics Advisory Committee has launched an anonymous survey addressed to ESCMID members discussing scientific misconduct in infectious diseases. (escmid.org)
  • The ESCMID Ethical Advisory Committee (EEAC) is an independent body that shall advise the ESCMID Executive Committee (EC) on specific ethical, regulatory, social and philosophical issues related to ESCMID funded-research projects and scientific behaviour of members or appointed persons in matters related to ESCMID activities. (escmid.org)
  • Guest told CNN that the committee would make its report public and allow Congress members to make their own judgment on whether Santos should be expelled. (yahoo.com)
  • RSF has learned that the committee will have 15 members, of whom 11 will be information and interior ministry officials. (rsf.org)
  • The committee has announced investigations into eight of those Members. (rollcall.com)
  • The ethics panel launched an investigative subcommittee in June to review five Congressional Black Caucus members who accepted privately sponsored travel to the Caribbean in 2007 and 2008. (rollcall.com)
  • But it's still possible that new information could emerge as the Committee focuses instead on what other members of Congress knew and when they knew it, and whether they acted appropriately in response. (nymag.com)
  • Members of the committee may meet with patients, families and medical personnel to discuss these concerns. (uofmhealth.org)
  • Ethics Committee members discuss the information which has been gathered. (uofmhealth.org)
  • In an increasingly litigious society where ritual demands for accountability and "taking responsibility" are now commonplace, it is not surprising that members of clinical ethics committees (CECs) are becoming more aware of their potential legal liability. (bmj.com)
  • Yet the vulnerability of committee members to legal action is difficult to assess with any certainty. (bmj.com)
  • Nevertheless, despite these difficulties this article will outline the broad legal principles governing the potential liability of committee members. (bmj.com)
  • This should allow sufficient time for RGR review and time for the committee members to review the application prior to the meeting. (www.gov.im)
  • Association of Research Ethics Committees is an independent, self-governing body of Research Ethics Committees, local and multi-centre, including their members and administrators. (alltrials.net)
  • And we want to thank three members who completed their service as members of the E&E Committee-Irene Osisioma, Cassie Quigley, and Jacqueline Samuel. (narst.org)
  • Based on the success of the inaugural book drive at the 2014 NARST conference, Equity and Ethics Committee members organized a similar social action project with Chicago public schools. (narst.org)
  • We thank all E&E Committee members as well as the NARST members and staff who helped make the above efforts successful! (narst.org)
  • As members from both parties, members of the Ethics Committee and Representative Santos return to Congress after the Thanksgiving break, Speaker Johnson encourages all involved to consider the best interests of the institution as this matter is addressed further. (yahoo.com)
  • Members of the European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network working party number 1, with expertise in the field of ethics, responded. (bmj.com)
  • There is a major heterogeneity in the composition of ethics committees among the surveyed countries based on the number of members, proportion of experts versus lay members and expertise of the scientific members. (bmj.com)
  • The summit was followed by a workshop on ethics in implementation research, held on 17 December 2019, which was co-facilitated by Dr Andreas Reis, Global Health Ethics, WHO headquarters, Dr Ehsan-Shamsi Gooshki, Secretary General, National Research Ethics Committee, Islamic Republic of Iran and Dr Ahmed Mandil, WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. (who.int)
  • Having already received documentation that all impermissible gifts have been repaid, the Committee hereby considers this matter closed," reads a Feb. 1 letter signed by Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), the committee chairman and Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del. (politico.com)
  • Paying someone while covering them breaches basic journalism ethics," SPJ Ethics Committee Chairman Andy Schotz said. (spj.org)
  • Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., kicked off a lengthy debate about the bill by calling attention to ethics violations from justices nominated by both Republican and Democratic presidents. (scotusblog.com)
  • While the committee didn't include a disciplinary recommendation in its report because that would have taken more time, the fact that the chairman is making the motion will send a strong signal to the rest of the Republican conference - and is a sign this expulsion effort could succeed this time around. (yahoo.com)
  • This document describes the governance arrangements for the Research Ethics Committee (REC) and is a policy document of Public Health within the Cabinet Office. (www.gov.im)
  • The Ethics Committee of the Barraquer Ophthalmology Centre is an independent and multidisciplinary body that safeguards the rights, safety, and well-being of patients participating in research projects, ensuring compliance with current codes, norms, and laws. (barraquer.com)
  • On the second day, the meeting included three presentations on ethics in humanitarian settings by UNESCO, UNHCR and a WHO Collborating Centre in Pakistan. (who.int)
  • Centre of Medical Law and Ethics. (who.int)
  • The Committee notes that the WHO-wide transformation agenda builds on the best practices and experience of the AFRO approach, and strongly recommends alignment and integration of priorities, results and KPIs across the three levels of the Organization. (who.int)
  • Nominees for and holders of APS Honors (prizes, awards, and fellowship) and official leadership positions are expected to meet standards of professional conduct and integrity as described in the APS Ethics Guidelines . (aps.org)
  • Unveiled on 2 August, the committee will "examine complaints by the public against journalists and media outlets," "evaluate the practice of journalism in Cambodia" and "provide orientation to journalists on how to conduct themselves," according to pro-government media outlets . (rsf.org)
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., announced sweeping ethics legislation on Tuesday that would impose a code of conduct on the justices and would ban them from owning securities. (scotusblog.com)
  • The committee said it uncovered additional "uncharged and unlawful conduct" by Santos that go beyond the criminal allegations already pending against him, and would immediately refer the allegations to the Justice Department for further investigation. (yahoo.com)
  • If the panel finds that Santos committed ethics violations, punishments could range from a reprimand to expulsion from the House of Representatives, depending on the severity of the conduct. (wskg.org)
  • The Murdoch Institute's Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) is responsible for the consideration of projects under the following licences as issued by Animal Welfare Victoria: Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Royal Children's Hospital. (edu.au)
  • The Animal Ethics Committee is constituted by the Murdoch Children's Executive with the authority to approve and monitor all animal-based research at The Melbourne Children's Campus. (edu.au)
  • Reporters Without Borders (RSF) is dismayed by the Cambodian information ministry's decision to create a "Monitoring Committee for Journalism Ethics" that is completely lacking in independence, transparency and accountability and is clearly designed to serve as a new censorship mechanism. (rsf.org)
  • Santos engaged in "knowing and willful violations" with regard to financial disclosure statements filed with the House, according to the panel, and "knowingly caused his campaign committee to file false or incomplete reports with the Federal Election Commission. (yahoo.com)
  • The Senate Ethics Committee has closed its file on Sen. Bob Menendez , putting a formal end to the ethics controversies that had dogged the New Jersey Democrat for more than six years. (politico.com)
  • As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. (motherjones.com)
  • I had the honour of appearing before both the House and Senate committees on Bill S-4, which was ostensibly the effort to update PIPEDA by implementing recommendations first made in 2006. (michaelgeist.ca)
  • But Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee slammed the efforts. (nwahomepage.com)
  • Regularly review American Physical Society ethics statements for consistency with current standards and practice, or in response to current events. (aps.org)
  • In practice, the committee reserves the right to summon and sanction any journalist or media whose reporting displeases the government. (rsf.org)
  • The Ethics Committee is troubled by how widespread the practice of paying sources has become and the extravagant amounts of money changing hands. (spj.org)
  • But the committee decided against issuing a subpoena to Santos because of his likelihood to invoke his Fifth Amendment right and that his testimony "would have low evidentiary value given his admitted practice of embellishment. (yahoo.com)
  • Report on compensation insurance and indemnity arrangements for institutional ethics committees / endorsed by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra - November 1994. (who.int)
  • In the United States, an ethics committee is usually known as an institutional review board (IRB) or research ethics board (REB) and is dedicated to overseeing the rights and well-being of research subjects participating in scientific studies in the US. (wikipedia.org)
  • Report of the Review of the Role and Functioning of Institutional Ethics Committees : a report to the Minister for Health and Family Services. (who.int)
  • Results of search for 'su:{Ethics committees. (who.int)
  • raising awareness of research integrity and ethics amongst staff and students across the University. (bath.ac.uk)
  • The IRSST's Ethics Policy on Research Involving Humans is one of the tools the Institute and its staff have at their disposal to help them appropriately address the various dilemmas and concerns associated with research involving human subjects. (irsst.qc.ca)
  • The IRSST's REC has a mandate to assess the ethical validity of research projects requiring the involvement of human subjects conducted by IRSST researchers or by research collaborators who do not have access to such a committee. (irsst.qc.ca)
  • Ethics Committees are responsible for safeguarding the ethics and safety of research involving human subjects. (barraquer.com)
  • And on Wednesday night, the House Judiciary Committee voted 22-16 along party lines to move a court ethics bill, delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, to the full House. (scotusblog.com)
  • The operation of the Committees and the leadership of the Chairs will be supported by the Research Governance and Compliance team. (bath.ac.uk)
  • and CHA's own Sr. Patricia Talone, RSM, PhD â€" describes the results of a recent survey of ethics committee chairs concerning their groups' role, impact, and future. (chausa.org)
  • The Biomedical Sciences Research Ethics Committee will be Chaired by Professor James Betts , Department for Health. (bath.ac.uk)
  • Surveying and evaluating ethical review practices : a complementary guideline to the operational guidelines for ethics committees that review biomedical research. (who.int)
  • This was further developed in the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 by the World Medical Association which has since become the foundation for ethics committees' guidelines. (wikipedia.org)
  • The convening of ethics committees to approve the research protocol in human experiments was first written into international guidelines in the first revision to the Declaration of Helsinki (Helsinki II, 1975). (wikipedia.org)
  • That probe includes Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), who faces an unrelated ethics committee inquiry into his personal finances and fundraising, as well as Reps. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (D-Mich.), Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and Donald Payne (D-N.J.) and Del. (rollcall.com)
  • These new Committees will report to the Academic Ethics and Integrity Committee along with the Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board (AWERB). (bath.ac.uk)
  • Following release of the report, Santos said he would no longer seek reelection but that he will continue to serve "up until I am allowed" - while tearing into the committee. (kdvr.com)
  • It was organized in 7 sessions distributed around four themes, namely the review of key research priorities in the context of COVID-19 and identification of those relevant to the region, building COVID-19 research capacity in the Africa region, report of the sub committees of the AACHRD, and partner reflection on research in the context of COVID-19. (who.int)
  • The following are seven tips on how to meet the SHA's seven Ethics Principles Standards . (sha.org)
  • All APS committees operate on a calendar year basis and committee terms run from January 1 through December 31. (aps.org)
  • Four new research ethics Committees will operate from 3 April when our new approach to research ethics governance starts. (bath.ac.uk)
  • Further to our review of our governance of research ethics the University has created four new research ethics Committees which will operate University-wide from 3 April when our new approach to research ethics governance starts. (bath.ac.uk)
  • Santos declined a voluntary interview and also did not submit a written response to the allegations from the Ethics panel. (yahoo.com)
  • This committee reports to the Academic Ethics and Integrity Committee. (bath.ac.uk)
  • Minutes are submitted to Academic Ethics and Integrity Committee . (bath.ac.uk)
  • This led to a situation in which two models of research ethics committees organisation systems exist, being the model in which the "single opinion" is considered to be the decision made by a single ethics committee more effective and simpler in terms of administrative and logistic workload. (bmj.com)
  • Michael Victoroff, MD, described the phone call he received from an attorney asking a thorny ethics question involving a patient's gift to another physician. (medscape.com)
  • The AEC is guided by the Terms of Reference provided by the Murdoch Children's Research Institute Executive Committee, such Terms being supported by legislative requirements. (edu.au)
  • Mònica Martí Orpinell, Technical Secretary of the Research Ethics Committee for Medicines. (barraquer.com)
  • The applications are submitted to the Ethics Committee of Human Sciences of University of Oulu and delivered to the secretary of the committee Janne Kurtakko by e-mail [email protected] . (oulu.fi)
  • Organize events on ethics education topics at APS meetings and develop a speakers' roster for lectures on research ethics and best practices. (aps.org)
  • Compile information on ethics practices and provide reports to APS membership, Board of Directors, and Council of Representatives, as appropriate. (aps.org)
  • For the treatment of artifacts and collections, please visit the American Association of Museums (http://www.aam-us.org/resources/ethics-standards-and-best-practices). (sha.org)
  • The ethical advance evaluation of medical research is stipulated by law ( http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1999/19990488 ) and is the task of the ethical committee of North Ostrobothnia's hospital district ( https://www.ppshp.fi/Tutkimus-ja-opetus/Eettinen-toimikunta ). (oulu.fi)
  • If, in addition to the description, any of the aforementioned parties requires an ethical advance evaluation, the statement is obtained from the ethical committee of human sciences. (oulu.fi)
  • The Ethical Committee of the Capital Region (H-21033114) approved the protocol. (lu.se)
  • An ethics committee is a body responsible for ensuring that medical experimentation and human subject research are carried out in an ethical manner in accordance with national and international law. (wikipedia.org)
  • An ethics committee in the European Union is a body responsible for oversight of medical or human research studies in EU member states. (wikipedia.org)
  • In Australia, an ethics committee in medical research refers to a Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). (wikipedia.org)
  • The Institute's Research Ethics Committee (REC) supports this process, which is fundamentally based on respect for human dignity. (irsst.qc.ca)
  • Upon request, the Ethics Committee of the University of Erfurt gives it's view on ethical aspects of research projects involving human beings. (uni-erfurt.de)
  • Research ethics includes ensuring that studies involving human beings are published and all results, positive and negative, disseminated. (alltrials.net)
  • The Ethics Committee of Human Sciences of University of Oulu carries out ethical review of non-medical research projects on requests of researchers within the university. (oulu.fi)
  • Propose and oversee the implementation of ethics policies for APS, including developing the roles and responsibilities of an APS Ombudsperson and potential revocation procedures. (aps.org)
  • Professor Julie Barnett, Associate Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research), said: "We have four new Research Ethics Committees and these are integral to a new approach to research ethics governance at the University. (bath.ac.uk)
  • Maastricht UMC+ and UM are aware of the ethical objections regarding experimentation on animals and only conducts animal experiments when the scientific necessity for this research has been established by an independent animal experiments committee (Dier Experiment Commissie, DEC, in Dutch). (maastrichtuniversity.nl)
  • The only concession to civil society is the decision to give four of the positions on the committee to representatives of journalists' associations. (rsf.org)
  • We first contextualize the tensions of navigating between photovoice, the research ethics committees (RECs) regulatory frameworks, and competing views on visual representations in agricultur e. (cdc.gov)
  • Having worked on a number of ethics focussed committees and external government advisory panels, I am keen to apply my experience to chairing this new committee. (bath.ac.uk)
  • The University of Michigan Hospital and Health Centers Ethics Committee advisory groups are appointed by the Hospital's Office of Clinical Affairs. (uofmhealth.org)
  • The government and journalists' associations must have equal representation on the committee if it plans to issue any regulation limiting journalistic freedom," he said. (rsf.org)
  • Public Health Ethics: Cases Spanning the Globe (2016). (cdc.gov)
  • After graduating from the doctoral program, the students are expected to possess intel ectual autonomy, disciplinary rectitude and be able to assess research ethics. (lu.se)
  • This ethics committee will act without any independence from the government, without any transparency as to the decisions it issues, and without any recourse for the journalists it sanctions. (rsf.org)
  • The committee does not deliberate on any research ethics issues as these must be submitted to the Health Research Ethics Committees, Faculty of Health Sciences. (sun.ac.za)
  • and share experiences and deliberate on current ethical issues such as migration ethics and the ethics of artificial intelligence. (who.int)
  • The purpose of the Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (SocSci REC) is to receive, consider and provide an ethics opinion on proposals for ethical approval for research being undertaken by staff and students. (bath.ac.uk)
  • The rules dictate that such trips are required to go through an approval process by the Ethics Committee . (jpost.com)
  • The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. (bmj.com)
  • The Committee is not responsible for the accuracy of posted material, and posting does not represent approval or endorsement by the Committee or the Vermont General Assembly. (vermont.gov)
  • The SPJ Ethics Committee says news organizations that pay sources, for whatever reason, while covering them inject themselves in those stories and develop an "ownership" interest. (spj.org)
  • The actual ethical review of individual research ethics applications is undertaken by academic departments. (sheffield.ac.uk)

No images available that match "ethics committees"