Editorial Policies
Publishing
Editorial
Peer Review, Research
Health Policy
Authorship
Policy Making
Journalism, Medical
Journal Impact Factor
Peer Review
Organizational Policy
Conflict of Interest
Protection of patients' rights to privacy. (1/243)
The following statement was agreed [upon] by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (the Vancouver Group) at its meeting last week in San Francisco. It is a complete revision of the initial guidelines on this subject issued in 1991. (+info)BMJ response to Dr. Gupta. (2/243)
We sent a questionnaire survey to a random sample of 125 correspondents to the BMJ who had previously sent a letter which had been rejected. The objective was to evaluate the policy of sending on some unpublished letters to the authors of the articles to which they referred. There were 94 replies, a response rate of 75%. The key finding was that although most respondents agreed with the policy, a third thought it unconstructive. A quarter of the respondents said that the BMJ policy would discourage them from sending a letter to the journal for publication. This survey has led to a change of policy at the BMJ. Letters which are not published are not now sent on to the authors of the original articles. (+info)Prominent medical journals often provide insufficient information to assess the validity of studies with negative results. (3/243)
BACKGROUND: Physicians reading the medical literature attempt to determine whether research studies are valid. However, articles with negative results may not provide sufficient information to allow physicians to properly assess validity. METHODS: We analyzed all original research articles with negative results published in 1997 in the weekly journals BMJ, JAMA, Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine as well as those published in the 1997 and 1998 issues of the bimonthly Annals of Internal Medicine (N = 234). Our primary objective was to quantify the proportion of studies with negative results that comment on power and present confidence intervals. Secondary outcomes were to quantify the proportion of these studies with a specified effect size and a defined primary outcome. Stratified analyses by study design were also performed. RESULTS: Only 30% of the articles with negative results comment on power. The reporting of power (range: 15%-52%) and confidence intervals (range: 55-81%) varied significantly among journals. Observational studies of etiology/risk factors addressed power less frequently (15%, 95% CI, 8-21%) than did clinical trials (56%, 95% CI, 46-67%, p < 0.001). While 87% of articles with power calculations specified an effect size the authors sought to detect, a minority gave a rationale for the effect size. Only half of the studies with negative results clearly defined a primary outcome. CONCLUSION: Prominent medical journals often provide insufficient information to assess the validity of studies with negative results. (+info)Abstract! (4/243)
With the availability of electronic databases, it has become crucial to provide informative abstracts to published papers. Articles published without an abstract run a great risk of being neglected by readers and authors. The Netherlands Journal of Medicine will provide informative abstracts of all future papers, including editorials and letters. (+info)Founding editorial--bone biology. (5/243)
The skeleton is a complicated vertebrate structure, comprised of bone cells that form, modulate, and resorb the extracellular structure of bone. It is the extracellular structure, made up of the bone mineral (largely calcium phosphate) and the bone matrix, which constitutes the visible skeleton and the mechanical support for the vertebrate body. The matrix is the protein structure on which the bone mineral is laid down, many components of which have been identified in recent years. (+info)Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals. (6/243)
Public interest in issues concerning the maintenance of high ethical standards in the conduct of scientific research and its publication has been increasing. Some of the developments in these issues as reflected in the publication of the medical literature are traced here. This paper attempts to determine whether public interest is reflected in the specific requirements for authors for manuscript preparation as stated in the "Instructions to Authors" for articles being prepared for submission to 124 "high-impact" journals. The instructions to authors of these journals were read on the Web for references to ethical standards or requirements. The ethical issues that the instructions most often covered were specifically related to the individual journal's publication requirements. The results suggest that while the editors and publishers of the biomedical literature are concerned with promoting and protecting the rights of the subjects of the experiments in the articles they publish, and while these concerns are not yet paramount, they are evolving and growing. (+info)Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals. (7/243)
BACKGROUND: Researchers from the developing world contribute only a limited proportion to the total research output published in leading medical education journals. Some of them believe that there is a substantial editorial bias against their work. To obtain an objective basis for further discussion the present study was designed to assess the composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals. METHODS: The editorial boards of the three leading medical education journals according to their impact factor were retrieved from the respective January issue of the year 2003. We evaluated in which countries the editorial board members were based and classified these countries using the World Bank income criteria. RESULTS: Individuals from a number of countries can be found on the editorial boards of the investigated journals, but most of them are based in high-income countries. CONCLUSION: The percentage of editorial board members which are based in developing world countries is higher for the leading medical education journals than in most of their psychiatry and general medicine counterparts. But it is still too low. (+info)Conflicts between commercial and scientific interests in pharmaceutical advertising for medical journals. (8/243)
In 1992, researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles, published a study on the scientific merit and validity of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals. Their results led them to conclude, provocatively, that many pharmaceutical advertisements contained deficiencies in areas in which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had established explicit standards of quality. This article provides a detailed account of third-party reactions to the study following its publication in the Annals of Internal Medicine, as well as the implications for those involved, including the authors, editors, and publisher. The increasingly diverging interests between medical journal editors and publishers are also discussed and highlighted by two recent cases of editors' departures from prominent general-interest medical journals. (+info)Editorial policies refer to a set of guidelines and principles that govern the development, selection, peer-review, production, and publication of manuscripts in a medical journal. These policies aim to ensure the integrity, transparency, and quality of the published research while adhering to ethical standards and best practices in scientific publishing.
Some essential components of editorial policies include:
1. Authorship criteria: Defining who qualifies as an author, their roles, and responsibilities, and specifying the order of authorship based on contribution.
2. Conflict of interest disclosure: Requiring authors, reviewers, and editors to declare any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their judgment or objectivity in the manuscript's evaluation.
3. Peer-review process: Outlining the steps involved in the peer-review process, including the selection of reviewers, the number of required reviews, and the criteria for accepting or rejecting a manuscript.
4. Plagiarism detection: Employing plagiarism detection software to ensure originality and prevent unethical practices such as self-plagiarism or duplicate publication.
5. Data sharing: Encouraging or requiring authors to share their data, code, or materials to promote transparency and reproducibility of the research findings.
6. Corrections and retractions: Establishing procedures for correcting errors, addressing scientific misconduct, and retracting published articles when necessary.
7. Post-publication discussions: Encouraging open dialogue and constructive criticism through post-publication discussions or letters to the editor.
8. Accessibility and copyright: Describing how the journal ensures accessibility of its content, such as through open-access models, and outlining the terms of copyright and licensing agreements.
9. Archiving and preservation: Ensuring long-term preservation and availability of published content by depositing it in appropriate digital archives or repositories.
10. Compliance with international standards: Adhering to guidelines and best practices established by organizations such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
I'm sorry for any confusion, but "publishing" is not a term that has a medical definition. Publishing typically refers to the process of preparing and disseminating information, such as books, journals, or articles, to the public or a specific audience. It could involve both print and digital media. If you have any questions related to medicine or healthcare, I'd be happy to try to help answer those!
A "periodical" in the context of medicine typically refers to a type of publication that is issued regularly, such as on a monthly or quarterly basis. These publications include peer-reviewed journals, magazines, and newsletters that focus on medical research, education, and practice. They may contain original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorials, letters to the editor, and other types of content related to medical science and clinical practice.
As a "Topic," periodicals in medicine encompass various aspects such as their role in disseminating new knowledge, their impact on clinical decision-making, their quality control measures, and their ethical considerations. Medical periodicals serve as a crucial resource for healthcare professionals, researchers, students, and other stakeholders to stay updated on the latest developments in their field and to share their findings with others.
In the context of medical publishing, an editorial is not a medical definition itself but rather a piece of writing that outlines the opinion or viewpoint of the editor or authors. It may express their stance on a specific medical issue, research finding, or policy and can help to shape public opinion and influence decision-making in the medical community.
An editorial may also provide context for an article or research study being published, summarize key points, and highlight any implications for clinical practice or future research. However, it is important to note that an editorial does not necessarily reflect the views of the entire publication or organization.
Peer review in the context of research refers to the evaluation of scientific, academic, or professional work by others working in the same field. The purpose of peer review is to ensure that the research is rigorous, valid, and relevant to the field. In a peer-review process, experts in the relevant field assess the research article, report, or other type of scholarly work for its accuracy, quality, and significance before it is published or presented at a conference.
The peer-review process typically involves several stages:
1. Submission: The author(s) submit their manuscript to a journal, conference, or other publication venue.
2. Assignment: The editor of the publication assigns the manuscript to one or more reviewers who are experts in the field.
3. Review: The reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on criteria such as originality, methodology, data analysis, interpretation of results, and contribution to the field. They provide feedback and recommendations to the editor.
4. Decision: Based on the feedback from the reviewers, the editor makes a decision about whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to the manuscript.
5. Revision: If the manuscript is rejected or requires revisions, the author(s) may have an opportunity to revise and resubmit the manuscript for further consideration.
Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process, as it helps ensure that research is held to high standards of quality and integrity. It also provides a mechanism for identifying and correcting errors or weaknesses in research before it is published or disseminated widely.
Health policy refers to a set of decisions, plans, and actions that are undertaken to achieve specific healthcare goals within a population. It is formulated by governmental and non-governmental organizations with the objective of providing guidance and direction for the management and delivery of healthcare services. Health policies address various aspects of healthcare, including access, financing, quality, and equity. They can be designed to promote health, prevent disease, and provide treatment and rehabilitation services to individuals who are sick or injured. Effective health policies require careful consideration of scientific evidence, ethical principles, and societal values to ensure that they meet the needs of the population while being fiscally responsible.
In the context of medical research, authorship refers to the recognition of individuals who have made significant contributions to the development and completion of a scientific paper or research project. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has established guidelines for determining authorship, which include the following four criteria:
1. Substantial contribution to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work.
2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content.
3. Final approval of the version to be published.
4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
All authors should meet these criteria, and their contributions should be clearly described in the manuscript. It is important to note that authorship should not be granted based on position or status alone, but rather on the basis of substantial intellectual contribution and commitment to the work.
I'm sorry for any confusion, but "policy making" is not a medical term per se. It refers to the process of formulating or establishing official guidelines or rules, such as public policies or organizational policies, that govern decisions and actions. In the context of healthcare, policy making can refer to the development of guidelines, laws, regulations, and procedures that govern the delivery, financing, and accessibility of medical care and health promotion activities.
Examples of policy making in healthcare include:
* Developing clinical practice guidelines for the management of specific medical conditions
* Establishing reimbursement policies for medical procedures or treatments
* Implementing regulations to ensure patient safety and quality of care
* Creating public health policies to address population health issues, such as tobacco control or obesity prevention.
Medical journalism is a branch of journalism that focuses on reporting and disseminating news and information related to the medical field, including healthcare policy, public health, medical research, clinical trials, pharmaceuticals, medical technology, and medical education. It involves writing for both professional and lay audiences in various formats, such as newspapers, magazines, websites, and broadcast media. Medical journalists are expected to have a strong understanding of medical concepts and terminology, as well as the ethical considerations involved in reporting on medical issues. They must also be able to critically evaluate scientific studies and communicate their findings accurately and clearly to the public.
The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is a measure of the frequency with which the "average article" in a journal has been cited in a particular year. It is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years. For example, if a journal has an Impact Factor of 3 in 2020, that means articles published in 2018 and 2019 were cited 3 times on average in 2020. It is used to gauge the importance or rank of a journal by comparing the times it's articles are cited relative to other journals in the field. However, it has been criticized for various limitations such as being manipulated by editors and not reflecting the quality of individual articles.
Peer review is a process in which experts in a field assess the quality and validity of scientific research, scholarly articles, or other professional works prior to publication. In the context of medical research, peer review typically involves one or more researchers with similar expertise evaluating a manuscript or study proposal to ensure that it meets established standards for design, methodology, analysis, and interpretation of results. The goal of peer review is to maintain the integrity and credibility of the scientific record by identifying and correcting errors, biases, or other shortcomings in the research before it is published. Peer review is a standard practice in medical publishing and is considered an essential component of the scientific process.
I'm sorry for any confusion, but "organizational policy" is not a medical term. It falls under the broader category of management or administrative terminology.
An organizational policy generally refers to a formal statement or set of guidelines that outline an organization's approved course of action or conduct regarding various matters. These policies guide decision-making and help ensure consistent action across the organization. They can cover a wide range of topics, including (but not limited to) employee behavior, data security, patient care standards, and operational procedures.
In a healthcare setting, organizational policies play a crucial role in maintaining quality of care, ensuring patient safety, and complying with relevant laws and regulations.
A conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person or organization has dual loyalties or is in a position to exploit their professional or personal relationships for personal or institutional gain. In the medical field, COIs can arise when healthcare providers, researchers, or institutions have financial or other interests that may influence their judgment or actions in providing care, conducting research, or making recommendations.
Examples of conflicts of interest in medicine include:
* A physician who has a financial relationship with a pharmaceutical company and receives compensation for promoting the company's products to patients or colleagues.
* A researcher who owns stock in a company that is funding their study and may stand to benefit financially from positive results.
* An institution that accepts funding from industry partners for research or educational programs, which could potentially influence the outcomes of the research or bias the education provided.
COIs can compromise the integrity of medical research, patient care, and professional judgment. Therefore, it is essential to disclose and manage COIs transparently to maintain trust in the healthcare system and ensure that decisions are made in the best interests of patients and society as a whole.
In the context of healthcare, "policy" refers to a course or principle of action adopted or proposed by an organization or government to guide and determine its decisions, actions, and responses to issues related to the provision, financing, and regulation of health and healthcare services. Health policies are formulated to address various aspects such as access to care, quality of care, cost containment, medical research, public health, and patient safety. They can be established through legislation, regulations, guidelines, protocols, or organizational rules and may be aimed at various stakeholders, including healthcare providers, payers, patients, and the general public.
Domestic policy of the Justin Trudeau government
Cryptocurrency
Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
UQ Law School
Combinatorial Theory (journal)
Ibn Sina Medical College
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Apparatus (journal)
Bitcoin
List of academic publishers by preprint policy
Global Policy
International Journal of Drug Policy
Josephat Obi Oguejiofor
Transformative Works and Cultures
Visa policy of Saudi Arabia
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Current Oncology
Marine Policy
Ethnicity & Disease
Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage
Open Access Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
Museum of Science Fiction
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Chattogram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College
Home Office hostile environment policy
Animal welfare and rights in Brazil
Information Technologies and International Development
Rangifer (journal)
Archives Italiennes de Biologie
History of U.S. foreign policy, 1829-1861
Section 377
Editorial Policies
Editorial and publishing policies | Scientific Reports
Interactive Patient Education Editorial Policy | Elsevier
CDC - Preventing Chronic Disease: Editorial Policy
APNIC document editorial policy - APNIC
KidsHealth Editorial Policy (for Kids) - Norton Children's
Editorial Policy | TopNews
Editorial Policy for eSecurity Planet
Editorial Policy and Call for Articles
African Journal of Biotechnology - Editorial Policies
Editorial Standards & Policies | Lab Manager
Editorial Policies
Editorial policy
Editorial Policy
CTV News | Editorial Standards and Policies
Polls show voters open to more sustainable spending policy | EDITORIAL | Editorials | Opinion
Editorial Policies | Pediatrics | American Academy of Pediatrics
NY Times Editorial: Obama 'Misspoke' When He Said You Can Keep Insurance Policy
Streetsblog San Francisco Editorial Independence Policy - Streetsblog San Francisco
International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research - Editorial Policies
Editor and Editorial Policy
What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy
Editorial Policies
עיתון ההסתדרות הרפואית וחיל הרפואה | Editorial Policies
CTV News | Editorial Standards and Policies
Editorial Policies - International Institute of Anticancer Research
Editorials Archives - Page 4 of 15 - Alabama Policy Institute
Suntory | Sustainability | Reporting Standards & Editorial Policy | Editorial Policy on Sustainability Information
Editorial policy
Focus and Scope1
- Focus and scope) Jurnal Dinamika Hukum (JDH) is an open access and peer-reviewed journal that aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research in multiple governance policies and civil rights law, particularly in developing and emerging countries. (unsoed.ac.id)
Scope2
- As part of the evaluation process, the National Library of Medicine (NLM) considers a journal's scope as well as the scientific and editorial quality of the publication. (nih.gov)
- NLM will also take note of basic information available about the journal and article content (e.g., editorial board information, ethical policy descriptions and adherence in articles, stated aims and scope), which will be available to the Literature Selection Technical Review Committee (LSTRC) if the application moves forward to scientific quality review . (nih.gov)
Manuscripts3
- The committee studies and analyzes procedural, ethical, legal, and economic policies and recommends policies and/or guidelines that relate to the editing, review, and publication of manuscripts in books and journals. (councilscienceeditors.org)
- For manuscripts reporting studies involving vulnerable groups (for example, unconscious patients) where there is the potential for coercion (for example prisoners) or where consent may not have been fully informed, manuscripts will be considered at the editor's discretion and may be referred to an internal editorial oversight group for further scrutiny. (springeropen.com)
- Along with the rest of the EHP editorial team, Windy's primary responsibility is to oversee the peer review process of manuscripts submitted to the journal. (nih.gov)
Objectivity6
- WebMD LLC ("WebMD" or "we"), which operates www.medscape.com ("Medscape"), is committed to providing Medscape users with editorial content that meets the highest journalistic and editorial standards, focusing on fairness, accuracy, independence, transparency, and objectivity. (medscape.com)
- We don't let our business relationships get in the way of our editorial objectivity. (putthison.com)
- Neurodiem editorial policy ensures the objectivity of published content, which is selected and developed by independent scientific writers and editorial partners, and governed by a scientific review committee to ensure it provides relevant content. (neurodiem.hr)
- In addition to the scientific issues at stake, a central question has been how scientists can maintain their objectivity when informing policy makers. (nih.gov)
- Objectives: Drawing from current ethical, conceptual, and empirical studies of objectivity and conflicts of interest in scientific research, we propose guiding principles for communicating scientific findings in a manner that promotes objectivity, public trust, and policy relevance. (nih.gov)
- Thus, efforts to suppress or hide interests or values may actually damage scientific objectivity and public trust, whereas a willingness to bring implicit interests and values into the open may be the best path to promoting good science and policy. (nih.gov)
Content18
- Medscape's editorial content, including news, features, and reference, is developed independently of the advertising and promotional content available on Medscape, all of which is clearly labeled as such in accordance with the WebMD Advertising Policy . (medscape.com)
- Third-party editorial content licensed for use on Medscape is held to the same editorial standards as Medscape's original content. (medscape.com)
- Medscape editors review all content prior to publication to ensure adherence to our editorial standards, including disclosure of any relevant financial relationships of expert contributors. (medscape.com)
- Chief editors and authors from this network work directly with Medscape's editorial team to ensure the currency, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of the content. (medscape.com)
- This page describes the editorial policy that the KidsHealth team follows when creating content. (kidshealth.org)
- Any such sponsorships are denoted as such, and are separate from editorial content and do not influence the content in any way. (healthychildren.org)
- For other policy statements, the policy content is preliminary. (councilscienceeditors.org)
- If you notice any discrepancies or inaccuracies, or if you have any suggestions or concerns about our content, please don't hesitate to contact us at [email protected] and we'll do our best to resolve the issue. (hitched.co.uk)
- The latest report, the content of which is available here in web format, focuses primarily on the Group's efforts in fiscal 2020 based on the Toray Group CSR Guidelines, which spell out the overarching policy governing the Group's CSR initiatives. (toray.com)
- The Spectator is written and edited by students of UW-Eau Claire, and they are solely responsible for its editorial policy and content. (spectatornews.com)
- We do not write or publish sponsored posts, or include sponsored content in our editorial posts. (putthison.com)
- Submission of a manuscript to a SpringerOpen journal implies that all authors have read and agreed to its content and that the manuscript conforms to the journal's policies. (springeropen.com)
- Keeper's editorial team relies on various sources to gather information for our content, both internally and externally. (keepersecurity.com)
- We maintain editorial control over all content that is published on our website. (keepersecurity.com)
- Content is selected and developed by independent scientific writers and editorial partners. (neurodiem.hr)
- All the editorial content is exclusively written for Neurodiem, with the exception of the articles from key internationally recognised scientific journals. (neurodiem.hr)
- NLM may consider an application from a publisher that has been publishing scholarly content for less than two years if there is evidence that the management and individuals responsible for editorial quality and operations have adequate experience in comparable positions at other organizations. (nih.gov)
- After a thorough review of the journal information, policies, and content (see Journal Selection for MEDLINE ), NLM will inform the publisher whether the journal meets MEDLINE's scientific quality standard. (nih.gov)
Ethics3
- In order to be faithful to our readers' expectations, we do our best to uphold the value of editorial independence and abide by industry-wide standards of ethics and journalism. (zmescience.com)
- SpringerOpen, as part of SpringerNature, is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and endorses the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) Policy Statement on Geopolitical Intrusion on Editorial Decisions . (springeropen.com)
- Indeed, although marketing scholarship has become increasingly narrow in some ways, JPP&M has maintained its connection to the big picture by publishing marketing research that offers policy, ethics, well-being, and societal implications. (ama.org)
Reviewers7
- The CSE Editorial Policy Committee attempts to address this problem by drafting policies in such areas, with the goal of providing guidance and a framework for discussion among editors, publishers, peer reviewers, and authors. (councilscienceeditors.org)
- It is the discretion of editorial committee of BJID to resolve any conflict of interest between the author(s) and reviewers. (banglajol.info)
- The Editorial Board maintains a list of reviewers cooperating with the Journal. (nanobuild.ru)
- The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. (iainbengkulu.ac.id)
- All scientific articles submitted to Gornye nauki i tekhnologii = Mining Science and Technology (Russia) editorial office are subject to an obligatory double anonymous («blind») peer-reviewing (manuscript authors do not know the peer reviewers and receive a letter with remarks signed by the editor in chief, the peer reviewers do not know the manuscript authors). (misis.ru)
- Articles are peer-reviewed by the editorial board members, as well as external peer reviewers, leading experts on mining in Russia and other countries. (misis.ru)
- Should such a decision be reached, it is our goal to implement it in a manner that will be least disruptive to the field and to authors, reviewers, editorial board, staff, and subscribers. (nih.gov)
Editors6
- We are committed to supporting all individuals' right to dignity and safety in their work, and we do not tolerate abusive treatment or bullying of our staff, or any other parties involved in any aspect of the editorial process, including editors, editorial board members, authors, journal editorial staff, or others. (sagepub.com)
- Bangladesh Journal of Infectious Diseases follows the policy of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Disclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Relationships and Activities, and Conflicts of Interest . (banglajol.info)
- If you are interested in becoming a member of the board, in the first instance please contact the editors, Patricia Kennett ( [email protected] ) and Misa Izuhara ( [email protected] ), to discuss the role of editorial board members. (social-policy.org.uk)
- The JSP editors welcome applications from all areas of social policy we would particularly like to encourage those specialising in the following to apply: employment and labour markets, comparative social policy, gender, poverty and well-being and quantitative methods. (social-policy.org.uk)
- If you are interested in becoming a member of the board, in the first instance please contact the editors, Catherine Bochel ( [email protected] ) and Hugh Bochel ( [email protected] ) to discuss the role of editorial board members. (social-policy.org.uk)
- In case of positive decision, the Journal's Editorial Board and scientific editors select a reviewer with regard to the field of the presented work. (nanobuild.ru)
20202
- They, along with many others, will be featured in the 2020 Marketing and Public Policy Conference , which is entirely virtual. (ama.org)
- Since 2020, Dr Calzada serves as editorial advisory board member of the journal TGPPP . (igorcalzada.com)
Authorship1
- We expect all parties involved in the authorship, review, editorial, and publishing processes - including, but not limited to all activities related to researching, writing, and submitting a paper through publication - will uphold and act consistently with these principles in their interactions with others. (sagepub.com)
Ethical2
- These are legal considerations but ethical considerations also come into play and should not be dismissed, even by the most hard-hearted of policy-makers. (ecre.org)
- Basically, this statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. (iainbengkulu.ac.id)
Independence2
- We take great pride in our editorial independence. (zmescience.com)
- This separation ensures that financial support does not present a conflict of interest for our journalism or compromise our editorial independence. (streetsblog.org)
Initiatives2
- The articles found on HealthyChildren.org are produced and reviewed by subject-matter expert pediatrician members of the over 60 Committees, Councils, and Sections of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to ensure they are consistent with AAP guidelines, policy, health initiatives, and standards of pediatric care. (healthychildren.org)
- With their expensive "public policy" initiatives (read that "K" Street lobbying), they've also got a lot of elected officials and government agencies on their side as well. (stopthecap.com)
Conflict1
- The Policy Note also includes the latest figures on return of persons to Afghanistan from Iran and Pakistan, two major refugee-hosting countries, opening up the question of the conflict between internal migration-related policy objectives and external affairs objectives. (ecre.org)
Guidelines1
- Our editorial guidelines are inspired by the best practices of leading global publishers. (zmescience.com)
Staff10
- For a list of the Medscape editorial staff, click here . (medscape.com)
- The KidsHealth editorial staff also reviews all reader comments about the articles on this site, including suggestions for possible improvements and corrections. (kidshealth.org)
- The KidsHealth editorial staff makes every effort to be as neutral as possible with regard to sex, race, color, religion, and age. (kidshealth.org)
- The HealthyChildren.org editorial staff works in partnership with these contributors and groups to determine new articles of interest, new site features, and long-term goals. (healthychildren.org)
- Please note the AAP does not have practicing pediatricians on staff to respond to parental requests regarding individual medical conditions, or questions about the AAP's policies and statements. (healthychildren.org)
- Editorials, opinion pieces, columns, cartoons and letters in The Spectator reflect the opinion of the writer and does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Spectator or the rest of its staff. (spectatornews.com)
- The editorial board generally comprises the editor-in-chief, managing editor, Currents editor, chief copy editor, News editor, Op/Ed Editor and Sports editor but may include other members of the editorial staff. (spectatornews.com)
- Students, faculty and staff members are invited to write letters to the editor to express their views on public issues and other matters of concern or to respond to editorials or other opinions in the newspaper. (spectatornews.com)
- Our editorial staff determines what those topics are and retains full editorial control of the resulting coverage. (streetsblog.org)
- Each article accepted by the Editorial Staff for consideration undergoes a procedure of reviewing. (nanobuild.ru)
Process4
- The KidsHealth articles and features on this site go through a rigorous editorial process that includes review by medical professionals. (kidshealth.org)
- See "Policy for Review and Approval of Statements Drafted by the Editorial Policy Committee" describing the review and approval process. (councilscienceeditors.org)
- Several policy statements have been through the review and comment process, and have been approved as final by the CSE Board of Directors. (councilscienceeditors.org)
- These are policies impacting thousands of children every day, and their parents, teachers and students themselves have a right to be involved in the decision-making process. (eastbayri.com)
Innovation2
- Why AT&T Killed Google Voice: Telecom Operators Are Yesterday's Business - It's Time for a National Data Policy That Encourages Innovation , strikes at the heart of the telecommunications industry's business models, and dismisses them as increasingly outdated, anti-innovation and anti-consumer. (stopthecap.com)
- Using the example of AT&T's blocking Google Voice from iPhone users, which would allow them to bypass their AT&T plan to make long distance calls, author Andy Kessler, a former hedge fund manager, believes this was the moment America wakened to the realization that telecommunications companies and government policies block innovation and limit competition. (stopthecap.com)
Corrections1
- Other minor editorial corrections have been made throughout the instructions. (nih.gov)
Team8
- This person has no influence over the editorial team, nor does he/she contribute to editorial efforts. (bikerumor.com)
- The Hitched Editorial Team works hard to stay on top of the latest wedding trends and advice backed by years of experience. (hitched.co.uk)
- Learn more about our editorial team and sign up to receive our newsletter. (hitched.co.uk)
- We maintain a clear separation between our editorial team and any external influence, be it advertisers, sponsors, partners, or any other collaborators. (zmescience.com)
- What is written on www.LeslieSbrocco.com and www.ThirstyGirl.com is the opinion of the LJS Productions/Thirsty Girl Editorial team. (lesliesbrocco.com)
- The MitzvahMarket.com editorial team scours the Internet, Mitzvah showcases, gift shows, magazines and even real-life Mitzvahs to bring to you the latest and greatest when it comes to all things Mitzvah. (mitzvahmarket.com)
- Our editorial team is dedicated to presenting diverse viewpoints and ensuring balanced coverage of topics relevant to the field of cybersecurity. (keepersecurity.com)
- Keeper's editorial team operates independently and is not influenced by outside parties, including advertisers. (keepersecurity.com)
Privacy Policy3
- You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link. (cdc.gov)
- If you need to go back and make any changes, you can always do so by going to our Privacy Policy page. (cdc.gov)
- Look for a privacy policy section to see how your personal information will be used. (medlineplus.gov)
Transparency1
- 2014. Science, policy, and the transparency of values. (nih.gov)
Review4
- The Committee members draft a policy with input from as many sources as they can identify, and then forward the draft to the Board of Directors for preliminary review. (councilscienceeditors.org)
- If the peer review contains recommendations on the article correction or revision, the journal editorial board shall send the peer review text to the author suggesting to take them into consideration while preparing the new article draft, or reject them (partially or in full) reason-based. (misis.ru)
- Should the authors fail to return the revised version upon expiration of 3 months from the time the peer review was sent, even provided an absence of the authors' refusal to revise the article, the editorial board shall write it off. (misis.ru)
- Publishers are encouraged to read through all steps and review MEDLINE's policies before submitting an application. (nih.gov)
Decisions2
- Conflicts of interest in publishing can be defined as conditions in which an individual holds conflicting or competing interests that could bias editorial decisions. (banglajol.info)
- We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. (unsoed.ac.id)
Committee4
- The Editorial Policy Committee of CSE serves as a resource regarding editorial and publishing policies applying to publications in the sciences. (councilscienceeditors.org)
- The Committee identifies topics that could benefit from a policy. (councilscienceeditors.org)
- One might expect a policy of such impact to warrant a public hearing and vote, but as of Tuesday morning, the Barrington School Committee had no public meetings posted for this week. (eastbayri.com)
- These findings in a new report from the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy and the American Friends Service Committee are instructive on the state's current social and economic struggles, and for the future. (wvpolicy.org)
Oversight1
- Legislation that hampers industry profits or enacts consumer protection is called "government interference" in most WSJ editorials, while deregulation that strips away oversight and ignores the abusive practices common in highly concentrated markets is advocated as the one-size-fits-all "free market solution. (stopthecap.com)
Innovations2
- Short articles and notes that describe policy and management innovations or analyze significant advances or setbacks in specific judicial systems will also be considered for publication, as will book reviews of relevant books. (iaca.ws)
- Other articles provide balanced analyses of legal, regulatory, public policy, and social aspects of environmental health (Spheres of Influence) and new discoveries or approaches in environmental health research, remediation, monitoring, and public health policy (Innovations). (nih.gov)
Standards3
- We aspire to be reliable, accurate, and engaging, maintaining the highest editorial standards, comparable to the best publishers in the world. (zmescience.com)
- This written policy iteration is based on standards developed by. (streetsblog.org)
- Conceptually, the current dispute over the EC report illustrates how scientists are forced to make value judgments about appropriate standards of evidence when informing public policy. (nih.gov)
Website1
- For more information on CDC's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers . (cdc.gov)
Public Policy4
- The theme of the conference is "Marketing, Public Policy, and Moral Courage in a Diverse, Rapidly Changing World," which was selected to reflect the challenges to marketing and policy making posed by a rapidly changing world that has become smaller as a result of digital connectivity, even as the diversity of needs, attitudes, and perspectives have been magnified by this connectivity. (ama.org)
- Mount Morris had the highest increase among any district outside of New York City, according to a report released Tuesday by The Empire Center for Public Policy in Albany. (empirecenter.org)
- The number of students enrolled in New York state public schools is the lowest recorded in 30 years, a new Empire Center for Public Policy study released Tuesday reveals. (empirecenter.org)
- E.J. McMahon, who served as a deputy tax commissioner in the administration of former Gov. George Pataki and now is the research director for the Empire Center for Public Policy, an Albany think tank, said STAR has always been about fiscal gimmickry and is going further in that direction. (empirecenter.org)
Page1
- The usually business-friendly editorial page of the Wall Street Journal published a surprising editorial this morning which threatens to cause a tear in the very fabric of space. (stopthecap.com)
Authors3
- If redundant or duplicate publication is attempted or occurs without such notification, authors should expect editorial action to be taken. (cdc.gov)
- Should the authors reject the article revision they shall notify the editorial board about their refusal to publish the article orally or in writing. (misis.ru)
- focused on two issues: First, the authors of the editorial criticized the EC for proposing a system in which evidence of endocrine disruption obtained in animals and various other experimental systems would be presumed to be relevant to humans in the absence of evidence to the contrary. (nih.gov)
Qualifications1
- Over the years, PNAS has enacted successive editorial policies to place limits, restrictions, and other qualifications on the publication privileges of NAS members. (sspnet.org)
Participants1
- In order to reduce the carbon footprint, for European participants, IARC's travel policy encourages travel by train instead of travel by air by the most direct route . (who.int)
Practice1
- It seeks to foster the exchange of information and ideas about court management policy and practice across national boundaries, and thereby contribute to improving the overall administration of justice. (iaca.ws)
Regulatory1
- Background: Opposing groups of scientists have recently engaged in a heated dispute over a preliminary European Commission (EC) report on its regulatory policy for endocrine-disrupting chemicals. (nih.gov)
Board members3
- Editorial board members serve a term of four years. (social-policy.org.uk)
- Editorial board members serve on the board for four years. (social-policy.org.uk)
- Too bad we can't hear the editorial board members read aloud the words "committed professionals. (substancenews.net)
Research3
- These groups and contributors help develop many of the AAP policies and programs as well as present educational programs for pediatricians in order to highlight current research and practical knowledge in their respective specialties. (healthychildren.org)
- The Center's research and analysis is designed to support informed public dialogue and policy in West Virginia. (wvpolicy.org)
- Discussion: Both conceptual and empirical studies of scientific reasoning have shown that it is unrealistic to prevent policy-relevant scientific research from being influenced by value judgments. (nih.gov)
Publishers1
- Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary. (unsoed.ac.id)
Members3
- After years of slowly tightening its editorial policy, papers contributed by National Academy of Science (NAS) members appear to be performing more like other submissions. (sspnet.org)
- The editorial board meets twice a year, and members are expected to be involved in refereeing papers submitted to the Journal. (social-policy.org.uk)
- All materials presented for publishing undergo initial expert examination by members of the Editorial Board and then sent for reviewing. (nanobuild.ru)
Publication1
- This policy does not preclude the journal considering a manuscript that has been rejected by another journal, or a complete report that follows publication of a preliminary report, such as an abstract or poster displayed at a professional meeting. (cdc.gov)
Work1
- This week ECRE publishes a Policy Note and an analysis of case law on return to Afghanistan, building on its previous work on return of persons to that country. (ecre.org)
Submission1
- New Submission and After Acceptance from the editorial boards. (iainbengkulu.ac.id)
News1
- This is a summary of CTV News policies and is not meant to be comprehensive. (ctvnews.ca)
Scientific1
- Get the latest COVID-19 technical guidance, scientific and policy briefs here . (who.int)
Health3
- J Health Polit Policy Law (1977) 1 (4): 528. (dukeupress.edu)
- The instructions have been modified to reflect the new policy concerning reimbursement of tuition, fees and health insurance (See NOT-OD-06-093 ). (nih.gov)
- AI-powered living evidence syntheses have begun to emerge across a range of sectors, including in challenging and fast-moving policy areas like climate and health, in which AI is used to automate the processes and reduce the timeline for the development of updated evidence syntheses (9). (who.int)
Topics1
- Special editorial topics will be advertised well in advance. (ledonline.it)